"We were pelted with rotten vegetables & stones after loss to India in 1996 World Cup" : Aaqib Javed

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
217,523
"We were pelted with rotten vegetables & stones after loss to India in 1996 World Cup" : Aaqib Javed

Aaqib Javed was one of the key figures in Pakistan bowling line-up from 1990 to 1998. He was part of the World Cup winning squad of 1992 and also played in the 1996 World Cup. Needless to say he knows a thing or two about playing in the cricket mega event and facing India in a high-adrenaline clash.

In an exclusive interview with Saj for Firstpost, just the before the epic India-Pakistan encounter on 16 June, the Former Pakistan fast-bowler spoke about his own experiences of playing in the World Cup, the importance to world cricket of the upcoming iconic encounter between old foes India and Pakistan on Sunday, his advice for both sets of players as they prepare for the game and explained why Pakistan’s unpredictability could be the perfect foil for India’s overall superiority in batting and bowling.



9dccf104-8316-4bf3-b124-f21b6c66511c.jpg


Firstpost (FP): Do you think it's possible for players to play such a game without any pressure?

Aaqib Javed (AJ): Look, it's easy to say that one should not take on extra pressure when playing an India-Pakistan game, but the fact is that this is something the players will have to face on the day of the match. This is why, in my experience, the temperament of the players is the key to success. As a player, the only way you will perform well in such games is when you play this game with a normal mindset and without fear of failure. Because, when one becomes too tense, then he cannot be expected to deliver the best performance in such high-profile games. But then, to expect players not to have a fear of failure in an India-Pakistan encounter is also asking too much. There are some players who are able to control this fear and are able to use their skills to the fullest but that does require some special character traits which are not common.


FP : How do the fans react to a loss suffered in a India-Pakistan match?

AJ: This is an emotional time for many fans and I still recall the time when we returned to Pakistan after losing in 1996 to India in the second quarter-final of the World Cup which was played in Bengaluru. On arrival, we were pelted with rotten vegetables, eggs and even stones and some of us received threats and couldn’t even step outside our homes for fear of safety for almost two months. In some cases, there were threats of players’ homes being burnt down so as a former player I can tell you that these games are very special. We all look forward to these encounters with eager anticipation but then players are also prepared to face the worse when things don’t go their way.


FP: What would be your advice be to players of both countries as they look ahead to the upcoming India-Pakistan World Cup encounter?

AJ: I would start by recommending Ian Chappell’s advice to both sets of players as they prepare for the upcoming high-profile game. He said something like your best chance of success happens when you go to sleep the night before and wake-up fresh in the morning without giving a thought to what game is to be played on that day. In today’s world, players would be well advised to not look at social media and go and watch a movie the night before to try and forget the challenge ahead.


Rohit-Ahmed_opt.jpg


Pressure is high among players when India and Pakistan play each other at any world stage.​


FP: Sounds like good advice but how practical is it in today’s world and what is the best way to play such tense games?

AJ: Obviously, this is easier said than done and things are much more difficult for players in today’s world as opposed to the times when we used to play cricket. Nowadays, social media is flooded with hype about the upcoming game. On top of that, a player is being bombarded with messages on phones from friends and family encouraging you to do your best, so the player is unable to get a good night’s sleep as he is constantly thinking about this match. So, when they wake up, their mind is already filled with thoughts about the upcoming game and they are almost fifty percent mentally exhausted even before the first ball is bowled. Even the journey in the team bus is a tense one as is the team meeting before an India-Pakistan game. There is so much emotion that each player at the end of these meetings is wanting to do something extraordinary for his side.

Suddenly skills that matter take a backseat and all that is filled in the players heads are emotions and the focus is way off. The best way forward for both sets of players is to try and control their anxiety ahead of the game. When the match starts, try and not push too hard at the start of the game with cheering each other because that energy and motivation will be needed later when things are not going your way. In a match with so much excitement, my advice would be for players to slow it down and say less on the field and concentrate more on keeping themselves calm.


FP: How do you assess Pakistan’s chances in the ongoing World Cup?

We all know that Pakistan are capable of anything as we saw how they capitulated against a West Indies side in the first match but then defeated a much stronger England team in the next game. They once again played some mediocre cricket against Australia and lost that game. In my mind, Pakistan and West Indies are the only two sides in the world that can be so inconsistent. This is nothing to do with their skills but their mindset and this is how we grow up in Pakistan where we are a bit too relaxed at times and don’t really care about results that much. Same applies to the West Indies as well where if they win a game, they want to savour the moment and relax too much in the next game. But when the going gets tough and they know they have no choice but to succeed, they bounce back with great force.


