What's new

Who should be the next PCB Chairman?

Who should be the next PCB Chairman?


  • Total voters
    78

Salman

ODI Debutant
Joined
Sep 1, 2001
Runs
9,668
Next chairman of the PCB ?

Will need to be someone who can carry on the good work done by Sethi's administration so far with resumption of international cricket and improve the domestic structure and facilities.

Wasim Akram - Would be interesting if he made chairman for a while, probably lacks as an administrator but an ideal person to interact with the ICC and other boards in working towards the resumption of international cricket in Pakistan.

So who are the likely candidates be on IK's list going to be ?
 
Arif Abbasi
Ehsan Mani
Retain Najam Sethi
Zaka Ashraf
Shahryar Khan
Or any other??

What do you think?
 
Ehsan Mani - a just man who will put cricketing interests at heart. His experience as ICC chairman will put him in good stead for this role as well.
 
anyone appointed now will be on a temporary basis.
He will have to have the skills to change or amend the current system and put into places a system of checks and balances.

This could be a 2 to 3 year appointment. Then you can have a vote for the next chairman and the current chairman can be included in that... two or four year term and no more then two terms at one time.

With a strong governing body the chairman will almost become just a figure head.
 
I voted for Ehsan Mani because I don't think IK will allow Sethi to run the PCB.

But honestly wouldn't mind if Sethi was retained.
 
Retain Sethi - turned PCB into a relatively professional unit.
 
Although Sethi has done a relatively good job, sack him. Anyone hired politically and not based on merit should be sacked. Bring in a new face who has the best interest of Pakistan Cricket at heart.
 
Misbah up Haq as PCB Chairman - the guy talks sense, is educated with MBA, has demonstrated his leadership qualities , understands modern cricket and keeps out of controversies , no ego which is a great quality.

As for his deputy as Director of Operations at PCB, I would like to nominate Mohammed Hafeez -- The Professor being in full time employment in an office job can only be beneficial to Pakistan cricket.
 
Misbah up Haq as PCB Chairman - the guy talks sense, is educated with MBA, has demonstrated his leadership qualities , understands modern cricket and keeps out of controversies , no ego which is a great quality.

As for his deputy as Director of Operations at PCB, I would like to nominate Mohammed Hafeez -- The Professor being in full time employment in an office job can only be beneficial to Pakistan cricket.



Maafi bhai
 
Let Sethi continue for another year I say. There are bigger matters to deal with and Sethi has done a good job so far.
 
Misbah up Haq as PCB Chairman - the guy talks sense, is educated with MBA, has demonstrated his leadership qualities , understands modern cricket and keeps out of controversies , no ego which is a great quality.

As for his deputy as Director of Operations at PCB, I would like to nominate Mohammed Hafeez -- The Professor being in full time employment in an office job can only be beneficial to Pakistan cricket.

Bhaijan, maaf kardein. Will throw our cricket back to dark ages.
 
:facepalm: baas duniya mein aek ehsan mani reh gya hai.

He already got his chance, move on from this guy for gods sake.

You guys need to understand that Imran Khan supports the Australian set up. If that set up comes into Pakistan then the baord of directors will be abolished, because the board is made up of senior representatives from Port Qasim, UBl and other department Cricket teams.

Chairman means nothing, its the board of directors and the president of the local baords like rawalpindi, lahore etc.

PSL chairman is also really important aswell, and i hope Sheryar stays
 
Sethi has done a great job. He didn't poke into Misbah's captaincy, he let that run smooth. He took recommendations made captains and finally got sarfraz in place. Got Mickey Arthur.

But Sethi most important accomplishment is PSL. He is running it smoothly.

PSL is very delciate, If Imran messes this up, he could mess up the PSL completely.
 
I think Ehsan Mani would be a good choice.

A few guys involved in Pakistan cricket suggesting that Arif Abbasi might be the favoured choice.
 
I think Ehsan Mani would be a good choice.

A few guys involved in Pakistan cricket suggesting that Arif Abbasi might be the favoured choice.

Arif Abbasi is a diploma holder with no qualifications in corporate world. He would be a horrible choice.
 
PCB is different affairs all together, why people even suggest cricketers can be the best bet for PCB. PCB chairman job is not to play cricket on the field, its more into how good relations he has inside the Pakistan and at ICC level, can his fellow cricket chairman's take him seriously or side with him.

