What's new

A leaf from history: Creation of FSF by ZA Bhutto to target Opponents with the help of Establishment

Mian

T20I Debutant
Joined
Oct 25, 2016
Runs
7,014
One of those many lessons leftists skip while telling us stories about Quaid e Awaam. Bhutto was a dictator without uniform.
When Bhutto was faced with the police strike in March 1972, he became disillusioned about the role of law enforcement agencies. He feared that the situation would deteriorate further. To pre-empt a disaster he took a bold step. He called General Tikka Khan, the newly-appointed Commander-in-Chief of the Pakistan Army, and shared his intentions. The Federal Security Force came into existence almost immediately after that, fully equipped with modern arms. It was a formidable force mainly aimed at providing security to Bhutto and potentially thwart a possible coup — something he always feared. It would be under the direct control of no less a person than Bhutto himself.

The Federal Security Force was established with a force of 15,000 personnel; the plan was to increase its strength but this could not be done for want of funds. Stationed all over the country, its prime duty was to provide assistance to the police in maintaining law and order, beef up security at political meetings and rallies, keep a strict vigil over political opponents and even resort to violence if necessary to keep opponents in line. Through various branches it collected intelligence to counter the opposition parties and kept an eye on potential threats.

Haq Nawaz Tiwana, an officer drawn from the police, was the first director general of the FSF; he was soon replaced by Masood Mahmood, who had begun his career in the Indian Police Service two years before Independence and later received his law degree from Lincoln’s Inn. Bhutto and Masood Mahmood had a close relationship and frequently discussed various issues in confidence. However, after Ziaul Haq took over and opened the Kasuri murder case — investigating the death of Nawab Mohammad Ahmad Khan Kasuri, father of eminent politician Ahmad Raza Kasuri, who was killed on March 10-11, 1974 — Masood Mahmood became his ally and helped Ziaul Haq in sending Bhutto to the gallows.

To come back to the FSF, it is not clear why Bhutto really needed such a force. Many writers and social scientists believe that Bhutto did not want any kind of opposition. They think that he wanted to keep the people, especially his political opponents, in a constant state of fright.

It is a fact that the FSF committed several acts of violence. Among them the killing of Dr Nazir Ahmad, was very shocking. A Jamaat-i-Islami leader and MNA elected from Dera Ghazi Khan, he was an outspoken leader who opposed dictatorship and autocratic rule in the country. He used to criticise the PPP and Bhutto’s policies. On June 8, 1972, he was killed by unknown assailants while he was working in his clinic. His murder was immediately blamed on the FSF.

Another violent tragedy was the firing at Liaquat Bagh on March 23, 1973 where a political rally was being held. As the meeting began, firing ensued from various sides killing dozens of people. Wali Khan blamed FSF for resorting to unprovoked firing that claimed many innocent lives. The firing was never investigated.

Besides this, cases against many opposition workers and activists were framed based on FSF intelligence reports. The FSF’s role as a force to encounter any attempt of a coup was becoming a farce and people were becoming aware of what was happening. After Ziaul Haq’s takeover, the case of Nawab Mahmood Ahmad Kasuri was opened and Masood Mahmood, its director general, selected by Bhutto himself, turned against him as state witness and paved the way for his death. Along with Bhutto, FSF officials Mian Abbas, Arshad Iqbal, Ghulam Mustafa and Rana Iftikhar were also sentenced to death. In July 1977, the FSF was disbanded by Ziaul Haq.

https://www.dawn.com/news/737999
 
Stories of Dalai camp and how Bhutto used it to torture opponents are also missing from most of our political history to save democracy.
 
Bhutto along with Zia were the absolute worst things to ever happen to Pakistan. We are still reeling from their consequences to this day.
 
Bhutto was a traitor coz of his role in 1971, so deserved to be hanged. But he also started Pakistan's nuclear programme and gave Pakistan a Constitution which was a great achievement. He was also a founding member of OIC and a leading voice of Muslim unity at that time. His friendships with Shah of Iran and Shah Faisal are well known. I wish Bilawal had an ounce of charisma that ZAB had.
 
Bhutto was a traitor coz of his role in 1971, so deserved to be hanged. But he also started Pakistan's nuclear programme and gave Pakistan a Constitution which was a great achievement. He was also a founding member of OIC and a leading voice of Muslim unity at that time. His friendships with Shah of Iran and Shah Faisal are well known. I wish Bilawal had an ounce of charisma that ZAB had.

