Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Saq
Warne
Murali
Qadir
Ajmal
6th man would have been Kumble. Tahir could have a shot at top 10 had he managed similar stats without bowling against novice kids against spin.
1. Warne
2. Saqlain
3. Murali
4. Kumble
5. Mushtaq Ahmed
Rest of 10 - Brad Hogg, Tahir, Bhajji, Qadir, Ajmal
Ajmal would have been much higher, but that a would have been unfair to others who didn't bend their arms.
Yes, it would have been very unfair for Harbhajjan.![]()
Saqlain didn;t play much cricket but he is a genius.
Warne & Murli undoubtedly there.
Imran tahir is doing something special for SA.
Abdul Qadir bowled at the time of Giants.
169 ODIs and 288 wickets with a bowling average of 23.88 against Australia (24.74 in Australia) and 24.38 against India (20.70 in India) is a good enough sample size to make him the greatest ODI spinner of all time.
I know this must have been beaten to death but Murali was a chucker wasnt he?
Why is the chucker even being mentioned. Surely the fact that he was bowling more than 2 times over the legal limit nullifies anything he achieved in his career.
Mine would be:
Murali
Warne
Saqlain
Qadir
Tahir
What would be your pick?
169 ODIs and 288 wickets with a bowling average of 23.88 against Australia (24.74 in Australia) and 24.38 against India (20.70 in India) is a good enough sample size to make him the greatest ODI spinner of all time.
Why is the chucker even being mentioned. Surely the fact that he was bowling more than 2 times over the legal limit nullifies anything he achieved in his career.
Saq
Warne
Murali
Qadir
Ajmal
6th man would have been Kumble. Tahir could have a shot at top 10 had he managed similar stats without bowling against novice kids against spin.
Why do you rate Qadir higher than Ajmal?
Because Ajmal bowled against novices - who bats with shoulder and mallet, Qadir bowled against batsmen who batted with feet and wrist. Ajmal's doosra was extremely effective because his batsmen had to wait for the ball to pitch to figure out which way it's turning (hence it's all about slog sweep or cow corner); Qadirs batsmen could read the Googly & flipper in air and could dance down to play the ball on it's pitch.
3 WKs, 3 WKs of 90s - Kalu, Mongia & Moin .... will be among top 10 spin player in modern era; I have to take that discount.
No it doesn't. If the governing body, the ICC, has no problem with it, then who are you to act as the judge and jury?
Ajmal is quite easily one of the top five ODI spinners of all time and definitely the best since Saqi, Murali and Warne retired.
I do not think that Sanga, Amla, ABD, Smith, KP, Hussey, Sachin, Yuvraj, Dhoni, Matthews, Jayawardene, Chanderpaul, Clarke, Cook, Kallis, Kohli and Maxwell can be remotely considered "novices" against spin bowling.
Qadir's impact was limited within Asia, IIRC, whereas Ajmal won us a series in South Africa and generally did well throughout the world.
No it doesn't. If the governing body, the ICC, has no problem with it, then who are you to act as the judge and jury?
Ajmal is quite easily one of the top five ODI spinners of all time and definitely the best since Saqi, Murali and Warne retired.
The governing body has found a problem with it. It is your ignorance that prevents you from acknowledging that.
The names you mentioned are indeed good collection, still, over all spin playing capacity has gone down drastically. It's very close, but Qadir was instrumental in PAK reaching 2 WC SF of 1983 & 1987 - Ajmal never won a MoM in ODI career
Yes when it's your favourites everyone else's opinion becomes irrelevant but yours is the most important. Furthmore same umpires who liase with the same ICC who found Ajmal action to be illegal find Ashwin action fine. Yet you have a problem with his action.
It is not my opinion which is important, but the ICC's. And I only want Ashwin to be tested so that all doubts are cleared, I do not claim that he is a chucker and certainly do not claim to know better than the governing body. If I have said anything negative about Ashwin's action other than the need for him to get tested, it was a joke that like most other things.
