What's new

We are a Dangerous Side at Home, Says Misbah-ul-Haq

Savak

World Star
Joined
Feb 16, 2006
Runs
50,007
Post of the Week
3
We are a Dangerous Side at Home, Says Misbah-ul-Haq

South Africa have always been a difficult opposition but Pakistan will have the home advantage this time as they host the visitors for the first time in nearly 14 years, said head coach Misbah ul Haq.

PTI

Updated: January 16, 2021, 8:51 PM IST

South Africa have always been a difficult opposition but Pakistan will have the home advantage this time as they host the visitors for the first time in nearly 14 years, said head coach Misbah-ul-Haq. Back from New Zealand after a disappointing tour which ended with a 0-2 loss in the two-Test series, Pakistan will now play two Tests against South Africa at Karachi (January 26-30) and Rawalpindi (February 4-8), followed by a three-match T20I series at Lahore, beginning from February 11.

"South Africa has never been an easy side to beat, but them playing after 13 years in Pakistan will be an advantage for us, and we have a great chance to improve our record against them," Misbah said. He said the two Test matches are part of the ICC World Championship and are very important for the home side which will try to get maximum points out of it to improve their position on the table.

"Playing at home ground is always encouraging for the players, and it reflected in our performances in the series against Sri Lanka and Bangladesh last year," Misbah said. Pakistan won Tests against Sri Lanka and Bangladesh in late 2019 and early 2020 at home but have lost successive away Test tours to Australia, England and New Zealand leading to a criticism of the team's performances and selection policies with Misbah under-fire.

Following their dismal tour of New Zealand, Pakistan's new chief selector Muhammad Wasim named nine uncapped players in a revamped 20-member squad for the test series against South Africa. "The series against South Africa is an important one, and I am sure the players selected in the squad have the potential and hunger to give best results in the series," Misbah said.

The South African cricket team, which last toured Pakistan in late 2007, arrived in Karachi on Saturday. The visiting team's head coach Mark Boucher cautioned his team, saying his batsmen will face a tough task against a "dangerous" side like Pakistan.

"Pakistan is a dangerous side at home; we will have to come up with a proper strategy to beat them at their own backyard," the former wicket-keeper said. "The wickets here in Pakistan are batting friendly, and we are relying on our batsmen to score runs. Their confidence will be high after scoring runs against Sri Lanka. Our fast bowlers will have to work very hard to get wickets." South Africa had drawn the two-Test series in 2010 and 2013 when Pakistan had hosted them in the United Arab Emirates, following a terrorists attacked on the Sri Lankan team bus at Lahore in 2009.

"Pakistan bowlers will have home advantage, so this series will be a test for our batsmen, but once they are successful in occupying the crease, they will be able to score freely," Boucher said. "We are excited to play in Pakistan again, and expect a great series ahead with all focus on the game." South Africa had won the two-Test series 1-0 during their last tour of Pakistan in 2007.

The visitors have been boosted by the return of top fast bowler, Kagiso Rabada from injuries and he picked up 17 wickets in the last series between the two sides at 18.70. The last Test between the both sides was in January 2019 in Johannesburg which the home team won by 107 runs.

South Africa squad: Quinton de Kock (C), Temba Bavuma, Aiden Markram, Faf du Plessis, Dean Elgar, Kagiso Rabada, Dwaine Pretorius, Keshav Maharaj, Lungi Ngidi, Rassie van der Dussen, Anrich Nortje, Wiaan Mulder, Lutho Sipamla, Beuran Hendricks, Kyle Verreynne, Sarel Erwee, Keegan Petersen, Tabraiz Shamsi, George Linde, Daryn Dupavillon, Marco Jansen.

Link: https://www.news18.com/cricketnext/...-side-at-home-says-misbah-ul-haq-3299321.html
 
Dude, Zimbabwe beat us at home under your coaching.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
We’re a dangerous side at home? We have 9 uncapped players in our squad, we have only 5 players who’ve solidified their spots in the test team (Babar Azam, Hassan Ali, Mohammad Rizwan, Faheem Ashraf and Shaheen Afridi).
 
If the tracks offer turn,Pak should win easily

If it turns Pakistan need to win Toss and bat first, otherwise Pakistan will flounder against SA spinners. They have brought three specialist spinners with them , including one left armer.
 
Pakistan hardly had pitches that were dust bowls like India or Sri Lanka.

Karachi is okay for spinners, but pindi pitch is not ideal for spinners if you go by history
 
Pakistan hardly had pitches that were dust bowls like India or Sri Lanka.

