Who will have a more disputed, tainted and despicable legacy: Justice Munir, Qazi Faez Isa or Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhary?

Who has a more controversial and tainted legacy?


  • Total voters
    18

Article 63-A verdict apparently intended to weaken no-confidence motions: CJP Isa​


Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa on Monday raised concerns over the inconsistent interpretation of Article 63-A, which governs the disqualification of lawmakers, during a Supreme Court hearing on review petitions related to the disqualification of defecting members of the National Assembly.

The chief justice called for adherence to the constitution’s text, emphasising the need for clarity in the application of the law.

Presiding over a five-member bench, Chief Justice Isa questioned the contradiction in rulings that suggest a lawmaker should be de-seated upon defection while also leaving it to Parliament to decide the duration of the disqualification.

"If the constitution clearly states that a disqualified member will be de-seated, then that is the action that must be followed," Isa said, highlighting that there should be no ambiguity in implementing the constitution’s provisions.

The case revolves around Article 63-A, which deals with the disqualification of members of Parliament for defying party directions during critical votes.

The Supreme Court is reviewing its earlier decision in the case, which ruled that the votes cast by dissident lawmakers would not be counted, and left it to Parliament to legislate on the duration of their disqualification.

PTI lawyer raises concerns over bench formation

The hearing began with Barrister Ali Zafar, representing the petitioner, raising objections to the formation of the bench.

He expressed concerns about the replacement of Justice Muneeb Akhtar with Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan in the five-member bench.

Chief Justice Isa assured the counsel that his concerns would be heard at a later stage in the proceedings, urging him to proceed with the arguments.

Chief Justice Isa also stressed that the Supreme Court is operating transparently, with no decisions being made behind closed doors.

"These days, nothing is happening behind closed doors in the Supreme Court. The larger bench is now complete, and we can begin the proceedings," he stated.

Contradictions in article 63-A interpretation

During the hearing, Chief Justice Isa pointed out a significant contradiction in the previous ruling.

He remarked that the decision to de-seat a lawmaker for defying party directions should be straightforward, but the involvement of Parliament in determining the disqualification period adds complexity.

He questioned how the decision-making process could be left to both the judiciary and Parliament, calling it a "clear contradiction."

"On one hand, the ruling states that a defecting member should be de-seated, but on the other hand, it allows Parliament to decide the length of disqualification.

This is contradictory," the Chief Justice said, urging that the constitution's wording should be the sole basis for such decisions.

Review of presidential reference

The case has its roots in the presidential reference filed by President Arif Alvi in March 2022, during the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) government.

The reference sought the Supreme Court’s opinion on whether the votes cast by dissident lawmakers could be counted and whether their actions would lead to disqualification.

In response to the reference, a five-member Supreme Court bench, led by former Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial, issued a verdict in May 2022.

The court ruled that the votes of dissident lawmakers should not be counted and that the Parliament could legislate on the period of their disqualification.

The decision was reached with a 3-2 majority, with Justices Ijaz-ul-Ahsan, Muneeb Akhtar, and the Chief Justice ruling in favour of the disqualification, while Justices Jamal Khan Mandokhail and Mazhar Alam Miankhel dissented.

Supreme Court divisions

The hearing also revealed the divisions within the Supreme Court over the interpretation of Article 63-A. Chief Justice Isa remarked that there has been growing criticism regarding how the Supreme Court is handling such sensitive matters.

Source: The Express Tribune
Qazi allowing the kidnapping and bribery of MNAs with this re-opening and overturning and allowing his own extension. What a corrupt thug he is
 

CJP Isa rejects PTI’s 'baseless' objection to Article 63-A bench formation​


The Supreme Court of Pakistan, led by Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa, has rejected Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf’s (PTI) objections against the bench formed to hear the review petition on Article 63-A.

The objections were raised during the case's hearing on Wednesday, where the PTI argued that the bench had been constituted improperly, but the Chief Justice firmly dismissed these claims.

PTI's legal counsel, Barrister Ali Zafar, argued that the bench’s formation did not follow proper legal procedures and that the party had not been notified adequately in advance about the hearing.

Zafar contended that this lack of notice compromised the fairness of the proceedings and demanded that the bench be reconstituted according to legal norms.

Chief Justice Isa swiftly rejected PTI’s objections as baseless.

He clarified that the bench's formation was in full compliance with judicial procedures, stating, “We all agreed as a court to reject the objections raised against the bench’s legality.”

The Chief Justice reiterated that the decision was unanimous among the judges.

The hearing turned tense when PTI lawyer Tayyab Mustafain Kazmi threatened the court by claiming that hundreds of PTI lawyers were prepared to prevent an unfavourable ruling.

Chief Justice Isa responded sternly, questioning whether Kazmi expected the country's institutions to be governed by threats. “We will continue with these proceedings regardless of the pressure,” the Chief Justice stated, making it clear that the judiciary operates independently.

Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail added that there is a worrying trend of criticising the judiciary when rulings do not favour certain political parties.

“Judges are not here to be influenced by threats or public pressure,” he remarked, underscoring the importance of judicial independence in Pakistan’s democracy.

Despite the heated exchanges, Chief Justice Isa instructed Barrister Ali Zafar to proceed with his arguments.

PTI’s objection to the bench formation was dismissed, and the hearing continued.

The court reaffirmed that the judiciary would not be influenced by external pressures and would continue its work impartially.

The case revolves around PTI’s review of the Supreme Court’s earlier interpretation of Article 63A, which deals with disqualifying lawmakers who defy party policies.

The decision on this matter holds significant implications for political discipline within Pakistan's party system, making the ongoing case a focal point of political interest.

 
Article 63-A review: Ali Zafar ‘boycotts’ hearing after Imran denied permission to appear via video link

The Supreme Court on Thursday appointed Senator Ali Zafar as amicus curiae to assist the court in a review petition against its 2022 verdict related to the defection clause under Article 63-A of the Constitution.

The decision came after Zafar, who is PTI founder Imran Khan’s counsel, announced that he was boycotting the proceedings on his client’s objections over the bench.

Through its May 17, 2022 verdict, the SC had declared that the vote cast contrary to the parliamentary party lines under Article 63-A should not be counted.

Article 63-A aims to restrict the voting powers of lawmakers by making them bound to the decision of the “Party Head” — whoever is formally declared the head of the party. The penalty for violating Article 63-A is disqualification from the National Assembly and the vacation of the defecting lawmaker’s seat, the Constitution states.

A five-member bench — headed by Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Qazi Faez Isa and also including Justices Naeem Akhtar Afghan, Aminuddin Khan, Jamal Khan Mandokhail, and Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel — resumed hearing today the review plea filed by the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) in June 2022.

Justice Afghan had been included after Justice Munib Akhtar — part of the bench that originally heard the case — and senior puisne judge Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah successively chose not to sit on the larger bench.

In a previous hearing, CJP Isa had poked holes in the opinion rendered by the previous larger bench. On Wednesday, the court dismissed objections raised by Zafar, Imran’s counsel, on the bench’s constitution in light of a recent amendment ordinance.

During today’s hearing, Zafar said he did not wish to be part of the case if his client was not being allowed to appear via video link. However, CJP Isa then asked him to assist the court, which he agreed to.

The hearing

At the outset of the hearing, CJP Isa inquired Zafar if he was able to meet Imran as per the court’s directives, to which the lawyer replied in the affirmative.

“Yes, I met him yesterday but it was not in private. There were jail authorities present during the meeting,” Zafar lamented. He stated that Imran wanted to speak before the court himself and present his arguments via video link.

“Okay, let’s move forward. You may present your arguments,” the chief justice said, addressing Zafar, who replied that Imran be allowed to put forward his contentions first.

“Ali Zafar sahib, you are a senior lawyer and a senator as well. You know how court proceedings work,” Justice Isa noted.

The PTI senator then stated that Imran had objections on the bench. “If the permission for the PTI founder to appear via video link is not granted, then he has told me to state a few things before the court,” Zafar said.

The lawyer insisted that he has to work according to the directions of his client, at which the top judge remarked, “You are not only your client’s counsel but also an officer of the court.”

Justice Mandokhail also recalled: “We have also been lawyers [but] we did not listen to every directive of our client. We only followed what was as per the law.”

Here, CJP Isa observed that five minutes had been “wasted” over the issue, at which Zafar said he would be done with his argument and out of the courtroom in seven minutes. “Very good, we also want the same,” the CJP quipped.

Zafar then pointed out that the government wanted to bring some amendments, referring to the proposed constitutional package for which the ruling coalition is trying to garner the required support after a failed first attempt to introduce its draft in the parliament.

“If you have to talk about this, then start from the beginning,” Justice Mandokhail said. “You are not letting me say what I want to,” the lawyer replied, at which CJP Isa remarked that Zafar was speaking about politics “so that there could be headlines tomorrow” about it.

Continuing with his arguments, Zafar said the proposed amendments had given an “impression that horse-trading was being allowed”, reiterating Imran’s earlier statements.

At this, the top judge said the court could initiate contempt of court proceedings against Zafar for saying so. “We respect you, you should respect us as well. By claiming horse-trading, you are making a huge statement,” CJP Isa stressed.

“What is horse-trading? You would be embarrassed if we told you,” he added.

Imran’s counsel argued that the court’s ruling on Article 63-A “prevented horse-trading”, at which Justice Mandokhail clarified that the apex court had “given an opinion, not a judgment”.

Zafar then announced boycotting the proceedings: “PTI founder has said the constitution of the bench is not right. [Therefore,] we will not be part of this case.”

He went on to say that if the CJP was part of the bench deciding on the review petition, it would be a “conflict of interest”. “Whatever you are saying, we will neither listen to it nor make it part of the case record,” Justice Isa observed.

He then asked Zafar if he had any objection if the court appointed him as an amicus curiae, to which the lawyer replied he had no issues. Subsequently, Zafar was told to assist the court as an amicus curiae, rather than contesting the case as Imran’s lawyer.

DAWN NEWS
 

PTI's lawyer Kazmi arrested for misconduct towards CJP Faez Isa​


Tayyab Mustafain Kazmi - a lawyer representing Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) - was arrested on Thursday for his unruly behavior during a Supreme Court hearing, which was presided over by Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa.

The incident took place as the court reviewed petitions regarding Article 63-A, a constitutional clause pertaining to the disqualification of lawmakers.