ONE REALLY DON'T NEED PERSON WITH CRICKETING BACKGROUND to be a PCB CHAIRMAN. SOMEONE WITH BUSINESS BACKGROUND AND PROFESSIONALISM can handle it.
 
Sethi is doing a good job but Ehsan Maani would be a far far better person for the job.
 
Best is, hire someone from outside to run PCB. enough of internal candidates and politics.
 
Chairman really doesn’t matter as long as Cricket is most popular sport in your country.BCCI is run by court still our cricket is in far better shape.
 
Ehsan Mani to become new PCB chairman

I heard reports that Wasim Akram was in line to become the PCB chairman, which was confusing because it makes no sense. However, from someone I know, who is in PTI and very close to Imran Khan revealed that Ehsan Mani will most likely become the new chairman of the PCB. Along with a list of other people for other jobs. I think this is probably the best we could do for now, the man has experience, is an accountant, has knowledge of cricket and represented the ICC in the past. Definitely a step in the right direction and a great improvement on Sethi, who has done a decent job, but nothing to improve the domestic and grass roots level structure.

Looks like a step in the right direction!
 
Najam has done good, however, we can still do better.

None of these names are good enough. Need someone with excellent relations around the cricketing world, not necessarily previous job as PCB chief or some other chief.

Wasim is good.

You need people with good contacts and PR.
 
Mani will be really bad.

Not bold enough or creative enough to take good decisions.
 
Mani will be terrible .... the world of cricket has moved on from his ICC days.

Does pcb head have to be Pakistani? Open a competitive process for all to apply.
 
IK should have focused on other matters first and tackled Sethi later. Sethi got things going which could have provided IK extra time to talk to better candidates + planning.
 
Mani will be terrible .... the world of cricket has moved on from his ICC days.

Does pcb head have to be Pakistani? Open a competitive process for all to apply.

You cannot expect Mani to improve Pak domestic either. If you appoint Mani then you need a CEO as well who knows Pak domestic. Someone like Bazid, Mudasser who agree with IK's vision of regional cricket.

Bazid infact has very interesting ideas.
 
Last edited:
I would've voted for Sethi, but its pretty well known Sethi himself is deciding to quit...
 
Mani will be terrible .... the world of cricket has moved on from his ICC days.

Does pcb head have to be Pakistani? Open a competitive process for all to apply.

How?

Mani (along with Speed) was the one who established the T20 world cup and pushed for it. The man is a financial wizard, has several connections in the ICC, and knows how to manage large institutions.

Don't forget Mani slammed Shehryar Khan for being a "traditionalist" and not thinking out of the box. Shehryar didn't want T20 cricket to flourish and Mani immediately tackled the notion. Look at how successful T20 cricket has become for the ICC.
 
Imran Khan wont compromise on performance so whoever it is going to be he will be someone who can make the difference.
 
Arif Abbasi is a diploma holder with no qualifications in corporate world. He would be a horrible choice.

Probably not talking about the PTI politician Arif Abbasi but former PCB chairman and PIA head Arif Ali Khan Abbasi. Won't be a bad choice except he would be pretty old now given he headed the PCB in the mid nineties.
 
Would ICC allow and appointment? I think now the only way is through elections as Shaharyar Khan and Najam Sethi came.
 
Majid Khan as Chairman, Ehsan Mani CEO, Najam Sethi Advisor, not sure about who should be director cricket though
 
if my choice, i will go for

Mudasar nazar

He is only a Coach who has an eye for talent and is brilliant in this regard. But he isn't an administrator at all, he has no experience in this field and is a bad choice for this role
 
Sethi has done a great job. He didn't poke into Misbah's captaincy, he let that run smooth. He took recommendations made captains and finally got sarfraz in place. Got Mickey Arthur.

But Sethi most important accomplishment is PSL. He is running it smoothly.

PSL is very delciate, If Imran messes this up, he could mess up the PSL completely.

Shahryar Khan hired Mickey.
 
Ehsan Mani will be a great choice, knows ins and outs of not only ICC but BCCI also. All these Manohars, Srinivasan's etc grew in front of him.

He is a financial wizard, can bring money and investment into Pak cricket
 
Keep Sethi, he's done a good job, why the change.

