What's new

"We haven’t received any money from ICC in the last few years" : BCCI President Sourav Ganguly

Abdullah719

T20I Captain
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Runs
44,825
"We haven’t received any money from ICC in the last few years" : BCCI President Sourav Ganguly

‘India supposed to get $372m from ICC,’ Sourav Ganguly to make sure BCCI gets its dues

In his first reaction after officially taking over as the new BCCI president on Wednesday, former India captain Sourav Ganguly made it clear that he will make sure BCCI gets its dues from ICC.

Ganguly, who was formally elected as BCCI’s 39th president on Wednesday, said that BCCI is supposed to get $372 million from ICC in the next five-year cycle. “India is supposed to get $372m from the ICC in the five-year cycle. It is heavy at the backend as we have the two World Cups then. We will make sure we get it,” said Ganguly.

This is not the first time Ganguly took a tough stance towards ICC’s revenue sharing model. Immediately after filing the nomination, earlier this month, Ganguly had said that BCCI has not got the money it deserves. “That’s one area that we will look into,” said Ganguly when asked regarding India’s position at ICC. “We haven’t received any money from ICC in the last few years. Money in the sense what we deserve.”

“India generates 75-80 percent of global revenue, so that’s going to on the agenda. Talks and discussions need to happen and we have to find a solution as this is not leading anywhere,” he added.

In the new revenue model which was drafted in 2017, the Indian cricket board will receive $293 million. Though BCCI is set to get a lion’s share across the eight-year cycle (2016 to 2023) under the new regulations, the income is way less than what the Indian cricket board wanted.

It was reported that BCCI wanted a share of $570 million which would have been possible only under the ‘Big Three’ model — a brainchild of former BCCI boss N Srinivasan. This particular model had cricket boards of England and Australia as partners.

Based on current forecasted revenues and costs, BCCI will receive $293m across the eight year cycle, ECB $143m, Zimbabwe Cricket $94m and the remaining seven Full Members $132m each. Associate Members will receive funding of $280m. This model was passed 13 votes to one in 2017.

https://www.hindustantimes.com/cric...ts-its-dues/story-o7SaKPGDEDLhwPMr7Z8oZJ.html

I am here to make Kohli's life easier, not difficult: Ganguly

BCCI president Sourav Ganguly on Monday called Virat Kohli "the most important man in Indian cricket" and promised the captain all possible support to make his life "easier and not difficult".

After taking charge as the BCCI boss here, Ganguly said he will be speaking to the Indian skipper on Thursday to discuss the way forward.

"I will speak to him tomorrow. He is the most important man in Indian cricket as captain of India. I look it at that way. So we will have a word with him and as I said we will support him in every possible way, he wants to make this team the best in the world. It has been a great team to be honest with the way they have played in the last three to four years," said Ganguly.

Ganguly said he will also sit with the team management which also includes head coach Ravi Shastri.

"It will be a proper discussion and everything will be mutually discussed but be rest assured, we are here to make their life easier, not make their life difficult. Everything is on the basis of performance," the BCCI president was clear.

"Performance is the most important thing and will decide the future of Indian cricket. Virat is the most important man in the entire context. We will support him, we will listen to him. I have been a captain myself so I understand. Mutual respect will be there, opinions and discussions will be there and we will do what is best for the game."

After it became clear that Ganguly would be the next BCCI president, the former captain had spoken about India's inability to win the ICC events since the 2013 Champions Trophy. He spoke on the subject again.

"Yes you can say that they have not won a World Cup but you don't win a World Cup every time. Hopefully, we will support him, whatever he wants and we will make sure Indian cricket goes ahead smoothly."

Ganguly brushed aside any need for split captaincy after rumours started doing rounds post World Cup that Rohit Sharma will be made the white-ball captain.
"I don't think this question arises. India is winning at the moment. They are probably the best team in the world," he added.

Following India's 3-0 whitewash of South Africa in Ranchi on Tuesday, Kohli had expressed an urgent need to limit the Test venues to five to ensure a decent turnout.

When asked about it, Ganguly was non-committal on the matter.

"In terms of Test venues, we have a lot of states, lot of venues, so we will have to sit with him (Kohli) and see what he wants and take it forward.

https://www.business-standard.com/a...ier-not-difficult-ganguly-119102300782_1.html
 
All gung ho Ganguly - let's see what he delivers.
 