Kazmi was taken into custody by Islamabad police from F-7/4 and subsequently transferred to the Secretariat Police Station. His disruptive conduct included making threats of opposition against the court's ruling, stating that “500 PTI lawyers were prepared to oppose any ruling against the party.”

Tensions escalated during the hearing when Kazmi openly challenged the bench’s legitimacy, criticizing the judiciary and demanding the removal of two judges, Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan and Justice Mazhar Alam Mian Khel. Chief Justice Isa firmly addressed Kazmi’s defiance, asserting, “You cannot run the courts through intimidation. We will continue with the proceedings, no matter how much opposition we face.”

The Chief Justice had earlier cautioned Kazmi about his behaviour, stating, “Do you want institutions to be run through threats? My only fault is that I have always shown patience.” As Kazmi persisted in his outburst, the Chief Justice ordered police intervention to maintain courtroom decorum.

Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail, also part of the bench, expressed serious concern regarding the increasing trend of targeting judges following unfavorable rulings, remarking, “This behaviour is unacceptable. We are here for the integrity of the institution, not for money or power. The judiciary must remain independent.”

Kazmi eventually exited the courtroom, refusing to continue his arguments, leading to his subsequent arrest. This incident followed a significant ruling by the Supreme Court, which overturned a 2022 decision regarding Article 63-A.

The court ruled that votes from defecting lawmakers should be counted, a decision that alters the legal interpretation of this constitutional provision. A detailed judgment is expected to follow the unanimous short order issued by the bench.

 

PTI’s Alvi accuses CJP Isa of fostering floor-crossing to prolong tenure​


Former president and Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) leader Dr Arif Alvi has accused Chief Justice of Pakistan Qazi Faez Isa of creating an atmosphere conducive to floor-crossing, driven by a "lust" to extend his tenure.

Alvi likened Isa's actions to those of the current government, which he alleged is "ruining the Constitution for its survival."

“I have never seen a chief justice like Faez Isa in my life,” Alvi said while speaking to reporters at the Anti-Terrorism Court, where he met with PTI lawmakers arrested in connection with the May 9 riots following the arrest of PTI founder Imran Khan.

Alvi went on to criticise the chief justice, stating, "He has damaged the country more than Justice Munir," referencing the controversial former judge who was criticised for judicial overreach in the 1950s.

The former president expressed concern over what he described as a "bazar of cruelty," claiming that the CJP had opened "a market for buying and selling people, like how slaves were once sold in America."

Alvi also questioned the timing of the invocation of Article 63-A, which deals with defection, claiming it was unnecessary and only served to prolong Faez Isa’s tenure. He stressed the need for judicial reforms in the lower courts to provide justice to the public, instead of what he saw as efforts to extend each other's tenures.

Regarding PTI's rallies, Alvi said that the police were solely responsible for the violence and chaos at the rallies. "PTI's rallies are peaceful; it's the police who create anarchy," he stated.

When asked about the ongoing situation in Gaza and Palestine, Alvi thanked Iran for its response to Israel and urged Muslim countries not to forget the plight of Muslims in Gaza, Palestine, and Kashmir.

“Israel is acting like a hooligan, and Muslims must stand united. Quaid-e-Azam’s vision was for a single state with a Palestinian majority,” he said.

 
PTI and its allies should introduce a no confidence motion against the govt. Bribe the opposition MNA's and make promises of seat adjustments. If this is how the other side wants to play the game then fair enough play it that way.
 
PTI and its allies should introduce a no confidence motion against the govt. Bribe the opposition MNA's and make promises of seat adjustments. If this is how the other side wants to play the game then fair enough play it that way.
Not going to work. The govt uses the billions of loans to buy votes. Beghairat Qazi set us back decades.
 
What a shame!
====

An Islamabad anti-terrorism court has granted a four-day physical remand for Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) lawyer Mustafin Kazmi, following accusations of misbehaving with Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa

The ruling was delivered by Judge Tahir Abbas Supra during a court hearing on Friday.

Kazmi was presented before the court, represented by lawyers Emaan Mazari and Rizwan, among others. During the hearing, prosecutor Raja Naveed read out the First Information Report (FIR) detailing the charges against Kazmi.

The defence argued that all individuals named in the FIR were lawyers, to which the prosecutor responded, "No one is above the law."

Judge Supra questioned who has the authority to determine who is above the law, following which the prosecutor requested a nine-day physical remand for Kazmi. However, the court approved a four-day remand and adjourned the case until October 8.

Kazmi’s arrest came following allegations of inappropriate behaviour towards Chief Justice Isa, leading to the current legal proceedings.

Day beofre yesterday, lawyers belonging to the PTI gathered outside the Supreme Court to protest the formation of a bench hearing the review petition on the court's interpretation of Article 63-A of the Constitution.

Inside the courtroom, PTI's counsel warned the bench of consequences if an unfavorable ruling was issued.

Despite the noisy protest outside, the hearing of the review petition continued. The case was heard by a five-judge larger bench, also including Justice Aminuddin Khan, Justice Jamal Mandokhail, Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan and Justice Mazhar Alam Miankhel.

During the hearing, PTI's counsel, Tayyab Mustafain Kazmi, threatened the bench, stating that 500 lawyers were protesting outside and that he would see how the bench gave the decision against the PTI. Kazmi warned the bench of dire consequences if the verdict went against his party.

Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa condemned the threat, asserting, "We will not tolerate insults." He asked the lawyer if he believed the country's institutions should be run through threats and intimidation, emphasizing his patience in the face of such behavior.

The chief justice then asked Kazmi, "How many members of parliament were sent to jail by former chief justice Saqib Nisar?" Kazmi replied that the current bench was not incorrect, adding, "The PTI is the victim in this case."

Angered, the chief justice called for the police.

Tayyab Mustafain Kazmi was arrested by Islamabad police on Thursday.

Kazmi was taken into custody from F-7/4 and transferred to the Secretariat Police Station following his disruptive behaviour during proceedings on Article 63-A review petitions.

Source: Dawn News
 
Lol am reading inspite of QFI issuing the 63-A review verdict in the establishment and govt's favour, this is now creating more problems for them and the numbers game is getting further out of their control because now a lot of PML N and PPP MNA's who were against the amendments can potentially vote against them without fearing any consequences and Diesel is refusing to support the amendments either.

QFI is running out of time.
 
Lol am reading inspite of QFI issuing the 63-A review verdict in the establishment and govt's favour, this is now creating more problems for them and the numbers game is getting further out of their control because now a lot of PML N and PPP MNA's who were against the amendments can potentially vote against them without fearing any consequences and Diesel is refusing to support the amendments either.

QFI is running out of time.
Don't believe this. The retarded Munir will force the puppets to vote for it at gun point. The Qazi has opened up the floor crossing for his benefit and when the PTI MNAs are kidnapped( and families) and forced to vote the Qazi can jerk off in his chair.
 
What a shame!
====

An Islamabad anti-terrorism court has granted a four-day physical remand for Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) lawyer Mustafin Kazmi, following accusations of misbehaving with Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa

The ruling was delivered by Judge Tahir Abbas Supra during a court hearing on Friday.

Kazmi was presented before the court, represented by lawyers Emaan Mazari and Rizwan, among others. During the hearing, prosecutor Raja Naveed read out the First Information Report (FIR) detailing the charges against Kazmi.

The defence argued that all individuals named in the FIR were lawyers, to which the prosecutor responded, "No one is above the law."

Judge Supra questioned who has the authority to determine who is above the law, following which the prosecutor requested a nine-day physical remand for Kazmi. However, the court approved a four-day remand and adjourned the case until October 8.

Kazmi’s arrest came following allegations of inappropriate behaviour towards Chief Justice Isa, leading to the current legal proceedings.

Day beofre yesterday, lawyers belonging to the PTI gathered outside the Supreme Court to protest the formation of a bench hearing the review petition on the court's interpretation of Article 63-A of the Constitution.

Inside the courtroom, PTI's counsel warned the bench of consequences if an unfavorable ruling was issued.

Despite the noisy protest outside, the hearing of the review petition continued. The case was heard by a five-judge larger bench, also including Justice Aminuddin Khan, Justice Jamal Mandokhail, Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan and Justice Mazhar Alam Miankhel.

During the hearing, PTI's counsel, Tayyab Mustafain Kazmi, threatened the bench, stating that 500 lawyers were protesting outside and that he would see how the bench gave the decision against the PTI. Kazmi warned the bench of dire consequences if the verdict went against his party.

Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa condemned the threat, asserting, "We will not tolerate insults." He asked the lawyer if he believed the country's institutions should be run through threats and intimidation, emphasizing his patience in the face of such behavior.

The chief justice then asked Kazmi, "How many members of parliament were sent to jail by former chief justice Saqib Nisar?" Kazmi replied that the current bench was not incorrect, adding, "The PTI is the victim in this case."

Angered, the chief justice called for the police.

Tayyab Mustafain Kazmi was arrested by Islamabad police on Thursday.

Kazmi was taken into custody from F-7/4 and transferred to the Secretariat Police Station following his disruptive behaviour during proceedings on Article 63-A review petitions.

Source: Dawn News
He called Qazi a fraud. How is this an act of terror.
 
Don't believe this. The retarded Munir will force the puppets to vote for it at gun point. The Qazi has opened up the floor crossing for his benefit and when the PTI MNAs are kidnapped( and families) and forced to vote the Qazi can jerk off in his chair.

Opening up floor crossing can work both ways. Their were reports that a lot of PML N and PPP MNA's were unhappy with the constitutional amendments and did not want to vote in favour of it but were bound by the rules that you cannot go against party lines and your votes will not count. Now they can vote as per their conscience.

If PTI keeps up their pressure on the streets the security forces could be stretched thin.
 
Opening up floor crossing can work both ways. Their were reports that a lot of PML N and PPP MNA's were unhappy with the constitutional amendments and did not want to vote in favour of it but were bound by the rules that you cannot go against party lines and your votes will not count. Now they can vote as per their conscience.

If PTI keeps up their pressure on the streets the security forces could be stretched thin.
Those guys that won on form 47s, which is 80% of Nooras and most of the PPP won't care about right and wrong and will never cross the floor.
 
What a bizarre logic
====
Vice Chairman of the Pakistan Bar Council (PBC), Farooq H. Naek, announced on Wednesday that the establishment of a constitutional court in Pakistan will lead to the appointment of two chief justices

Naek explained that one chief justice will preside over the new federal constitutional court, while the other will lead the Supreme Court of Pakistan. The chief justice of the constitutional court will have a term of three years, with an age limit of 68 years.

