Which Indian players would make it into PSL this year?

[naseem]

Babar azam would not get selected in ipl playing 11. His batting is too slow to bat in top order as an overseas player.

Babar or ny PAK bat is not need in IPL i have said it earlir

 

[tyron_woodley]

Saheen
Amir
Wahab
Junaid
Tanvir
Gul
Naseem
Hasnain
Dilbar
Akif Javed
Sameen gul
Md Musa.....

They will mostly walk into any IPL team as an overseas player...... If isru Udana Curran Pattinson can.... Then they can ALSO MAKE THE CUT

I m not serious about..

Irfan Rahat Sami ......

shaheen amir
wahab
rest no. don't need mediocre fast bowlers. Aaron is probably better than husnain and faster.

 

[naseem]

shaheen amir
wahab
rest no. don't need mediocre fast bowlers. Aaron is probably better than husnain and faster.

Which team Aron is playing..... ??? When he last played......he is just another canon fodder.....Hasnain was picked by TKR the Caribbean wing of KKR.....SRK had watched him live there.....if any team would pick him it would be obviously KKR....just like they picked Ali Khan ......from TKR......Hasnain. didnt feature this year bcoz he was in England...

So ur list is...
Amir
Saheen
Wahab
RAuf.......

I wish u watch few more videos of Naseem Dilbar......along with Rajpoot Udana Undakat NATRAJAN Mavi Avesh .......u will get a clearer view

 

[Mamoon]

Even within the salary cap it wouldn’t make sense to spend a chunk on Chahal or Kuldeep when you have similar or slightly lower level local spinners available. Unless you think Kuldeep, Ashwin etc are going to fetch the same lower tier contract as Chris Green who you named in your post. Perhaps I was overrating these Indian spinners by giving them a contract closer to the top tier than the bottom tier.

Any team using brains would go to upgrade on their batsmen who aren’t close to similar level to some top international batsmen.

Again you are using poor logic. Get on with how player selections and draft picks in such leagues work.

You are overrating Pakistani spinners by suggesting that they are similar or equal to Indian spinners like Kuldeep, Chahal, Ashwin, Jadeja etc.

Our spin bowling stocks are shockingly bad and even worse than Bangladesh and Afghanistan let alone India.

A nothing spinner like Shadab is our first-choice in Limited Overs cricket and a Limited Overs failure like Yasir is still getting PSL contracts.

Forget Kuldeep, Chahal, Ashwin and Jadeja, even Harbhajan would easily get picked.

 

[Rana]

Babar azam would not get selected in ipl playing 11. His batting is too slow to bat in top order as an overseas player.

Yeah and QDK, Aaron Finch, Watson and Warner score at a much quicker pace than he does??

Just because he doesn’t look as flashy as they do with the bat, does not mean he can’t score regularly at a sr of 140-160. He is consistent, which those guys are not.

 

[tyron_woodley]

Which team Aron is playing..... ??? When he last played......he is just another canon fodder.....Hasnain was picked by TKR the Caribbean wing of KKR.....SRK had watched him live there.....if any team would pick him it would be obviously KKR....just like they picked Ali Khan ......from TKR......Hasnain. didnt feature this year bcoz he was in England...

So ur list is...
Amir
Saheen
Wahab
RAuf.......

I wish u watch few more videos of Naseem Dilbar......along with Rajpoot Udana Undakat NATRAJAN Mavi Avesh .......u will get a clearer view

nah others aren't impressive. I already said unadkat, rajpoot are dud fodders who just have good connections.

 

[Banton10]

With sr of 127, Babar would not get into playing 11
Warner,Watson and Finch has sr. over 140 in t20 and qdk has sr of 136 and he is keeper too.
He would not get place over them as opener.

 

[naseem]

nah others aren't impressive. I already said unadkat, rajpoot are dud fodders who just have good connections.