Because Ajmal bowled against novices - who bats with shoulder and mallet, Qadir bowled against batsmen who batted with feet and wrist. Ajmal's doosra was extremely effective because his batsmen had to wait for the ball to pitch to figure out which way it's turning (hence it's all about slog sweep or cow corner); Qadirs batsmen could read the Googly & flipper in air and could dance down to play the ball on it's pitch.
3 WKs, 3 WKs of 90s - Kalu, Mongia & Moin .... will be among top 10 spin player in modern era; I have to take that discount.
Yes, it would have been very unfair for Harbhajjan.![]()
Chucker Ajmal should not even be rated or ranked
1. Bhajji is a chucker, all neutrals and non biased fans know that.
2. He doesn't play anymore so can't be shamelessly banned like Ajmal was
3. One wrong doesn't make a right, Ajmal is a cheat and so was Bhajji, therefore both should not be mentioned under the names of other legit spinners, Bhajji, luckily for him, escaped prosecution.
Saqlain
Warne
Murali
Qadir
Imran tahir
Ajmal didn't wake up one day and start bowling 2x over the legal limit, ethically speaking, anything he achieved during his career should not be of value as he did it illegally.No it doesn't. If the governing body, the ICC, has no problem with it, then who are you to act as the judge and jury?
Ajmal is quite easily one of the top five ODI spinners of all time and definitely the best since Saqi, Murali and Warne retired.
Ajmal didn't wake up one day and start bowling 2x over the legal limit, ethically speaking, anything he achieved during his career should not be of value as he did it illegally.
Ajmal didn't bowl a single over after he was called, therefore it's unfair to call him cheat or chucker. In history of game, there are many bowlers in past who would have failed this 15 degree rule (I don't want to put names, but some of them are regarded even ATG) - I think, ICC put a limit of 15 degree to keep themselves out of controversy, therefore bowlers who had been called should be recognized for their pre-call stats. Ajmal bowled as long as ICC allowed him to bowl and the guy didn't do the disgusting staff of MoHa.
I like Leggis more than finger spinners and Qadir was a magician on his day, otherwise this is really, really close call. In this high scoring era, Ajmal's numbers are mind blowing, even outside Asia and that guy actually knocked-off many set middle orders between 15-40 overs. Like Murali or Hadlee, he was truly an one man army for best part of 5 years, for a poor team under a pathetic Captain.
You need to read up the definition of 'illegal' again because what Ajmal did was definitely not illegal. Had he defied the ICC and still bowled with his old action after they demanded he change his action, that would be illegal. As it stands, he did what he was allowed to do by the governing body and was as clean as any other bowler.
Saqlain is a pioneer and a great spinner.. Easily the GOAT of ODI's.. Very few players are great at something and also pioneers and bring something new.. Saqi is one of them..
Warnie would be second pick.
Murali would be third
Kumble, vettori, bhajji are far behind the above mentioned 3..
Muralis ODI stats are much better than Warne.
Ajmal may not have bowled any illegal deliveries technically, but he was clearly dishonest about his elbow problem that prevented him from bowling within the limits. As soon as he got banned, he was able to bowl with a clean action and he did not undergo any corrective surgical procedure or physiotherapy.
In addition, the practice of batting with short-sleeves and bowling with long-sleeves was dodgy. He is not the innocent soul some are portraying him to be - he has plenty of skeletons in the closet.
Ajmal may not have bowled any illegal deliveries technically, but he was clearly dishonest about his elbow problem that prevented him from bowling within the limits. As soon as he got banned, he was able to bowl with a clean action and he did not undergo any corrective surgical procedure or physiotherapy.
In addition, the practice of batting with short-sleeves and bowling with long-sleeves was dodgy. He is not the innocent soul some are portraying him to be - he has plenty of skeletons in the closet.
It was very difficult for him to change his action and even when he did, it was not effective in the least.
The practice of bowling in long sleeves is a non-issue. Plenty of bowlers have done so and continue to do so. Long sleeves hardly prevent umpires from calling bowlers with dubious actions.