He also mentioned that the performance of constitutional court judges could be reviewed, with recommendations for their removal or further action made to the Judicial Commission if necessary. A committee will be formed to propose names for the position of chief justice of the constitutional court.

Earlier, Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari expressed his party’s support for the formation of the constitutional court. Speaking to the Balochistan High Court Bar Association, he urged legal professionals to accept the constitutional courts as mandated by the Constitution, stating, “If you don’t accept the constitutional courts, you should leave the practice.”

JUI-F to introduce its own judicial package

Amid a continuing political standoff between the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N)-led ruling coalition and Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl (JUIF) Chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman, the latter has now proposed to constitute a constitutional bench within the Supreme Court instead of creating a separate Federal Constitutional Court (FCC).

Though pollical impasse stays over the proposed constitutional package between the two sides, developments till Tuesday led JUI-F officials to say that the party was preparing its own constitutional amendment package, which includes a proposal to set up a constitutional bench within the incumbent apex court instead of establishing a new FCC over the Supreme Court.

While sharing details about the proposal, the JUI-F officials said that the party wishes to suggest that a five-member bench should be constituted, which should only deal with constitutional matters.

They said that it has not yet been finalized if the incumbent judges should be a part of the bench or new judges should be hired for the purpose.

The official also said that the party was busy contemplating the criteria which will be used if new judges are appointed in the incumbent apex court, saying ensuring merit as well as age, qualification, experience, among other things, of would-be judges is the key in this matter.

Emphasising that the JUI-F was not interested in enacting person-specific legislation, they shared that party's constitutional package was expected to be finalised soon and it will be shared with everyone to develop broader consensus in order to avoid a situation which was created last time when the ruling alliance made an attempt to pass constitutional amendments.

Commenting on news reports about a purported breakthrough between JUI-F and the ruling alliance over the constitutional package, a JUI-F official said that several meetings have taken place to deliberate on the issue but to declare that things have already been finalized would be too early to say. He said the meetings mostly focused on agreeing on a common minimum agenda regarding constitutional court.

The clarification came after media reports on Tuesday suggested that government had succeeded in persuading Maulana, saying amendments regarding constitutional court and judges' appointment in it would be completed in the first phase in sessions called soon after Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit.

As opposed to the reports claiming that Maulana has given his consent to the government over constitutional package, a JUI-F official said the reports have surfaced after the ruling coalition made another attempt to convince Maulana on its proposed constitutional package on Monday when he went to the Presidency to take part in a multiparty moot on the Palestine issue.

Source: The Express Tribune
 
Full court reference for outgoing CJP Qazi Faez Isa set for Oct 25

The full court reference for outgoing Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Qazi Faez Isa has been scheduled for October 25, according to a letter from the Supreme Court registrar.


The development emerged in a letter, a copy of which is available with Dawn.com, from Supreme Court Registrar Jazeela Aslam dated today to Supreme Court Bar Association President Shahzad Shaukat.

Justice Mansoor Ali Shah is next in line to be the country’s top judge after CJP Isa’s retirement.

Since August, there have been rumours that the government was planning to extend CJP Isa’s tenure in office. Sources within the ruling coalition had claimed that some crucial amendments were on the cards. Without elaboration, a source had said the amendments would be tabled in the house through a supplementary agenda, indicating that it may be about a uniform extension in the retirement age of superior court judges.

The opposition has opposed any such move, with PTI Founder Imran Khan warning of a nationwide protest if the chief justice’s tenure was extended.

In an informal talk with reporters in Islamabad after addressing a full court to mark the beginning of the new judicial year, CJP Isa was asked about his reportedly agreeing to an extension “if it was applied to all judges”.

Dismissing the claims made by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s political adviser Rana Sanaullah that CJP Isa would accept the proposal if the age limit was extended for all judges, the top judge had reiterated that he had refused any extension to his tenure.

However, the Supreme Court had subsequently regretted that “an off-the-record conversation between CJP Isa and journalists” was unnecessarily and largely inaccurately reported and published, resulting in “unwarranted sensationalism”.

A press release issued with the signature of CJP’s Secretary Dr Muhammad Mushtaq Ahmad had explained that “giving unnecessary attention and importance to individuals detracts from what was important — institutions — and it be ensured that they serve the people”.

Biography

Born in Quetta on October 26, 1959, CJP Isa is the son of the late Qazi Mohammad Isa of Pishin, who was in the forefront of the Pakistan Movement and a close associate of Quaid-i-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah.

CJP Isa’s father was the first person from the province to acquire the Bar-at-Law degree and helped establish the All India Muslim League in Balochistan after his return from London. His father had served as the only member on the Central Working Committee of the All India Muslim League from Balochistan.

Begum Saida Isa, CJP Isa’s mother, was a social worker and worked in an honorary capacity on the boards of hospitals and other charitable organisations which focused on education, children and women’s health issues.

After completing his primary and secondary education in Quetta, Isa moved to Karachi to finish his ‘O’ and ‘A’ levels from the Karachi Grammar School (KGS). He then went on to study law from London, where he completed his Bar Professional Examination from the Inns of Court School Law, London.

CJP Isa enrolled as an Advocate of the Balochistan High Court on January 30, 1985, and as an Advocate Supreme Court in March 1998.

He has practised law for over 27 years before the High Courts of Pakistan, the Federal Shariat Court and the Supreme Court of Pakistan. He became a member of the Balochistan High Court Bar Association, Sindh High Court Bar Association and Life Member of the Supreme Court Bar Association of Pakistan.

From time to time, he was called upon by the High Courts and the Supreme Court as amicus curiae and rendered assistance in certain complicated cases. He has also conducted international arbitration.

CJP Isa took oath as a judge of the Supreme Court of Pakistan on September 5, 2014, and was sworn in as the 29th chief justice on September 17, 2023, for 13 months.

He lives in Islamabad with his wife and has two children and a granddaughter.

DAWN NEWS
 

CJP Isa-led bench to hear petition seeking to block constitutional package​


The Supreme Court will take up next week a petition seeking to declare proposed constitutional amendment proposed by the coalition government, aimed at introducing judicial reforms including establishing separate court to hear constitutional matters, "ultra vires" the Constitution.

A three-member bench of the apex court headed by Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Qazi Faez Isa will hear the case on October 17. The bench will also include Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan and Justice Shahid Bilal Hassan, according to a supplementary cause list issued by the registrar's office.

The petition was filed by former Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) president Abid Shahid Zuberi, Shafqat Mahmood, Ishtiaq Ahmed, Shahab Sarki, Munir Kakar and others.

In a constitutional petition filed under Article 184(3), the apex court has been requested to set aside the proposed amendments and declare them "ultra vires" the Constitution, principle of separation of powers, independence of judiciary and fundamental rights enshrined under the law.

"It is prayed that the separation of powers and independence of the judiciary and its powers and functions to enforce the fundamental rights be kindly declared as sacrosanct under the Constitution and beyond the power and competence of the Parliament to withdraw, interfere or tamper with in any manner whatsoever,” the petition read.

The petitioners requested the court to restrain the federal government from tabling the bill, order the suspension of the operation of the proposed amendments, and stop it from being signed into law by the president of Pakistan even if it sails through both houses of parliament.

The constitutional package, among other things, aims to set up a federal constitutional court and fix the tenure of the Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) for three years.

The government had attempted to present the bill to amend the Constitution last month, but its allies as well as members from the opposition benches vehemently opposed the proposal, forcing the the rulers to begin a consultation process.

It is pertinent to mention here that CJP Isa is set to retire on the 25th of this month. A full court reference for the outgoing top judge has been scheduled for the said date.

 

Elections Act amendment cannot retroactively undo July 12 verdict, reaffirm 8 SC judges​


The Supreme Court of Pakistan has reiterated that amendments made to the Elections Act cannot be applied retroactively to alter its July 12 ruling.

In a detailed clarification issued by eight judges on Friday, the court responded to applications from the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) and Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), both seeking clarification on the impact of recent changes to the law governing elections.

The clarification was made in light of the ECP’s query regarding the legal effect of the Elections (Second Amendment) Act, 2024. The ECP argued that amendments to Sections 66 and 104, along with the addition of Section 104-A, had altered the legal landscape and sought the top court’s guidance on whether its July 12 judgment—delivered before the amendments—still held force.

PTI, in a separate application, contended that the Supreme Court’s judgment was based on constitutional principles and should not be overridden by legislative changes. It argued that the amendments could not retroactively affect the judgment, particularly concerning the allocation of reserved seats in parliament.

The Supreme Court had earlier ruled on a case concerning the allocation of reserved seats for women and minorities. The court’s July 12 judgment emphasised proportional representation for political parties in line with the number of general seats won, under Articles 51 and 106 of the Constitution. The amendments made by parliament were seen as an attempt to adjust this allocation process, prompting the ECP’s request for clarification.

In its latest response, the Supreme Court reaffirmed its original stance, making it clear that the amendments could not undermine the judgment retrospectively. "The effect of the amendment made in the Elections Act cannot undo our judgment with retrospective effect," the judges stated in the two-page clarification.

The court explained that its original ruling had provided a "window" for parties to seek clarification, should any misunderstanding arise before the release of the detailed reasons. However, with the detailed reasons now issued, the apex court said there was no need for further clarification.

"The judgment of this court has binding effect in terms of Article 189 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, and should have been implemented," the clarification read. It emphasised that the amendments made after the July 12 decision had "no bearing" on the ruling and that the ECP was legally bound to implement it in full.

The court granted the original relief to uphold the right of political parties to proportional representation in reserved seats, which it deemed a constitutional requirement. "The commission [ECP] is bound to implement the judgment passed by the Supreme Court of Pakistan, in its letter and spirit, without seeking any further clarification."

The clarification was signed by eight of the Supreme Court’s senior judges, including Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, Justice Munib Akhtar, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Ayesha A. Malik, Justice Athar Minallah, Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Justice Shahid Waheed, and Justice Irfan Saadat Khan.

Previously, National Assembly Speaker Sardar Ayaz Ayaz Sadiq had issued a forceful letter to the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP), urging it to respect parliamentary sovereignty in the allocation of reserved seats to the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI).

The letter comes on the heels of a Supreme Court judgment that had ruled that independent candidates, after winning elections, could join political parties and alter their political allegiance followed up by a note released by eight SC judges directing ECP to implement the judgment at the earliest.