Watch out for National t20......u might find a few........expect Bumrah Sami all are coming fodders

 

[naseem]

With sr of 127, Babar would not get into playing 11
Warner,Watson and Finch has sr. over 140 in t20 and qdk has sr of 136 and he is keeper too.
He would not get place over them as opener.

Recently made 114* of 60 odd......so that SR may be misleading but as I said IPL don't need foreign esp Pak bats....those foreign players are t20 stars tht play in IPL

 

[Rana]

With sr of 127, Babar would not get into playing 11
Warner,Watson and Finch has sr. over 140 in t20 and qdk has sr of 136 and he is keeper too.
He would not get place over them as opener.

Babar is still better than all of them. Babar will easily score at 150 in this IPL

 

[Banton10]

Babar is still better than all of them. Babar will easily score at 150 in this IPL

How is babar azam is better than them with 127 sr?
All have better sr than babar in international t20s too.
Babar would not even get into playing 11 in this ipl.

 

[tyron_woodley]

Watch out for National t20......u might find a few........expect Bumrah Sami all are coming fodders

bumrah
shami
saini
yadav
prasidh krishna
porel
warrier
chahar

are all good for t20

chahar alone would outperform all fodders from psl except amir, wahab and shaheen.

 

[silentkiller187]

not one PSL bowler impressed me. Calibre of batsmen you face matters.
rauf is the only one who is good. I have seen him play BBL. He is good but not extraordinary.

That's like how Mike Tyson beats spinx. ok sure he beat a good fighter. Was that fighter one of the best? no.

He lost to holyfield and Lennox who were the best fighters. He never faced the best fighters when he won his title.

The irony is you can use the same example for the IPL, the batsmen flourish against mediocre bowlers on flat tracks but when they come up against more technically astute players they struggle. Remind me how many W20 india has won? The way their players and the IPL has been spoken of you would assume they were miles ahead of any one else when it came to playing T20 with a near perfect record.

 

[tyron_woodley]

The irony is you can use the same example for the IPL, the batsmen flourish against mediocre bowlers on flat tracks but when they come up against more technically astute players they struggle. Remind me how many W20 india has won? The way their players and the IPL has been spoken of you would assume they were miles ahead of any one else when it came to playing T20 with a near perfect record.

india is the only team to win away in England t20s. so yes india is a top side.

in fact india also beat them at home.

india has 1 WC t20 and several semi final appearances and also a loss in a final.

what has pakistan done? 1 title in 2009. then ?

india's record in t20 vs pakistan and every team. do you want me to go through it?

india only had a losing record vs n.z iirc and india now leveled it with a 5 0 thumping recently.

 

[Rana]

india is the only team to win away in England t20s. so yes india is a top side.

in fact india also beat them at home.

india has 1 WC t20 and several semi final appearances and also a loss in a final.

what has pakistan done? 1 title in 2009. then ?

india's record in t20 vs pakistan and every team. do you want me to go through it?

india only had a losing record vs n.z iirc and india now leveled it with a 5 0 thumping recently.

Lo lololol


Pakistan beat England away in a T20 series with Khalid Latif and Sharjeel Khan. Also they just drew to them. Pakistan were the finalists in 2007, winners 2009, Semi Finals 2010. Unbeaten streak under Sarfaraz for God knows how many series.

Don’t let the current results fool how great a T20i side they are.

 

[Rana]

How is babar azam is better than them with 127 sr?
All have better sr than babar in international t20s too.
Babar would not even get into playing 11 in this ipl.

Oh jaa mama! You clearly have no understanding of cricket if you still can’t see how Babar isn’t better than those guys. He’s clearly too brown for your liking

 

[silentkiller187]

india is the only team to win away in England t20s. so yes india is a top side.

in fact india also beat them at home.

india has 1 WC t20 and several semi final appearances and also a loss in a final.

what has pakistan done? 1 title in 2009. then ?

india's record in t20 vs pakistan and every team. do you want me to go through it?

india only had a losing record vs n.z iirc and india now leveled it with a 5 0 thumping recently.

