What's new

“You want players who score runs and have a huge impact on the game in a positive way”: Mike Hesson

BouncerGuy

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Aug 29, 2023
Runs
34,927
Pakistan white-ball Head Coach, Mike Hesson, speaking during a Press Conference:

“From a T20 perspective, we’ve won six of the last nine games. We lost one on the last ball, one by a handful of runs, and one quite badly. So out of eight games, we were in a position to win all eight. From a T20 standpoint, this side is progressing quite nicely. ODI is a different question and will be addressed separately, but from a T20 perspective, this side has shown promise. Salman Mirza has been added in the squad based on his performance against Bangladesh.”

“Our T20 side is performing well, but we need to look at building depth in isolation. When we talk about this level, we have to develop depth and play smart.”

About Babar Azam’s form and his selection:

“It is very harsh to challenge a player’s form based on 3 games. Babar played nicely in the first ODI, but he missed out in the next to but we know how fine pa layer he is. There is no doubt that Babar has been asked to improve in some areas around like taking on spin and his strike rate. He is working very hard, but at the moment, the players we have are performing exceptionally well. For instance, Sahibzada Farhan has played six games and won three Man of the Match awards. This is what you want from players when they score runs and have a huge impact on the game in a positive way. Player like Babar has the opportunity to play in the BBL and show that he has improved in those areas in the T20 format. He is too good of a player for us not to consider”

About areas that need improvement in the team:

“We were challenged with three different types of pitches. In Lahore, the surface was flat and the batting excelled. Then we went to Bangladesh, which was tougher with low-scoring games. But the way we got ourselves out of trouble in couple of games despite early wickets shows that we have the death but our top order sets the game up, like in the third game and we need more of that but with a specific run rate that gets us well ahead in the game and that is certainly what happened in the that game. T20 is all about setting the game and from the batting point of you we have the lineup that can continue doing that.”

About the upcoming series and preparations:

“The fact is, we’re playing in Sharjah, which should be the most challenging conditions for facing spin. So, we’re aware of that. And that’s why the middle order is so critical—not only should they be able to rotate against spin, but also apply pressure. And it’s going to be a big challenge. Afghanistan was the semi-finalist of the last T20 World Cup and we are not taking it lightly and preparing for the Asia Cup.”
 
The sad thing for Babar and Rizwan is that their franchise PR teams cannot activate for them at the moment

They have suffered because of these two
 
Is this a new trend where an international team coach like Mike Hesson is hyping up the squad selected by Aaqib and Naqvi? Maybe Aaqib and Naqvi asked their puppet to say this on Twitter. If I were the coach, I’d rather stay quiet, keep away from social media, and focus on improving the team instead of drawing unnecessary attention to squad selection. Because if the team doesn’t do well, the same people online will tag him and troll him.
 
Is this a new trend where an international team coach like Mike Hesson is hyping up the squad selected by Aaqib and Naqvi? Maybe Aaqib and Naqvi asked their puppet to say this on Twitter. If I were the coach, I’d rather stay quiet, keep away from social media, and focus on improving the team instead of drawing unnecessary attention to squad selection. Because if the team doesn’t do well, the same people online will tag him and troll him.
If Hesson is giving a squad, that he hasn’t chosen, the stamp of approval publicly, then it’s on him to face the music if things go south.

If he agreed to be their puppet, then so be it.
 
Solid points, he has a vision and a plan to achieve that vision. He is using T20 bilaterals to build depth and try players. Exactly what we need from a coach in this format, but we must give him time, at least until the 2028 T20 world cup.
 
Good points by Hesson. T20 is all about impactful runs. Look at the way Australia plays their T20. Short but impactful innings by multiple players and you have a solid score on the board.

Babar and Rizwan for too long have played impactless innings that have only helped their own numbers.

It’s a 20 over game. Divide those among 6 specialist batsmen and you are looking at each batsman playing only approx 3 overs - that’s it! Quick fire 30s is all we need.

Babar and Rizwan do not make this T20 side on merit.
 