On July 12, the Supreme Court declared PTI a parliamentary party and held that PTI was eligible to get reserved seats that were earlier distributed among other parties in the national and provincial assemblies.

However, in response, parliament passed the Elections (Second Amendment) Act, 2024, which imposes new restrictions on party-switching by independent candidates and overrides the Supreme Court’s ruling.

The decision to issue a second clarification reflects the ongoing legal debate surrounding the Elections Act amendments. The amendments, introduced by parliament earlier this year, added a new section, 104-A, and modified existing provisions to retroactively impact the allocation of reserved seats—a move seen by critics as an attempt to counterbalance the court’s ruling.

However, the Supreme Court’s clarification has put the matter to rest, stating unequivocally that its ruling stands unaffected. The judgment, the judges reaffirmed, is final and binding under the Constitution, and no legislative action can be used to subvert it retroactively. The court directed its office to forward the clarification to the ECP and PTI and to upload it on the official website for public access.

 

Mansoor Ali Shah will be next chief justice, asserts Fawad Chaudhry​


Former federal minister Fawad Chaudhry claimed that Justice Mansoor Ali Shah would be the next chief justice of the Supreme Court.

Sharing his message on social media site X, Fawad Chaudhry hailed the draft of Maulana Fazlur Rehman on the appointment and performance of high courts judges, saying it was credible.

He stated the appointment of judges would not be made on the principle of seniority.

The 12-member committee needed 2/3 majority which could only be met through support of opposition, therefore Mansoor Ali Shah would be the CJP, Chaudhry emphasised.

He stressed that the concept of constitutional bench was reasonable and there was no problem in finalising rules for appointment on benches.

Declaring the constitutional amendment unfavorable for the chief election commissioner, he said the fear and chaos created for this amendment was unfathomable.

The amendment could be made through dialogue but Pakistan’s image was disgraced globally.

 
Sp from now on there will be 2 CJ's with lot of shuffling and rotations in courts. Surely the country already devoid of any rule and law sunk to a new level.
 

CJP Qazi Faez Isa throws out PTI's review plea on intra-party polls​


Supreme Court of Pakistan Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa has dismissed the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party's review petition challenging the decision regarding its intra-party elections.

The Chief Justice noted in the court's order that the PTI lawyers failed to present any substantial arguments on the merits of the case.

 
Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari stressed on Tuesday the need for reaching consensus over the appointment of the next chief justice of Pakistan

According to details, the former foreign minister had held a telephonic conversation with the parliamentary committee members. He had given special instructions of the PPP leaders, who are part of the committee.

“The decision over the appointment of the next chief justice of Pakistan should be made through consensus,” Bhutto-Zardari stated.

“The committee members should make efforts to make decisions through consensus,” he added.

Source: Samaa News
 
Justice Yayha Afridi nominated as next CJP

The Special Parliamentary Committee on Tuesday recommended Justice Yahya Afridi’s name to be the next chief justice of Pakistan (CJP), ARY News reported.

Incumbent CJP Qazi Faez Isa is set to retire on October 25, 2024 and will be replaced by Justice Yahya Afridi, who is third in the seniority list.

Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar also confirmed the development and said that the Special Parliamentary Committee has taken the decision with two-thirds majority.

Meanwhile, the committee sent Justice Yahya Afridi’s name to Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif who will forward the same to President Asif Ali Zardari for final approval.

The Special Parliamentary Committee, formed after the 26th constitutional amendment, held its meeting with nine out of 12 members in attendance to deliberate the three names for a top judge slot.


 
Justice Yayha Afridi nominated as next CJP

The Special Parliamentary Committee on Tuesday recommended Justice Yahya Afridi’s name to be the next chief justice of Pakistan (CJP), ARY News reported.

Incumbent CJP Qazi Faez Isa is set to retire on October 25, 2024 and will be replaced by Justice Yahya Afridi, who is third in the seniority list.

Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar also confirmed the development and said that the Special Parliamentary Committee has taken the decision with two-thirds majority.

Meanwhile, the committee sent Justice Yahya Afridi’s name to Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif who will forward the same to President Asif Ali Zardari for final approval.

The Special Parliamentary Committee, formed after the 26th constitutional amendment, held its meeting with nine out of 12 members in attendance to deliberate the three names for a top judge slot.


In the space of 2.5 years we have gone from a developing democracy to a country that is totally in the grip of an evil mafia.

So we have the new crook in charge of the Judiciary. We know that this mafia will never nominate anyone honest or law abiding. If Afridi had any sense of Justice he would turn their criminality on its head.
 
Senior lawyer and senator Hamid Khan has urged Justice Yahya Afridi to reject the government’s offer to assume the role of chief justice early, advising him to wait for his "rightful turn"

Speaking at a press conference at the Lahore High Court Bar Association on Wednesday, Hamid emphasised that accepting the position prematurely could damage Afridi's reputation.

"Yahya Afridi should wait for his turn and preserve his honour and name. The government’s offer is designed to create divisions within the judiciary," Hamid said.

He also criticised the outgoing Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Qazi Faez Isa, accusing him of causing significant harm to the judiciary and the Constitution.

He called on lawyers across the country to observe October 25 as a "day of liberation" to mark the end of Isa’s tenure.

The press conference, attended by Lahore High Court Bar President Asad Manzoor Butt and other legal professionals, highlighted growing concerns within the legal fraternity regarding recent constitutional amendments.

Hamid claimed that the recently passed amendments, including the appointment of the third-ranking judge as chief justice, were aimed at "undermining" the judiciary.

"The country is facing a severe constitutional crisis. These amendments are an assault on the judiciary, just like Israel’s attacks on Gaza. We, the legal community, reject these unconstitutional amendments," Hamid added.

He further remarked that Pakistan’s legal system should only recognise the senior-most judge as the chief justice and warned that attempts to interfere with this process would erode public trust in the judiciary.

In addition to his remarks on Afridi, Hamid criticised political interference in judicial matters and called for greater transparency in the appointment of judges.

Source: Dawn News
 
Nice to witness awe-inspiring Holy Kabbah instead of watching Donut
====
Justice Mansoor Ali Shah will depart for Makkah on Thursday to perform Umrah. He is expected to return after the swearing-in ceremony of the new Chief Justice of Pakistan

Sources indicate that Justice Shah will be unable to attend the farewell reference for outgoing Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa and the swearing-in ceremony of the incoming Chief Justice, Justice Yahya Afridi.

He will be traveling with his family and is scheduled to return on November 1.

A full court reference will be held on October 25 in honor of Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa, with Chief Justice-designate Yahya Afridi also addressing the event.

President Asif Ali Zardari will administer the oath of office to Justice Yahya Afridi as the new Chief Justice of Pakistan on October 26 at 11:00 AM in a ceremony at the President’s House, with 300 guests in attendance.

Justice Shah’s absence will mean he will miss both the farewell and swearing-in events.

Source: Aaj News
 

Farewell lunch in honour of outgoing CJP Faez Isa on Friday​


A lunch ceremony will take place in honour of the outgoing Chief Justice Faez Isa in the Supreme Court building on Friday.

The event is being organised by the nominated CJP Justice Yahya Afridi.

Sources said that alongside the luncheon, Chief Justice Isa will be presented with gifts as part of the farewell ceremony.

Besides, sources revealed that the inauguration of the Supreme Court’s new Monument of Fundamental Rights, currently under construction, is scheduled for tomorrow. Chief Justice Isa, along with other judges, will formally inaugurate the monument.

It's noteworthy that Justice Isa had earlier declined a lavish farewell dinner, citing that he did not wish to spend Rs 2 million of public funds on the event.

 

Farewell lunch in honour of outgoing CJP Faez Isa on Friday​


A lunch ceremony will take place in honour of the outgoing Chief Justice Faez Isa in the Supreme Court building on Friday.

The event is being organised by the nominated CJP Justice Yahya Afridi.

Sources said that alongside the luncheon, Chief Justice Isa will be presented with gifts as part of the farewell ceremony.

Besides, sources revealed that the inauguration of the Supreme Court’s new Monument of Fundamental Rights, currently under construction, is scheduled for tomorrow. Chief Justice Isa, along with other judges, will formally inaugurate the monument.

It's noteworthy that Justice Isa had earlier declined a lavish farewell dinner, citing that he did not wish to spend Rs 2 million of public funds on the event.

The crook needs to be dragged out of office like the common criminal he is. He will rot in hell and as the dust settles, you will see the role of his horrific wife come into full view. If he comes to the UK and is seen on public, he will see real PKs show him what they think of him. It won't be just verbal
 
Youm-e- Tashakur will be celebrated across the country led by JuiF tomorrow on removal of Dobermann ala QFE
 
What an embarrassment, 6 SC judges skipped it
====
The Supreme Court of Pakistan, alongside the Pakistan Bar Council hosted on Thursday night, a farewell dinner to honor outgoing Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa

According to details, the event was attended by the newly-appointed Chief Justice Yahya Afridi and several other senior judges. Notable attendees included Justices Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Aminuddin, Jamal Mandokhail, Hasan Azhar Rizvi, and Irfan Saadat, as well as Ad Hoc Judges Sardar Tariq Masood and Mazhar Alam Mian Khel.

Also present were Justices Musrat Hilali, Naeem Akhtar Afghan, and Aqeel Abbasi, along with Chief Justice of Islamabad High Court Amir Farooq and Justices Mohsin Akhtar Kayani, Mian Gul Hassan, and Arbab Tahir.

Lahore High Court Justice Alia Neelam also graced the occasion.

Notably absent from the farewell gathering were Justices Muneeb Akhtar, Athar Manullah, Ayesha Malik, and Shahid Waheed. The evening served as a moment to reflect on Justice Isa's contributions and to welcome the new leadership under Chief Justice Afridi.

Source: Samaa News
 

Humbled CJP Isa says 'I learned most from lawyers' at farewell reference​


Humbled by the praise and appreciation, outgoing Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Qazi Faez Isa shared the "life-changing" moments of his 42-year-long judicial career, saying that he had learned the most from the lawyers, as he was honoured with a full-court reference on his retirement day today (Friday).

In an emotional farewell speech at the event, CJP Isa humorously noted that "hours are left to freedom" and highlighted his appointment as chief justice (CJ) of Balochistan as a turning point in his professional journey.

The top judge said his life changed overnight when he became the Balochistan CJ.

