Chrish
First Class Captain
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2015
- Runs
- 4,827
- Post of the Week
- 1
Which is a better test team right now?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
WI will beat Bangladesh in WI
Bangladesh will beat WI in Bangladesh
Neutral venues both team are susceptible to collapse so you never know who is better..
I doubt Bangla can beat WI in BD.
Bangladesh have done nothing to earn this comparison. They are a rubbish Test team.
We are getting there, no need to call rubbish lately we won a test in srilanka agaisnt srilanka, which is no joke. Even bigger team has surrendered there lately in test team like australia, so we are no mean of rubbish.
I doubt Bangla can beat WI in BD.
I doubt Bangla can beat WI in BD.
You are massively underrating BD
Which is a better test team right now?
I would say that for a 2 test series. In BD, it will end as 1-1 between the two teams
Bangladesh have done nothing to earn this comparison. They are a rubbish Test team.
Apart from Zimbabwe any test nation can beat this weak WI even in WI. Pity that our team has full of passengers Shafiq, Babar/Sadab (not test material), Younis, Shehzad. With this team we can only play well with Zimbos.
The win against England and Lanka says the opposite,the only thing remotely of any importance by Windies has been the one test they won in UAE.
Both are same actually with SL one level above and Pak/Eng one level above that.
Pak and Eng are NOT grouped together anymore. England are currently stronger than Pakistan in all 3 international forms. England are on par with New Zealand, who are also better than Pakistan across all 3 forms.
Pak and Eng are NOT grouped together anymore. England are currently stronger than Pakistan in all 3 international forms. England are on par with New Zealand, who are also better than Pakistan across all 3 forms.
Eng >>>>>> NZ>Pak
West Indies will whitewash them each time they play, irrespective of the conditions.
Can someone explain me why Bangladesh can't beat this West Indies side when a similar strength west indies side lost to Bangladesh of 09 by 2-0 margin?
From then onwards Bangladesh have improved a lot.
BD beat a similar string WI team in WI with a far weaker team than Pak.
Can someone explain me why Bangladesh can't beat this West Indies side when a similar strength west indies side lost to Bangladesh of 09 by 2-0 margin?
From then onwards Bangladesh have improved a lot.
since April 2015, WI have beaten ENG and PAK twice. BD has beaten ENG and SL away. I think thats even stevens. But BD are a very young and rookie type side, so they have a huge upside.
Hope this the beginning of a WI resurgence.
Which is another lie really, the team BD beat had 9 debutantes out of a squad of 12 and all of whom had barely cobbled 50 FC matches between them. Some of them don't even have cricinfo profiles.![]()
Only sensible BD poster on PP.
I think BD test team has made a lot of strides. Battled NZ in one Test, beat England and then Sri Lanka, even battled well in a game against Pakistan.
Yet there is something missing from the Test side in comparison to your ODI team. [MENTION=79064]MMHS[/MENTION] But I don't think BD would be easily beaten in BD by any side.
BD better at home, WI far better at home. On neutral grounds, in Asia BD better, outside Asia WI better. In a 3 Test series, I believe result will be 2-1 BD at home; 2-1 or 1-1 in Asia; 1-1, 1-2 or 0-2 outside Asia; 0-2 or 0-3 in WI.
Bangladesh Drew a test series against Lanka in Lanka. West Indies would be annihilated if they played in Lanka. Heck even Australia were
A BD-WI series would be great to watch, when was the last both played in a tour?
Bd is more familiar with Lanka conditions than WI. If you loose the past 97 games but win the recent last 3 games it doesn't make your team good. Your record will be still 3-97, why doesnt BD fans realize this?
Why are you continuing on with this lie?
The team BD beat had 9 players making debut, some of whom don't have even cricinfo profiles and they had all barely even played any FC cricket.
There is no comparison to the college team that BD played and the one playing now.
Why on Earth does past record matters? Do you think cricket is ever played with thinking about the past performances?
True that team was less experienced but I think it had the likes of Sammy Roach. But I won't say it was the worst team ever it had some domestic players. The current West Indies side don't have too many spectacular batsmen either.
Why on Earth does past record matters? Do you think cricket is ever played with thinking about the past performances?
Bd is more familiar with Lanka conditions than WI. If you loose the past 97 games but win the recent last 3 games it doesn't make your team good. Your record will be still 3-97, why doesnt BD fans realize this?
Why are you continuing on with this lie?
The team BD beat had 9 players making debut, some of whom don't have even cricinfo profiles and they had all barely even played any FC cricket.
There is no comparison to the college team that BD played and the one playing now.
You're comparing a team that had 9 debutantes with 50 FC matches between them and most of them not even having player profiles online to the team with international experience playing against Pakistan now? There is no comparison between the two. The team that BD beat were barely club cricketers.
