What's new

An 'attritional' batting style will bring positive results for Pakistan against England in Tests

Abdullah719

T20I Captain
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Runs
44,825
A big thanks to [MENTION=136079]ahmedwaqas92[/MENTION] for this wonderful article!



In this day and age of the modern T20 format, attritional cricket seems like the odd memory which neither fades nor captivates the mind. It acts somewhat like a blunt knife which might not slice through butter on most occasions, but on the offset if you accidentally ring your finger; in the struggle to extract butter i.e., it wouldn’t do half the damage, that a sharper more well rounded knife would generally induce.

The same can be said, extensively I might add, about how Pakistan have approached their Test campaigns in the last 6 odd years – more or less. Their rise in the rankings has been predominately built on the back of a single most defiant strategy of yesteryears; occupy the crease as long as you can and grind the opposition into the zapping heat of the desert. They did it against the English back in 2012 and comprehensively have managed to keep the U.A.E. fortress from falling over ever since.


876632-missyou-1430121073.jpg


Now with the first Test at Lord’s in sight, in almost as little as 3 days, Pakistan may need to conjure up a batting strategy that might suit their strengths and at the same time give them enough of a cushion to negate the foreign soil dilemma. In such a scenario, attritional cricket, although one of the most unpopular choices, serves up to be the most effective option under the current circumstances.

To begin with, the team management on tour needs to identify Pakistan’s batting strengths and the cogs that make it a competitive unit. In practice, the line up can be broken down into 3 different sets:

  1. Openers – Mohammad Hafeez and Shan Masood
  2. Middle Order – Azhar Ali, Younis Khan, Misbah-ul-Haq and Asad Shafiq
  3. Lower Order – Sarfraz Ahmed + The Tail

In this particular analysis, we will provide a hypothetical run down of how, if given small manageable targets, can this Pakistan batting lineup compete in testing and unfamiliar conditions. The data sets used subsequently range from 29th Aug 2010 (the last day of the last Test from our previous English tour in 2010) up until our most recent Test assignment in 2015. Our focus would entail the number of balls faced by each batsman over the course of the entire periodic range and how it enables us to identify the role of each and every batsman.

Historically speaking, Pakistan have always had their fair share of troubles whenever it came to finding decent opening pairs. In retrospect it can be said that apart from the Mohammad Hafeez and Taufeeq Umar pairing, nothing comes to mind when speaking of substantial numbers in the recent past.

Such a mindset does not increment a lot of confidence if you’re a Pakistani team strategist or someone that would be looking to strategise a batting plan; however, what we can do is to look at what can be achieved with the resources at hand.

At this very moment, Mohammad Hafeez and Shan Masood are all set to make it to the Lord’s test as our openers, while in order for them to flourish, we will first need to identify how they’ve fared over the course of the entire preceding period.

ss1.jpg

In the course of the prescribed time period (29th Aug 2010 – Present), Mohammad Hafeez, as seen from the table, has faced approximately 4500 deliveries in 69 odd innings with an impressive strike rate of 60+ and healthy average consisting in the early 40s. Shan Masood on the other hand, while relatively new on the block, has faced 780 deliveries in as much as fourteen innings with a par strike rate and average of 46.28 and 25.78 respectively.

Since both these batsmen are locked in for the first match, it is unwise and practically unrealistic to expect blazing hundreds from each of them therefore the best possible batting strategy would be to enable them with smaller achievable targets that might benefit and complement the strong middle order that is to follow suit. Dissecting the above data sets we can extract the following information:

ss2.jpg

The above numbers signify that if, based on historic data documented over the course of the prescribed time period, Hafeez and Shan play out the average deliveries per innings; their combined score would establish the Pakistani opening stand with a sixty plus score in as much as approximately 20 overs.

An opening stand like this will maximize the run rate to 3.xx and would almost completely scale the first session. This batting strategy based on grind work and attritional batting would be in line with the deficiencies of the shaky top order and while the conditions would be totally different to what they might have faced earlier, it is a very basic and achievable starting point for Pakistan’s opening batsmen.

Following suit is the much talked about and celebrated middle order consisting of Azhar Ali, the veteran Younis Khan, the Pakistani skipper Misbah-ul-Haq and Asad Shafiq. A look at their numbers seems more than appropriate and in line with the same above concept, we deduced:

ss3.jpg

The difference in stature and quality is quite apparent when the numbers are seen in comparison with the openers earlier; out of the above four, Asad Shafiq, someone who features at #6 in the lineup has 4 innings less than the experienced Mohammad Hafeez but has faced 1000+ more balls in comparison.

He is also someone who has the least number of innings across the five settled top order individuals and on most occasions faces the second new ball in a Pakistani innings. That said, we can now extract the following information from the above table:

ss4.jpg

It is noteworthy that if everyone plays to their average potential, the middle order would be adding 180 odd runs and consuming 400 odd deliveries in the process. This kind of a batting, featuring on the back of a 60 run opening stand would automatically make Pakistan’s score hover between 250+, on most occasions and seeing the bowling resources we have, it would definitely make a very stiff challenge for the English batsmen whenever the Pakistani boys take the field.