Thats all well and good, Pak have beaten England as someone already mentioned, and would have been twice had the rain not saved England recently. Pakistans win/loss ratio is only 3% lower than indias since the beginning of t20 internationals so we can see how far ahead IPL has put india. You can always manipulate stats to fit the narrative.

I never compared Pakistan to India as i agree india is the better team overall but i wanted to challenge the myth that IPL is the greatest T20 product and is miles ahead of any league, even if it is, it is only because of the money that allows them to attract all these international names, because the homegrown players have won 1 wt20 and reached 1 wt20 final, the same as Pakistan.

 

[tyron_woodley]

Thats all well and good, Pak have beaten England as someone already mentioned, and would have been twice had the rain not saved England recently. Pakistans win/loss ratio is only 3% lower than indias since the beginning of t20 internationals so we can see how far ahead IPL has put india. You can always manipulate stats to fit the narrative.

I never compared Pakistan to India as i agree india is the better team overall but i wanted to challenge the myth that IPL is the greatest T20 product and is miles ahead of any league, even if it is, it is only because of the money that allows them to attract all these international names, because the homegrown players have won 1 wt20 and reached 1 wt20 final, the same as Pakistan.

ok. well india have become like south africa. india choke alot despite having a great team. Doesn't help when you lose the toss in a major semi final every time as games are often played on used pitches in the later stages.

pakistan are a mercurial team. They do step up in world tournaments. Pakistan are a strong side for cup games but it depends on the format. They did come close to qualifying for semis in 2019. You can never count out.

 

[viveks]

India has generally not been great at T20s but improving recently I think. I would pick Pant, Pandya, Rahul, Bumrah and Chahar. Samson and Shaw would be good bench picks/ good picks if you have no other international players. I'm sure there's other good utility players/bench players you could pick too, but you would have to weigh options and price. Assuming Kohli and Rohit are expensive, I don't feel that would be worth it.

 

[Slog]

You are overrating Pakistani spinners by suggesting that they are similar or equal to Indian spinners like Kuldeep, Chahal, Ashwin, Jadeja etc.

Our spin bowling stocks are shockingly bad and even worse than Bangladesh and Afghanistan let alone India.

A nothing spinner like Shadab is our first-choice in Limited Overs cricket and a Limited Overs failure like Yasir is still getting PSL contracts.

Forget Kuldeep, Chahal, Ashwin and Jadeja, even Harbhajan would easily get picked.

Shadab is a top level T20 bowlers and one of the first picks in international t20 leagues these days. So you are talking nonsense there. For t20 leagues Yasir, Asghar,Nawaz etc also have their utility and as local players they will get picks over international spinner. It will be for same reason why utter dross like Dinda and Unadakat get picked year after year in IPL Eventhough the gulf between them and too international pacers is significantly bigger.

The Indian bowlers you name wouldn’t be easily picked due to 4 international player rule and similar quality local bowlers available. Unless you think they will be on Chris Green
Type contracts they will not get picked because the incremental value they bring wouldn’t be worth a higher tier contract.

 

[shamaan]

The only players who proberly garranteed to play inpsl are
Bumra,kohli,rohit,dhoni

 

[shamaan]

Babar azam would not get selected in ipl playing 11. His batting is too slow to bat in top order as an overseas player.

If you think babar wont get selected in playing xI you are deluded if that's the case then williamson smith also his strike rate is that becouse he bats 20 overs slot of the time and everyone bats around him everyone is reliant on him

 

[Rana]

The only players who proberly garranteed to play inpsl are
Bumra,kohli,rohit,dhoni

Selecting Dhoni would be a backward step. People like Kamran will leach on until the age of 50.

Dhoni is a legend but he is past it. Just like Yuvraj, Afridi, Harbajhan, Malik and Gul. The era is over, let it end.

 

[sweep_shot]

Kohli
Bumrah
Samson
Rohit
Chahal
Jadeja.