Not to turn this into anti-Bangladesh rant, as I think BD has improved very well but there are no parallels between the two WI sides.
Are you kidding me? Sometimes you win sometimes you loose. Losing two straight games does not mean your team is poor nor does winning two straight means your team is good.
If youve lost like the last 20 games, but won last 5 games your record is still 5-20 which is abysmal. You need more games/samples to say whether a team has become good or not.
Fair enough. But tbh the current west Indies side is very weak.
This WI side will easily whitewash BD in the Carribbean like BD was whitewashed in 2014. In BD, it will be closer. Maybe in BD, BD will edge it out in a 3 test series 2-1.
Fair enough. But tbh the current west Indies side is very weak.
Why are we going to be bothered about performance 10 years back? It's about how good you are now. Infact in the last 15 matches we played the record stands 5 wins 6 losses and rest were drawn. Not something outstanding by any stretch of the imagination.
Record can only get better. That's why you don't talk about performance of the past
You're comparing a team that had 9 debutantes with 50 FC matches between them and most of them not even having player profiles online to the team with international experience playing against Pakistan now? There is no comparison between the two. The team that BD beat were barely club cricketers.
Not to turn this into anti-Bangladesh rant, as I think BD has improved very well but there are no parallels between the two WI sides.
I agree with that, this WI side isn't stellar. Its shameful we are struggling.
The reason there is a lot of reason to be hopeful for Bangladesh is that the seniors are still fairly young: Shakib just turned 30, Mushfiq I think is still 29, and Tamim just turned 28. They have been the heart and soul of the Bangladesh Test side for several years and are getting better with age. They have also have younger players who are stepping up on big occaisions and just need to become more consistent. Mominul is only 25, Mosaddek 21, Miraz 19, Mustafiz 21, and Taskin only 22. Sabbir, Soumya, Nasir, Taijul are also 26 or younger. Quite a young Test side.
The Test we won against England, we had a number of rookie players as follows:
Sabbir (1 cap)
Mehedi (1 cap)
Kamrul (1 cap)
Hom (7 caps)
Taijul (9 caps)
Thats 5 of the XI that had 10 or fewer Test matches at that time.
Against SL it was even more inexperienced:
Soumya (6 caps)
Mosaddek (0)
Mehedi (6)
Mustafiz (3)
Roy (2)
Taijul (12)
Thats more than half the side with less caps than Virat Kohli got in one home season alone.
I agree, I said earlier BD is making big strides in Test matches. I think once your bowling in Test is settled you'll start getting series wins. As it stands, I doubt any team would now walk away from BD with easy Test wins.
Most sensible words i have ever heard from you. Bd is not a world beater at all but they are now coming of age in test too like odi. Long way for them to be big boy but they are not pushover anymore.
I have never denied what I said, if a poster does not troll I don't mind debates. Shutdown Corner is probably one of the best non-Pakistani posters on PP, even if I disagree with his views time to time.
On topic, I don't know who would win between BD and WI in WI but I know that away teams will find winning in WI a lot easier than winning against BD in BD. What BD need is a few series wins in a row to give them the confidence and some pacers to take regular wickets. We had Sohail, even Rahat in England and now Amir and Abbas taking good wickets. The spinners will obviously do the bulk of the work but the pacers need to be there chipping in with some wickets, other than Musti I am not sure if BD have a consistent pacer for Tests?
The series against Australia is crucial, they were beaten by India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka (very easily by latter two) so this series will tell us where BD are in terms of their standing. Before the Indian tour I had BD as favorites easily but Australia performed good in India so let's see.
I have never denied what I said, if a poster does not troll I don't mind debates. Shutdown Corner is probably one of the best non-Pakistani posters on PP, even if I disagree with his views time to time.
On topic, I don't know who would win between BD and WI in WI but I know that away teams will find winning in WI a lot easier than winning against BD in BD. What BD need is a few series wins in a row to give them the confidence and some pacers to take regular wickets. We had Sohail, even Rahat in England and now Amir and Abbas taking good wickets. The spinners will obviously do the bulk of the work but the pacers need to be there chipping in with some wickets, other than Musti I am not sure if BD have a consistent pacer for Tests?
The series against Australia is crucial, they were beaten by India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka (very easily by latter two) so this series will tell us where BD are in terms of their standing. Before the Indian tour I had BD as favorites easily but Australia performed good in India so let's see.
We need some consistent effective good pacers, i agree, to be good in test. This is the main weak link of bd team right now. But the current bunch has potential to be good with experience if they are given proper time to develop in different conditions. With experience i hope the current lot can be good.
Thanks for the encouragement. I dont think Id make the top 5 foreigners though...I spend to much time trading barbs with a few "favorites" of mine, lol.