"I took on the role at a time when there were no judges in Balochistan," he stated, addressing an audience that included his wife Sarina Isa, other family members, and Supreme Court judges.

Attorney General for Pakistan (AGP) Mansoor Usman Awan, senior lawyer Farooq H Naek and Justice Yahya Afridi — who is set to replace CJP Isa after he relinquishes the charge — attended the session and praised the outgoing justice in their opening remarks before his address.

CJP Isa began by thanking everyone who attended the event, including CJP-designate Justice Afridi, and those who didn’t.

Accepting all the praise and appreciation from the participants of the session, the top judge said that it was fortunate that his wife was present during the reference as she would have never believed that people lauded him.

Shedding light on his life and career, CJP Isa said his mother advised him to complete his degree first before doing anything else.

"I was married right after I completed my studies. My married life and career are both 42 years long," he said.

CJP Isa further stated that his father was the first barrister in Balochistan. He said that his wife, Sarina, had a major role in his services in Balochistan but it was her wish not to highlight her name.

Recalling when he took up the post of Balochistan CJ, the top judge said he was writing for an English newspaper when he was summoned by the then-chief justice of Pakistan, Justice (retd) Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry.

"I thought the chief justice was summoning to reprimand me but he said 'there is no chief justice in Balochistan so you should become the Balochistan CJ'," he said.

"Becoming the Balochistan chief justice was a life-changing moment," he added.

He said he was the only judge in Balochistan High Court so he learned from the lawyers and revived a non-functional court in Balochisntan.

"I haven't learned from anyone as much as I learned from the lawyers," he added.

Highlighting the role of women, CJP Isa said that the men should be scared as the women have left them behind.

"Men should improve their performance or else the women will take over every seat," he said in a light-hearted manner.

Speaking about the importance of judges and lawyers, the outgoing top judge also read a letter he received from a woman, who termed one of his past judgments a "shield of protection" for her and her children.

"It is our responsibility to serve justice," CJP Isa said, adding that he might have made "wrong decisions but while making judgments, we follow the law and documents" which favour one party and goes against the other.

"However, only Allah knows what is the truth," he added.

In his address on the occasion, the CJPdesignate, Justice Afridi lavished praise on his to-be predecessor, saying that he found CJP Isa to be "one of the best human beings" and got to learn a lot from him.

“Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa will be missed in the Supreme Court. We have a rush of feelings while saying goodbye to the chief justice,” said Justice Afridi.

He said CJP Isa was a kind-hearted person, adding that he disagreed with CJP Isa multiple times during his career but the latter always listened to his stance "with an open heart".

"Speak with a smile, and you will become familiar with CJP Isa's courteous responses, or provoke CJP Isa and you won't be able to match his anger," Justice Afridi said.

"Only God can help you when CJP Isa is angry. I also faced his ire several times and it surely wasn't a pleasant experience", he said in a light-hearted manner, prompting CJP Isa to respond with a laughter.

The upcoming top judge also paid tribute to the chief justice’s family a tribute.

He said it was necessary for the nation to ensure the devolution of powers and supremacy of law. He also drew attention towards the district judiciary in remote areas, saying that the first priority as would be the district judiciary of the far-flung areas.

When the top judge retires today, Justice Afridi will succeed him and take the oath of the office of CJP in a ceremony slated to be held at the Aiwan-e-Sadr. President Asif Ali Zardari will administer the oath to the CJP-designate.

Justice Afridi has been appointed the 30th chief justice of the country, who will serve for a fixed three-year term starting tomorrow (October 26), according to a statement from the Aiwan-e-Sadr released on Wednesday.

He is the first CJP to be appointed under Articles 175A(3), 177, and 179 of the Constitution following the 26th Constitutional Amendment.

The ruling coalition last week successfully pushed through the highly contentious judicial reforms through the Parliament via a two-thirds majority with 225 and 65 votes in the lower and upper house, respectively.

The constitutional tweaks were also opposed by the PTI, which has pledged to revoke the legislation whenever it returned to power in the Centre, terming it an attack on the “independence” of judiciary.

The party has also announced rejected the nomination of Justice Afridi as the next CJP, vowing to launch a protest movement against the Special Parliamentary Committee’s decision.

 
Congratulations to all Pakistanis, especially Judiciary for getting rid of its greatest liability
You are being too kind. His head was bowed in shame because afterall he did for the Junta, he was still kicked out.The shameless was an accomplice in every crime imaginable. From hiding assets, to banning the PTI, to giving the Junta a free hand in kidnapping people, he was the sahlutkaar. And not forgetting the theft of the mandate of PKs on the 8th February and he was rumbled by the Rawalpindi commissioner straight away. I don't expect much from Afridi- he wouldn't have been appointed if he was with the people of PK.
 
You are being too kind. His head was bowed in shame because afterall he did for the Junta, he was still kicked out.The shameless was an accomplice in every crime imaginable. From hiding assets, to banning the PTI, to giving the Junta a free hand in kidnapping people, he was the sahlutkaar. And not forgetting the theft of the mandate of PKs on the 8th February and he was rumbled by the Rawalpindi commissioner straight away. I don't expect much from Afridi- he wouldn't have been appointed if he was with the people of PK.
News is he is back in limelight, was missing since that video statement
 

Justice Yahya Afridi takes oath as Chief Justice of Pakistan​


Justice Yahya Afridi has taken the oath as the new Chief Justice of Pakistan.

The oath-taking ceremony was held at the Aiwan-e-Sadr (President's house), where President Asif Ali Zardari administered the oath to Justice Yahya Afridi as Chief Justice of Pakistan.

The ceremony at the Presidential Palace was attended by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, the heads of the three armed forces, the Speaker of the National Assembly Sardar Ayaz Sadiq, senior judiciary judges, Punjab Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz, Balochistan Chief Minister Sarfraz Bugti, Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa Chief Minister Ali Amin Gandapur, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Governor Faisal Karim Kundi, Punjab Governor Saleem Haider, federal ministers, and other prominent personalities.

Additionally, Supreme Court Justices Ayesha Malik and Athar Minallah were also present at the oath-taking ceremony.

It is noteworthy that after the approval of the 26th Constitutional Amendment, a special committee of Parliament nominated Justice Yahya Afridi for the position of Chief Justice.

Chief Justice Faez Isa bids farewell

During his farewell speech, Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa expressed heartfelt gratitude to his colleagues, supporters, and attendees, reflecting on his career and personal journey.

He acknowledged former Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry’s role in appointing him as the Chief Justice of the Balochistan High Court during challenging times and emphasized the unique responsibility of judges to uphold truth and justice.
Justice Isa recounted his education in Balochistan and Karachi, praising his family's dedication to learning.

He credited his wife for her unwavering support and contributions to public service, noting her assistance in various community projects.

Touching on environmental conservation, he shared a conversation with his granddaughter on the importance of protecting Islamabad’s Margalla Hills for future generations.

Journey to CJP appointment

Justice Yahya Afridi was nominated by a special parliamentary committee as the incoming Chief Justice of Pakistan from among the three most senior Supreme Court judges, under the newly adopted 26th Constitutional Amendment.

Following this nomination, a summary was sent by the prime minister to the president, who approved Justice Afridi’s appointment as the 30th CJP.

Born on January 23, 1965, in Dera Ismail Khan, Justice Afridi began his legal career as an advocate of the High Court in 1990 and later as an advocate of the Supreme Court in 2004.

He has also held roles as Assistant Advocate General for Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and as a Federal Counsel for the Government of Pakistan.

Justice Afridi was appointed to the Bench of the Peshawar High Court as an Additional Judge in 2010 and was confirmed as a Judge on March 15, 2012. He made history as the first judge from the Federally Administered Tribal Area to become Chief Justice of the Peshawar High Court, assuming this role on December 30, 2016, until his elevation to the Supreme Court on June 28, 2018.

Supreme Court Website Updated

Following the swearing-in of the new Chief Justice, the Supreme Court's website has been updated. Justice Yahya Afridi’s name has replaced Qazi Faez Isa as Chief Justice of Pakistan on the website.

Speaker of the National Assembly Sardar Ayaz Sadiq extended his congratulations to Justice Yahya Afridi on assuming the position of Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Pakistan.

In his message, he expressed best wishes for Justice Afridi and stated that becoming the Chief Justice of Pakistan is a great honour and privilege. He remarked that no society can survive without justice and that a strengthened justice system will, in turn, strengthen democracy and drive the country's progress.

Chief Minister of Sindh Murad Ali Shah has also congratulated Justice Yahya Afridi on assuming the role of Chief Justice of Pakistan.

 
As soon as Qazi leaves office he runs off from PK. As IK once said these guys have all their wealth abroad and because of that their loyalty is to those that protect their wealth. Shameless Qazi permitted attacks on anyone that opposed the mafia and will have to face the music. He will not get peace
 

Justice Mansoor Ali Shah’s letter about Qazi Faez Isa is deplorable,’ says Sanaullah​

Adviser to prime minister Rana Sanaullah said on Saturday that the letter written penned by Justice Mansoor Ali Shah about former chief justice of Pakistan Qazi Faez Isa.

Taking a jibe at the PTI founder, Sanaullah said: “The PTI founder had been imposed on the country due to which the entire nation had to bore the brunt.”

“The establishment and judiciary had played their role in sending the government packed in the past,” the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) stalwart averred.

Expressing his thoughts, Sanaullah said: “It would have been better for Justice Mansoor to not talk on the matter as he went on to perform Umrah.”

“There is no deal behind the release of Bushra Bibi and the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder’s sisters,” he added.

Source: Samaa News
 
As soon as Qazi leaves office he runs off from PK. As IK once said these guys have all their wealth abroad and because of that their loyalty is to those that protect their wealth. Shameless Qazi permitted attacks on anyone that opposed the mafia and will have to face the music. He will not get peace
He didn't even wait for a day lol
 

Justice Mansoor Ali Shah’s letter about Qazi Faez Isa is deplorable,’ says Sanaullah​

Adviser to prime minister Rana Sanaullah said on Saturday that the letter written penned by Justice Mansoor Ali Shah about former chief justice of Pakistan Qazi Faez Isa.

Taking a jibe at the PTI founder, Sanaullah said: “The PTI founder had been imposed on the country due to which the entire nation had to bore the brunt.”

“The establishment and judiciary had played their role in sending the government packed in the past,” the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) stalwart averred.