Is this a new trend where an international team coach like Mike Hesson is hyping up the squad selected by Aaqib and Naqvi? Maybe Aaqib and Naqvi asked their puppet to say this on Twitter. If I were the coach, I’d rather stay quiet, keep away from social media, and focus on improving the team instead of drawing unnecessary attention to squad selection. Because if the team doesn’t do well, the same people online will tag him and troll him.
Hesson has a hands on role in selection
 
Is this a new trend where an international team coach like Mike Hesson is hyping up the squad selected by Aaqib and Naqvi? Maybe Aaqib and Naqvi asked their puppet to say this on Twitter. If I were the coach, I’d rather stay quiet, keep away from social media, and focus on improving the team instead of drawing unnecessary attention to squad selection. Because if the team doesn’t do well, the same people online will tag him and troll him.
Pakistan cricket is not about Babar and Rizwan. They failed horribly over the past two years, domestic performers deserve a chance to stake their claim.

Hesson is spot on with his selections so far.
 
Hesson has a hands on role in selection
It’s more or less the same players Aaqib has been picking and dropping over the past few series, long before Mike Hesson was even brought in as coach. Aaqib had already decided that, no matter what, Babar and Rizwan were the “problem” and had to be punished and made examples of how a low strike-rate batter won’t be tolerated. Yet the irony is, he keeps selecting players who have already been proven failures across just about every format of the game.

On the surface, they’ll say they’re listening to Mike since he’s just been appointed, but there’s no way this is his vision or his selection strategy. Right now, there are too many cooks, and while Aaqib is clearly running the show, the only person who seems like a complete puppet in all of this is Salman Agha, who is not being taken seriously or listened to at all. In reality, the captain should have the main vision of how he wants to proceed, with the coach supporting and agreeing with that direction. Until that happens, it’s hard to see any real progress being made.
 
It’s more or less the same players Aaqib has been picking and dropping over the past few series, long before Mike Hesson was even brought in as coach. Aaqib had already decided that, no matter what, Babar and Rizwan were the “problem” and had to be punished and made examples of how a low strike-rate batter won’t be tolerated. Yet the irony is, he keeps selecting players who have already been proven failures across just about every format of the game.

On the surface, they’ll say they’re listening to Mike since he’s just been appointed, but there’s no way this is his vision or his selection strategy. Right now, there are too many cooks, and while Aaqib is clearly running the show, the only person who seems like a complete puppet in all of this is Salman Agha, who is not being taken seriously or listened to at all. In reality, the captain should have the main vision of how he wants to proceed, with the coach supporting and agreeing with that direction. Until that happens, it’s hard to see any real progress being made.
Picking Babar and Rizwan in a T20 squad is not progress, what are you even talking about? The world has moved on from such players ages ago and here our fans are slitting wrists on two players who have no place in the modern LOI game.

Regardless of how bad this squad does, a template needs to be set based on which the younger players will need to come up at different age levels. We are mocked for playing 90s cricket by literally everyone, and here our fans are crying now that someone has the cojones to drop them both from the T20 squad.
 
Last 2 years Pakistan batting performance in T20 when they did not have both Rizwan and Babar. Salman Ali Agha selection will continue to be enigmatic. He got the most runs but at a strike rate of 118.


Screenshot-2025-08-17-143849.jpg
 
Make no mistake about it, this is Aaqib’s vision. The constant chopping and changing, the trial of bits and pieces players, all of it has his stamp on it. He, with Naqvi’s help, handpicked a coach who would fit neatly into his vision of running this Pakistan team. Hesson, in turn, seems to like Aaqib because they probably think alike and operate on the same page.
 
Wow, what an insight. All other teams were looking to select players who won't score any runs or have any positive impact. These coaches interviews comes off as fluffs without any substance
 
Last 2 years Pakistan batting performance in T20 when they did not have both Rizwan and Babar. Salman Ali Agha selection will continue to be enigmatic. He got the most runs but at a strike rate of 118.


Screenshot-2025-08-17-143849.jpg
Very positively impact full fun's from Agha Salman, Harris, Khushdil, Fakhar, Faheem, etc.
 
It’s more or less the same players Aaqib has been picking and dropping over the past few series, long before Mike Hesson was even brought in as coach. Aaqib had already decided that, no matter what, Babar and Rizwan were the “problem” and had to be punished and made examples of how a low strike-rate batter won’t be tolerated
So why are you sulking?

Aqib diagnosed the problem correctly. What’s your issue??
 
I thought I wouldn’t see a more incompetent foreign coach than Mickey, but he’s making him look like a genius. Captain clueless.
 
