Abdul
ODI Debutant
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2015
- Runs
- 9,212
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
just shows how good warne is at recognizing talent.
even before Yasir step foot in lords, Warne was like we have the words best leggie here. People were skeptical about what he said, and boom, right in that match he gets his name on the Lords honour board.
This also makes me worry about that Indian spinner who Warne has praised
Warne praises every single spinner that comes onto the scene, that way if any of them become good he can pretend he knew it all along. If they turn out to be a bit crap then he goes over the top in criticising them to try and make you forget that he praised them originally.
Warne is great at making himself look good above all else, don't fall for the con.
just shows how good warne is at recognizing talent.
even before Yasir step foot in lords, Warne was like we have the words best leggie here. People were skeptical about what he said, and boom, right in that match he gets his name on the Lords honour board.
This also makes me worry about that Indian spinner who Warne has praised
not really.
Warne didnt praise adil rashid. Even though the commies asked him about rashid, he tried to make up some praises.
"The over-riding thing is he's a wonderful bowler," said Warne. "When anyone starts their Test career, it takes time to see the best of them. What we've seen already is some glimpses of magic. We've already seen he can do it at this level.
"It's about being consistent, so that's going to take time. All of us need to be a bit patient with him. And he needs to be patient too. But there's not too many people going round with a better leg-break than Rashid's. He's as good as anyone I've seen, ever.
"It was a pleasure to work with him. I think he has all the toys and tools, I think he's a wonderful bowler, a good kid and he thinks about the game. A lot of spinners don't really think like he does. We have to make sure he doesn't over-think. He needs to keep a clear mind, keep his plans and just go out and deliver."
Warne also said there was no need to always compare the two legspinner in this series. Yasir has a smoother action and bowls significantly quicker than Rashid, whose slower style often allows batsmen to play him off the pitch, but Warne said it was not a one-size-fits-all style.
"They are completely different bowlers. Rashid can be just as successful. It's a different style. It doesn't mean it is not as effective. They can have the best tools in the trade but you have to think right, how big is his heart? Is he up for the fight? Is he patient? Does he want the ball in his hand when it is tough? All those things you don't know about a spin bowler no matter how good you think they are. Yasir looks like he's got it. Rashid, we've seen him bowl some magic in the first Test. So he's got it."
Yasir's figures for this innings were 6/184. That is an average of 30.67, hardly anything to get excited about. His 5 match streak has a lot to do with the ineptitude of other Pakistani bowlers, and also facing a weak WI side in the earlier series.
It's not easy to bowl on this wicket during the first 3-4 days so he has done quiet well given the conditions and that too with no support.
Ashwin on the same pitch would have taken 3 wickets for 300 runs during first 3-4 days.
Even in his best series outside of home he averaged 40 in England
I know his performances against wi. Ashwin has done even better than him there. Nobody rates performances against west indies.check again his best series outside asia is w.i than two match winning performances in Eng
I know his performances against wi. Ashwin has done even better than him there. Nobody rates performances against west indies.
Yasir's figures for this innings were 6/184. That is an average of 30.67, hardly anything to get excited about. His 5 match streak has a lot to do with the ineptitude of other Pakistani bowlers, and also facing a weak WI side in the earlier series.
Good bowler,but over rated,understandable though based on bowling options Pakistan have currently.
he had bowling average of 24 before start of overseas tours and at the end it reached 32 or 33 something.
Isn't that whole claim to fame of Kumble![]()
Even in his best series outside of home he averaged 40 in England
I know his performances against wi. Ashwin has done even better than him there. Nobody rates performances against west indies.
now it is 29 if he plays 10 consecutive test more in uae it will come down to 25
Nobody calls kumble the goat and atg like u fans claim amir and yasir to be
to burst your bubble
yasir was better than him in wi he took 25 wicket at 21.95 avg and ashwin 17 wicket at 23 avg
Yes the bubble has busted really isn't it? Thats what we r saying all along. U r team depends on him where as our team has other bowlers who will do the job.
A bowler bowling 50 overs per innings and getting 5 wickets is nothing to be proud of
Isn't that whole claim to fame of Kumble![]()
I must have missed the thread talking about Kumble's string of 5-fers.
Also, there is no point in comparing a bowler who has taken 163 wkts to one who has taken 619 wkts.
Yes because one played for the better part of two decades and is retired while the Other has finished his third and is still playing.I must have missed the thread talking about Kumble's string of 5-fers.
Also, there is no point in comparing a bowler who has taken 163 wkts to one who has taken 619 wkts.
Normally, when you see a 6-fer, you expect to see something like 6/84, not 6/184.
Ashwin would not have average 100 per wkt when Shah averaged 30.67. Ashwin's lifetime avg is 25.3 compared to Shah's 29.8. It is not the wkt, Shah is pretty close to his lifetime avg here.
Ashwin would be averaging 600 on this wicket, that's why he is only picked for games on rank turners
Isn't that whole claim to fame of Kumble![]()
Indians can't shut up about his 10 wickets.... When it means that other team mates must have been really bad... Kumble took 10 wickets in 71 overs but 116 overs other bowlers took 0 wickets... Indians should be really ashamed....