Players got to play under Imran from sifarish as well, iirc Saeed Anwar was one, but he delivered the goods and so kept his place. Same with Sethi here.

Got the PSL up and running, saw good recruitments like Mickey and Inzi under him.
 
Keep Sethi, he's done a good job, why the change.

Players got to play under Imran from sifarish as well, iirc Saeed Anwar was one, but he delivered the goods and so kept his place. Same with Sethi here.

Got the PSL up and running, saw good recruitments like Mickey and Inzi under him.

But seems he himself do not want to continue.. That tweet was the most rustic gesture he showed to his future boss.

No doubt he has shown progress, but he is not sensible, thats for sure!!
 
Whoever comes, we want very strong leadership and representation at ICC level. Someone who can start doing things from the word GO. Sethi, unfortunately, showed his more political inclination rather than professional one. So, he is any way ruled out from the position.

And thats why I do not see anyone beyond Ehsaan Mani. Even he is reluctant to take for longer term, but can be caretaker of PCB till next world cup.
 
It won’t happen but Bazid Khan (don’t think his dad would want it)

Bazid should just be the CEO and focus on domestic affairs. Someone else can take the administrator role (chairman) without interfering in Bazid's matters.

Sethi had guys like Subhan, but Bazid is ten times better than the people Sethi had for cricketing matters.
 
Keep Sethi, he's done a good job, why the change.

Players got to play under Imran from sifarish as well, iirc Saeed Anwar was one, but he delivered the goods and so kept his place. Same with Sethi here.

Got the PSL up and running, saw good recruitments like Mickey and Inzi under him.

Mickey and Inzi were under SK, not Sethi.
 
Majid and Mani both are excellent choices but IK will be criticized for appointing any of them. Majid is his cousin and Mani is a member of Board of Governors of Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital.
 
I will support anyone who is good in the corporate world. We don't need cricketers for the top post. What Pakistan requires is someone who understands the business side of things and not someone who knows the rules of an LBW. With the amount of sponsorships in play in today's world, you cannot expect a person who does not have much experience in marketing or business to succeed as PCB Chairman. Today's day and age is exclusively money-driven and to keep your head above water you need someone who excels at bringing in the dollars.
 
Majid Khan has very little interest in cricket these days.

In fact media have tried to speak with him in recent times about cricket but he mostly refuses.

If he has no interest in cricket then I don't see him wanting to be PCB Chairman.
 
Among the last 10-12 Chairmen, I was most impressed by Arif Ali Khan Abbasi. But, he must be close to 80 now and out of cricket/administration for long time. Among recent cricketers, I don't think apart from Rameez or Misbah anyone has the required academic background to serve the role. Wasim can be a fantastic Director cricket, for his 20+ years of career in PAK & Counties, also over a decade in media.
 
Decision time coming up soon - will there be a change?
 
Majid and Mani both are excellent choices but IK will be criticized for appointing any of them. Majid is his cousin and Mani is a member of Board of Governors of Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital.

EHsan Mani has had his turn.

WHy keep bringing him back?

Its like hes the only one left for CHairman
 
EHsan Mani has had his turn.

WHy keep bringing him back?

Its like hes the only one left for CHairman

Fasten your seat belt then a news paper reported Shakeel Sheikh met Imran Khan in bani gala :facepalm:
this guys is the biggest opporunist in PCB i hope the news is false

DjnsQhMXsAEaAfs.jpg:small
 
If not Majid (because of his health) i would love to see Bazid as PCB Chairman or at least head of domestic cricket but that will result in a whole campaign against IK in media.
 
Fasten your seat belt then a news paper reported Shakeel Sheikh met Imran Khan in bani gala :facepalm:
this guys is the biggest opporunist in PCB i hope the news is false