Expressing his thoughts, Sanaullah said: “It would have been better for Justice Mansoor to not talk on the matter as he went on to perform Umrah.”

“There is no deal behind the release of Bushra Bibi and the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder’s sisters,” he added.

Source: Samaa News
Or pure facts. What's deplorable is criminals like Rana choosing the guy that should hold him accountable
 
Video being viral , QFE insulted on plane to Dubai let the work begin
 
QFE is a criminal and he will have to either hide for the rest of his life or face the music. The chances are that the Junta and NS will give him some official role to give him security and be away from the public. Just imagine what will happen to him when he lives London or Spain.
 
Ex-CJP Isa in PTI crosshairs as UK MPs raise Imran’s predicament

After lobbying UK parliamentarians to write to their government about Imran Khan’s incarceration, the PTI is going full steam ahead to campaign and build awareness overseas around the prolonged detention of its leader, with a planned protest at an event where former chief justice Qazi Faez Isa will be a key guest.

A group of parliamentarians has issued a formal letter to UK’s Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Affairs David Lammy, urging action on the detention of ex-premier Khan, while a PTI leader confirmed to Dawn on Sunday that London-based leaders and supporters of the party would protest at an event later this week where ex-CJP Isa would be a key guest.

Speaking to Dawn, PTI’s UK-based leader Sayed Zulfikar Bukhari said, “Naturally, overseas Pakistanis are going to protest. Faez Isa has left a miserable legacy and destroyed the judicial system in Pakistan. He has a long charge sheet from depriving us from our symbol, to reserved seats and allowing courts to open certain constituencies for recounting. He’s a disgraced character and shouldn’t be speaking at any prestigious platform.”

Mr Bukhari was referring to ex-CJP Faez Isa’s attendance at the prestigious event at Middle Temple, one of the four Inns of Court, which have the exclusive right to call students to the Bar.

A dinner for Benchers and members of the Inn will be held in London on Tuesday during which there is a ceremony to call elected members to the Bench. This year, Callees include retired Justice Isa, among others, who will be called to the Bench before dinner, then asked to take their place at the High Table. After dinner each new Bencher will give a short speech.

Ex-justice Isa is the first Pakistani judge elected as a bencher at the Middle Temple. After retiring on October 25, he arrived in London to attend the ceremony in his honour. He studied law at the Middle Temple, following in the footsteps of his father, who was also an alumnus.

Ahead of the event, PTI’s main X account called on its London-based supporters to “stand up for justice and make your voice heard”, saying that Mr Isa is set to be nominated as a bencher at Middle Temple “despite his controversial decisions” and a protest will be staged at the venue.

MPs write letter

Kim Johnson, the MP for Liverpool Riverside, along with several other MPs, wrote a letter to cabinet minister David Lammy, arguing that Mr Khan’s detention had “no legal basis” and was intended to prevent his participation in political office.

It cited an Amnesty International report that talked of a “pattern of weaponisation of the legal system” to inhibit his political activities. Kim Johnson’s letter highlighted that Mr Khan has been deprived of adequate resources to prepare his defense in at least three trials, underscoring concerns over violations of fair trial standards.

The MPs also condemned recent amendments to constitution in Pakistan that would establish a new federal constitutional court, with powers to override the Supreme Court on politically sensitive cases.

The British MPs argued this would erode judicial independence and allow the Pakistani government to silence opposition voices more effectively.

There was also concern from the MPs over recent measures to limit the activities of the party that has faced restrictions.

“Parliamentarians across this House will agree that the political precedent this is setting is dangerous,” the letter stated, calling for the immediate release of Mr Khan and urging the UK government to advocate for the protection of human rights and democratic values.

This letter was supported by cross-party MPs and peers, including Baroness Joan Bakewell, Apsana Begum MP, and Lord Peter Hain, among others.

The letter comes just days after Imran Khan made headlines in major international publications after his ex-wife Jemima Goldsmith, English business magnate Richard Branson, philanthropist Jeffrey Skoll and American epidemiologist Lawrence Brilliant spoke about concerns for his health and life.

 
Bill regarding number of Supreme Court judges to be tabled soon

The inside story of the recent meeting between Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) Chairman Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari and Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has unveiled significant political developments

Sources revealed that the leaders discussed a range of constitutional and governance issues, including the proposed 27th Constitutional Amendment.

A main outcome of the meeting was the decision to quickly table a bill in parliament that addresses the composition of the Supreme Court by increasing the number of judges. This bill is expected to be introduced in parliament immediately and is anticipated to be approved within days.

Discussions also extended to the implementation of the newly approved 26th Constitutional Amendment, focusing on devising a mechanism for the formation of constitutional benches at both the federal and provincial levels. They decided that formal meetings would be held on the formation of constitutional benches.

Moreover, the leaders reviewed the pending bill related to the municipal powers of the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM), which has now been forwarded to the relevant committee for further consideration.

They also talked about the implementation of an agreement between the PPP and Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) regarding the issues of Punjab. The meeting also reviewed the progress in implementation of an agreement over fund release and administrative positions in Punjab, according to sources.

Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif assured Bilawal Bhutto of the federal government’s support for ongoing development projects in Sindh.

Source: The Express Tribune
 

SCBA election to impact judicial crisis​


The result of Tuesday (today's) annual election of the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) will significantly impact the ongoing judicial debacle in which the executive has increased its influence over the superior courts' internal affairs through the 26th Constitutional Amendment.

Both presidential candidates belong to the province of Balochistan.

Muneer Kakar is from the Professional group while Rauf Atta is associated with the Independents.

The Independent group has consistently supported the present federal government on key issues. It did not object to the 26th Constitutional Amendment, and currently, holds the majority in the Pakistan Bar Council.

On the other hand, the Professional group is strongly opposed to the 26th Constitutional Amendment. The representatives of the same group are approaching the Supreme Court, seeking a declaration against this amendment as they believe it violates the basic structure of the Constitution.

Some of the Professional lawyers group members, like Hamid Khan, and Ishtiaq Chaudhry, belong to the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI). Given this situation, the annual election of the SCBA is important.

Professional group members are alleging that the government is fully backing the Independent group all over the country. They claimed that CVs are being sought from lawyers regarding the nomination in the superior courts.

Likewise, the independent group has always gained advantages of the welfare projects for lawyers.

Interestingly, the Independent group's candidate, Rauf Atta, is associated with JUI-F as a junior of Senator Kamran Murtaza. SC judges always give weightage to the SCBA executive body's opinion. The result of the SCBA election will have impact on the future role of the judiciary.

It has been learnt that the judges did not discuss the constitutional amendment and changes to the Supreme Court Practice and Procedure Act 2023 during the full court meeting on Monday.

A lawyer says the declaration of the full court meeting suggests that judges' top priority is the disposal of cases. Likewise, they also gave a prominent role to Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah who was superseded by the special parliamentary committee meeting for the nomination of the CJP. He also said that the full court meeting suggests that judges are united.

The lawyer adds the reason given for the 26th Constitutional Amendment was the existing backlog and greater interest in political cases. That's why judges have decided to clear the backlog first.

However, one section of lawyers suggests that the judges should have discussed the constitutional amendment as it is an attack on the independence of teh judiciary. Likewise, their judgments are deliberately being defied by other institutions, members of the legal fraternity pointed out.

However, now all eyes are on the Judicial Commission of Pakistan (JCP) meeting where the majority will decide on the formation of constitutional benches.

Some government functionaries were expecting that both judges who were superseded will retire. However, both have dampened their hope by deciding to continue in their roles as judges. Lawyers are also suggesting that their resignation will strengthen the elements who are attempting to weaken the judiciary.

Legal wings of PML-N, PPP, ANP and JUI-F are backing Independent group candidates while PTI legal wing known as Insaaf Lawyers Forum is backing Professional group candidates.

Source: The Express Tribune
 

SCBA election to impact judicial crisis​


The result of Tuesday (today's) annual election of the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) will significantly impact the ongoing judicial debacle in which the executive has increased its influence over the superior courts' internal affairs through the 26th Constitutional Amendment.

Both presidential candidates belong to the province of Balochistan.

Muneer Kakar is from the Professional group while Rauf Atta is associated with the Independents.

The Independent group has consistently supported the present federal government on key issues. It did not object to the 26th Constitutional Amendment, and currently, holds the majority in the Pakistan Bar Council.

On the other hand, the Professional group is strongly opposed to the 26th Constitutional Amendment. The representatives of the same group are approaching the Supreme Court, seeking a declaration against this amendment as they believe it violates the basic structure of the Constitution.

Some of the Professional lawyers group members, like Hamid Khan, and Ishtiaq Chaudhry, belong to the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI). Given this situation, the annual election of the SCBA is important.

Professional group members are alleging that the government is fully backing the Independent group all over the country. They claimed that CVs are being sought from lawyers regarding the nomination in the superior courts.

Likewise, the independent group has always gained advantages of the welfare projects for lawyers.

Interestingly, the Independent group's candidate, Rauf Atta, is associated with JUI-F as a junior of Senator Kamran Murtaza. SC judges always give weightage to the SCBA executive body's opinion. The result of the SCBA election will have impact on the future role of the judiciary.

It has been learnt that the judges did not discuss the constitutional amendment and changes to the Supreme Court Practice and Procedure Act 2023 during the full court meeting on Monday.

A lawyer says the declaration of the full court meeting suggests that judges' top priority is the disposal of cases. Likewise, they also gave a prominent role to Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah who was superseded by the special parliamentary committee meeting for the nomination of the CJP. He also said that the full court meeting suggests that judges are united.

The lawyer adds the reason given for the 26th Constitutional Amendment was the existing backlog and greater interest in political cases. That's why judges have decided to clear the backlog first.

However, one section of lawyers suggests that the judges should have discussed the constitutional amendment as it is an attack on the independence of teh judiciary. Likewise, their judgments are deliberately being defied by other institutions, members of the legal fraternity pointed out.

However, now all eyes are on the Judicial Commission of Pakistan (JCP) meeting where the majority will decide on the formation of constitutional benches.

Some government functionaries were expecting that both judges who were superseded will retire. However, both have dampened their hope by deciding to continue in their roles as judges. Lawyers are also suggesting that their resignation will strengthen the elements who are attempting to weaken the judiciary.

Legal wings of PML-N, PPP, ANP and JUI-F are backing Independent group candidates while PTI legal wing known as Insaaf Lawyers Forum is backing Professional group candidates.

