Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What well done? Lost twice against India, lost against Afg...just beaten an off guard Pakistan and minnow level Lankan team. How is it well done?
Fact remains, after 20+ years of cricket, they are yet to win a tri series. Its a shame actually
Today we have shown yet again why we r the second best team Asia. Today we fielded our second string team against India who played the match with 13 players. It was 11 against 13. Obviously the team that had two extra players have finally won the game.
Today we have shown yet again why we r the second best team Asia. Today we fielded our second string team against India who played the match with 13 players. It was 11 against 13. Obviously the team that had two extra players have finally won the game.
But why your ranking in every format and performance in every ICC tournament (except for rain) says otherwise? And also what happened to the 2nd best Asian team in WI tests (Under 50 all out in two innings)? Also what happened against Afg in T20s 3-0? And recent loss to Afg in ODI?
How? Pls Check ur facts again.
Bangladesh is one of the most rapidly progressing teams in the world at the moment. They were the quarterfinalist of last world cup and semifinalist of last champions trophy. They r 3 times Asia cup finalists and should have won atleast two of those finals.
We were talking about about ODIs. But u've suddenly brought up tests and T20s. But anyway, in tests we've hammered Australia, England, Srilanka very recently and as far as t20s r concerned as I have said it many times already, international T20s r totally pointless unless it's a world t20. Even the world champion Australia lost a t20 series of against Minnow Lanka in their home ground. It means nothing.
2 things:
You qualified in semi final of CT only bcoz of rain washed out game vs Aussies.
Also you said you are only talking about ODIs but suddenly brought how you reached Asia cup final last 3 times. Arent you contradicting yourself bcoz last Asia cup was T20![]()
Wrong again.
Firstly it was Australia who got benefited due to Rain against New Zealand where kiwis were cruising to victory but Australia got away due to rain. If Australia didn't get lucky against NZ they wouldnt have made it to the QF in the first place. That same NZ team got hammered by us. We were the superior team, hence we played the semifinal.
Secondly, since titan24 brought up tests and t20s in his discussion I had to mention our appearance in the last Asia cup final where T20s were played incase of ODIs to make it even. Hope its making sense to u now
Today we have shown yet again why we r the second best team Asia. Today we fielded our second string team against India who played the match with 13 players. It was 11 against 13. Obviously the team that had two extra players have finally won the game.
Wrong again.
Firstly it was Australia who got benefited due to Rain against New Zealand where kiwis were cruising to victory but Australia got away due to rain. If Australia didn't get lucky against NZ they wouldnt have made it to the QF in the first place. That same NZ team got hammered by us. We were the superior team, hence we played the semifinal.
Secondly, since titan24 brought up tests and t20s in his discussion I had to mention our appearance in the last Asia cup final where T20s were played incase of ODIs to make it even. Hope its making sense to u now
You are singlehandedly ruining whatever the appreciation, sympathy that is coming towards BD team with arrogant comments.
Easily the second best team in Asia Cup
If I recall correctly, most of Aust matches got washed out. They had to beat BD to reach semi's and they were cruising. BD got all out for 183 and Aust were 88/1 after 18 overs when rain came. The match was heading only in 1 direction but rain allowed BD a fluke entry in semis. And the fluke entry was validated by 9 wicket thrashing by India in the semis.
So no need to boast so much about CT semi final. We all follow cricket and we all know what happened. Your WC 15 quarter final was praise worthy though with a win over Eng.
Wrong. U r just shifting the ur goalposts now.
Australia weren't at all unlucky in CT. They were on their way to get a hammering against NZ but got saved by rain. Then they got hammered against England. Even If we hypothetically assume that no matches were interrupted by rain in that group still the points of AUS, NZ, and BD would have been similar and Bangladesh would've reached the semifinal.
And yes, I agree with u regarding the fact that BD played brilliantly in 15 wc but they were robbed off a victory against India in QF due to biased Umpiring just like the way THEY WERE robbed off a victory tonight.
Easily the second best team in Asia Cup
Wrong. U r just shifting the ur goalposts now.
Australia weren't at all unlucky in CT. They were on their way to get a hammering against NZ but got saved by rain. Then they got hammered against England. Even If we hypothetically assume that no matches were interrupted by rain in that group still the points of AUS, NZ, and BD would have been similar and Bangladesh would've reached the semifinal.
And yes, I agree with u regarding the fact that BD played brilliantly in 15 wc but they were robbed off a victory against India in QF due to biased Umpiring just like the way THEY WERE robbed off a victory tonight.
Second best team in Asia is Pakistan. Second best team in Asia cup was Afghanistan.
1) India
2) Pak
3) Afg
4) SRL
5) Hong Kong
6) Bangladesh
Best teams are consistent. Only two teams were consistent in this tournament. Afg didn't collapse or lose by a huge margin in any game. They fought and won or came very close to winning in every game. That makes them the 2nd best team of the tournament.
Two best teams of this tournament played in finals. That's what finals are for.
I think BD deserved to win today.
I think BD deserved to win today.
I think BD deserved to win today.
How the 2nd best side?
Pakistan may have been poor in this tournament but that's the worst performance they have given in 15-18 months
In CT Pak defeated 3 of the top sides,BD beat just 1
Pak have been poor against top sides after that but same has been the case with BD
Pak dominated SL & whitewashed them,BD lost a tri series involving SL at their home where they lost 2 out of 3 matches against SL
1 win of BD against Pak won't make them better than Pak
Remember they even got thrashed by AFG in this tournament
I just want us to win trophies and have a billion haters
Second best team in Asia is Pakistan. Second best team in Asia cup was Afghanistan.
Nice try with the fake opinion but both those teams combined record vs weakened BD team is 1-2 in the Asia Cup. 2nd best team has lost 4 straight ODIs to us and you have to go back to 2014 to find their most recent win. Zimbabwe has beaten Australia more recently than that.
How the 2nd best side?
Pakistan may have been poor in this tournament but that's the worst performance they have given in 15-18 months
In CT Pak defeated 3 of the top sides,BD beat just 1
Pak have been poor against top sides after that but same has been the case with BD
Pak dominated SL & whitewashed them,BD lost a tri series involving SL at their home where they lost 2 out of 3 matches against SL
1 win of BD against Pak won't make them better than Pak
Remember they even got thrashed by AFG in this tournament
Nice try with the fake opinion but both those teams combined record vs weakened BD team is 1-2 in the Asia Cup. 2nd best team has lost 4 straight ODIs to us and you have to go back to 2014 to find their most recent win. Zimbabwe has beaten Australia more recently than that.
You keep saying weakened team but it appears there is no difference. You lost to Afghanistan with Shakib in the team by 136 runs and won against them in a close game without him. Afghans have not been rolled over by any team in this tournament.
Honestly Afghanistan deserved to be in finals. But for the brain fade against BD in super 4 match, would have got there. They were the better team.
If BD and Afghanistan were to play a 5 match ODI series in Asia, AFG will win it. No wonder BD is reluctant to play ODIs vs them, more so after the 3-0 hammering in T20s.
Congratulatins.....Bd may soon reach no 1 in rankings....
You think BCCI will let that happen? NEVER!!
They done their fans proud, but I bet they're sick of reading & hearing that.
You mean BCCI will do what it can to help its players perform well and deny teams like Bangladesh a chance to go above them
You keep saying weakened team but it appears there is no difference. You lost to Afghanistan with Shakib in the team by 136 runs and won against them in a close game without him. Afghans have not been rolled over by any team in this tournament.
Honestly Afghanistan deserved to be in finals. But for the brain fade against BD in super 4 match, would have got there. They were the better team.
If BD and Afghanistan were to play a 5 match ODI series in Asia, AFG will win it. No wonder BD is reluctant to play ODIs vs them, more so after the 3-0 hammering in T20s.
Well said - deep down Bangladesh fans know it's only a matter of time before Afghanistan overtake their side in ODIs.
The nerve of their supporters to come up with these BCCI conspiracy theories... I mean just seriously grow up. Bangladesh and Pakistan were lucky to have beaten Afghanistan. Had the Afghans won just won one of those games, Bangladesh wouldn't even have made it in the final, so there would be none of this crying of "BCCI = ICC" crap.
Please dont post nonsense, if you got nothing better to say. Before, Afg can overtake BD they have to overtake WI, SRL, and possibly current Australia.
There is a higher chance of Bd going past Australia and Pakistan in rankings over Afg surpassing BD at least in the near future.
Please dont post nonsense, if you got nothing better to say. Before, Afg can overtake BD they have to overtake WI, SRL, and possibly current Australia.
There is a higher chance of Bd going past Australia and Pakistan in rankings over Afg surpassing BD at least in the near future.
You've been struggling against Afghanistan since 2016 as a matter of fact. You may have won that series 2-1 couple of years ago at home but I remember in one of the ODIs they dominated virtually the whole game only to throw it away and lose by single digit no. of runs. They actually played the better cricket in that series.
In T20Is they smashed you guys, so the less said the better. Even though it's a slightly different format it is still a limited overs contest where the fundamentals remain the same. When it comes to best new finds in T20 - whether it be from T20 leagues or success from T20Is they go on to play ODIs, so the fact your side got whitewashed 3-0 is extremely alarming.
In addition in the Asia Cup they got the better of Bangladesh over the two matches played in which they dominated both contests.
If you're going to come up with BCCI conspiracy theories first get the better of Afghanistan first.
This is merely a sign of things to come.
A difference of 25 ranking points (92 for BD, 67 for AFG). A couple of full series with BD in India and AFG will march ahead.
Also, BD play lower ranked Zim and WI, every single loss could lose them 2-3 ranking points
If the fundamentals between T20 and ODI is same, then explain to me how two times T20 Champion WI is rated almost the same as AFG currently in ODIs? Also, explains how Pak got obliterated in NZ in ODIs, but managed to actually win the T20 series?
Even if for the sake of argument Afg won all matches against BD in a tournament, it still wouldn't mean that they are better. Let me give you an example, BD has beaten ENG(you know the team that's been owning everyone in ODIs since the last world cup) both in 2011 WC and in 2015 WC. In fact, in the last five years, BD record against ENG(#1), and NZ(#3) is 7W and 8L. At the same time, IND has 11W 13L record against these two top teams for the same duration. It does not mean that BD is at same level as NZ or Eng.
You are welcome to make a "well played AFG" thread and gloat about how great they are over there.
Fundementally there is a lot of similarity between 50 over and a 20 over cricket with minor caveats. Both played with field restrictions, white kookkaburra balls, short boundaries etc. Yes in ODIs you got to apply that bit extra compare to a t20. But its not that huge a difference as you making it out to be. Test cricket is completely different though with different levels of skill levels required.
Also your WI arguement is wrong. You very well know WI plays its best players only in T20s but most of them dont play ODIs due to issues with board. That is not the case with BD, the still play all its main players in both formats.
@ Rainman, Dear brother please learn to get on with life.We all know all the wrong decisions are against Bangladesh and everyone watches cricket so take a chill-pill.
The truth is that Bangladesh,(at least till now), cant win knockout semifinals/finals.
Please accept this fact.
By crying like this over every incident/non incident, fans like you are demotivating your own team.A winner never give excuses .please accept that this team cant handle a big match pressure.
Yiu are saying what India achieved in first 20 years, we had world cup 1983, world series 1985 both outside India. Please stop non sense comparisons.
Bangladesh has to work hard to improve and the better they get, better will be the world cricket.
Difference between ODIs and t20 is huge. First of all, in T20s teams usually don't get a chance to come back in the match. Its very fast paced and most of the time the result of the match depends on how well a team start their innings.
Thats not the case with ODIs. In this format even if a team starts off badly they will still get the chance to recover in the later part of the innings.
3rdly, t20 format is a paradise for useless hacks. Players who don't know how to find the gaps, rotate the strikes but r good at muscling the ball r the usual performers in this format. This very same set of players usually becomes a fish out of water in ODIs because the structure of that format doesn't suit their mindless slogging. Any average team can be a top class t20 team. Look at Pakistan.
International T20s r absolutely pointless, so is its ranking. Nobody takes it seriously. Its played just for fun at the very end of a series and certainly has little to no significance to any of the international teams. There is a reason why a world class test and odi team like SA is at no 6 position in this format while a team like Pakistan that got manhandled by every other team in ASIA cup and resides at the bottom of the pile in every other format is at the helm of t20 ranking.
If u have couple of very good bowlers, few power hitters and a plethora of batting all rounders who can sneak in couple of overs in the middle, then u r good to go in this format.
Now coming back to the topic of the discussion, even if West indies had fielded their main 11 they still would've been the same useless team. The reason is hacks like Russel, Samuel and pollard is good at smacking the ball for 3/4 overs, but tell them to do the same thing for 15/20 overs in ODIs and this very same set of players will go into hiding.