What's new

Who is the most evil person in history to have gotten away scot-free for their crimes?

aarizzler720

Debutant
Joined
Aug 31, 2025
Runs
57
there are people who have done horrible things in their lives, but still got away for e.g Henry Kissinger, Joseph Mengele etc. Who do you think they are, Discuss!
 
George W. Bush.
Netanyahu.
Chaiwala Modi.
Sheikh Hasina.
Tony Blair.
bush led U.S to the greatest economic crisis since the greatest depression. Nethanyu I don't like him and policy against Palestine seems opressive. Not sure avout Modi and Hasina though, Modi is as overrated by his followers as Trump by MAGA, but he has done some good somethings. Hasina did lead them to somewhat economic development, however she has moments of corruption too
 
bush led U.S to the greatest economic crisis since the greatest depression. Nethanyu I don't like him and policy against Palestine seems opressive. Not sure avout Modi and Hasina though, Modi is as overrated by his followers as Trump by MAGA, but he has done some good somethings. Hasina did lead them to somewhat economic development, however she has moments of corruption too

Bush messed up Iraq. Killed many innocent Iraqis and created a power vacuum in Iraq (which eventually caused ISIS).

Netanyahu - Gaza genocide.

Modi - Butcher of Gujarat.

Hasina - Killed many innocent people and looted Billions in Bangladesh (along with her party).

Tony Blair - He was Bush's partner-in-crime in Iraqi invasion.
 
Netanyahu

plain and simple answer... No words needed to prove it.
Netanyahu’s story is not finished yet. He might be jailed for corruption. Obviously not for the genocide so most likely he will get away with that.
 
Leopold II is probably the worst human in the last 1,000 years. What he did in Congo is unforgivable and horrific.

Gengish Khan is another one. A brutal monster who massacred civilisations.
 
Except Zia-Ul-Haq, most Pakistani military dictators had it pretty easy. I think Yahya had to live under house arrest in a luxurious bungalow in his later years but both Ayub and Musharraf had it pretty easy.

I expect your current dictator - Munir will also get a sweet retirement in a few years.
 
Leopold was one of the most horrible men in recent history.

Some of the evil Nazis who conducted experiments on human beings also managed to quietly slip into the background.
 
Except Zia-Ul-Haq, most Pakistani military dictators had it pretty easy. I think Yahya had to live under house arrest in a luxurious bungalow in his later years but both Ayub and Musharraf had it pretty easy.

I expect your current dictator - Munir will also get a sweet retirement in a few years.
It's actually quite funny.

All the political leaders are ( probably correctly) accused by the public of being corrupt, murderers, evil people and the army guys just come and chill.
 
I am surprised one of Britain's greatest heroes hasn't been mentioned yet given the amount of Indian posters we have here. Just heard a few of his quotes again this week and it was truly mind boggling stuff.
 
It's actually quite funny.

All the political leaders are ( probably correctly) accused by the public of being corrupt, murderers, evil people and the army guys just come and chill.
It's a good gig as a military dictator if you can get it. And unless you're an absolute homicidal maniac, Pakistani military dictator is probably one of the best assignments even in the military dictator job category. The cream of the cream so to say.

Worst case, you **** off the wrong people and get quietly put away with a mango bomb (I'd love to go out that way to be honest). Best case, you take a quiet retirement with billions in the bank.

None of the rude being imprisoned or hanged or dragged through the streets stuff that happens in some countries.

Pakistani civilian Prime Minister on the other hand, is one of the worst jobs going. Hanged, murdered, bombed, jailed - not a chance of it turning out well. It's a testament to the power of human avarice that people still want it.
 
It's not Bibi.

Bibi for all his evil is still a public face thus his actions are reported accordingly.

The real evil that gets away scott free is the Western banking cartel, run by of course the Zionists.

Financial crash - who from the proven fraudulent banks such as Lehman's/Bear Sterns faced the music? Zilch.

Real evil is not what you see but what influences.

Remember who funded both sides of the World Wars - The effing Zionist bankers.
 
I am surprised one of Britain's greatest heroes hasn't been mentioned yet given the amount of Indian posters we have here. Just heard a few of his quotes again this week and it was truly mind boggling stuff.
Churchill? Wouldn't Pakistanis also be equally abhorred by that monster and not just the Indians? We (in the context of our ancestral origins and our forefathers) were all affected by him, right?
 
Idi Amin spent the rest of his life living in luxury in Saudi Arabia. Even Pol Pot spent the rest of his life moldering in a jungle even though he got away too
I absolutely hate the fact that Idi Amin was given a cushy life by the Saudis just because he converted to Islam. Nothing about him says he is a true muslim.
 