DjnsQhMXsAEaAfs.jpg:small

Any chance that this is (unfunny) satire? :dw
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">In fact its chugging along nicely! <a href="https://t.co/hwxSwqmdE0">https://t.co/hwxSwqmdE0</a></p>— Najam Sethi (@najamsethi) <a href="https://twitter.com/najamsethi/status/1025435564399648769?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 3, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Javed Afridi lobbying for Sethi?
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">.<a href="https://twitter.com/najamsethi?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@najamsethi</a> has performed remarkably as PCB/PSL Chairman. PM <a href="https://twitter.com/ImranKhanPTI?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@ImranKhanPTI</a> will win love of cricket fans if he worked with him to further uplift PCB/PSL. Personally acknowledged his 24/7 efforts for the revival of cricket and bringing back cricket into our home grounds.</p>— Javed Afridi (@JAfridi10) <a href="https://twitter.com/JAfridi10/status/1026067076975214593?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 5, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
I will support anyone who is good in the corporate world. We don't need cricketers for the top post. What Pakistan requires is someone who understands the business side of things and not someone who knows the rules of an LBW. With the amount of sponsorships in play in today's world, you cannot expect a person who does not have much experience in marketing or business to succeed as PCB Chairman. Today's day and age is exclusively money-driven and to keep your head above water you need someone who excels at bringing in the dollars.

The PCB's mission is not to make money per se, but to foster cricket in Pakistan, cultivating young talent, etc etc. Money is a means to that end. And there are things that can be done without money. Most people would agree that there are serious shortcomings in basic organizations, support for youth, even things like List A team touring, which need to be addressed, quite apart from the question of funding. Any organization can hire a marketing manager, but the head of the organization has to know about more than business.
 
I think the current Pakistan chairman has done enough to stay on.
 
If they're not going to retain Sethi, then I will go with Misbah-ul-Haq.
 
Reports suggest that new PM is all set to remove Najam sethi and other political appointments in pcb and regions as well.
 
The PCB's mission is not to make money per se, but to foster cricket in Pakistan, cultivating young talent, etc etc. Money is a means to that end. And there are things that can be done without money. Most people would agree that there are serious shortcomings in basic organizations, support for youth, even things like List A team touring, which need to be addressed, quite apart from the question of funding. Any organization can hire a marketing manager, but the head of the organization has to know about more than business.

and the shortcomings, the support, the touring, needs to be self funded - hence making money

the more profitable the board is, the better it can spend on CAPEX / R&D to better its product (i.e. cricket and its players the assets)

The way it can be profitable is to have a very astute management team (CEO who knows how to drive growth in his top line and a strong CFO, who knows how to manage a very low base OPEX!)

If in Pakistan, best way is to search and hire any current CEO, who has strong turnaround experience, or worked in a sector where competition is fierce. It doesnt matter if he has relevant sector experience or not

Now if we come to candidates

1) Shakeel Shaikh - by the looks of it he has been a journalist, with managing a city board (islamabad)
2) Najam Sethi - journalist, with managing the country's board
3) Arif Ali Abbasi - Army background with managing country board
4) Ehsan Mani - Chartered Accountant ex ICC chairman

however Ehsan Mani's brother (Dilawar Mani) can also be a candidate - Chartered Accountant, ran a healthcare business (sold it for 3x multiple) Runs an education nursery business (currently in process to exit to a Private Equity) Was chairman for Emirates Cricket Board. He knows how to make money, drive growth. Ran his own professional services firm in the UK - Was once also a partner in a top ten accounting firm


The more profitable PCB is the more it can spend on bettering its product.

To make money it needs a man on top that doesnt give in to these media mafia that low ball the broadcasting and sponsorship rights!. Why does it happen even now, because these media and sponsor businesses have shrewd CEOs who negotiate hard and know that PCB has no where to go or leverage!.

You need a man who creates a competitive process for these broadcasting rights and sponsorships and do a better job at selling the Pakistan cricket product in its current state.

What you need is a shrewd narcissistic CEO, single minded, tunnel vision CEO, who doesnt care what people say, but make Pakistan Cricket marketable and profitable

Any of the PSL CEOs would also be a good idea - One's who made their franchise profitable!. No Javed Afridi himself is looking for a CEO (before anyone mentions his name)

If I am the PE guy and PCB is my asset, I would even interview Salman Sarwar Butt, the guy who put all of PSL in to motion, contrary to what people think Najam and Shahryar did.

It was him, who put together the whole team, the scheduling, speaking to potential investors, doing the management presentations. The chap is an ex banker used to work for ABN AMRO

The moment I think of PCB as a non profit organisation, then I am playing catch up with other boards! as India, CA and ECB run it as any other organisation where objective is to create shareholder's wealth, which is connected ofcourse to bettering the quality of their product
 
Misbah-ul-Haq should be the new PCB chairman if Sethi is definitely going to be removed

Bazid Khan should be appointed to oversee domestic cricket affairs
 
and the shortcomings, the support, the touring, needs to be self funded - hence making money

the more profitable the board is, the better it can spend on CAPEX / R&D to better its product (i.e. cricket and its players the assets)

The way it can be profitable is to have a very astute management team (CEO who knows how to drive growth in his top line and a strong CFO, who knows how to manage a very low base OPEX!)

If in Pakistan, best way is to search and hire any current CEO, who has strong turnaround experience, or worked in a sector where competition is fierce. It doesnt matter if he has relevant sector experience or not

Now if we come to candidates

1) Shakeel Shaikh - by the looks of it he has been a journalist, with managing a city board (islamabad)
2) Najam Sethi - journalist, with managing the country's board
3) Arif Ali Abbasi - Army background with managing country board
4) Ehsan Mani - Chartered Accountant ex ICC chairman

however Ehsan Mani's brother (Dilawar Mani) can also be a candidate - Chartered Accountant, ran a healthcare business (sold it for 3x multiple) Runs an education nursery business (currently in process to exit to a Private Equity) Was chairman for Emirates Cricket Board. He knows how to make money, drive growth. Ran his own professional services firm in the UK - Was once also a partner in a top ten accounting firm


The more profitable PCB is the more it can spend on bettering its product.

To make money it needs a man on top that doesnt give in to these media mafia that low ball the broadcasting and sponsorship rights!. Why does it happen even now, because these media and sponsor businesses have shrewd CEOs who negotiate hard and know that PCB has no where to go or leverage!.

You need a man who creates a competitive process for these broadcasting rights and sponsorships and do a better job at selling the Pakistan cricket product in its current state.

What you need is a shrewd narcissistic CEO, single minded, tunnel vision CEO, who doesnt care what people say, but make Pakistan Cricket marketable and profitable

Any of the PSL CEOs would also be a good idea - One's who made their franchise profitable!. No Javed Afridi himself is looking for a CEO (before anyone mentions his name)

If I am the PE guy and PCB is my asset, I would even interview Salman Sarwar Butt, the guy who put all of PSL in to motion, contrary to what people think Najam and Shahryar did.

It was him, who put together the whole team, the scheduling, speaking to potential investors, doing the management presentations. The chap is an ex banker used to work for ABN AMRO

The moment I think of PCB as a non profit organisation, then I am playing catch up with other boards! as India, CA and ECB run it as any other organisation where objective is to create shareholder's wealth, which is connected ofcourse to bettering the quality of their product

I understand that to you and quite a few others on this board , every human endeavor can be reduced to a business metaphor, every wisdom boiled down to management jargon. But beyond the more existential
question of whether we actually want to live in a world where cricket teams, let alone actual living people, talk of themselves as 'brands'? Can we ask, what does it even mean to say that cricket is the PCB's 'product'? what on earth is the applicability here of the notion of 'R&D.'

Sure most of the things that are done to encourage cricket require some money, but it's pretty easy to establish empirically on the basis of historical experience that 1) money alone is not always sufficient solution, 2) when money is not available it is advisable to look for alternative solutions 3) companies and corporate leaders do not always do it better.

if we can't trust corporations to deliver better electricity, train services, or mail, as california, the uk, and germany have learned, respectively, when they went to privatize such utilities, why would we expect corporations to be better at encouraging a phenomenon so rooted in sociality and community, as is cricket in pakistan?

What basis is there for thinking that the success of half the companies in Pakistan owes to much more than a combination of well placed influence peddling, i.e. corruption, and the basic privilege, enjoyed by some, of having capital to invest when others don't, as opposed to sound growth strategies and what not?

towards the end of the 1990 i worked for a very prestigious us company whose job it was to suss out what exactly what is the usefulness of management expertise, and the overarching conclusion, based on thousands of interviews with Fortune 500 managers, was that there was little empirically sound evidence to suggest that management expertise made much of a difference. needless to say, this underlying conclusion had to be covered up in various creative ways, because the company in question, my employer, had to sell its own so-called expertise .
 
Last edited:
Back
Top