Aggressors always find justifications for their aggression by blaming the victims for having done something wrong. Hitler claimed that he was forced to attack the Soviet Union because the Soviets were planning to attack him.
As for the "legal framework order" begin broken, the order itself was an imposition by a dictator and not something which the people had voted for.
Breaking an order which a dictator has imposed may be "treason" to you, but not to everyone. Nor would everyone agree that a dictator should decide who is fit and who is not fit to govern a country.
Giving the majority of the people the majority of seats in a parliament is not being "treated incredibly generously", especially when the dictator refused to follow through and transfer power to the East Pakistani winner of the elections.
West Pakistan treated East Pakistan like an economic colony, with less than a third of government budget going to East Pakistan even though it had more than half the population.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_Pakistan#Economic_discrimination_and_disparity
Dude, number of seats are supposed to be based on the number of people, not the number of "popular political parties".
Obviously ridiculous to allot 60 seats to provinces with 10% or less of the population when another province with more than 50% of the population gets 60 seats.
Again, in a democracy it is the people who get to decide who rules, not a dictator who decides who has and who has not committed "treason". Obviously Yahya started out wanting representation according to population but later when faced with the actual prospect of Mujib becoming PM resorted to violence.
You seem very angry, i am just telling what happened.
Let me respond to some of your points:
1. Now i have very little respect for president yahya, because i think he was politically inept, but you keep calling him a dictator, which technically he was, but he was allowing the first free democratic electons in pakistan history. Give him some credit.
Furthermore, Pakistan had only been a nation for 23 years at this point, 23 turbulent years, with a much larger nation- india, next to it, trying its best at all times to destable it. For a initial period of stability, it was decided by the military to take control of the country until it was stable and then hold free and fair elections, which it did.
Even furthermore, many people in Pakistan, prefer a military regime in charge than a civilian government, as these have been found to be corrupt time and time again.
2. The legal framework order of all 5 newly created provinces accepting one united islamic state is the most sensible and logical thing any nation would implement, when creating provinces with limited self governing powers.
There is no sensible argument against this, 5 provinces were created, not 5 independent states!
3. Mujib ur rahman and the awarmi league were unfit to run Pakistan , as they had been for at least a decade seeking assistance from an enemy state, to achieve independence i.e. committing treason! This is well documented, not just by pakistani sources, but international sources, including the American intelligence services. Do some google searches and you will find out, so stop trying to say this was a lie, when it is a FACT! Comparing this to hitler and germany/ russia war is ridiculous, as those are two independent sovereign nations who went to war and not one sovereign nation, as pakistan was at that time, but irrational and biased people like yourself always refer to crazy hitler analogies.
By the way, stalin did go on and invade many independent and sovereign nations, so who knows if stalin did or did not have plans to wage war against germany or not!
You just have to see what has happened in catalonia to its treasonous politicians(sent to jail) for trying to unilaterally declare independence.
4. Your comprehension skills leave alot to be desired, at no point did i say parliamentary seats should be based on the number of political parties in the province, i was just highlighting the number of popular political parties per region and that it was obvious to anyone with any political acumen that the awarmi league would be virtually unchallenged in its 160 seats and win all of them, whereas, the PPP party would be challenged in the western provinces, due to there being several popular political parties.
Even if the PPP was successful in winning all its seats, it could only amass 140 seats, compared to the awarmi leagues 160.
Thats why yahya advisers advised against allocating seats according to province poulation and to allocate seats according to an equal share per province. As you are ignorant, let me advise you that both systems are used and accepted in the democratic world, America uses the second system and its called the 'College electoral system'! Thats why many american presidents become president by winning the college elecoral vote, but have actually received in total less votes than their rivals(popular vote), an example would be george w. Bush!
5. There is no rule to divide to the budget according to popuation of regions or provinces, the government has to divide its resources to meet the needs of the people the best it can, especially when resource are limited, as they were for a nation only 23 years old. This is done throughout the democratic world and is not an anomaly, otherwise you get heavily populated, wealthy regions and less pooulated vastly undeveloped poor regions.
Currently, the uk are trying to rebalance the economic divide between the vastly populated london and south east and the much less populated and much poorer northern regions by investing and creating infrastructure in the north- the nortern powerhouses, obviously, there is resistance from london and the south east.
As far as using east pakistan as a economical colony, most countries have regions which are economically doing better than other regions, like london and the south east mentioned above, and any competent government would redistribute this wealth across poorer regions.
A thread on here recently showed how most of india's goverment taxes came from a handful of indian states, such as maharasta and mumbai in particular, does that mean mumbai is an indian economical colony?
These type of facts are used for poltical prpaganda.!
6. President yahya saying kill 3 million etc, i dont know if its true or not but if he did say it, whose to know if he meant it or was just using as a soundbite for the western provinces. If he did mean it, then i completely and wholly condem him .
In reality a war broke out, architectured by india and if you had any knowledge about war, you would know not just devastation occurs but many atrocities will occur, as i stated earlier, the first casualty of war is humanity.
Now you can talk about who committed the most atrocities in the war and who is more evil, for your political points scoring, but the fact is WAR IS EVIL, one atrocity is one too many.
Indians love to talk about pakitani atrocities committed in the bangladesh war, which they helped to instigate, but never mention the atrocities committed by bangladeshis on western pakistan residents in eastern pakistan at the time and the pro pakistani bihari people.
I have personal experience of this as my great uncle was slaughter by his bengladeshi workers during the war, leaving his young wife a widow and his children orphans.
So please stop degrading the memories of the victim of war for your politcal point scoring!!
In summary, no matter about your bias and hate for Pakistan, pakistan held its first free and fair elections in 1970, knowing full well that the eastern province would win the election and did not try to prevent it by changing the system, Pakistan was fully prepared to allow the traitor mujibur rahman and his traituous party to rule pakistan, until they were informed by americsn secret services, about mujib and awarmi league traituous decade long activities, conspiring with our most ardent enemy - india!
Hence, mujib and the awarmi league were disallowed from taking office and before legal preceedings were able to be performed on these traitors, they declared independence at the bequest of trouble making and vindictive india, who still to this day can not get over that fact that we pakistanis rejected your anti muslim nation and created our own wonderful and precious PAKISTAN!
PAKISTAN ZINDABAD!!!
Stick that in your pipe and smoke it!