Ganguly has said that he will take BCCI into a new direction.

im hoping that means pak vs ind in a neutral venue
 
Ganguly has said that he will take BCCI into a new direction.

im hoping that means pak vs ind in a neutral venue

Ganguly has said this depends on Modi and Imran and is not in his hands
 
Ganguly will take BCCI arrogance to a higher level. My bad feeling
 
I'm afraid PCB would do the same if we were in their shoes. It takes a guy with a very broad vision to think about things other than themselves.
 
Modi and Ganguly is a great combination for Indian cricket to exert it's dominance.

Also Modi will not finally be able to use BCCI as a political weapon which wasn't possible earlier to the same extent.
 
Ganguly was a great guy during his playing days. I was a big fan of him.

All the best to Ganguly.
 
Indians get enough money, no need to give them anymore
 
Maybe you missed the point. BCCI isn’t asking for additional money, they are asking for their share of money which ICC haven’t paid them.

Why would the ICC do that? Does it have to do with the Tax issue from the 2016 T-20 WC?
 
Ganguly will earn my respect if he can help or atleast make a sincere effort to resume bilateral ties and tours b/w Pakistan and India and open doors for Pakistani players to play in the IPL.
 
Ganguly will earn my respect if he can help or atleast make a sincere effort to resume bilateral ties and tours b/w Pakistan and India and open doors for Pakistani players to play in the IPL.

He can’t government controls India Pakistan cricket it’s not in his hands
 
Ganguly will earn my respect if he can help or atleast make a sincere effort to resume bilateral ties and tours b/w Pakistan and India and open doors for Pakistani players to play in the IPL.

No. Thanks.

Esp the IPL bit.
 
We need to understand that playing cricket with Pakistan isn’t going to be on any Indian officials priority list. Especially not in the current environment
 
Ganguly will earn my respect if he can help or atleast make a sincere effort to resume bilateral ties and tours b/w Pakistan and India and open doors for Pakistani players to play in the IPL.

Can we stop running after India and ipl
 
Lol.

Any money we were supposed to receive from the ICC was probably given to the ICC by us in the first place.
 
Even as Karnataka and Tamil Nadu gear up to play the final of the Vijay Hazare Trophy -- the premier 50-over domestic tournament in the country -- the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) officials have taken note that lack of proper planning has led to a scenario where teams like Mumbai and Punjab had to miss out on an opportunity to fight it out for ultimate glory. Rain and lack of reserve days saw Punjab and Mumbai being knocked out in the quarter-finals. While Tamil Nadu had nine wins in the league stages as compared to Punjab's five, Chhattisgarh had five wins as compare to Mumbai's four.

Speaking to IANS, a BCCI official said that it was indeed sad how two good teams didn't get an opportunity to fight it out and had to let their performances in the group stage decided their fate. He termed it as poor planning on part of GM Cricket Operations Saba Karim and his team. Domestic tournaments are planned under the supervision of Karim.

"Not just sad (on the two teams), also poor planning. When you choose venues on a whim and when your planning is done without feedback and inputs from experienced members, you are courting disaster," the official said.

Another official pointed at the Mumbai game and said how it was unfair on the team after they looked very much in the chase. "Have you seen the scoreboard? Mumbai were chasing Chhattisgarh's score of 190 and were placed comfortably at 95/0 after 11 overs. Are you telling me that they still didn't deserve a fair go? It is a long tournament, but reserve days in the knockouts shouldn't be such a big issue," he pointed.

Interestingly, new BCCI President Sourav Ganguly did point that the thing needs a relook even though he did give Karim benefit of the doubt saying that the rules were clear at the start of the tournament.

"Yes, the pertinent point is whether a reserve day is to be kept for knockouts as quarter-final and semi-final are important. It (having a reserve day) is a practical thing, but you remember whatever happened it was on the basis of the rule which was given at the start of the tournament," he said.

Interestingly, Ganguly's former teammates Yuvraj Singh and Harbhajan Singh both took a dig at Karim and the way the tournament was planned.

Yuvraj wrote: "Again an unfortunate result for Punjab against TN in the Vijay Hazare tournament, again Punjab cruising and game abandoned due to bad weather, and on points we don't go to semis! Why don't we have a reserve day? Or is it domestic tournament it doesn't really matter (sic)?"

Harbhajan tweeted: "Sick rule why not reserve day for these tournaments [MENTION=14959]bcci[/MENTION] must look into this and change it (sic)."