Karachi is okay for spinners, but pindi pitch is not ideal for spinners if you go by history

Our pitches don't really break up like Ind, SL or BD. If anything, the surfaces just get better and better to bat on.
 
Make the pitches dustbowls and hope for the best, as I don't fancy our batsmen against South Africa's pacers.
 
I agree. The only way for Pakistan to have any sort of success at home is if they turn these pitches into spin friendly tracks that offer some reverse swing.

I would be more than happy if we just won at home. Because losing in SENA is an inescapable reality for the near future.
 
Instead of providing these gutter level rhetoric, it would be good if Misbah can provide an insight as to why the batters are not scoring runs, and the bowlers are not taking wickets.

We are a dangerous side at home but got whitewashed by Sri Lanka B, and lost to Zimbabwe. No wonder, none of this guy's statements can be taken seriously.
 
We are a Dangerous Side at Home, Says Misbah-ul-Haq

The problem with this statement is that it only looks valid and good when it is said by the opposing team members or experts. If you are a dangerous side at home just like India is, you will have to beat every team that lands on your soil mercilessly and no draws are not allowed. This is how India became the final frontier of Steve Waugh led Australia in 2001. :inti
 
Yet to be seen. Stronger tests await in the forms of NZ, OZ and England. This SA side is not exactly one that is going to challenge Pakistan's best in Pakistan.
 
I am the dangerous or the smartest or prettiest or bestest - sounds good when others say it about you. Else it’s a sad whimper of a meek or an IQ-90 person or an aesthetically challenged woman.
 
I do feel dropping Shan and Gohar was a poor call, Shan is still a good opener he just had a poor series. I hope sense prevail and he comes back and along him, Imam and Abdullah Shafiq are given chances to cement a place.

Against SA we need to produce spin friendly results pitches, not dull and boring high scoring match, Australian and SA pitches are the best to a good quality cricket.
 
I do feel dropping Shan and Gohar was a poor call, Shan is still a good opener he just had a poor series. I hope sense prevail and he comes back and along him, Imam and Abdullah Shafiq are given chances to cement a place.

Against SA we need to produce spin friendly results pitches, not dull and boring high scoring match, Australian and SA pitches are the best to a good quality cricket.

You must be having a laugh about Shan. Do you know what his average his? He was lucky to make a career out of cricket for this long. We dont want another Asad Shafiq type player or do we?

Zafar Gohar and M Nawaz on par are not too different to each other. Agree that they should have persisted with Zafar.
 
Everyone enjoys their own home conditions and pile up runs for themselves, so why not Pakistani players, shan would have regained his form at home pitches. Their is a saying the confidence you gain at home you carry that around the world.

Shan and abbas deserved another go.
 
:mw :facepalm :rabada :abbas1 :jordan

This man never fails to embarrass PCT
If NZ wasn't enough now he is doing that in press conferences
This statement is SO childish
 
Nortje/Rabada will run through us. I'm not confident in our batting or bowling.

The Rawalpindi match could end up in an embarrassment for Pakistan. Fastest wicket in Pakistan because of its location.

Rabada, Lungi and Nortje will feel like they are bowling in Johannesburg.
 
I have a feeling Hassan Ali will make a good comeback in this series.

Could be make or break series for Yasir shah.

Abid and Imran butt should open.

Rawalpindi we should prepare seaming track, we came from NZL so we are used to it after 2 thrashings.
 
Based on my memory Pakistan in the 90's & 2000's at home lost or drew the following series at home when they were favorites

Pakistan vs Sri Lanka 2-1 in 1995
Pakistan vs New Zealand 1-1 in 1996
Pakistan vs South Africa 1-0 in 1997
Pakistan vs Australia 1-0 in 1998
Pakistan vs Zimbabwe 1-0 in 1998
Pakistan vs Sri Lanka 2-1 in 1999/2000
Pakistan vs England 1-0 in 2000
Pakistan vs India 2-1 in 2004
Pakistan vs Sri Lanka 1-1 in 2004
Pakistan vs South Africa 1-0 in 2007

This is a terrible record but it also shows that Pakistani wickets by and large are very sporting with everything for the batsmen who will get value for their shots, for good spinners especially on Day 4,5, fast bowlers who are willing to bend their backs and utilize the new ball well or reverse the old ball. There is no real home advantage on Pakistani wickets. In the UAE Pakistan enjoyed a home advantage from 2009 to 2018 and even then we squandered that advantage on many occasions.
 
Sadly Pakistan are and have been a pretty ordinary side for a while. Apart from Babar Azam nobody really stands out. Doesn’t matter what Misbah says. It’s probably better if he does his coaching and let the cricket do the talking.
 
The Rawalpindi match could end up in an embarrassment for Pakistan. Fastest wicket in Pakistan because of its location.

Rabada, Lungi and Nortje will feel like they are bowling in Johannesburg.

I think at this time of the year, the days may be shorter in Northern part of Pakistan and we may not get a full 80 overs a day. Bad light is usually a problem as the atmosphere has tons of pollution.

Perhaps they can start early and make the most out of it? But then morning dew could play a vital role for either side.
 
I do feel Pakistan Batsmen will enjoy batting at home. SA have to play really well to win here.
Babar Azam and Azhar ali will score bulk of runs.


I think getting 20 wickets will be the problem. Elgar is a gutsy character, Markhram has sorted his first class game out it seems, their middle order is experienced.
 
Nortje/Rabada will run through us. I'm not confident in our batting or bowling.

I think they'll be ok. We mostly negotiated NZ's world class attack with the exception of Jamieson. Home pitches won't provide that bounce that our batsman struggle with so they'll be able to shift onto the front foot more which is what they're used to.

I would back Abid Ali to do well against SAF and i'm glad he's been picked.
 
I think getting 20 wickets will be the problem. Elgar is a gutsy character, Markhram has sorted his first class game out it seems, their middle order is experienced.

We should have included Waqas and Hamza both have been performing v well in the domestic.
 
Based on my memory Pakistan in the 90's & 2000's at home lost or drew the following series at home when they were favorites

Pakistan vs Sri Lanka 2-1 in 1995
Pakistan vs New Zealand 1-1 in 1996
Pakistan vs South Africa 1-0 in 1997
Pakistan vs Australia 1-0 in 1998
Pakistan vs Zimbabwe 1-0 in 1998
Pakistan vs Sri Lanka 2-1 in 1999/2000
Pakistan vs England 1-0 in 2000
Pakistan vs India 2-1 in 2004
Pakistan vs Sri Lanka 1-1 in 2004
Pakistan vs South Africa 1-0 in 2007

This is a terrible record but it also shows that Pakistani wickets by and large are very sporting with everything for the batsmen who will get value for their shots, for good spinners especially on Day 4,5, fast bowlers who are willing to bend their backs and utilize the new ball well or reverse the old ball. There is no real home advantage on Pakistani wickets. In the UAE Pakistan enjoyed a home advantage from 2009 to 2018 and even then we squandered that advantage on many occasions.

1995-2000 era is different. Lot of infighting and match fixing was going on back then. Nothing to do with home advantage. Pakistan beat SRL and Zim away in the 90's but lost to them at home. Tells you the story.

Anyway Pakistan have only lost 2 home series since 2001 and have the 3rd best W/L ratio at home since 2001 behind Australia and India.
 
Misbah should quiet and make sure his bags are packed by the end of the SA series
 
Based on my memory Pakistan in the 90's & 2000's at home lost or drew the following series at home when they were favorites

Pakistan vs Sri Lanka 2-1 in 1995
Pakistan vs New Zealand 1-1 in 1996
Pakistan vs South Africa 1-0 in 1997
Pakistan vs Australia 1-0 in 1998
Pakistan vs Zimbabwe 1-0 in 1998
Pakistan vs Sri Lanka 2-1 in 1999/2000
Pakistan vs England 1-0 in 2000
Pakistan vs India 2-1 in 2004
Pakistan vs Sri Lanka 1-1 in 2004
Pakistan vs South Africa 1-0 in 2007

This is a terrible record but it also shows that Pakistani wickets by and large are very sporting with everything for the batsmen who will get value for their shots, for good spinners especially on Day 4,5, fast bowlers who are willing to bend their backs and utilize the new ball well or reverse the old ball. There is no real home advantage on Pakistani wickets. In the UAE Pakistan enjoyed a home advantage from 2009 to 2018 and even then we squandered that advantage on many occasions.

I think the Asian test championship final 2002 may have been in pakistan too.
 
I agree. The only way for Pakistan to have any sort of success at home is if they turn these pitches into spin friendly tracks that offer some reverse swing.

I would be more than happy if we just won at home. Because losing in SENA is an inescapable reality for the near future.

Our spinners should get maximum support from the wicket in order for us to beat South Africa with a degree of comfort.

However, we are also undermining South Africa's spin department. Maharaj is a good spinner, considering that he mostly plays in SA conditions, he is by no means a walk-in-the-park. Tabraiz Shamsi is a bit confusing, like all chinaman bowlers, because on his day, he can truly be lethal. Also, he turns it both ways, so it makes batting a bit difficult.

I can guarantee you that both Shamsi and Maharaj will play the test match at Karachi. That being said, there's a few ways to go about the game. First, we have to win the toss and bat first. Put on some runs while the wicket isn't as dangerous. Their pacers will be a handful on Day 1, so we need to play good cricket and look to get a few solid partnerships.

By lunch of Day 2, the pitch should really start to help the spinners, and so that's when you need to make sure that Maharaj and Shamsi aren't allowed to settle. Keep rotating strike, hitting the odd boundaries, and just make it difficult for them to execute plans and analyze batsmen.

Yasir Shah in spinning conditions can take all 10 wickets if he's on top of his game. He has a lot to prove, and alongside a young spinner (Sajid Khan IMO), we should look to bowl out South Africa without letting any big partnerships prosper.

For the next few years, I agree that our plan should be to make ourselves an unbeatable team at home and try to steadily improve our overseas performances by drawing more games.
 
Home series wins of late:

The mighty Bangladesh (1 Test)
The mighty Sri Lanka 1-0
 
The Misbah experiment was due to fail.

I was opposed to it from the start.

When I started learning cricket, people used to talk about Pakistan beating good sides. Then it was about drawing against good sides. Then it was about possibly losing, but fighting it out and showing character.

Now people have started talking about losing and big the losing margins would be.

The priorities have been completely wrong and PCB has just failed to keep up with how the modern game is changing. They got Misbah to coach the team, a player who played the 80s and 90s brand of cricket.
 
The Misbah experiment was due to fail.

I was opposed to it from the start.

When I started learning cricket, people used to talk about Pakistan beating good sides. Then it was about drawing against good sides. Then it was about possibly losing, but fighting it out and showing character.

Now people have started talking about losing and big the losing margins would be.

The priorities have been completely wrong and PCB has just failed to keep up with how the modern game is changing. They got Misbah to coach the team, a player who played the 80s and 90s brand of cricket.

The problem is, he will now start playing the blame game, and hide under a new shelter of an excuse.
Soon as the team performs bad, Misbah will blame it on the wrong selection poliices.

And we all know that Misbah and Waqar are NOT part of the solution at any level. This is crystal clear to ALL but to PCB. Not sure, why are they so hell bent in keeping them in the equation?

Logically thinking, if the experiment had failed (which indeed is what happened), then clean it up and say good bye to both Misbah and Waqar.
 
Our spinners should get maximum support from the wicket in order for us to beat South Africa with a degree of comfort.

However, we are also undermining South Africa's spin department. Maharaj is a good spinner, considering that he mostly plays in SA conditions, he is by no means a walk-in-the-park. Tabraiz Shamsi is a bit confusing, like all chinaman bowlers, because on his day, he can truly be lethal. Also, he turns it both ways, so it makes batting a bit difficult.

I can guarantee you that both Shamsi and Maharaj will play the test match at Karachi. That being said, there's a few ways to go about the game. First, we have to win the toss and bat first. Put on some runs while the wicket isn't as dangerous. Their pacers will be a handful on Day 1, so we need to play good cricket and look to get a few solid partnerships.

By lunch of Day 2, the pitch should really start to help the spinners, and so that's when you need to make sure that Maharaj and Shamsi aren't allowed to settle. Keep rotating strike, hitting the odd boundaries, and just make it difficult for them to execute plans and analyze batsmen.

Yasir Shah in spinning conditions can take all 10 wickets if he's on top of his game. He has a lot to prove, and alongside a young spinner (Sajid Khan IMO), we should look to bowl out South Africa without letting any big partnerships prosper.

For the next few years, I agree that our plan should be to make ourselves an unbeatable team at home and try to steadily improve our overseas performances by drawing more games.

I don't think we are. I think everybody agrees that Maharaj is a good spinner but then our guys are supposed to be good players of spin too. I mean they have basically grown up on it. Can't say the same about Shamsi. I think he is decent in limited-overs but (to quote M. Waseem) he is not a finished product in tests. I hope they play him because I think he can be put to the sword if our batsmen are confident and don't go into their defensive shells, or don't come with the intent of making him a hero the same way they have made so many seemingly innocuous players heroes.

And I agree with you. I think that should be our plan. Because let's face it, the only way we are beating England, NZ, Australia and South Africa at home is by making spin-friendly tracks. West Indies too will struggle on spinning tracks whenever they come. In regards to the others, India ain't coming, Bangladesh, you could beat with your A team and Sri Lanka as we are seeing at present and when England toured them last are not the best and most consistent team, even against spin. There is a real possibility to recreate that golden UAE run but something like that can only happen by selecting the right guys and then giving them consistent chances in the side, instead of chopping and changing every series.
 