I'd be wary of calling Bhutto a traitor, especially on accounts of all his achievements you mentioned. His role in 1971 was restricted to not conceding Premiership to Mujib ur Rehman. Yahaya and earlier administrations were more responsible for East Pakistan's separation than Bhutto was.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Historic speech of <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/ShaheedZulfiqarBhutto?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#ShaheedZulfiqarBhutto</a> I strongly recommand <a href="https://twitter.com/BBhuttoZardari?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@BBhuttoZardari</a> to hear his Nana before committing his politics to PTM and other so called Nationalist <a href="https://t.co/URX0l9nLrL">https://t.co/URX0l9nLrL</a></p>— Ch Fawad Hussain (@fawadchaudhry) <a href="https://twitter.com/fawadchaudhry/status/1134568659169554439?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 31, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Historic speech of <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/ShaheedZulfiqarBhutto?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#ShaheedZulfiqarBhutto</a> I strongly recommand <a href="https://twitter.com/BBhuttoZardari?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@BBhuttoZardari</a> to hear his Nana before committing his politics to PTM and other so called Nationalist <a href="https://t.co/URX0l9nLrL">https://t.co/URX0l9nLrL</a></p>— Ch Fawad Hussain (@fawadchaudhry) <a href="https://twitter.com/fawadchaudhry/status/1134568659169554439?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 31, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Bhutto was a master at giving speeches, second only to hitler in that regard IMO in modern times.
 
Bhutto along with Zia were the absolute worst things to ever happen to Pakistan. We are still reeling from their consequences to this day.

Zia was monk compared to Bhutto...

The only cretin that challenges Bhutto as the worst calamity to have hit Pakistan is that coward fake commando Mushy...
 
Bhutto was a master at giving speeches, second only to hitler in that regard IMO in modern times.

According to Rafi Raza, one of Bhutto's confidants, the latter was inspired by the Fuhrer and implored this cabinet members to emulate Hitler's ministers in their respective ministries.
 
I'd be wary of calling Bhutto a traitor, especially on accounts of all his achievements you mentioned. His role in 1971 was restricted to not conceding Premiership to Mujib ur Rehman. Yahaya and earlier administrations were more responsible for East Pakistan's separation than Bhutto was.

Which provided the most prominent and palpable emblem of injustice meted out to East Pakistanis by West Pakistan. It was a profound symbol of continued usurpation of Bengali rights and proved to be the last and very heavy straw.

And let's not forget his part in fanning the mistrust of establishment against Mujib, his dalliances with Mujib leading up to the '71 crisis forged the antipathy against Mujib.

Bhutto was the face of establishment and played an equal part in dismembering of the country.
 
Zia was monk compared to Bhutto...

The only cretin that challenges Bhutto as the worst calamity to have hit Pakistan is that coward fake commando Mushy...

Mush had the best opportunity to make Pakistan great again but he was more interested in becoming a politician instead of a dictator.
 
Yup if he had lined up and shot all the politicians, AKA looters, thugs, traitors, people would have cheered him on. He had the biggest mandate in the history of Pakistan to clean house, but he singularly resurrected the political careers of the biggest looters and traitors in Pakistan's history.
 
Bhutto was as guilty as anyone if not more for the break-up of the country.
 
Bhutto was as guilty as anyone if not more for the break-up of the country.

i always found such post really hilarious.

Please do read mujeeb's 6 points.

Bhutto couldn't give it to him if you read those 6 points. And even Mujeeeb was right on those 6 points, but mujeeb had to come up with those 6 points due to what the Pak govt had been doing in the past.

The pinnacle moment was the cyclone, when our govt/army ignored.

As for Bhutto's case, the guy was innocent, the case is there for everyone to read. How the judges were planted, witnesses were killed.
 
i always found such post really hilarious.

Please do read mujeeb's 6 points.

Bhutto couldn't give it to him if you read those 6 points. And even Mujeeeb was right on those 6 points, but mujeeb had to come up with those 6 points due to what the Pak govt had been doing in the past.

The pinnacle moment was the cyclone, when our govt/army ignored.

As for Bhutto's case, the guy was innocent, the case is there for everyone to read. How the judges were planted, witnesses were killed.

So who attempted to kill Kasuri and ended up killing his father??? That has got to be the biggest mystery of the modern age...

I'd reckon whoever threatened to break the legs of newly elected parliamentarians if they were to attend the session called by Mujeeb in Dhaka...and the only one to do so was Kasuri...

And since Bhutto was such a benevolent leader, who didn't display any authoritarian traits after he took over the helm and it couldn't have been him since he never wrote in his notes to "eliminate him"...
 
i always found such post really hilarious.

Please do read mujeeb's 6 points.

Bhutto couldn't give it to him if you read those 6 points. And even Mujeeeb was right on those 6 points, but mujeeb had to come up with those 6 points due to what the Pak govt had been doing in the past.

The pinnacle moment was the cyclone, when our govt/army ignored.

As for Bhutto's case, the guy was innocent, the case is there for everyone to read. How the judges were planted, witnesses were killed.

Why Bhutto needed FSF and why he asked General Tikka Khan to help him create FSF?
 
Found this great pic of Zulfi

D_DhLvpXsAEUW2a.jpg:large
 
Back
Top