Efforts to get in touch with Karim failed as he didn't reply to calls.

https://sports.ndtv.com/cricket/bcc...mp=1&akamai-rum=off&__twitter_impression=true
 
N.Srinivasan to represent BCCI at the ICC

Can anyone update this too?
I hope for sake of Indian cricket it’s true. We really need to put this Shashank guy in its place. He has been really hurting Indian interest off late. Sooner we get rid off him the better
 
Ganguly will earn my respect if he can help or atleast make a sincere effort to resume bilateral ties and tours b/w Pakistan and India and open doors for Pakistani players to play in the IPL.

I’m sure he hardly cares about earning some respect from fans across the border. He is going to do what’s best for Indian cricket. As far as IPL goes then it’s not happening anytime soon, not after all the mud slinging by PMIK past few weeks
 
Issue isnt India receiving greater revenue. Issue is India using its revenues to blackmail the ICC into such rules that provide them benefit and not to everyone else.
 
I am here to make Kohli's life easier, not difficult: Ganguly

BCCI president Sourav Ganguly on Monday called Virat Kohli "the most important man in Indian cricket" and promised the captain all possible support to make his life "easier and not difficult".
"I will speak to him tomorrow. He is the most important man in Indian cricket as captain of India. I look it at that way. So we will have a word with him and as I said we will support him in every possible way, he wants to make this team the best in the world. It has been a great team to be honest with the way they have played in the last three to four years," said Ganguly.
..............................


A captain understand what captain needs... Great going DADA
 
I hope for sake of Indian cricket it’s true. We really need to put this Shashank guy in its place. He has been really hurting Indian interest off late. Sooner we get rid off him the better

ICC is heading for a clash with BCCI. Its unavoidable. Manohar has played his cards.

He believes that by giving extra money to boards via ICC he will buy their votes and out vote Bcci.

But will ICC have revenues if bcci refuses to sign the MPA. Will ICC have the guts to ban bcci? While the boards will vote for more revenue share from ICC, will they risk a diplomatic incident by not playing India?

Thing is that BCCI will now do everything to bring Manohar down. Remember Manohar is a Pawar man and BCCI has Amit Shah's son as Secretary.

Manohar at ICC and BCCI cannot exist together.
 
Issue isnt India receiving greater revenue. Issue is India using its revenues to blackmail the ICC into such rules that provide them benefit and not to everyone else.

What are these rules that benefit India and not everyone else?
 
why this guy? This fellow will corrupt the sport like how he did for CSK.
BCCI should keep him away from cricket

Why? Because he has the experience of running a billion dollar cement empire and he has the ability to be a tough negotiator.

I dont like Srini. But he is the man BCCI needs to take down Manohar and his cronies, who think they will outmuscle bcci.
 
The BCCI are constantly begging and yet also bragging that they are the richest board. First they begged the ICC for money to run their own domestic cricket, then they huffed and puffed about CT but still played and now this. Maybe they should concentrate on winning test series outside of Asia and the windies :)
 
Why? Because he has the experience of running a billion dollar cement empire and he has the ability to be a tough negotiator.

I dont like Srini. But he is the man BCCI needs to take down Manohar and his cronies, who think they will outmuscle bcci.

Most probably Its N. Srinivasan who will be representing BCCI in all ICC meetings from now onwards as BCCI believes that he is the best man for the job who knows how things work in ICC as he has been the chairman of ICC and has a lot of experience.


https://www.republicworld.com/amp/s...oard-to-get-dollars-372-million-from-icc.html

Its going to happen if the reports are to be believed as BCCI wants Shashank Manohar's ouster. Also there will be an ugly tussle between BCCI and ICC over the revenue sharing model. Everyone in the new set up of BCCI be it GANGULY, ARUN DHUMAL or old guards like N. Srinivasan is admant to get BCCI back to its old position in ICC on all levels...

https://www.republicworld.com/amp/s...-manohars-ouster-as-president-of-the-icc.html
 
Last edited:
The BCCI are constantly begging and yet also bragging that they are the richest board. First they begged the ICC for money to run their own domestic cricket, then they huffed and puffed about CT but still played and now this. Maybe they should concentrate on winning test series outside of Asia and the windies :)

What a ridiculous post ? If Asking for your rightful money is begging, then everyone is a beggar and hasnt India won a test series in Australia recently.. BCCI was in a mess and controlled by COA so they had to play CT17 else do u think if BCCI had its own ppl then they would have played CT17. Now tell ICC to do anything against BCCI when there is no COA to pull its strings so that ICC will have its way. Your thoughts make u chhota aadmi not [MENTION=146504]barah_admi[/MENTION]
 
Amit shah (BJP President) was asked if Ganguly will join BJP in near future and he was optimistic. This for me is clear indication that Ganguly getting such a big post without opposition is clear signs.

Other top post in BCCI taken by Amit Shah's son further confirms it.
 
Amit shah (BJP President) was asked if Ganguly will join BJP in near future and he was optimistic. This for me is clear indication that Ganguly getting such a big post without opposition is clear signs.

Other top post in BCCI taken by Amit Shah's son further confirms it.

Are you suggesting under UPA govt very sporting body including BCCI had democratically elected members?
 
Are you suggesting under UPA govt very sporting body including BCCI had democratically elected members?

They try showing it as an independent body but it's all hogwash. Can anyone explain what the likes of Rajiv Shukla and Arun Jaitley were doing heading the BCCI in the past ?
 
They try showing it as an independent body but it's all hogwash. Can anyone explain what the likes of Rajiv Shukla and Arun Jaitley were doing heading the BCCI in the past ?

Why only these two?

What about Sharad Pawar and madhavRao Scindia?

Powerful politicians who have a interest in Cricket have always made it to BCCI. Nothing new.
 
The BCCI are constantly begging and yet also bragging that they are the richest board. First they begged the ICC for money to run their own domestic cricket, then they huffed and puffed about CT but still played and now this. Maybe they should concentrate on winning test series outside of Asia and the windies :)

I thought Australia was considered outside asia? Bad timing for this kind of post.
 
MUMBAI: This could now be new president Sourav Ganguly’s first big challenge since he assumed office on October 23. Considering the current tension between the two neighbours, the idea of an India-Pakistan series, in any sport, appears nothing more than illusion.

The BCCI recently wrote to the government of India seeking permission to host Pakistan for a women’s ODI series at the end of November. This series would have been a part of the ICC Women’s World Championship (and hence accrue points for qualification towards the 2021 World Cup). With no permission forthcoming from the Centre, the BCCI is set to write to the ICC that it cannot host the series, and hence the points for the same, crucial for qualification for the 2021 World Cup, be shared between both the teams. This issue was discussed in the Committee of Administrators’ (CoA) meeting on September 16.

“The CoA noted that, as discussed at the ICC meetings, in such a situation, the points for the same are likely to be shared between both the teams,” mention the minutes of the meeting, put up on the Board website. The CoA demitted office on October 22.

An ICC source has made it clear that the BCCI may have to produce a letter from the Indian government that cites a reason as to why India can’t host the Pakistan women’s team for a series presently. “We’re waiting to hear from members (India and Pakistan) as to whether or not they can play (this series). They have to present evidence, for example, a letter from (their) government as to why they can’t play (this series). The technical committee (of the ICC) will then meet and make a decision on (whether) the points (will be shared or not),” the source told TOI on Friday.

In November 2016, India’s women’s cricket team had lost points for refusing to play Pakistan in Round 6 the ICC Women’s Championship. The matches had been scheduled to be held from August 1 to October 31, 2016. It meant that they lost out on direct qualification for the 2017 World Cup, in which they ultimately reached the final.

Retired players too have to take NOC from BCCI

In its meeting on September 16, the CoA had decided that even those players who have quit international cricket, and are not contracted by the BCCI anymore, are required to take a Noobjection certificate from the Board before playing in foreign T20 or T10 leagues.

First-Class travel for cricketers at all times

In another meeting, the CoA had approved business class air travel at all times for Team India players from both the men’s and women’s teams for all cricket-related purposes. It means the cricketers travelling to the National Cricket Academy (NCA) in Bangalore for injury rehab, medical consultation can now travel by air in business class.

BCCI to conduct tourney for under-16 girls

In its meeting on October 1, the COA decided to send an advisory to all the state association to conduct an under-16 girls tournament at the zonal level. There is presently a tournament at the under-19 and under-21 level for women, but not under-16. The BCCI organizes the Vijay Merchant Trophy for under-16 boys.

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com...oints-again/articleshow/71770264.cms?from=mdr
 
Back
Top