FP: How do you rate India’s bowling resources compared to Pakistan’s in this World Cup?

AJ: To me, when comparing both sides, it's crucial to note that whichever side makes good use of the new ball will have a definite advantage. In English conditions, if you have new-ball bowlers who can swing and seam the ball, then you have a great opportunity of taking at least 2 wickets in the first ten overs. In that regard, India have extremely effective bowlers such as Jasprit Bumrah who I feel is amazing and is the best bowler in this World Cup. Then you have Bhuvneshwar Kumar who is an excellent swing and seam bowler and of course Mohammed Shami is also as good as any other bowler in the Indian line-up. Unfortunately, in contrast, Pakistan do not have a new ball specialist in their ranks. Although Mohammad Amir bowled really well against Australia, he only came to the fore later in the innings. Amongst the others, Shaheen Shah Afridi, Hasan Ali and even Wahab Riaz are not what I consider as new-ball bowlers.

Coming to the middle-overs, India are blessed with the likes of wrist spinners like Kuldeep Yadav and Yuzvendra Chahal whilst in Hardik Pandya they have an all-rounder who can make a difference. Sadly, after Abdul Razzaq, Pakistan are yet to produce a good quality seam-bowling all-rounder. This is a huge area of concern for Pakistan in all games and will matter a lot when they play against India as well.

In this tournament, Pakistan’s confidence looks shaken and the biggest example of that is that they are not comfortable playing their best leg-spinner Shadab Khan whom they dropped in the game against Australia. In contrast, India were so confident of their spinners that they played both Kuldeep Yadav and Yuzvendra Chahal in their crucial game against Australia. In terms of the comparison of spin resources between both sides, I would say that India are miles ahead.


Pak-1_opt.jpg

Pakistan showed at the ICC Champions Trophy 2017 that they can beat an in-form India.​


FP: How would you compare both side’s batting line-ups ahead of the clash in Manchester?

AJ: When it comes to batting, the top 6 Indian batsmen are averaging close to 50 in ODIs and a side which boasts a batsman as accomplished as MS Dhoni coming into bat in the middle can only be classed as superior to all others. Shikhar Dhawan’s possible absence due to injury may slightly weaken the Indian side as he has been a consistent performer but overall their batting remains very strong and a huge challenge for Pakistan's bowlers.

In contrast, Pakistan’s top 3 batsmen are also very strong with good batting averages to show for themselves. Fakhar Zaman is a dangerous player and on his day is capable of big things but the problem with him is that he is inconsistent where he gets one big score after five to six innings. We then have Imam-ul-Haq who is a talented youngster, but very raw. In terms of comparison between the pairs of Shikhar Dhawan and Rohit Sharma versus Fakhar Zaman and Imam-ul-Haq, I am afraid there really is no way these pairings can be compared.

Whilst at the number 3 position, there is no real comparison between Virat Kohli for India and Babar Azam from Pakistan, I would say that Babar is improving steadily but really needs to do more. And then we have Mohammad Hafeez who has experience but after him there really is nothing to compare with the India batting line-up as putting Sarfaraz Ahmed in front of a vastly experienced MS Dhoni is a futile exercise.

It's obvious that there is no comparison possible between both sides in terms of experience and in terms of options available to each side. In such a situation, if Pakistan are to beat India, it will be through a special performance from one or two players. This could be something like an innings that Fakhar Zaman played in the Champions Trophy final or how Mohammad Amir took three top India wickets in the same game.


FP: Can Pakistan break India’s winning streak against them in the World Cup?

AJ: Look at South Africa who are ranked as one of the top teams of the world in all formats of the game, but curiously have never been able to win the World Cup. We also have examples of New Zealand and the current favourites England who are yet to win the trophy but have usually been top performers in all series leading up to the tournament. There is no explanation for it but somehow, they all seem to fail in the World Cup. Pakistan too have a similar issue when it comes to defeating India in a World Cup. Going back to my playing days, we used to regularly beat India in Sharjah but then somehow, we could never defeat them in the World Cup. However, this time around, there is hope from a Pakistan point of view. That hope is borne out of our brilliant victory against India in the Champions Trophy final. The current India World Cup side has many players who took part in that final so Pakistan can take hope and courage from the fact they beat a similar side in 2017. I feel that Pakistan have the ability to win against India in this World Cup, and they may well do it.

https://www.firstpost.com/firstcric...ecial-performances-to-beat-india-6814721.html
 
Last edited:
Some sensible stuff from Aaqib as he known how people react to loss!
 
