CricFan2012
First Class Star
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2012
- Runs
- 3,228
King Kohli is currently sitting at 58.10 and his average is pretty much increasing by a point or so every series he plays, he is unstoppable in the fifty over format.
Smith, on the other hand, has the impressive average of 63.75, as there has been comparisons between him and Bradman.
Smith has the advantage of over 5 runs, but can Kohli become a better ODI batsman than Smith the test batsman?
Reaching an average of over 60 will be an unprecedented act in the shorter format and if Kohli can retire with a better average than smith then he will be known as the batsman of the decade, same scenario for Smith.
Thoughts
Smith, on the other hand, has the impressive average of 63.75, as there has been comparisons between him and Bradman.
Smith has the advantage of over 5 runs, but can Kohli become a better ODI batsman than Smith the test batsman?
Reaching an average of over 60 will be an unprecedented act in the shorter format and if Kohli can retire with a better average than smith then he will be known as the batsman of the decade, same scenario for Smith.
Thoughts

Last edited by a moderator: