West Indies v Pakistan | 4th ODI | Barbados | 2/5/11 | West Indies Innings

[Pakistani93]

Even thoug he always perform, he.is more like rana naveed part 2

Sent from my X10i using Tapatalk

People don't care if he performs or not , they ignore the fact that Tanvir Ahmed averages 25 with the ball in test cricket and make fun of him cause he dosen't bowl phast

 

[Osman]

that is harsh calculation of DL for west indies

 

[SameerP]

West Indies need 223 from 39 overs

Pakistan got 248 in 50 overs but WI has only 39 overs for 223? Doesn't exactly sound fair but I guess nobody here would be complaining

 

[Looney]

How is this calculated ? Would it not make more sense to multiply the average RR of Pakistan with the amount of overs to be played ?

4.96 x 39 overs is what i mean - which should be around 190-something ?

 

[Statsman]

I thought the D/L is biased against the side which loses a large number of wickets..

Well I was wrong

 

[Fawad2010]

First Power Play 8 overs, 4 overs each bowling & batting respectively. Fielders warming up under grey skies

again from WICB twitter

 

[Looney]

out lol gets a wicket

 

[Fawad2010]

39 overs maximum; 4 bowlers can bowl 8 overs. Simmons & Edwards open the batting for Windies

 

[nads_rocks]

2nd ball out!

Caught behind 1-1

 

[Fireworks11]

Off the mark. 1/0

 

[1137moiz]

OUT; nicely bowled Junaid Khan

 

[Fireworks11]

1/1. Good start.

 

[Fawad2010]

out!!

 

[Statsman]

This is going to be brutal for the Windies

 

[Deewana Mastana]

 

[Looney]

2nd wicket for the tiger from Swabi

 

[saj001]

I want to see anger in Junaid bowling today...

 

[1137moiz]

How is this calculated ? Would it not make more sense to multiply the average RR of Pakistan with the amount of overs to be played ?

4.96 x 39 overs is what i mean - which should be around 190-something ?

They reduce the NUMBER of runs required but increase the RUN-RATE to make it tougher.

I think it's flawed, though.

 

[adnan yasin]

:

1 down

 

[duostyle]

We were down 2 wickets only around 40th over, so it played a part in the target staying almost the same but the overs being taken out, that's how I think they got this total, feel free to correct me though.

What a start!

 

[Looney]

They reduce the NUMBER of runs required but increase the RUN-RATE to make it tougher.

I think it's flawed, though.

why ? and how do they decide how many runs to reduce ?

 

[Deewana Mastana]

Not much carry on that

 

[1137moiz]

We were down 2 wickets only around 40th over, so it played a part in the target staying almost the same but the overs being taken out, that's how I think they got this total, feel free to correct me though.

What a start!

I don't think they factor the over-by-over scores; I think they just put in the end result.

I might be wrong though. It's a silly system though. Lotsa flaws.

 

[Looney]

 

[Deewana Mastana]

Poor ball to end the over with



Bravo creams it easily!

5/1 after 1 over

 

[Looney]

is it just me or it is looking darker again

 

[cricfan4ever]

lol D/L method is bogus...we batted at a RR of 4 for the most part of our innings and WI has to chase at a RRR of nearly 6 )

 

[1137moiz]

why ? and how do they decide how many runs to reduce ?

Not sure. But they have an automatic calculator on their website.

Also this article they wrote in 1999. I still don't get it though, hahah.

http://static.espncricinfo.com/db/ABOUT_CRICKET/RAIN_RULES/DUCKWORTH_LEWIS.html

 

[Deewana Mastana]

83.8mph

 

[Fireworks11]

Bravo in.

 

[nads_rocks]

Tanvir bowling in the 80s

 

[Deewana Mastana]

couple for Simmons

 

[adnan yasin]

They reduce the NUMBER of runs required but increase the RUN-RATE to make it tougher.

I think it's flawed, though.

I think it will be unfair to bowling team to restrict them to 190 odd in 39 overs ... if RR is low and overs are less .. its easy to chase .. so unfair for team batted first

 

[Looney]

lol D/L method is bogus...we batted at a RR of 4 for the most part of our innings and WI has to chase at a RRR of nearly 6 )

very unfair

 

[Deewana Mastana]

85.3mph by Tanvir

 

[Deewana Mastana]

84.7mph this time

 

[Deewana Mastana]

7/1 after 1 over

 

[NJamal]

7/1 after 2 overs

 

[Batman]

West Indies | 1/7 | 2 Overs | Need 216 runs to win from 37 Overs

2 off the over!

 

[cricfan4ever]

very unfair

yup!

 

[Fawad2010]

NO FIRST OVER WICKET for Tanvir in ODI's

 

[Looney]

84.8
85.2
84.6 WIDE
84.4
86.3
83.0
speed not shown for 6th delivery

 

[Hando]

People don't care if he performs or not , they ignore the fact that Tanvir Ahmed averages 25 with the ball in test cricket and make fun of him cause he dosen't bowl phast

Exactly lol, and thats including me, he just isnt your typical pakistan phast bowler, young, slim, able to bowl 138-145 k's and isn't balding

 

[Deewana Mastana]

Wide and Good take by Salman!

 

[NJamal]

Wide

 

[Desi]

what a take...saved 4

 

[NJamal]

9/1 after 3 overs

 

[Batman]

West Indies | 1/9 | 3 Overs | Need 214 runs to win from 36 Overs

2 off the over!

 

[Fireworks11]

WI will be fuming at that target.

 

[Deewana Mastana]

9/1 after 3 overs

 

[Deewana Mastana]

Is it only Cozier in the comm box talking away or is it just me?!

 

[ads101]

I think it will be unfair to bowling team to restrict them to 190 odd in 39 overs ... if RR is low and overs are less .. its easy to chase .. so unfair for team batted first

I think the target is a little unfair as it's too high

but in d/l I feel the team batting last almost always has the advantage, they can just play more recklessly, knowing they only need to last 39 overs, while the team batting first had to ensure to try and play out the whole of 50 overs.

 

[Fireworks11]

Good line by Tanvir.

 

[nads_rocks]

86 mph!

 

[shafkath]

Here comes another "Tanvir Fatima" fan! nvir

lol never seen it before actually, had to google it to see what all the commotion is about

 

[Fireworks11]

Good pace by Tanvir.

 

[anakwalajinn]

nvir is cranking it up delivery by delivery. according to my prognosis he should beat Akhtar's record by his 7th or 8th over...

 

[Deewana Mastana]

85.3mph

 

[Deewana Mastana]

Couple for Bravo

 

[Prince_Pathan]

still dont see why everybody criticizes tanvir ahmad...

very good bowler

bowls good line...good enough pace

he knows what hes doing with the ball

 

[Deewana Mastana]

Just over the top of the field

2 runs for Bravo

 

[Fireworks11]

Not timed. 2 runs.

 

[Hando]

Come Fatima aunty nvirahmed

 

[Prince_Pathan]

3 matches and 14 wickets in test...is impressive...considering it came against south africa +NZ

 

[Pakistani93]

Great shot for four

 

[Deewana Mastana]

Good shot by Bravo

17/1 after 4 overs

 

[Fireworks11]

still dont see why everybody criticizes tanvir ahmad...

very good bowler

bowls good line...good enough pace

he knows what hes doing with the ball

Not everybody.

 

[Looney]

nvir

86.0
85.7
85.3
86.0
not shown
86.7

 

[NJamal]

444444444444 by Bravo

 

[Batman]

West Indies | 1/17 | 4 Overs | Need 206 runs to win from 35 Overs

8 off the over!

 

[Fireworks11]

17/1

 

[Deewana Mastana]

3 matches and 14 wickets in test...is impressive...considering it came against south africa +NZ

Absolutely!

 

[sam]

Shaitaani shot by Lara!

 

[NJamal]

17/1 after 4 overs

 

[Deewana Mastana]

Salman shakes his head that no edge on it

 

[Pakistani93]

still dont see why everybody criticizes tanvir ahmad...

very good bowler

bowls good line...good enough pace

he knows what hes doing with the ball

Who cares if he is a good bowler and takes wickets?The Only things that matters that he isn't fast and isn't 20 years old

 

[Fireworks11]

Just short.

 

[NJamal]

Just short of keeper

 

[Deewana Mastana]

Did that carry?

 

[Fireworks11]

Or was it...