Technics 1210
Test Debutant
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2019
- Runs
- 14,930
Out of court settlement written all over it.
Welcome to Amreekan justice.
Welcome to Amreekan justice.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I know logic is not your strongpoint.They need to nail Baldwin, the guy was arrogant and behaved like a negligent cowboy on set. You cannot kill someone and get away with it, let's not forget he was the producer as well therefore he shares the biggest burden.
Why? He was given a tool, which experts checked and certified as safe. If the tool was not safe, what is his fault?Hopefully he will pay big time in these Civil Suits
While most of the blame lies on the person who gave him the gun, he bears some responsibility for not checking if the gun was loaded or not.Why? He was given a tool, which experts checked and certified as safe. If the tool was not safe, what is his fault?
It was meant to be loaded with dummy rounds. It was not meant to be empty.While most of the blame lies on the person who gave him the gun, he bears some responsibility for not checking if the gun was loaded or not.
Why? He was given a tool, which experts checked and certified as safe. If the tool was not safe, what is his fault?
have you ever used a firearm? do you have any knowledge on differentiating between live and dummy rounds?If the script required to shoot himself, would he have double checked to ensure the gun was loaded with live bullets or not or would he have blindly relied on the armourer?
It’s a movie set. Any actor who has worked on a movie set with guns knows the steps you’re supposed to follow. You’re shown the gun, the barrel is checked to ensure it’s clear and that there’s nothing wedged inside, and you’re shown the blanks used for the scene.It was meant to be loaded with dummy rounds. It was not meant to be empty.
It’s the armorers job (l’m one btw) to make sure it didn’t have “live” rounds
Actually No. The proper procedure is to hand the firearm with the dummy rounds loaded to he actor and as soon as the scene is done, you take it away.It’s a movie set. Any actor who has worked on a movie set with guns knows the steps you’re supposed to follow. You’re shown the gun, the barrel is checked to ensure it’s clear and that there’s nothing wedged inside, and you’re shown the blanks used for the scene.
1) No amateur can tell the difference between dummy rounds and real rounds by casual inspectionAn actor of Baldwin's experience should have been more diligent in that situation, and should have ensured it was safe to use. The bulk of the responsibility lies on the person who have him the gun but Baldwin does bear some responsibility for that woman's death.
I think I will take Tarantino's word on this. A renowned filmmaker who has made numerous films involving guns, as opposed to someone like you who clearly has no idea what he is talking about.Actually No. The proper procedure is to hand the firearm with the dummy rounds loaded to he actor and as soon as the scene is done, you take it away.
Would you mind clarifying what you call blanks?
Might be a confusion in terminology
1) No amateur can tell the difference between dummy rounds and real rounds by casual inspection
Have you used firearms and created ammunition
2) "If" the scene calls for him to pull the trigger, I don't see how the actor has any blame here
LMAO. so you are appealing to authority, that too a a film director not a firearms expert.I think I will take Tarantino's word on this. A renowned filmmaker who has made numerous films involving guns, as opposed to someone like you who clearly has no idea what he is talking about.
![]()
Quentin Tarantino Says Alec Baldwin Is “10 Percent” Responsible for ‘Rust’ Shooting
While appearing on Bill Maher's podcast 'Club Random,' the filmmaker opined that "you are a partner in the responsibility to some degree" when it comes to actors being involved in such accidents on set.www.hollywoodreporter.com
You have zero idea what you are talking aboutLMAO. so you are appealing to authority, that too a a film director not a firearms expert.
So you previous post was a verbatim copy of Taratino and passing it off as your own words.
If that works for you great.
care to elaborate? or is it going to more of what Tarantino says.You have zero idea what you are talking about
You have zero idea what you are talking about
Still waiting bro.care to elaborate? or is it going to more of what Tarantino says.
I reckon you will be waiting another six months if you don't learn how to comprehend basic English.Still waiting bro.
You must be a great dodgeball player.I reckon you will be waiting another six months if you don't learn how to comprehend basic English.
Maybe go back and try to read my response slowly this time. Read one word at a time. That might be easier for you.
You don’t need a reply, you need a mirror and a long conversation with it.You must be a great dodgeball player.