 

[hitthestump]

Any of India's top 10-15 batsmen would walk into the PSL.

Bowlers you could make less of an argument for as Pakistan have a lot of 'decent' bowlers without being groundbreaking.

 

[tyron_woodley]

India has generally not been great at T20s but improving recently I think. I would pick Pant, Pandya, Rahul, Bumrah and Chahar. Samson and Shaw would be good bench picks/ good picks if you have no other international players. I'm sure there's other good utility players/bench players you could pick too, but you would have to weigh options and price. Assuming Kohli and Rohit are expensive, I don't feel that would be worth it.

india are powerful in t20 since 2011. india has made a couple of semi finals, a final and will probably win in 2021 or atleast make semis again. india is a top team in all formats

 

[naseem]

india are powerful in t20 since 2011. india has made a couple of semi finals, a final and will probably win in 2021 or atleast make semis again. india is a top team in all formats

India is good after 2013 14....... ..only good....but now on the basis of batting only india is a beast.....in ODIS and T20s at home.....but away....???
I will reserve. My statement till 2021 WC

 

[naseem]

Selecting Dhoni would be a backward step. People like Kamran will leach on until the age of 50.

Dhoni is a legend but he is past it. Just like Yuvraj, Afridi, Harbajhan, Malik and Gul. The era is over, let it end.

Dhoni Yuvi won't have takers.......may be in SLPL....BPL

 

[Mesozoic]

Dhoni Yuvi won't have takers.......may be in SLPL....BPL

Yeah Psl has such golden standards that it only picks players of the calibre of Ronchi and Samit Patel.

 

[Rana]

The delusion! At least 10-12 Indians will walk into PSL sides. But the question is do they want to play for PSL teams?

Yes they would but there are financial constraints and overseas quota caps to look at. There is no reason for to stuff 10-12 Indians into PSL just because they can, 20-30 English players would walk into PSL, IPL or any league also.

Franchises are not fantasy leagues, there is REAL money, REAL contractual obligations and REAL background politics involved. Stop making this a joke about Delusion all the time!

 

[Rana]

Yeah Psl has such golden standards that it only picks players of the calibre of Ronchi and Samit Patel.

When did he disrespect any current Indian superstar?

 

[Mesozoic]

When did he disrespect any current Indian superstar?

When did I say he did ?

 

[Forward Defensive Push]

Yes they would but there are financial constraints and overseas quota caps to look at. There is no reason for to stuff 10-12 Indians into PSL just because they can, 20-30 English players would walk into PSL, IPL or any league also.

Franchises are not fantasy leagues, there is REAL money, REAL contractual obligations and REAL background politics involved. Stop making this a joke about Delusion all the time!

Exactly and that's why PSL can never afford Indian superstars, at least in the current circumstances. Even fielding has-beens like Yuvraj or Dinesh Karthik will really increase the brand value of PSL teams but even they may be difficult to procure to be honest.

 

[Rana]

When did I say he did ?

You clearly want to cause trouble don’t you? He simply said Yuvraj and Dhoni will not get a PSL contract and if they are happy to enter any auction as players then they should be good enough to play other leagues. They probably will not enter any auctions at this age in the first place.

 

[tyron_woodley]

India is good after 2013 14....... ..only good....but now on the basis of batting only india is a beast.....in ODIS and T20s at home.....but away....???
I will reserve. My statement till 2021 WC

india is a top team in tests odi and t20 since 2011.

india is a beast in t20s. india is a beast in odi.

period. home and away. india have won away everywhere.

 

[Rana]

Exactly and that's why PSL can never afford Indian superstars, at least in the current circumstances. Even fielding has-beens like Yuvraj or Dinesh Karthik will really increase the brand value of PSL teams but even they may be difficult to procure to be honest.

Who says they can’t afford Kohli or Sharma? And if these boys were allowed to play without the political tension, I’m sure they would play PSL for whatever is the ceiling offer. If PSL and the franchises are told to up their financial game in order to secure the signature of someone like Kohli, I’m sure the investors would. But there is no chance at the moment anyways, and the fans on this forum don’t want to give it a chance either!