It takes a special kind of a fool to react to a defeat in a cricket match in this manner. Sadly Pakistan has plenty of these characters!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Contrary to traditional wisdom, Indian batting is weak. That may well be the deciding factor.
 
Somehow rotten vegetables are always handy on such occasions.

On topic, its a shame Pakistan has such a poor record against India at ICC events. A blot.
 
It takes a special kind of a fool to react to a defeat in a cricket match in this manner. Sadly Pakistan has plenty of these characters!

Indian fans are even worse in that regard.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think those days are long gone. Cricket is more popular today but it has lost its maniac level outrageous following in India and Pakistan.

Bangladesh today is what we used to be in the 90s. I fear for them :yk :srt
 
The only time a player deserves such treatment from fans is if he sells off his nation and it’s fans. No loss in a cricket match should incite such reaction from fans. Criticism is vastly different from this.
 
It takes a special kind of a fool to react to a defeat in a cricket match in this manner. Sadly Pakistan has plenty of these characters!

Many such fools are being carried in the team???
 
Somehow rotten vegetables are always handy on such occasions.

On topic, its a shame Pakistan has such a poor record against India at ICC events. A blot.

It's a good indicator of the Pak economy that ordinary people can buy veg cheaply enough and "donate" it to the team in such a manner??!!!!
 
I think those days are long gone. Cricket is more popular today but it has lost its maniac level outrageous following in India and Pakistan.

Bangladesh today is what we used to be in the 90s. I fear for them :yk :srt

Very true...everytime i watch BD specators and read their blogs...can't help being reminded of our own manic selves in th 90's....we've definately moved on...(well, the star sports promo guys-haven't...with their pathetic cringworthy stomuch churning dignity dusting of a wonderful day like father's day with 'that' promo....but u know what i mean)....cricket is not the all enveloping nowadays....i guess with time all changes...that said i sincerely hope no outward incident amongst players, spectators in the stadiums, and us bloggers especially my fellow indian ones treating the others like true sportsmen without the ugly oneupmanship and vitriolic sendoff...cheers...
 
Everything spot on. Refreshing to see sensible statements from ex players on both sides.
 
Bdesh is the only nation , who are passionate about Cricket wins/ losses. Sadly ind/ pak have kind of moved on baring minor incidents.
 
The loss of Wasim Akram hurt Pakistan badly in 96 WC. Interestingly India is in similar position in this WC after losing Dhawan. The players doesn't deserve to be treated badly just because they lost a match.
 
The loss of Wasim Akram hurt Pakistan badly in 96 WC. Interestingly India is in similar position in this WC after losing Dhawan. The players doesn't deserve to be treated badly just because they lost a match.

India has players to replace most of their batsmen. They have many talented batsmen in domestic set up.
 
I think those days are long gone. Cricket is more popular today but it has lost its maniac level outrageous following in India and Pakistan.

Bangladesh today is what we used to be in the 90s. I fear for them :yk :srt
Well put. I can only imagine how fans from both sides of the border would have been irritating other nations. Like how BD fans irritates us.
 
Because you were favourites in that game

Somehow rotten vegetables are always handy on such occasions.

On topic, its a shame Pakistan has such a poor record against India at ICC events. A blot.

The loss of Wasim Akram hurt Pakistan badly in 96 WC. Interestingly India is in similar position in this WC after losing Dhawan. The players doesn't deserve to be treated badly just because they lost a match.

Pakistan had the game won, but Sohail decided it was a good time to sledge Prasad. As a batsman you make one mistake, and the game can end for you. So a batsman should always make the best effort to retain his concentration. Sohail handed India the game when he decided to mock Prasad and tell him that he would hit him to the boundary again.
 
Ian Chappel's advice on one side. Who else noticed Babar Azam yawning during the team huddle and prayer?
 
Aaqib very right about not thinking about this game - our players as they did before vs India - mentally exhausted before game started.
 
Pakistan fans are the least educated and most animalistic. No one deserves this. If you don’t like the fact you can lose, don’t watch.
 
Pakistan fans are the least educated and most animalistic. No one deserves this. If you don’t like the fact you can lose, don’t watch.