I absolutely hate the fact that Idi Amin was given a cushy life by the Saudis just because he converted to Islam. Nothing about him says he is a true muslim.
His name is "Id+Amin" so wasn't be already Muslim???

Id = Eid
 
His name is "Id+Amin" so wasn't be already Muslim???

Id = Eid
Yes by birth classification. His father converted to Islam (not sure about mother) in 1910 so technically he was born into a muslim household. His mother being a priestess in the "Yakanye Order" and family being strongly tied to African Kakwa and Lugbara ethnic roots leads me to believe they were not strict adherents of Islam per se. He seemed to have taken up stricter adherence to Islam to get protection from the Saudis and in my mind this seems like a "born again" Christian scenario and hence I used the word converted.
 
Concur with most of these names.

Will add Kim Il Sung and his rotten family for overseeing the most repressive regime on the planet.

Forget democracy, even mild Chinese-style reforms could've prevented so much misery and starvation for the North Korean people.
 
MBS - the butcher of Yemen. Enjoys positive global press because of some cosmetic social reforms. Instead of palling around with boxers and mixed martial artists - he should be in front of a judge.
 
Is North Korea as repressive as they say it is? Some of the stuff is unbelievable. For example, if you have dust on a picture of dear leader aka Rocket Man, you go to a prison camp for 20 years or something like that.
 
Leopold II, easily.

Another notable mention is Shirō Ishii of Japanese bioweapon Unit 731. Pure evil, and got away with it by selling his secrets to the US for his freedom.

 
I absolutely hate the fact that Idi Amin was given a cushy life by the Saudis just because he converted to Islam. Nothing about him says he is a true muslim.
Idi Amin was born a Muslim. His father converted to Islam in 1910.
 
Xi Jinping and what he’s doing to Uyghur Muslims. Kutta of the highest order. Some absolute shocking and horrific stories from some of the brothers and sisters who survive those concentration camps, may Allah save them all.

Sad that it’s not getting much coverage, and even sadder that Muslim countries instead of coming together are in bed with these monsters.

Mao Zedong as well while we’re at it.

Everybody that I wanted to say has been mentioned.

Will also put Firawn and Abu Jahl at the forefront for their crimes against humanity. There is a reason Allah chose them as the worst of the worst examples.
 
According to chat gpt, it is the below:

King Leopold II of Belgium (1835–1909)


  • Crimes: Under his private rule of the Congo Free State (1885–1908), millions of Congolese died from forced labor, starvation, and disease. His regime mutilated and terrorized entire communities for rubber and ivory profits.
  • Consequence: Leopold never faced trial; he died wealthy and respected in Belgium, though modern historians regard him as one of history’s most murderous colonial rulers.
  • Why it fits: He committed atrocities comparable in scale to the Holocaust yet was never punished.
 
"if Independence is granted to India, power will go to the hands of rascals, rogues, freebooters; all Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They will have sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight amongst themselves for power and India will be lost in political squabbles. A day would come when even air and water would be taxed in India"

Well his prophecy on water does seem to be coming to fruition.
 
Churchill? Wouldn't Pakistanis also be equally abhorred by that monster and not just the Indians? We (in the context of our ancestral origins and our forefathers) were all affected by him, right?
British empire gets a relatively clean chit from Indians and Pakistanis, outside of academic circles.

From an Indian Hindu perspective the British empire isn't referenced too much, their obsession seems to be on Mughals. Modi had a day of mourning for the death of the Queen, can you imagine him commenting the death anniversary of a Mughal emperor?

Pakistanis let it slide too. You would expect Muslims to be a bit more upset. British deposed the legitimate Muslim rulers, during multiple rebellions under British rule, Indian armed forces consisting of Hindus and Muslims tried their best to restore the Mughals to the throne.

Yet during the partition, Muslims were only given a small part of India, and undeserving Hindus ended up with the big chunk of the country on their lap for nothing!

If the British wished to exit fairly, the Mughals should have been restored.
 
It has to be Mao. China wasn't even at war and about a 100 million people supposedly died in the 1950s and 60s due to his politics.
 
British empire gets a relatively clean chit from Indians and Pakistanis, outside of academic circles.

From an Indian Hindu perspective the British empire isn't referenced too much, their obsession seems to be on Mughals. Modi had a day of mourning for the death of the Queen, can you imagine him commenting the death anniversary of a Mughal emperor?

Pakistanis let it slide too. You would expect Muslims to be a bit more upset. British deposed the legitimate Muslim rulers, during multiple rebellions under British rule, Indian armed forces consisting of Hindus and Muslims tried their best to restore the Mughals to the throne.

