Hitman
Senior T20I Player
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2013
- Runs
- 17,341
I'm not comparing the two, not at all. I'm just asking do you guys the likes of Inzamam, Laxman, Yousuf, Ganguly, etc make it to the ICC HOF?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Laxman should for playing one of the best innings of the 21st century so far.
Who cares? Not many pay attention the the Hall of Fame. However, like someone else said, if Anil Kumble can make it then these guys should definitely be in there too.
Anil Kumble have 600+wickets in Test
red soil bully
Yeah
If Indian bowlers take wicket then they are red soil bully
If indian batsman score runs then they are flat track bully
Anil Kumble have 600+wickets in Test
Inzamam has a truck-load of runs, Yousuf and Ganguly have plenty of centuries. Heck, if quantity is what we're after, Shahid Afridi should be a hall of famer too. Guy has runs and wickets.
nah check my post history I rate Gavaskar best opener of all time.
Also out of all the current crop Kohli is the best batter at present.
SRT is one of the 2 best batsmen of all time - still undecided between him and and Viv.
I just don't rate Kumble as an ATG.
Shahid Afridi in Test ???
I think Inzi should make it. He was the second batsmen after Sachin to score 20000 international runs and for almost half his career had the record of most ODI 50's. Also was the 2nd run getter in ODI's after sachin until he retired. One of the best finishers in ODI cricket at the time. Also has a very high percentage of test centuries in winning causes.
Those achievements should count for something even if he isn't somebody's idea of an excellent batsmen. Though I will admit I don't know a thing about the inclusion criteria in ICC Hall of Fame so we will have to see if they induct guys like Inzi/Laxman or no.
The thing is does ODI cricket come under the criteria or not.
The thing is does ODI cricket come under the criteria or not.