mominsaigol
Senior T20I Player
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2021
- Runs
- 20,092
- Post of the Week
- 2
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
He was the chief bottler. Sh4t it so much he couldn't bowl straight. That's the reality. I'm glad he's been dumped. I've got no issue if Babar, Rizwan or Haris got dumped after that match too.Is it because chasing 18 off 6 vs USA cannot be done?
USA scored 11 off the last 3 balls in the 20th over, yet we could only score 13 off 6 in the super over?
Also, if you’re tied with the USA after 40 overs, you’ve already lost.
I don’t want to go off topic but you have to be fair to the entire process of holding players accountable..
In this example - we had lost the game long before it went to a Super Over.. Haris couldn’t defend 12 off 3 and we were 20/3 batting first on that Dallas wicket
How come Pakistan lost the game before the Super Over? That makes no sense, logically. The fact that it went to the Super Over meant that it was 0/0 all over again and nothing that happened previously mattered anymore.As if others were very good. Both Babar and Rizwan were failure so as Shaheen. In ideal world all of them should be banned for creating groups.
He was the chief bottler. Sh4t it so much he couldn't bowl straight. That's the reality. I'm glad he's been dumped. I've got no issue if Babar, Rizwan or Haris got dumped after that match too.
Chacha has played 3 super overs in his international career including USA and he bottled all of them.He was the chief bottler. Sh4t it so much he couldn't bowl straight. That's the reality. I'm glad he's been dumped. I've got no issue if Babar, Rizwan or Haris got dumped after that match too.
As I have said you can put all the ifs buts maybe and pots and pans but these hypothetical can't change what we witnessed with our eyes.Chacha has played 3 super overs in his international career including USA and he bottled all of them.
So even if the score was 10, Chacha wouldn't get their. Infact one 4 was pure luck due to it being a legbye of shadab. The defection caused it to go past the keeper for a boundary.
Chacha has bottled 3 super overs and honestly I can't recall any player who has had the privilege of playing 3 super overs in their cricketing lifespan.
So even if USA made 11 or 12. Chacha wouldn't have gotten their.
In reality pakistan only scored 9 runs in that super over.
What hypothetical? Chacha had failed 3 super overs for pakistan. That is not a hypothetical.As I have said you can put all the ifs buts maybe and pots and pans if my aunty had wheels she'd be a bike comments but these hypothetical can't change what we witnessed with our eyes.
That shouldn't be ignored either, those players have got their comeuppance too from fans. However we have every right to ridicule someone who sat on TV giving judgements but couldn't control himself in a real pressure environment. In purely technical terms he did single handedly lose the match for us given it was just a one over shoot out.It was a bad over, but all I’m seeing is that he’s the only one being blamed for the loss because of his selection, not because of that one bad over.
We saw Rauf not being able to defend 15 off 6.
We saw a dropped catch from Shaheen in the last over.
We saw Babar’s clueless field placements in the last over which actually allowed the US to get the boundary of the last ball.
But, all that is being ignored because the game was level at the super over?
It's hypothetical because we don't know if Chacha would not have been able to chase a less reasonable score.What hypothetical? Chacha had failed 3 super overs for pakistan. That is not a hypothetical.
It happened. You can blame amir all you want in which case I agree. But that's the point..you should blame ALL THE PEOPLE WHO CAUSED SAID LOSS. Not focus on one and ignore the other cause Chachu is your favourite.
Chacha flunked 3 super overs, his most embarrassing one being Zimbabwe lol
It's the 3rd worst super over of all time , not 1st. Not my fault you're unaware of statistics and are arguing from emotion.It's hypothetical because we don't know if Chacha would not have been able to chase a less reasonable score.
It's just your opinion.
You are choosing to focus on imaginary scenarios than the reality of the situation which is we witnessed the worst super over bowling performanfe of all time.
You have been unable to acknowledge this for a long time and instead try to deflect and blame.
Do you realize he came just before t20 world cup. I would take Gary over pcb any day.To be honest there was not an iota of improvements under Kristen. He was ok with Ifti, Shadab, Azam.... followed by Babar as a captain. We lost to US and Ireland along with first round exit in T20 World Cup and lost to England. After these types of performances you shouldn't have any authority to select team by yourself specially if you obsessed with Babar and his parchi friends.
Why waste time playing 20 overs?We did lose because of Amir.
Technically the match was tied until the super over.