Yet during the partition, Muslims were only given a small part of India, and undeserving Hindus ended up with the big chunk of the country on their lap for nothing!

If the British wished to exit fairly, the Mughals should have been restored.



Pakistanis don't really care about Britain. They just see this country as an ATM.
 
It's not Bibi.

Bibi for all his evil is still a public face thus his actions are reported accordingly.

The real evil that gets away scott free is the Western banking cartel, run by of course the Zionists.

Financial crash - who from the proven fraudulent banks such as Lehman's/Bear Sterns faced the music? Zilch.

Real evil is not what you see but what influences.

Remember who funded both sides of the World Wars - The effing Zionist bankers.

Spot on. The names known in the modern history are mere puppets of evil. The real evil is not seen openly.

Evil is more of a concept than any individual, all are influenced by some sort of evil idea, nobody is born evil.

The banking crooks who use interest to enslave are up there as leaders of evil in the world. Over the last 100 years or so , upto 500 million or more have been killed for their profits.

We dont need to name them
 
No idea. I am not a Pakistani.
Neither am I, and I'm an American who grew up in the US with a full on American accent. But both our ancestors were Pakistanis in the context of Churchill's timeline. The more accurate and timeline relevant contextualization for people like us when referencing colonial Pakistan/India is identifying with South Asians and not with the colonial oppressors.
 
Dick Cheney, the one who orchestrated the whole invasion of Iraq on a false pretense, resulting in a massive loss of life and throwing the whole region in turmoil which its still trying to recover from even now after nearly 25 years
 
I got an interesting not so famous one. I knew this thanks to a couple of guys from Sri Lanka in our local softball social league thanks to whom I got interesting anecdotes about the Sri Lankan civil war.

Adele Balasingham - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adele_Balasingham

This is a British lady who was married to this senior level LTTE leader and actively pushed for recruiting child soldiers. She escaped back to the UK when the LTTE was on the verge of losing. She is now living a peaceful life in the UK. The BBC did some righteous expose on the Sri Lankan army atrocities but they have conveniently covered up their own British citizen who committed these acts, never been prosecuted for her actions and is allowed to live a peaceful life in the UK now.

Some neutral reference hinting at her recruiting "girls" - https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/wps/27/ I'm not posting the SL govt references here since people can say it is biased. What is also interesting is that there were many links for her actions and mentions in her wikipedia page but it is completely "white washed" now.

Remember Shamima that the UK prosecuted for returning from ISIS, depriving her citizenship etc? Why the double standards for Adele, cuz she is white?
 
Warren Anderson - thousands died because of his careless and harmful methods of management of union carbide factory in india, and thousands more born defective after the disaster for years to come.(bhopal gas disaster)
 
Shiro Ishii. Americans decided his "research" was too valuable for anything to happen to him after WW2.

Other Japanese military leaders couldn't stomach to watch the footage of things done at the Unit 731 Ishii was director of.
 
I am going to go off on a slight tangent. Rather than focus on particular individuals, I think it is worth reflecting on the type of thinking that enabled many figures, in the modern period, to justify horrific acts, whilst believing that they were ushering in a new and better world.

There is an argument that the French Revolution from 1789 was the first ‘modern’ revolution in the sense that the participants believed in historical progress, and who saw society and the human condition as something malleable that could be intentionally re-made. The revolution was imagined as the harbinger of a new world order marked by reason and justice.

As we fast forward to the twentieth century, there were inspiring visions of a better world but also visions that led to terrifying outcomes. The atrocities committed by revolutionary movements in the twentieth century were far from being pathological or a reversion to pre-modern barbarism. They were in fact connected to the process of modernisation. They were a product of the modern industrial, bureaucratically organised society. Notions of rationalisation and instrumental rationality, grand visions of a revolutionary remaking of society, were central to the horrific acts.

The British philosopher, John Gray, perceptively noted:

“The death camps of Nazi Germany and the gulags of Soviet Russia and Maoist China killed many millions of people, far more than in any earlier century. Yet it is not the number of the dead that is peculiarly modern. It is the belief that as a result of these deaths a new world would be born. In former times, the Inquisition tortured and killed on a large scale; but it did not imagine it would remake the world through terror. It promised salvation in the world hereafter, not paradise in the world below. In contrast, in the twentieth century, industrial-scale killing by states of their own citizens has been practised in the belief that the survivors will live in a world better than any that has ever existed.”

Ideologues (and many obscure planners and bureaucrats) saw mass deaths as purificatory and as a prelude to the making of a brave new world. If many “got away” with their crimes it was partly because of the type of thinking that prevailed.
 
Back
Top