Source: The Express Tribune
Don't trust these lawyers to be any different from each other. One of the reasons the country is bankrupt is because the Junta spend trillions on buying lawyers, politicians, judges and media houses. On the other hand, the public doesn't even get the crumbs from the table
 
Mohsin Naqvi condemns attack on ex-CJP Qazi Faez Isa’s car in London

Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi has strongly condemned the attack on former chief justice of Pakistan Justice (retired) Qazi Faez Isa’s car in London.

In his message, Naqvi while condemning the incident has instructed the National Database and Registration Authority (NADRA) to take immediate steps to identify the attackers.

The interior minister also confirmed that a vehicle belonging to the Pakistani High Commissioner in London was targeted as well.

“We cannot remain silent on this incident,” Naqvi stated, questioning why security was not provided despite prior threats to Qazi Faez Isa. He ordered that the assailants be identified through available footage and assured that legal actions will be taken against them.

Naqvi added that an FIR will be registered in Pakistan to advance the case, including measures to block the attackers’ identity cards and revoke their passports.

He also announced steps to strip the assailants of their Pakistani citizenship, with a formal case to be sent to the cabinet for approval. “No one will be permitted to engage in such attacks,” Mohsin Naqvi emphasized firmly.

PTI activists attempted to obstruct the former chief justice’s vehicle, which belongs to the Pakistan High Commission, in London, even trying to smash its windows. They chanted slogans upon spotting Qazi Isa’s car and ran alongside it.

Qazi Isa was en route to a ceremony at the Middle Temple.

Senior PTI leaders, including Zulfi Bukhari, Malika Bukhari, and Azhar Mashwani, addressed party supporters who were protesting against the former Chief Justice at the Middle Temple on Tuesday night.

 
Mohsin Naqvi orders investigation into attack on Qazi Faez Isa in London

Interior minister Mohsin Naqvi on Wednesday ordered the Pakistani High Commission to probe into attack on former chief justice Qazi Faez Isa in London.

He condemned the attack on former chief justice while seeking report of the incident.

“The attack on the vehicle of former chief justice and Pakistani High Commission is highly condemnable,” Naqvi said.

He ordered the NADRA officials to trace the assailants through video footages.

The interior minister said that stern action would be taken against the miscreants.


 
Mohsin Naqvi orders investigation into attack on Qazi Faez Isa in London

Interior minister Mohsin Naqvi on Wednesday ordered the Pakistani High Commission to probe into attack on former chief justice Qazi Faez Isa in London.

He condemned the attack on former chief justice while seeking report of the incident.

“The attack on the vehicle of former chief justice and Pakistani High Commission is highly condemnable,” Naqvi said.

He ordered the NADRA officials to trace the assailants through video footages.

The interior minister said that stern action would be taken against the miscreants.


What a bongi lol
 
Mohsin Naqvi orders investigation into attack on Qazi Faez Isa in London

Interior minister Mohsin Naqvi on Wednesday ordered the Pakistani High Commission to probe into attack on former chief justice Qazi Faez Isa in London.

He condemned the attack on former chief justice while seeking report of the incident.

“The attack on the vehicle of former chief justice and Pakistani High Commission is highly condemnable,” Naqvi said.

He ordered the NADRA officials to trace the assailants through video footages.

The interior minister said that stern action would be taken against the miscreants.


What? Surely if the law was broken you contact the Met and make a complaint. Demo's aren't break the law and calling someone a thug or a chore isn't breaking the law
So guys why is this guy threatening protesters with cancelling of passports and Nadra cards.
@emranabbas
@Rana
 
Guys who have no intentions of ever living in Pakistan but harassing those who live there should honestly have their Nadra/Passports revoked.

Sorry but this is disgraceful.
 
Guys who have no intentions of ever living in Pakistan but harassing those who live there should honestly have their Nadra/Passports revoked.

Sorry but this is disgraceful.
Firstly is this a dig at NS and Qazi. Because both seemed to be looking for asylum in other lands but with PK tax payer money. And as far as the demos are concerned ,It's not illegal and if it was then the Police will deal with it. But why is this criminal threatening people that haven't broken any laws. But he gives full immunity to people that are torturing people, killing and kidnapping. Can you explain
 
Guys who have no intentions of ever living in Pakistan but harassing those who live there should honestly have their Nadra/Passports revoked.

Sorry but this is disgraceful.
So in your book peaceful demos against criminals shouldn't be allowed. But isn't that against international law. And also Qazi and NS both engineered torture and kidnapping of people, worked together to steal an election and locked up entire families. Is that OK?
 
I have no time to comment on wastemans who attack an old man’s car.

If the current government of Pakistan can legally revoke their Nadra based on the harrasment they have dished out to one of their Judges, then it is deserved in my opinion.
 
What a bongi lol
BTW
You saw the post @emranabbas
He wants anyone that posts against the abuse of human rights to be tracked through IP addresses and tortured like the 1000s in PK. This beyond a joke. If this isn't advocating criminality then what is. There are people on here to monitor what's been posted. This deserves a permanent ban
 
I have no time to comment on wastemans who attack an old man’s car.

If the current government of Pakistan can legally revoke their Nadra based on the harrasment they have dished out to one of their Judges, then it is deserved in my opinion.
The same old man that was part of the regime that has jailed 1000s without trial. Trials that were his job. An old man that destroyed the SC for his extension and old man that took bribes to buy houses in London, which he claimed were brought with his wife's teacher salary in PK.
 
I have no time to comment on wastemans who attack an old man’s car.

If the current government of Pakistan can legally revoke their Nadra based on the harrasment they have dished out to one of their Judges, then it is deserved in my opinion.
BTW they can't legally revoke anything because it's against international law as it makes people stateless. But if it's not breaking the law in the UK and the UK does have laws, unlike Naqvis and Mistrys Pk, then why is it a problem.
 
Absolutely loved the woof of all touts who got pinched by QFE humiliation, deep down they know one day they will suffer the same
 
Absolutely loved the woof of all touts who got pinched by QFE humiliation, deep down they know one day they will suffer the same
QFE is apparently an old man that needs to be left alone @Rana but was young enough to sign off torture, kidnappings and the destruction of the constitution. Not to mention the election theft and his salutkhaari
 

Perpetrators of attack on ex-CJP Isa's car will be brought to justice: FO​


The spokesperson for Foreign Office, Mumtaz Zahra-Baloch, said on Thursday action would be taken against those who attacked former CJP Qazi Faez Isa's vehicle in London.

Addressing the weekly news briefing, she regretted that attacking the former CJP's vehicle was a cause of concern. "Pakistan's embassy provides facilities to all the former chief justices during their foreign visits," she said.

Talking about the prime minister's foreign visit, she said PM Shehbaz Sharif was on a two-day visit to Qatar where he would hold the bilateral meetings with his counterpart and emir and discuss regional matters.

The spokesperson said PM Sharif was previously on a visit to Kingdom of Saudi Arabia where he held meetings with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Sulman and Vietnam's counterpart.

Regarding BRICS, she said Pakistan expressed desire to join the group and came up to the standards for getting membership of the organisation.

 

Perpetrators of attack on ex-CJP Isa's car will be brought to justice: FO​


The spokesperson for Foreign Office, Mumtaz Zahra-Baloch, said on Thursday action would be taken against those who attacked former CJP Qazi Faez Isa's vehicle in London.

Addressing the weekly news briefing, she regretted that attacking the former CJP's vehicle was a cause of concern. "Pakistan's embassy provides facilities to all the former chief justices during their foreign visits," she said.

Talking about the prime minister's foreign visit, she said PM Shehbaz Sharif was on a two-day visit to Qatar where he would hold the bilateral meetings with his counterpart and emir and discuss regional matters.

The spokesperson said PM Sharif was previously on a visit to Kingdom of Saudi Arabia where he held meetings with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Sulman and Vietnam's counterpart.

Regarding BRICS, she said Pakistan expressed desire to join the group and came up to the standards for getting membership of the organisation.

Which attack? This Naqvi and Co hoping that that PTI can be bullied into stopping the legal demos. Well boys, I have news for you- it ain't happening
 
I see Sarina Isa is doing dramabaazi with her fake tears. This is the women that that laundered money under fake Spanish names called Zarina Montserrat Carrera.

@Rana where you aware of her Spanish passport and property in London
 
Pakistan lodges complaint over attack on ex-CJP Qazi Faez Isa’s vehicle in London

PTI activists attempted to obstruct the former chief justice’s vehicle, which belongs to the Pakistan High Commission, in London, even trying to smash its windows. They chanted slogans upon spotting Qazi Isa’s car and ran alongside it.

Diplomatic sources confirmed to ARY News that Pakistani High Commissioner Dr. Muhammad Faisal raised the issue with British authorities, requesting Scotland Yard to pursue charges against nine individuals involved in the incident.

Speaking with ARY News, Dr. Faisal expressed regret over the incident, stating, “The event is unfortunate, and we will pursue it with British authorities.”

Earlier, Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi strongly condemned the attack on former chief justice of Pakistan Justice (retired) Qazi Faez Isa’s car in London.

In his message, Naqvi while condemning the incident has instructed the National Database and Registration Authority (NADRA) to take immediate steps to identify the attackers.

The interior minister also confirmed that a vehicle belonging to the Pakistani High Commissioner in London was targeted as well.

“We cannot remain silent on this incident,” Naqvi stated, questioning why security was not provided despite prior threats to Qazi Faez Isa. He ordered that the assailants be identified through available footage and assured that legal actions will be taken against them.

Naqvi added that an FIR would be registered in Pakistan to advance the case, including measures to block the attackers’ identity cards and revoke their passports.

 
The Judicial Commission of Pakistan (JCP) on Tuesday appointed Justice Amin-ud-Din Khan as head of the constitutional bench in the Supreme Court

JCP, led by Chief Justice Yahya Afridi, constituted the constitutional bench in a 7-5 split decision, with the majority of members voting in favor of its formation, Express News reported.

The constitutional bench has been formed for a period of 60 days, according to sources. The bench will be headed by Justice Amin-ud-Din Khan, with Justices Ayesha Malik, Naeem Akhtar Afghan, Athar Minallah, Hassan Azhar Rizvi, Musarrat Hilali, and Jamal Khan Mandokhail also included as members

Justice Ayesha Malik will represent Punjab, while Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan and Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail will represent Balochistan, say Express News sources.

