-
Contact the PP Team
Was Shannon Gabriel out?
- Thread starter Saj
- Start date
Slog
Senior Test Player
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2015
- Runs
- 28,984
- Post of the Week
- 1
Yes
What's point of having Drs when you don't even have a snicko
What's point of having Drs when you don't even have a snicko
pakistanigoneaussie
Senior ODI Player
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2010
- Runs
- 21,505
- Post of the Week
- 2
Doesn't matter
It was consistent umpiring: following the umpires call as it was with Babar and Dowrich
It was consistent umpiring: following the umpires call as it was with Babar and Dowrich
TahirFan
Tape Ball Star
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2017
- Runs
- 880
- Post of the Week
- 1
Yes that was a edge but no hot spot unfortunately
Mamoon
ATG
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2012
- Runs
- 106,442
- Post of the Week
- 12
He was out and Dowrich was not out. The umpires get far too much protection from the DRS.
ExpressPacer
ODI Debutant
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2016
- Runs
- 8,560
- Post of the Week
- 1
Maybe. Or maybe not. You can never be sure with the lack of technology we have available in the Caribbean. Personally, I think ICC should make sure that all boards have the same sort of technology available otherwise stats will never be entirely accurate. And comparisons will take a wrong route similar to the biased umpiring in the 70's and 80's.
Major
Test Star
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2013
- Runs
- 36,162
- Post of the Week
- 7
Lack of technology
Adil_94
ODI Debutant
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2014
- Runs
- 12,557
it was one of them u needed drs n snicko for
SpiritOf1903
ODI Debutant
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2009
- Runs
- 9,834
There was deviation on the ball!
Aman
Test Captain
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2013
- Runs
- 47,061
Not enough conclusive evidence, so you stick with umpires call.
Would have been out had the umpire given it out.
Would have been out had the umpire given it out.
marlonbrowndo
Senior ODI Player
- Joined
- May 29, 2015
- Runs
- 22,526
- Post of the Week
- 2
Well he's out now
TalentSpotterPk
Test Debutant
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2015
- Runs
- 15,072
- Post of the Week
- 1
I think he definitely edged it but cameras did not show whether Sarfraz caught it cleanly or not.
Wrt edge definitely there was noise.
imshally81
T20I Star
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2009
- Runs
- 30,134
Yes... It was...
Barragan
Test Debutant
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2013
- Runs
- 14,143
There was a faint noise, so it was out.
However, the on-field ump gave it not out and unfortunately, not enough evidence to overturn the decision.
That's why you need technology like snicko and hot-spot.
However, the on-field ump gave it not out and unfortunately, not enough evidence to overturn the decision.
That's why you need technology like snicko and hot-spot.
Yossarian
Test Debutant
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2007
- Runs
- 13,897
- Post of the Week
- 1
Technology is improving exponentially. How long must cricket fans be forced to endure "umpires call" and "not enough evidence to overturn the on-field umpires decision" defending glaring inconsistencies? The ICC should be embracing these new technologies with open arms instead of being dragged kicking and screaming into doing so.
Cricket must be the only sport where the same result reached by technology leads to two opposing outcomes depending upon whether it's the batsman or fielding captain who challenged the on-field umpires decision?
Cricket must be the only sport where the same result reached by technology leads to two opposing outcomes depending upon whether it's the batsman or fielding captain who challenged the on-field umpires decision?
Yossarian
Test Debutant
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2007
- Runs
- 13,897
- Post of the Week
- 1
Read post above.
shaz619
Test Star
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2010
- Runs
- 38,411
- Post of the Week
- 7
It was a hypocritical decision.
Prior to that decision am not sure who the batsman was but the on field decision was not out and then Pakistan reviewed it, the third umpire would then back up the on field decision by saying not out.
Then the on field decision with gabriel was out but the third umpire reversed his decision to not out.
When it comes to such technology it is designed as such to back up the on field decision and if there is no conclusive evidence to over turn it then the on field decision is to remain, in that instance the evidence was not conclusive and there was no hawkeye or snicko either so the on field decision should have remained because there was nothing conclusive there.
Prior to that decision am not sure who the batsman was but the on field decision was not out and then Pakistan reviewed it, the third umpire would then back up the on field decision by saying not out.
Then the on field decision with gabriel was out but the third umpire reversed his decision to not out.
When it comes to such technology it is designed as such to back up the on field decision and if there is no conclusive evidence to over turn it then the on field decision is to remain, in that instance the evidence was not conclusive and there was no hawkeye or snicko either so the on field decision should have remained because there was nothing conclusive there.
Abdullah719
T20I Captain
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2013
- Runs
- 44,825
The discussion is about Hasan Ali's ball to Gabriel in the 89th over. It was given not out and the third umpire upheld the decision. Presumably due to 'lack of evidence'.
Syed1
ODI Captain
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2015
- Runs
- 46,041
- Post of the Week
- 3
If there is DRS in the series then the full suite of the technology should be available, no point of DRS without snicko, hot spot and ball tracking.
QalandarFan
ODI Debutant
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2016
- Runs
- 8,719
He clearly smashed it but whatever we still won!
Similar threads