I agree with you but Pakistani people are full of passion and emotion and that’s what’s get better of them.
 
Due to rising inflation vegetables are getting expensive so won't waste on our team... Stones can be handy though..
 
Pakistan had the game won, but Sohail decided it was a good time to sledge Prasad. As a batsman you make one mistake, and the game can end for you. So a batsman should always make the best effort to retain his concentration. Sohail handed India the game when he decided to mock Prasad and tell him that he would hit him to the boundary again.

What a painful memory, it was 115/0 in 15 overs.

Before that brain ****, Pakistan was hammering India. That and Wasim's mysterious injury just before the game. How I wish that game had resulted in Pak winning.

For one this stupid streak chatter would have never occured.

No bilateral series mean the streak has become ever more relevant. 4 more years now and we will collapse inside India like Mohali to make it 8-0 :(
 
Aaqib Javed was a match-winner for Pakistan in his playing days. The former pacer now rues the fact that the current side does not have players of quality to win matches for his country. Above all, he says, the team is led by a captain who’s not only weak but also not inspirational. Excerpts from an interview…

After all the build-up, the India-Pakistan game became a one-sided affair…

India have gone far ahead of Pakistan in terms of batting, bowling and fielding. Rohit Sharma is a seasoned, experienced and class batsman; Rahul is as good as anyone, technically sound and sharp. Then Virat Kohli… there is no match between the sides. Basically, there is a huge gulf between the skillsets of the India and Pakistan teams.

Now everyone seems to be talking of the 90s…

There are reasons. In the 90s we used to have bowlers who were oncein-a-lifetime players. Lucky that we had players like Imran Khan, Wasim Akram, Waqar Younis, Aaqib Javed… at one time. That was a different era. The mindset of the Indian team of that era was what the Pakistan team is having now.

And that is…

Defensive mindset. It was not a winning mindset. When we would play India in the 90s, we never thought that we would not beat India.

Things have changed now…

Yes, things have changed. Now we can’t even imagine how Pakistan can beat India. This change has been engineered by Sourav Ganguly. He brought something different to the Indian cricket psyche. That has been carried forward by MS Dhoni and now by Virat Kohli. They have also got exposure to high-quality cricket in the IPL and they play like champions.

Why do you say that?

What is important for a player to develop his skills and confidence? You need crowds, good opposition and challenging situations. All that they have got in the 12 seasons of the IPL. Everything, including fitness levels, has improved. In the 90s, India would depend on a few individuals. They were missing great leaders for whom the players will do anything.

You are talking of Sarfaraz Ahmed now…

Sarfaraz is not a captain of that calibre. Since 2015, he has been struggling for his place in the team. He became a captain by accident as the boards make changes after every World Cup. Since the 2017 Champions Trophy final, Pakistan have done nothing… they even lost to Australia and New Zealand in the UAE. As a captain, he can’t demand anything in front of chief selector Inzamam-Ul-Haq and coach Mickey Arthur. They dropped Wahab Riaz and he was not in their plans. Asif Ali was not in their original squad. If you want to look at their planning, they dropped a player whom they had groomed for two-and-half years. The cap tain and coach fail to support their players. No player is looking at Sarfaraz as aleader who will back him. There is no harmony between coach, captain and chief selector. Sarfaraz is very, very weak, cannot show his authority on the field and off it as well. He cannot assert himself in front of even Inzamam.

You seem to suggest that matchwinners have dried up in the Pakistan team…

That is because the selection is not sensible. They have picked players who can’t handle the new ball properly. In the England-Pakistan series, there was hardly an occasion when they took a wicket with the new ball. Even against Australia and India, the first wickets fell at 146 and 136. And then you win the toss and put the opposition in. The game is lost in the first 20-25 overs. Mohammad Amir is a strike bowler, but he cannot take a wicket in the first 25 overs. He takes wickets when the batsmen are looking for runs. When you elect to bowl, you need at least two wickets in the first 10 overs. Hasan Ali is a bad choice for a new ball. Wahab Riaz cannot bowl with a new ball, he needs an old ball, dry wicket because he banks on reverse-swing. He is not a good bowler for green tops and overcast conditions. He can be lethal, but he needs two good new-ball bowlers.

So it was a wrong decision to bowl first against India…

Definitely. You know your strength and then discuss the opposition. If you know that your bowlers cannot swing the ball, then why you are opting to bowl first? If you are giving a 136 start to any team, what will you be chasing? When you play in a high-pressure game against India, your best chance is in putting the runs on the scoreboard.