Fawad Rana and Javed Afridi are devout cricket lovers, they probably run more at a loss in PSL but they continue to invest. If they have to cough up $2M to have Kohli or Sharma, they will cough it up.

 

[Mesozoic]

You clearly want to cause trouble don’t you? He simply said Yuvraj and Dhoni will not get a PSL contract and if they are happy to enter any auction as players then they should be good enough to play other leagues. They probably will not enter any auctions at this age in the first place.

No I don't want to cause any trouble. Thanks for asking.

The poster I quoted said "Dhoni and Yuvi won't have any takers in PSL". I just promptly reminded him that Ronchi and Samit Patel have takers so he can make of that what he will.

 

[Forward Defensive Push]

Who says they can’t afford Kohli or Sharma? And if these boys were allowed to play without the political tension, I’m sure they would play PSL for whatever is the ceiling offer. If PSL and the franchises are told to up their financial game in order to secure the signature of someone like Kohli, I’m sure the investors would. But there is no chance at the moment anyways, and the fans on this forum don’t want to give it a chance either!

Fawad Rana and Javed Afridi are devout cricket lovers, they probably run more at a loss in PSL but they continue to invest. If they have to cough up $2M to have Kohli or Sharma, they will cough it up.

Maybe it is not a bad investment to offer higher packages to Indian superstars as they also bring an entirely new market for the franchises to explore and profit from, not to mention the dynamic these guys can bring with them.

Rohit, Kohli, Dhoni, Rahul, Bumrah, Kuldeep, Shami, Samson, Shaw, Gill can light up PSL like no tomorrow.

 

[BalluBalleBaaz]

Kaptaan, Rohit, Gill, Bumrah, Shami, Rahul, Kuldeep, Chahal, Samson, Saini, Kishan, Pandya.

Depending on requirements of each team.

Haven't taken their pay packages into consideration.

 

[cricketjoshila]

Who says they can’t afford Kohli or Sharma? And if these boys were allowed to play without the political tension, I’m sure they would play PSL for whatever is the ceiling offer. If PSL and the franchises are told to up their financial game in order to secure the signature of someone like Kohli, I’m sure the investors would. But there is no chance at the moment anyways, and the fans on this forum don’t want to give it a chance either!

Fawad Rana and Javed Afridi are devout cricket lovers, they probably run more at a loss in PSL but they continue to invest. If they have to cough up $2M to have Kohli or Sharma, they will cough it up.

A Kohli makes around 30mn usd a year. Dhoni around 20mn most top stars make in excess of 10mn.

Leave PSL, Indian stars wont play anywhere else because they are financially very secured.

Just because a $2mn is offered(which i doubt) would be, doesn't mesn Kohli or Rohit etc will take it.It has to be substantially morr for them to take that plunge.

 

[Rana]

A Kohli makes around 30mn usd a year. Dhoni around 20mn most top stars make in excess of 10mn.

At 4-6mn usd, they can buy a psl franchisee. Not play in it.

Leave PSL, Indian stars wont play anywhere else because they are financially very secured.

Just because a $2mn is offered(which i doubt) would be, doesn't mesn Kohli or Rohit etc will take it.

So firstly, PSL can’t afford them

And Secondly, if PSL offers them the asking value of what they get paid in the IPL they won’t take it? We are at a lose lose situation anyways.

Thirdly, they are already financially secure. So why are your fans asking which Indian players will make PSL?

 

[Cric_lover4487]

Frankly, I don't think any Indian player is good enough to play in PSL.

 

[Hasan123]

Rohit
KL
Dhwaan
Iyer
Dhoni
Pant
Pandya
Kohli
Bumrah
Kuldeep
Shami
Saini
Bhuvi
Jadeja
Chahal

A lot of Indian players would be chosen if available for the PSL.