Simply ridiculous whatever reason the sources come up with ... They didnt even let him last atleast one series where he can pick his team and compete, He has to convince himself to join this tumultuous board that has Chairman swap every six months and so many coaches left and gone for good professional reasons..According to PCB sources both the foreign coaches were demanding full fledged selection powers and the authority to choose the captain and vice captain but the coaches in return were refusing to stay and spend long periods of time in the country at the NCA, to watch young budding cricketers at the academies and domestic cricket.
The PCB then responded to the coaches that if you just insist on coming a few days before the start of every series, then we are going to give selection powers and authority to the selection committee who atleast live in Pakistan, are fully dedicated to their jobs and have up to date knowledge of domestic cricket and the upcoming players.
Losing Kirsten for Aaqib is like giving away BMW for a tuk tuk.. These clownsAaqib, Saqlain in fray to replace Kirsten for Pakistan white ball coach’s job
As an interim management, PCB has asked read ball coach Jason Gillispie to manage the team for white ball series in Australia from Nov 4
PTI
Karachi, Updated At : 07:41 PM Oct 28, 2024 IST
Current senior selector Aaqib Javed and former spinner Saqlain Mushtaq are in fray to replace Gary Kirsten as Pakistan’s new white ball coach after the former Proteas batter stepped down due to his differences with country’s cricket board.
Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB), on Monday, officially confirmed that Kirsten had resigned and as an interim arrangement it has asked the red ball coach, Jason Gillispie to manage the team for the white ball series in Australia from November 4. But Gillespie has intimated that he would look at it as a one-off arrangement.
“The problem is both Kirsten and Gillispie were not happy with their sudden demotion in powers with the selectors given powers to call all the shots,” one source said.
He said since Gillispie was in the middle of the England series he reluctantly accepted the changes but has publicly made it clear he is no happy at not being involved in the selection process.
“The situation now is that PCB has to appoint a new white ball coach given the number of white ball commitments of the national team coming up and leading up to the Champions Trophy early next year,” the source said.
“One option is to let assistant coach Azhar Mahmood continue as interim head coach but Aaqib or Saqlain could also land the job.”
Saqlain has remained head coach of the Pakistan team before but was replaced by Mickey Arthur early last year when Najam Sethi was in power in the board.
The source did say they are some other candidates under consideration and the board chairman, Mohsin Naqvi would soon have talks with shortlisted candidates.
PCB has made no official comment on why Kirsten resigned nor has the former South African player said anything but board insiders say the dispute arose over several issues between Kirsten and PCB.
“Look we had high hopes from Kirsten when we entered into a two-year contract with him. The idea was he could help PCB to revolutionise the white ball team,” one source aware of the happenings said.
He said PCB got the feeling that Kirsten never seemed fully committed to his job.
“He did not have a single camp in Pakistan for any of the white ball teams. He was not present at the white ball camps of the Shaheens throughout the summer. And it all culminated with him missing the majority of the Champions Cup.”
Another complaint against Kirsten is that although his contract stated clearly he would just take 30 day-vacation in a year, he didn’t even spend 30 days in Pakistan after joining.
PCB was also put off with Kirsten’s insistence on having more foreign coaches on his team and the dispute between them blew up once the board decided to strip the coaches of selection powers.
PCB had also sidelined and pushed foreign coaches, Mickey Arthur, Grant Bradburn, etc. to resign after last year’s World Cup.
Link: https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/s...e-kirsten-for-pakistan-white-ball-coachs-job/
Comments: It is important to get the PCB's version and point of view. The complaint about Kirsten not having a single white ball camp or spending time in the domestic circuit is justified. Kirsten obviously took advantage of PCB's desperation of hiring high profile coaches and thought he could dictate to them on everything.
PCB obviously let him go for a reason. He was not being fully committed to his role.
I can assure that you if that Super Over was bowled by Hassan Ali or Shaheen, the narrative would have been different and those two would have been crucified. However, since it was Amir and a lot of people advocated for his return because of his so-called intelligence and ability to handle pressure, people are looking to deflect the blame, e.g. @emranabbas.It's the 3rd worst super over of all time , not 1st. Not my fault you're unaware of statistics and are arguing from emotion.
Chacha flunked 2 super overs in which case he couldn't chase a score of less then 10 and in the other only scored 2 runs in the super over against Zimbabwe.
To top it off, it's not like he failed but remained not out, he missed a delivery, Hit a 4 on the next one and then got out to a full toss .
Anyone on the planet would have put that full toss away
Infact chacha getting out on an easy full toss against netrvalkar was not an anamoly. Nz bowlers dismissed him in the exact same fashion.
So no this whole we don't know is nonsense from you. Theirs statistical evidence to showcase why chacha wouldn't chase it and infact would have just gotten out scoring 1-4.
As for worst super over in history, I really recommend a Google search.
This is your issue that many people highlighted. You argue from emotion. Theirs never any actual rhyme or logic to anything you argue about.
That's AlrightE with me.I can assure that you if that Super Over was bowled by Hassan Ali or Shaheen, the narrative would have been different and those two would have been crucified. However, since it was Amir and a lot of people advocated for his return because of his so-called intelligence and ability to handle pressure, people are looking to deflect the blame, e.g. @emranabbas.
We also know what Amir would have said if he was on TV and some other bowlers conceded 19 vs the USA including 3 wides. He would have ripped him to shreds.
It is the worst Super Over of all time due to multiple reasons: yes it is not the most runs ever conceded in a Super Over, but it happened in an actual World Cup unlike other 20+ runs Super Overs that happened in bilateral or World Cup qualifiers like WI vs NED etc.
Also, I’m not sure if we have ever seen 3+ wides in a Super Over. That must be some sort of a record as well but I would be interested to see the actual statistics for this if they exist.
So not only did Amir bowl the most awful Super Over we have ever seen in an actual World Cup, he did it vs a proper minnow/associate team like USA, which makes it the worst Super Over of all time.
Furthermore, none of the other Super Overs were bowled by bowlers who are hailed for their strong mentality and ability to keep their cool under pressure. Amir enjoyed the reputation of being a big moment player but that reputation has been destroyed forever because he will never get a chance to compensate for this since he is not playing for Pakistan again.
Basically, Amir came back only to disgrace himself and bowl the worst Super Over ever. I guess you can call it karma for the amount of toxic criticism that he dished out while on TV.
I can guarantee you that had Babar given someone else the Super Over and he would have done what Amir did, the fans would have claimed that Amir would have won the match for Pakistan if he was given the Super Over and Babar had a personal grudge with him which is why he didn’t give him the ball etc.
Not a single Amir fan would have entertained the possibility that Amir would have conceded 19 runs including 3 wides in a Super Over vs the USA. Not in their wildest dreams.
As far as Iftikhar is concerned, look he might have failed a million Super Overs prior to this one, but we don’t know what he would have done in this situation if the target was lower. History and statistics don’t guarantee anything. History and statistics also show that Amir should not be conceding 19 runs with 3 wides in a Super Over vs USA but it happened anyway.
Maybe Iftikhar would have fluked it this turn and got lucky for once or maybe not. We don’t know, because it is hypothetical.
There is a huge difference been chasing 10-12 in a Super Over as opposed to 20 because that leaves you with no margin of error and every single ball has to go to the boundary. Iftikhars and others didn’t cover themselves in glory either but it was done & dusted after the Amir’s over and he deserves to be singled out for that defeat and his fans should accept it and move on instead of deflecting it by blaming XYZ players and coming up with hypothetical situations.
The USA defeat is 100% on Amir. That doesn’t mean that others played well. They didn’t, but the sequence of events make it clear and obvious that Amir lost Pakistan the match.
So Gary wanted Fakhar Zaman as captain and also Mohd Haris in the team instead of Rizwan..Basit Ali speaking on his YouTube Channel:
"The story started when Mohammad Rizwan was named Pakistan's new white-ball captain. Kirsten wanted a different captain and demanded another player in the team. Coincidently, both of them are not in the team. He was thinking that maybe he could have full authority. However, he doesn't know that in Pakistan, even the PCB chairman can get changed overnight."
“Mohsin Naqvi has come with a lot of power. The coaches, selectors and managers are being removed. Earlier, the chairman used to be changed from time to time. Now, whoever raises their voice will be sidelined."
It’s like Nana Patekar in Welcome:So Gary wanted Fakhar Zaman as captain and also Mohd Haris in the team instead of Rizwan..
awkward moment for for fan girls who wanted Rizwan as captain and were also in favour of Gary KirstenSo Gary wanted Fakhar Zaman as captain and also Mohd Haris in the team instead of Rizwan..
Hope you stick to this drivel when Javed Afridi appoints Harris as Peshawar Zalmi captain.My allegations that Kirsten is a lot older than 56 are confirmed to be true. Advocating for a rubbish hack like Haris is not the working of a sound mind. He has clearly gone senile.
Haris struggled in the Emerging Asia Cup (SR of 128) in spite of being a seasoned international cricketer says everything that needs to be said about his caliber as a cricketer.
He is not half the cricketer Rizwan is in any format. Perhaps he would be more useful in T10 or Hong Kong Sixes, but that is it. Too bad they are not international formats.
@Rana rana ji who they backing now?awkward moment for for fan girls who wanted Rizwan as captain and were also in favour of Gary Kirsten
Old age gets to many. Gary suffering too.So Gary wanted Fakhar Zaman as captain and also Mohd Haris in the team instead of Rizwan..
Why don’t you argue Gary Kirsten is basically Rana or is reading too much Rana from PPOld age gets to many. Gary suffering too.
Sadly sticking with the status quo that has not won anything in T20 cricket across multiple cycles while also taking the team to new lows with defeats against associates is probably a sign of insanity too.My allegations that Kirsten is a lot older than 56 are confirmed to be true. Advocating for a rubbish hack like Haris is not the working of a sound mind. He has clearly gone senile.
Haris struggled in the Emerging Asia Cup (SR of 128) in spite of being a seasoned international cricketer says everything that needs to be said about his caliber as a cricketer.
He is not half the cricketer Rizwan is in any format. Perhaps he would be more useful in T10 or Hong Kong Sixes, but that is it. Too bad they are not international formats.
Akif JavedSo Gary wanted Fakhar Zaman as captain and also Mohd Haris in the team instead of Rizwan..
Shocking really if he advocated for the tulla Haris. One of the worst cricketers ever to wear Pak shirtMy allegations that Kirsten is a lot older than 56 are confirmed to be true. Advocating for a rubbish hack like Haris is not the working of a sound mind. He has clearly gone senile.
Haris struggled in the Emerging Asia Cup (SR of 128) in spite of being a seasoned international cricketer says everything that needs to be said about his caliber as a cricketer.
He is not half the cricketer Rizwan is in any format. Perhaps he would be more useful in T10 or Hong Kong Sixes, but that is it. Too bad they are not international formats.
Akif Javed
If it is true that Kirsten wanted Haris as captain then good thing we sacked him.
What drivel? We all know that if Rizwan were to have a SR of 127 in an Emerging Asia Cup, there would be 5 threads on this forum and you would be all over the place like a rash.Hope you stick to this drivel when Javed Afridi appoints Harris as Peshawar Zalmi captain.
It is fine to try something new. There is no harm in shaking things up. However, it should be done with reason and logic.Sadly sticking with the status quo that has not won anything in T20 cricket across multiple cycles while also taking the team to new lows with defeats against associates is probably a sign of insanity too.
Our cricket is in a tough place at the moment
The coaches should also understand that, different country, different culture, different roles. How one works in Team A may not be possible for Team B due to cultural and structural and organizational differences."What you need to do is to make sure that once you involve and engage somebody, you've got to give them clarity regarding the role."
Haris is also a motor mouth. Not captaincy material.My allegations that Kirsten is a lot older than 56 are confirmed to be true. Advocating for a rubbish hack like Haris is not the working of a sound mind. He has clearly gone senile.
Haris struggled in the Emerging Asia Cup (SR of 128) in spite of being a seasoned international cricketer says everything that needs to be said about his caliber as a cricketer.
He is not half the cricketer Rizwan is in any format. Perhaps he would be more useful in T10 or Hong Kong Sixes, but that is it. Too bad they are not international formats.
Yes. Zero skills and poor attitude.Haris is also a motor mouth. Not captaincy material.
Who decides this, the phuppa jee at Sui Gas????Haris is also a motor mouth. Not captaincy material.
Yeah I would strongly advise all cricket professionals to read your posts and do the opposite of your recommendations.Why don’t you argue Gary Kirsten is basically Rana or is reading too much Rana from PP
Rich coming from someone who makes no sense themselves.Yeah I would strongly advise all cricket professionals to read your posts and do the opposite of your recommendations.
Previously wanting Azam Khan badly. Now wanting M Haris badly. Wanting Asif Ali badly as captain.Rich coming from someone who makes no sense themselves.
What are the sources for these? I want to believe this and go with this but I've struggled to find the source of this infoKirsten also strongly demanded Shadab's inclusion in the ODI and T20 squad in Australia, Zimbabwe even though Shadab's form in the last one plus year clearly shows he desperately needs to play a few seasons of redball cricket.
The PCB have correctly identified that these foreign coaches don't have the stomach to make tough calls and are going out of their way to please, pacify the senior players in the team. Better to have an independent empowered selection committee to make the tough calls
Shareef Banda hai iss liye bakhsh deta hoon.Previously wanting Azam Khan badly. Now wanting M Haris badly. Wanting Asif Ali badly as captain.
Buddy ulta chor kotwal to daante
And I thought I was a bit too aggressive with my posts.There is a special place in Hell for people who support the following players:
Amir, Sharjeel, Imad, Azam Khan, Haris
Good coaches do adapt but they are brought in to incalculate their methods to the locals, otherwise you just employ the localsThe coaches should also understand that, different country, different culture, different roles. How one works in Team A may not be possible for Team B due to cultural and structural and organizational differences.
Well that makes it 99% of pakpassion posters.There is a special place in Hell for people who support the following players:
Amir, Sharjeel, Imad, Azam Khan, Haris
Kirsten also strongly demanded Shadab's inclusion in the ODI and T20 squad in Australia, Zimbabwe even though Shadab's form in the last one plus year clearly shows he desperately needs to play a few seasons of redball cricket.
The PCB have correctly identified that these foreign coaches don't have the stomach to make tough calls and are going out of their way to please, pacify the senior players in the team. Better to have an independent empowered selection committee to make the tough calls
But but but Kirsten gave Rizwan Aashirwaad of captaincy?Former Pakistan cricketer Basit Ali has scathingly attacked PCB chief Mohsin Naqvi and claimed that Kirsten left the position because he raised his voice about something that was not going right, he said:
"Mohsin Naqvi has come with a lot of power. The coaches, selectors and managers are being removed. Earlier, the chairman used to be changed from time to time. Now, whoever raises their voice will be sidelined,"
"The story started when Mohammad Rizwan was named Pakistan's new white-ball captain. Kirsten wanted a different captain and demanded another player in the team. Coincidently, both of them are not in the team. He was thinking that maybe he could have full authority. However, he doesn't know that in Pakistan, even the PCB chairman can get changed overnight,"
Gary Kristen is older then 56 because he recommended Haris? What sort of logic is that?My allegations that Kirsten is a lot older than 56 are confirmed to be true. Advocating for a rubbish hack like Haris is not the working of a sound mind. He has clearly gone senile.
Haris struggled in the Emerging Asia Cup (SR of 128) in spite of being a seasoned international cricketer says everything that needs to be said about his caliber as a cricketer.
He is not half the cricketer Rizwan is in any format. Perhaps he would be more useful in T10 or Hong Kong Sixes, but that is it. Too bad they are not international formats.
I agree it was one of the worst Super over ever.. It is literally 16 + 3 runs of 9 balls vs the target 20 runs off 6 balls.I can assure that you if that Super Over was bowled by Hassan Ali or Shaheen, the narrative would have been different and those two would have been crucified. However, since it was Amir and a lot of people advocated for his return because of his so-called intelligence and ability to handle pressure, people are looking to deflect the blame, e.g. @emranabbas.
We also know what Amir would have said if he was on TV and some other bowlers conceded 19 vs the USA including 3 wides. He would have ripped him to shreds.
It is the worst Super Over of all time due to multiple reasons: yes it is not the most runs ever conceded in a Super Over, but it happened in an actual World Cup unlike other 20+ runs Super Overs that happened in bilateral or World Cup qualifiers like WI vs NED etc.
Also, I’m not sure if we have ever seen 3+ wides in a Super Over. That must be some sort of a record as well but I would be interested to see the actual statistics for this if they exist.
So not only did Amir bowl the most awful Super Over we have ever seen in an actual World Cup, he did it vs a proper minnow/associate team like USA, which makes it the worst Super Over of all time.
Furthermore, none of the other Super Overs were bowled by bowlers who are hailed for their strong mentality and ability to keep their cool under pressure. Amir enjoyed the reputation of being a big moment player but that reputation has been destroyed forever because he will never get a chance to compensate for this since he is not playing for Pakistan again.
Basically, Amir came back only to disgrace himself and bowl the worst Super Over ever. I guess you can call it karma for the amount of toxic criticism that he dished out while on TV.
I can guarantee you that had Babar given someone else the Super Over and he would have done what Amir did, the fans would have claimed that Amir would have won the match for Pakistan if he was given the Super Over and Babar had a personal grudge with him which is why he didn’t give him the ball etc.
Not a single Amir fan would have entertained the possibility that Amir would have conceded 19 runs including 3 wides in a Super Over vs the USA. Not in their wildest dreams.
As far as Iftikhar is concerned, look he might have failed a million Super Overs prior to this one, but we don’t know what he would have done in this situation if the target was lower. History and statistics don’t guarantee anything. History and statistics also show that Amir should not be conceding 19 runs with 3 wides in a Super Over vs USA but it happened anyway.
Maybe Iftikhar would have fluked it this turn and got lucky for once or maybe not. We don’t know, because it is hypothetical.
There is a huge difference been chasing 10-12 in a Super Over as opposed to 20 because that leaves you with no margin of error and every single ball has to go to the boundary. Iftikhars and others didn’t cover themselves in glory either but it was done & dusted after the Amir’s over and he deserves to be singled out for that defeat and his fans should accept it and move on instead of deflecting it by blaming XYZ players and coming up with hypothetical situations.
The USA defeat is 100% on Amir. That doesn’t mean that others played well. They didn’t, but the sequence of events make it clear and obvious that Amir lost Pakistan the match.
Simply where is the proof that he asked for Haris as captain..My allegations that Kirsten is a lot older than 56 are confirmed to be true. Advocating for a rubbish hack like Haris is not the working of a sound mind. He has clearly gone senile.
Haris struggled in the Emerging Asia Cup (SR of 128) in spite of being a seasoned international cricketer says everything that needs to be said about his caliber as a cricketer.
He is not half the cricketer Rizwan is in any format. Perhaps he would be more useful in T10 or Hong Kong Sixes, but that is it. Too bad they are not international formats.
Nothing yet it’s just PCB media tout feeding lite to protect Sethi and his goons from this PR disaster it’s simple Gary did not accept this ridiculous suggestion that he’s just a match day coach while Aaqib and his pals will handpick playing XI for him no self respecting coach will accept it let alone a World Cup winning one .Has Gary come forth with his version of events yet ?
Well that makes it 99% of pakpassion posters.
See you all in hell everybody
Maybe he doesn't care about the drama. Will put out a statement when he needs to.Been two days since Gary resigned and no statement from him. Why? If he is completely in the clear then why not clarify that he did not indulge in any lack of professionalism and violations of his contract.
Maybe because he doesn’t need to give a statement?Been two days since Gary resigned and no statement from him. Why? If he is completely in the clear then why not clarify that he did not indulge in any lack of professionalism and violations of his contract.
What are the sources for these? I want to believe this and go with this but I've struggled to find the source of this info
Been two days since Gary resigned and no statement from him. Why? If he is completely in the clear then why not clarify that he did not indulge in any lack of professionalism and violations of his contract.
The biggest violation of contract was PCB appointing a coach then turning around a few months later saying sorry, you now don't even have a say in selecting the XI.Been two days since Gary resigned and no statement from him. Why? If he is completely in the clear then why not clarify that he did not indulge in any lack of professionalism and violations of his contract.
Nothing yet it’s just PCB media tout feeding lite to protect Sethi and his goons from this PR disaster it’s simple Gary did not accept this ridiculous suggestion that he’s just a match day coach while Aaqib and his pals will handpick playing XI for him no self respecting coach will accept it let alone a World Cup winning one .
The biggest violation of contract was PCB appointing a coach then turning around a few months later saying sorry, you now don't even have a say in selecting the XI.
Instead of leaking dubious smears to favoured journos in an obvious attempt to sway the public, they should summon up the courage and go on the record specifying these supposed violations.
Well that's why I'm saying PCB should come out on the record and state clearly what the terms of the contract were, and which terms Kirsten supposedly breached. Did it stipulate Kirsten needed to spend X amount of time in Pakistan ?If the coaches are making dubious clueless selections which are resulting the team in making losses and if the coaches are not doing the bare minimum i.e. spending 10 - 11 months in the country working in the academies, with the Shaheen's, U-19 teams and domestic cricket then yes the PCB rightfully can take back the powers and leave the decisions to an independent full time selection committee.
Apparently the PCB told the coaches that if they want their vote back then they need to spend time in Pakistan which is a fair demand.
now would be interesting what Gary says because I m sure there is something else cooking behind the closed doors.PCB chairman Mohsin Naqvi during interaction with media at Karachi:
“He (Kirsten) broke his contract with the PCB and made some breaches. He ended the contract with us."
"We will have a new white ball head coach by the end of this month because Jason Gillispie has only agreed to manage the team in Australia for the white ball matches on an interim basis. He is more focussed on his role as red ball head coach. The team will have a new white ball coach for the Zimbabwe tour."