Last edited:
I don't think we are. I think everybody agrees that Maharaj is a good spinner but then our guys are supposed to be good players of spin too. I mean they have basically grown up on it. Can't say the same about Shamsi. I think he is decent in limited-overs but (to quote M. Waseem) he is not a finished product in tests. I hope they play him because I think he can be put to the sword if our batsmen are confident and don't go into their defensive shells, or don't come with the intent of making him a hero the same way they have made so many seemingly innocuous players heroes.

And I agree with you. I think that should be our plan. Because let's face it, the only way we are beating England, NZ, Australia and South Africa at home is by making spin-friendly tracks. West Indies too will struggle on spinning tracks whenever they come. In regards to the others, India ain't coming, Bangladesh, you could beat with your A team and Sri Lanka as we are seeing at present and when England toured them last are not the best and most consistent team, even against spin. There is a real possibility to recreate that golden UAE run but something like that can only happen by selecting the right guys and then giving them consistent chances in the side, instead of chopping and changing every series.

Yeah, spinning tracks are the best way to go about bringing victories.

We should look to create spinning tracks and have our quicks work hard for wickets, and set up genuine plans to take wickets on unsupportive wickets.
 
No we're not. We suck. Pakistan is the worst cricket team right now.
 
Yeah, spinning tracks are the best way to go about bringing victories.

We should look to create spinning tracks and have our quicks work hard for wickets, and set up genuine plans to take wickets on unsupportive wickets.

As long as there is reverse-swing, quicks will have something. Spinning tracks would reduce their workload aswell (which should theoretically make them more effective) as the onus will on the spinners.
 
As long as there is reverse-swing, quicks will have something. Spinning tracks would reduce their workload aswell (which should theoretically make them more effective) as the onus will on the spinners.

Out of the quicks we have picked, probably only Hassan Ali knows how to bowl proper reverse swing. He used to do it quite often in the UAE, but the others don't convince me with their skillsets.

This series will be a big one for Hassan Ali. I hope he can be the fast bowler he once was, and lead our bowling attack to many victories.
 
Out of the quicks we have picked, probably only Hassan Ali knows how to bowl proper reverse swing. He used to do it quite often in the UAE, but the others don't convince me with their skillsets.

This series will be a big one for Hassan Ali. I hope he can be the fast bowler he once was, and lead our bowling attack to many victories.

I don't think its too much to expect a guy like Shaheen to get it to reverse. I know we haven't seen him do it much (or at all) but what is the point of having Waqar if he can't even teach the guys how to reverse it.
 
I think deep inside Misbah knows we will loose to S Africa if not whitewash. That's why he is barking to scare opposition team.
 
I don't think its too much to expect a guy like Shaheen to get it to reverse. I know we haven't seen him do it much (or at all) but what is the point of having Waqar if he can't even teach the guys how to reverse it.

Most bowlers can reverse the ball at times just by chance, because normally, every bowler bowls with the seam up at a decent angle.

Surprisingly, none of our quicks used reverse swing in the series against New Zealand, and that just tells you that Waqar isn't teaching our quicks about this stuff.

I can understand if Shaheen can't reverse it, he's the new ball bowler across all formats. Someone like Rauf gets some good reverse swing in T20 cricket at times when I've watched him bowl.

Again, Hassan Ali is the only one who maximizes the use of reverse swing, so he will be very important in this series.

Once the ball has gone soft, bowling line/length is useless, but our bowlers or our management don't understand that.

Every team has that one bowler they call to rough up the opposition (England: Archer and Wood, Australia: Starc, New Zealand: Wagner, India: Shami/Umesh, South Africa: Norje, etc.)

We need a bowler like that to utilize the conditions with the old ball, because your new ball spell doesn't dictate the game. India showed that just now when they couldn't make a big breakthrough with the new ball, and the Harris-Warner partnership was prospering. They instead used skill with the old ball to get the job done, triggering a pretty good Australian collapse as both openers were gone shortly after.
 
If its a dust bowl Pakistan should win easily so let's hope for a dust bowl
 
I fear dustbowls would rather be more dangerous for Pakistan itself.. SA have spinners.. Our problem is except for Babar and Azhar, we don't have players who an play long innings..
SA needs to get these 2 out and then there a bunch of newcomers..

Only way Pakistan can win is making sporting wicket , amass 500+ runs and hope, SA makes mistakes and somehow Yasir takes wickets
 
Back
Top