Mickey is the coach that won PK 2017 CT, how is he incompetent?
Mickey destroyed Pakistan’s Test team after the retirement of Misbah and Younis. He also transformed Pakistan into a minnow outfit in ODIs between 2018 and 2019.

He saw the demise of Sarfaraz as an individual performer and protected him even though Rizwan was clearly the superior WK batsman by 2019.

He found himself in the right place at the right time in the CT. It was not something that he designed. The stars aligned for Pakistan in that tournament.

The way Pakistan declined in Test cricket, got whitewashed in NZ, humiliated in the Asia Cup and exposed in the 2019 World Cup after getting battered by England, showed that Mickey was completely out of his depth and giving him the sack after the World Cup was necessary.

His second but completely forgettable “online coaching” stint was a complete farce too.
 
Mickey destroyed Pakistan’s Test team after the retirement of Misbah and Younis. He also transformed Pakistan into a minnow outfit in ODIs between 2018 and 2019.

He saw the demise of Sarfaraz as an individual performer and protected him even though Rizwan was clearly the superior WK batsman by 2019.

He found himself in the right place at the right time in the CT. It was not something that he designed. The stars aligned for Pakistan in that tournament.

The way Pakistan declined in Test cricket, got whitewashed in NZ, humiliated in the Asia Cup and exposed in the 2019 World Cup after getting battered by England, showed that Mickey was completely out of his depth and giving him the sack after the World Cup was necessary.

His second but completely forgettable “online coaching” stint was a complete farce too.
Every coach post Mickey had been 100x worse. Who has been better?

Mickey was a garbo test coach, that much i agree on. He was an excellent t20 coach and a good odi tournament coach but a poor bi lateral coach.

Rizzu replacing sarfi however is arguably the worst decison ever made in the history of Pakistan cricket.
 
Wow, what an insight. All other teams were looking to select players who won't score any runs or have any positive impact. These coaches interviews comes off as fluffs without any substance
What he is saying is clear and direct, and it sends a message to the Pakistani players. He is not saying players who score runs or have a positive impact, he is saying players who score runs AND have a positive impact. The implication is clear, no more stat padding run scoring for personal milestones.
 
Every coach post Mickey had been 100x worse. Who has been better?

Mickey was a garbo test coach, that much i agree on. He was an excellent t20 coach and a good odi tournament coach but a poor bi lateral coach.

Rizzu replacing sarfi however is arguably the worst decison ever made in the history of Pakistan cricket.
Mickey did a lot of stat-padding in T20Is in 2018 when teams were prioritizing ODIs due to World Cup season and hardly played their key players in T20Is.

Pakistan played an insane amount of T20 cricket that year and almost no matches vs full-strength sides. He was lucky there was no T20 WC at the time otherwise he would have been exposed.

As far as other coaches are concerned, Kirsten and GP were better than Hesson and Mickey. They should have been at the helm for at least two years but that clown Aqib sabotaged them only to get humiliated himself.
 
Mickey did a lot of stat-padding in T20Is in 2018 when teams were prioritizing ODIs due to World Cup season and hardly played their key players in T20Is.

Pakistan played an insane amount of T20 cricket that year and almost no matches vs full-strength sides. He was lucky there was no T20 WC at the time otherwise he would have been exposed.

As far as other coaches are concerned, Kirsten and GP were better than Hesson and Mickey. They should have been at the helm for at least two years but that clown Aqib sabotaged them only to get humiliated himself.
The tri series vs Aus was against a full strength aussie side at that time.
 
The tri series vs Aus was against a full strength aussie side at that time.
It wasn’t. There was no Warner or Starc.

Look at Australia’s bowling attack: Stanlake, Wildermuth, Agar, Tye, Richardson.

If there was a T20 World Cup in that year, Australia wouldn’t have picked at least 5 players who were part of the playing XI in that tri-series.

It was clearly a B if not a C Australian team.
 
It wasn’t. There was no Warner or Starc.

Look at Australia’s bowling attack: Stanlake, Wildermuth, Agar, Tye, Richardson.

If there was a T20 World Cup in that year, Australia wouldn’t have picked at least 5 players who were part of the playing XI in that tri-series.

It was clearly a B if not a C Australian team.
Fair enough on the Australia part. I'll acknowledge that it was a B team aus
 
Back
Top