Waqar Younis says Pakistan are intimidated by India. A fair comment?

Intimidation I don’t know but it is clear lack of skills. There is no comparison between Fakhar Zaman and Rohit Sharma, same between Shikhar Dhawan/KL Rahul and Imam-ul-Haq. Can there be a comparison between Virat and Babar (Azam)? Hafeez is no match for Rahul. Then Sarfaraz against MS Dhoni… laugh-worthy. If someone asks me about the best ODI player ever, Iwould say MS Dhoni for India. We have not had an all-rounder of the quality of Hardik Pandya who can bowl 5-6 overs and score at 6-7 run-rate after Abdul Razzaq retired. Same goes with the bowlers as well. Jasprit Bumrah is better than Mohammad Amir. Overall, I can’t see why Pakistan should be disappointed. They were beaten by a better-skilled and better-talented side.

What is your prediction now?

Look, in Pakistan they are hopeful, but it looks like a 12-point tournament and Pakistan can’t reach 12 points (they have three points and four games in hand). Australia are on 8 and they have two weak opponents, same goes for New Zealand. India and England are ahead of the rest and they can easily reach 12 points. It is very clear: Australia, New Zealand, India and England. I want to see an England-India final.

https://mumbaimirror.indiatimes.com...t-show-his-authority/articleshow/69847893.cms
 
Says everything I feel I have been saying to friends and to a lesser extent on PP.

Particular points that resonate with me are the lack of power/authority Sarfaraz commands and the new-ball bowling/toss and insertion decisions.

I love Amir - from when he broke through as a kid to present with the perceived professionalism/effort compared to others... but for the wickets he has taken (amongst the top wicket takers in the WC) how many have been first up, with the new-ball? Snorters, snicking off? Bowled's/LBW's? Not many - especially not first up in opening spells.

Majority seem to have been good defensive/containing bowling buying wickets whilst the opponent are trying to force the pace/hit-out... by that time, as shown in the India and Aus games we're already looking at 300+

Depressing that we cannot take wickets early despite having one of the tournaments best performing bowlers.
 
He is spot on about Amir though. Never strikes in opening spell and get the wickets when batsmen are forced to hit out and hence make mistakes. Not a bad thing but not that great TBH. But he is the best bowler of Pakistan and so nothing to do.
 
He is spot on about Amir though. Never strikes in opening spell and get the wickets when batsmen are forced to hit out and hence make mistakes. Not a bad thing but not that great TBH. But he is the best bowler of Pakistan and so nothing to do.

He is the joint leading wickettaker in the WC with 13 wickets, averaging 13, the best SR of 16, economy well under 5. Just to put things in perspective India’s highest wicket taker have 5 wickets.

So he is not only the best bowler in Pakistan, but one of the very best in World. Unfair critisizm.
 
He is the joint leading wickettaker in the WC with 13 wickets, averaging 13, the best SR of 16, economy well under 5. Just to put things in perspective India’s highest wicket taker have 5 wickets.

So he is not only the best bowler in Pakistan, but one of the very best in World. Unfair critisizm.

Not arguing the stats. I believe wickets at top is more important.
 
I agree.

Partnerships of 130 and 140 without loss first up proportionally outweighs the 3-5 wickets taken towards the back-end of an innings when the score is already beyond Pakistan's reach.

Massive Amir fan - but wickets first up is vital.
 
He is the joint leading wickettaker in the WC with 13 wickets, averaging 13, the best SR of 16, economy well under 5. Just to put things in perspective India’s highest wicket taker have 5 wickets.

So he is not only the best bowler in Pakistan, but one of the very best in World. Unfair critisizm.

Amir is a good support bowler in the beginning. He keeps things tight and will give the other opening bowler a lot of support in taking wickets. Amir will also be excellent in the middle and end when the batsmen are going after him. This was visible in the match against Aus and Ind. He was tight in the beginning and took wickets towards the middle and end.

Hasan Ali also makes a good 3rd bowler. Someone who is good for middle and end.

But you need someone with wicket taking skills up top. Wahab should have been a no - no. He hasn't bowled badly, but doesn't provide the right balance in the XI.

Then coming to your spinners. You can keep one of Shadab and Imad as AR.
But you need at least 1 proper spinner in the team. The best spinner in the country should be taking that spot, and not an AR.
 
Back
Top