Ashwin would be averaging 600 on this wicket, that's why he is only picked for games on rank turners
I am getting a bit tired of having to keep referring to numbers. Kumble took 10 wkts conceding 74 runs, that is an avg of 7.4. Yasir's performance of 6/184 has an average of 30.7. There is no comparison.
The wickets in Kumbles 10 for include Saeed Anwar, Ijaz Ahmed, Saleem Malik, Inzamam ul Haq, Mohammed Yousuf,Moin Khan and Shahid Afridi.
I am pretty sure that this poster will tell us that the Lankan line up is better.
His claim to fame is 600 plus test wickets.if Yasir Shah gets 600 everyone will say the same.
I am getting a bit tired of having to keep referring to numbers. Kumble took 10 wkts conceding 74 runs, that is an avg of 7.4. Yasir's performance of 6/184 has an average of 30.7. There is no comparison.
Hardly, Kumble was outbowled by Harbhajan many a times, similarly by Zaheer/Irfan/Sreesanth away & majority of his wickets came after 2K.That part was for you saying that yasir took the consecutive wickets because his team mates are not good...
And how many of Kumble's 600 wickets came in such matches as 6/184? The majority I'd wager....
And they would be wrong... and I'm sure Napa agrees with me rather than you or he is hypocrite...
I assume you believe that this is a really tough wkt, and therefore Yasir averaged 30.7.
Wickets more suited to Yasir must be the Australian wkts, where he recently averaged 84, or NZ where he recently averaged infinity (thanks to 61 runs for 0 wkts).
Drop the hype and say something sensible based on real numbers for a change.
That part was for you saying that yasir took the consecutive wickets because his team mates are not good...
And how many of Kumble's 600 wickets came in such matches as 6/184? The majority I'd wager....
An Ashwin must be some Aussie specialist who won you a Test there and in Englandyou should take your own advice
Normally, when you see a 6-fer, you expect to see something like 6/84, not 6/184.
Ashwin would not have average 100 per wkt when Shah averaged 30.67. Ashwin's lifetime avg is 25.3 compared to Shah's 29.8. It is not the wkt, Shah is pretty close to his lifetime avg here.
I am not the one who brought the pitches into this discussion, you did.
Aahwin's played majority of his matches on spin friendly tracks in India, of course his overall avg is going to be lower than Yasir's who's never had the opportunity to bowl on those type of pitches in his entire career. He's mostly toiled on lifeless UAE pitches.
And what do you wager? I smell the chance of making some easy money here. Kumble took 10 or more wkts in a Test match (not innings but the entire match) only 8 times. So it is safe to say that most of his wkts did not come from 6-fers, let alone 5-fers.
http://www.espncricinfo.com/india/content/player/30176.html
He would be a hypocrite if he will not call Yasir Shah a great of the game if he takes 600 test wickets.
Hardly, Kumble was outbowled by Harbhajan many a times, similarly by Zaheer/Irfan/Sreesanth away & majority of his wickets came after 2K.
Earlier it was Srinath & Prasad who outbowled him away.
Ashwin can't even take 5 wicket hauls in 5 consecutive tests on rank turners, Yasir has done it on a lifeless pitchAshwin is the most overly rated spinner ever and he would have averaged 600 in this Test match
Srinath and Prasad are the same people who didn't take a wicket in 130 overs leading to Kumble's 10.....
You are saying Yasir's average in this match is 30.... How many of Kumble's wickets are in matches where he averaged 30+?? I'll take the wager
One man army
Best test spinner in the world
He could take 2000 wickets he won't be a great if his averagge is like kumble...
Do you even remember the scorecard of that test? No you don;t, India didn;t bowl 130 overs overs in the second innings, also the 3 bowlers took 6 wickets between them in the first innings with AK taking four!Srinath and Prasad are the same people who didn't take a wicket in 130 overs leading to Kumble's 10.....
now it is 29 if he plays 10 consecutive test more in uae it will come down to 25
Then few more tours and again it will go to 32![]()
don,t worry it won,t be as worse as a overrated off spinner have in away
don,t worry it won,t be as worse as a overrated off spinner have in away
thats why ashwin averages 5 points less than goat yasir .who averaged over 1oo in australia and nz series combined.do u think any bowler has such worse figures than shah in nz and aus
thats why ashwin averages 5 points less than goat yasir .who averaged over 1oo in australia and nz series combined.do u think any bowler has such worse figures than shah in nz and aus
So GOAT now get compared with worst off spinners)
Warne praises every single spinner that comes onto the scene, that way if any of them become good he can pretend he knew it all along. If they turn out to be a bit crap then he goes over the top in criticising them to try and make you forget that he praised them originally.
Warne is great at making himself look good above all else, don't fall for the con.
Even against England he gave away too many runs..Only good thing Yasir have is worse bowlers in his team so he gets majority of the wickets even when opposition bats for 2 days.
how many matches have ashwin played in india and then compare it with yasir in uae if both play similar
amount of matches at home both will have same bowling avg
yasir played only 12 test uae and have 77 wicket
while ashwin have 32 test in india and have 208 wicket
while you bring up yasir performances in aus ,nz what about ashwin in aus and nz
in england yasir have out perform him by winning 2 test for his country
yasir is the worse bowler to ever tour aus by a country mile
where did i say he is GOAT?
after him ashwin is second worse with bowling avg of 54
Title