1730805733172.jpg

Source: The Express Tribune
 

Legal battles may shape nation's future​


After the nomination of seven judges to the constitutional benches, all eyes are now on the three judges committee, led by Justice Aminuddin Khan, to see which constitutional matters will be fixed for hearing in the next two months.

Justice Aminuddin Khan is being considered the most important judge in the apex court now, as his role as head of the committee involves shortlisting constitutional cases for adjudication – outcome that could significantly impact national politics.

Justice Aminuddin Khan was heading the larger bench hearing the government's intra-court appeals against the ruling that declared civilian trials in military courts unconstitutional.

The two other members of the committee - Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail and Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar - were also part of that larger bench. The matter remains pending in the apex court.

It will be interesting to see whether the committee will consider fixing the petitions against 26th Constitutional Amendment. Though, the constitutional benches are the creation of this amendment, so the question may arise as to whether the constitutional bench could hear those petitions.

It is also learnt that some senior politicians have decided to challenge the 21st Constitutional Amendment, which was passed in 2015 to establish military courts to try terrorists.

Balochistan National Party-Mengal (BNP-M) chief Akhtar Mangal, Mustafa Nawaz Khokhar, Fahmida Mirza and Mohsin Dawar will file the joint petition against the 21st Amendment through lawyer Salahuddin Ahmed.

All petitioners would also request the apex court to constitute full court for the hearing of their petition. Some lawyers are criticising Chief Justice Yahya Afridi for not fixing petitions on same subject on November 4.

During a meeting of Judicial Commission of Pakistan (JCP), Chief Justice Afridi suggested that all the Supreme Court judges should be nominated for constitutional benches.

However, majority of the JCP members rejected his proposal. Only two senior judges and two Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) members supported the suggestion. Even Justice Aminuddin Khan did not support his proposal.

Now, all eyes are on the seven judges of the constitutional benches as to how they will restore the image of the judiciary and maintain their independence, as these judges have been nominated by the government members in the JCP.

Another important matter is the review petitions against July 12 order of the full court in the reserved seats case. The Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) has so far not implemented the order.

A law officer believes that 13 judges will be required to hear the review petitions against the reserved seats case judgment. He said that these seven judges' nomination is for two months, adding that the JCP may sit again by or before this period ends.

There are chances that the Supreme Court may initiate proceedings regarding the implementation of July 12 order in near future. Out of the seven nominated judges, three judges are signatory to July 12 majority order.

Currently Justice Mandokhail is abroad. There is no report about the first meeting of the committee to fix constitutional cases.

 
Federal govt raises Supreme Court judges’ salaries, allowance

According to details, the house rent allowance has been raised from Rs. 68,000 to Rs. 350,000, while the judicial allowance has been increased from Rs. 3.42 million to Rs. 10.9 million.

This decision was made after Acting President Yousuf Raza Gilani’s approval and notification by the Ministry of Law and Justice.

The development follows last year’s July increase in the salary of Chief Justice of Pakistan more than Rs. 200,000 , bringing it to over Rs. 1.2million. The 20 percent increase in Supreme Court judges’ salaries was approved through an ordinance by then President Sadiq Sanjrani.

According to the ordinance, the salaries of other judges were also raised by 20 percent to over Rs. 1.1 million.

Earlier in June, the National Assembly (NA) passed an amendment in the Budget 2024-25 to increase the salaries and travel allowances of Pakistan lawmakers despite protest from the opposition.

The amendment, presented by Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) leader Abdul Qadir Patel, was approved with a majority vote. The amendment to the Salary and Allowances Act was implemented through the Finance Bill 2024-25.

According to the documents, travel allowance for lawmakers have been increased from Rs10 to Rs25 per kilometre. Additionally, unused annual airline tickets will now carry over to the following year instead of being canceled. The number of annual travel vouchers has also been increased from 25 to 30.

 

Shayan Ali among 23 Pakistanis added to PCL after Qazi Faez attack incident​


A major development has emerged in the ongoing investigation into the violent attack on former chief justice Qazi Faez Isa in London.

The names of 23 individuals, including prominent Pakistani figures such as Shayan Ali, Malika Bukhari, and Sadia Faheem, have been added to the passport control list (PCL), with their passports also suspended.

According to official sources, the passport control list now includes individuals implicated in the attack on Justice Isa, which took place on October 30 outside the Middle Temple, London.

The list includes high-profile names like Shayan Ali, leader of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) UK, his mother Sadaf Mumtaz Malik, and others. These individuals have been linked to the violent protest against the former chief justice, which resulted in an attack on his vehicle.

The incident occurred when Justice Isa, leaving the Middle Temple after an official engagement, was ambushed by protesters led by Ali and his mother. According to diplomatic sources, the protesters physically assaulted the car, smashing its windows and banging on its body, while the group shouted slogans and made inflammatory statements.

Witnesses said the group was incensed by a decision by the Middle Temple to invite Justice Isa to the bench, following his retirement.

Footage of the attack circulated widely on social media, where Shayan Ali was seen boasting about the attack, claiming that Justice Isa had been "caught" after allegedly attempting to flee.

In a viral video, Ali stated, "Mr. Qazi Faez Isa had lowered his head, but we caught him. His car hit a protester, and we will register a case against him and the police. One of the protestors was hit. This is a violation of human rights. We had promised to catch Justice Qazi Faez Isa, and we delivered our promise."

Aisha Ali Qureshi, another participant in the attack, echoed these sentiments, calling the former chief justice “shameless” for allegedly hiding his face. Sadia Faheem, another attacker, suggested that Isa’s actions indicated guilt, claiming, "He was hiding his face, which means he has done something wrong."

 

Shayan Ali among 23 Pakistanis added to PCL after Qazi Faez attack incident​


A major development has emerged in the ongoing investigation into the violent attack on former chief justice Qazi Faez Isa in London.

The names of 23 individuals, including prominent Pakistani figures such as Shayan Ali, Malika Bukhari, and Sadia Faheem, have been added to the passport control list (PCL), with their passports also suspended.

According to official sources, the passport control list now includes individuals implicated in the attack on Justice Isa, which took place on October 30 outside the Middle Temple, London.

The list includes high-profile names like Shayan Ali, leader of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) UK, his mother Sadaf Mumtaz Malik, and others. These individuals have been linked to the violent protest against the former chief justice, which resulted in an attack on his vehicle.

The incident occurred when Justice Isa, leaving the Middle Temple after an official engagement, was ambushed by protesters led by Ali and his mother. According to diplomatic sources, the protesters physically assaulted the car, smashing its windows and banging on its body, while the group shouted slogans and made inflammatory statements.

Witnesses said the group was incensed by a decision by the Middle Temple to invite Justice Isa to the bench, following his retirement.

Footage of the attack circulated widely on social media, where Shayan Ali was seen boasting about the attack, claiming that Justice Isa had been "caught" after allegedly attempting to flee.

In a viral video, Ali stated, "Mr. Qazi Faez Isa had lowered his head, but we caught him. His car hit a protester, and we will register a case against him and the police. One of the protestors was hit. This is a violation of human rights. We had promised to catch Justice Qazi Faez Isa, and we delivered our promise."

Aisha Ali Qureshi, another participant in the attack, echoed these sentiments, calling the former chief justice “shameless” for allegedly hiding his face. Sadia Faheem, another attacker, suggested that Isa’s actions indicated guilt, claiming, "He was hiding his face, which means he has done something wrong."

Firstly there was no attack because if there was then the local Police would have taken action. Then there is the issue of transnational harassment and I would urge all those that had their passports suspended to report the Junta and start a case. In PK there is no law so all is good for the boots but the UK has laws and I hope Naqvi and Co have to face cases.
 

Accused's interim bail extended in case pertaining to propaganda on social media against judge​


Islamabad’s district and session court has extended the interim bail of accused Siddique Anjum till November 23 in a case of propaganda on social media against the judge.

Additional Session Judge Afzal Majoka heard the bail plea of accused in propaganda on social media against the judge case.

During the hearing, a Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) prosecutor told the court that the accused had protective bail from the Peshawar High Court (PHC).

Prosecutor requested the court to reject the bail plea of the accused in this case as he had already one.

Defence lawyer stated that FIA was misquoting the facts to the court. The accused had not taken the protective bail in this case but secured protective bail in unknown cases from PHC.

Accused’s lawyer informed that the court had restrained the FIA from arresting Siddique Anjum in unknown cases.

Consequently, the district and session court adjourned the case hearing granting interim bail to the accused until Nov 23.

 

SC constitutional bench to start hearing 34 cases from tomorrow​


The Supreme Court's constitutional bench has scheduled a series of cases for hearings tomorrow and the day after, as a six-member bench, led by Justice Aminuddin Khan, presides over the proceedings on November 14 and 15.

On Wednesday, the bench will begin by revisiting cases related to environmental pollution filed in 1993, 2003, and 2018.

A review petition, filed by Riaz Hanif Rahi, regarding the appointment of Qazi Faez Isa as chief justice of the Balochistan High Court is also fixed for hearing by the six-member bench on Nov 14. Originally dismissed by a three-member bench headed by former chief justice of Pakistan Saqib Nisar, the review petition has now been scheduled by the Supreme Court constitutional bench.

Among other high-profile cases, the bench will address a petition requesting the rescheduling of the 2024 general elections, aiming to move the polls from February to the first week of March. A separate petition seeking to disqualify lawmakers with assets or businesses abroad will also be heard tomorrow, while another challenges the legality of marriages between government officials and foreign nationals.

Another petition has been filed to nullify legislation passed under the previous PDM government. The bench will also examine a petition seeking the dismissal of former president Arif Alvi, and a suo motu notice on the foreign bank account details of Pakistani nationals is also part of the roster. A case filed by Muhammad Ali Durrani seeks the repatriation of public funds allegedly stashed abroad.

Moreover, cases related to harassment of women in offices are also scheduled for hearing, as well as a harassment case involving singer Ali Zafar and musician Meesha Shafi. The constitutional bench will also review a suo motu notice on the private use of Islamabad’s Convention Center based on notes from former judge Qazi Faez Isa, alongside cases related to the jurisdiction of the courts of Gilgit-Baltistan.

Cases concerning energy projects filed by Khawaja Asif are set for hearing by the six-member bench on Nov 15.

The constitutional bench of the Supreme Court will hear 18 cases on Nov 14 and 16 cases on Nov 15.

 
Back
Top