Another glaring stat that came up in analyzing these data sets was the difference of Average Difference / Data Normalization for Younis Khan and Misbah-ul-Haq from their periodic average of 60.25 and 56.87 respectively. For Younis Khan Aggregate Expected Runs came down 8.19 units to 52.06 and for Misbah it subtracted to more than 10 units coming in at 45.80.

This clearly shows that both these veterans have quite a few not outs in their Test careers. While this may downplay their achievements in the long run, it is something quite encouraging for our batting lineup as it articulates the notion that both these individuals can spend long amounts of time at the crease and consume pressure so that lesser experienced batsmen bat around them; the likes of Azhar, Shafiq, Shan and the wicket-keeper Sarfraz can score within their comfort zone.

The last bit of deduction requires our attention to move over to the wicket keeper (Sarfraz Ahmed) and how his bit (with the bat, that is) could potentially result in Pakistan scoring 100 runs with the tail or being bundled out for 20 odd runs. Initially, his data sets provide the following information:

ss5.jpg

Looking at the above, what’s extremely apparent is the escalated strike rate of 74.56 and with an extremely decent average of 46.28, Sarfraz can be the perfect counter attacking foil to the solid preceding middle order. However, once we take into account our Balls faced per Innings and Data Normalization for the average we get:

ss6.jpg

It is evidently clear that attritional cricket is not the strongest suit in Sarfraz’s game since his deliveries faced per innings is even lower than Shan Masood’s, an out and out rookie in Test cricket; but what’s encouraging is that the average difference comes to 11.24 units which again clarifies that if given the opportunity, he might have it in him to play a longer, more steadied hand as his previous stints have quite the number of not outs.

Sarfraz also has the added responsibility of playing with the tail, and as the Pakistan tail has fared to be below par in recent times, the responsibility on his shoulders to properly farm the strike and at the same time add sufficient runs to the tally becomes doubly important.

With all things said and done, we might as well look at a scoreboard scenario where every one of the above bats plays to the minimum of what we’ve deduced; while as said in the early bit of our analysis the best way forward to devising a batting strategy based on our strengths would be to set small incremental targets in occupying the crease for as long as possible, and if every of our batsmen successfully conjures to the notion, then at a bare minimum, we could be looking at something like this:

ss7.jpg

The scoreboard shows only one batsman reaching a score of 50 runs with no hundreds tallied either, while for argument’s sake we have given 30 runs for the occupation of 50 odd deliveries for the entire tail of 4 bowlers. This practically amounts to 7.5 runs per tail ender who might survive for 12 odd deliveries in one given innings; a fair enough conclusion for a struggling tail, for an international Test team.

Three hundred and eleven runs scored in excess of 100 overs constitutes that Pakistan, if they play minimum to what their historic stats suggest, would carry out batting 4 sessions every given time they come out to bat. Coupled that with the bowling resources at hand, it can be safely be said that if our players and management put their minds to the task there could genuinely be a case of an English upset this summer.

However, the key to success lies in playing to your strengths and as the data has fundamentally shown, occupation of the crease and setting achievable targets should be the immediate strategy for our boys in green.

Blazing stroke play and aesthetically pleasing cover drives can win you a bucket load of fans and other artificial incentives, but an overseas win in testing conditions can only be overhauled by the virtue of patience and the application of the tried and tested method of attritional Test match batting. The sooner we realize this, the closer we’ll get to creating history.
 
Last edited:
An excellent article.

I think Misbah knows this well but hope he can get that instilled in his batsmen as well. Stay on the wicket and runs will come. That is our only hope to set up good scores for out bowlers to defend and take the attack to the opposition
 
An "attritional" batting style is not as easy as it sounds. It requires a solid technique and knowing the off-stump. We're talking about England here, where even a proper horizontal bat shot could get you caught at the slip.
 
Last edited:
An "attritional" batting style is not as easy as it sounds. It requires a solid technique and knowing the off-stump. We're talking about England here, where even a proper horizontal bat shot could get you caught at the slip.

I agree but we cannot panic here. The batsmen need to bring their experience to bear.

Remember we arent talking 600+ type scores here. Even 300+ can yield us a positive result.
 
An "attritional" batting style is not as easy as it sounds. It requires a solid technique and knowing the off-stump. We're talking about England here, where even a proper horizontal bat shot could get you caught at the slip.

Technique, although extremely important, is sometimes massively over rated when it comes to practical on field results. In the current line up, Younis Khan and Azhar, having not the most celebrated batting technique have been somewhat our middle order batting pillars.

Grind work and attritional cricket are as important in test as knowing where your off stump is and this is the same reason aesthetic batsmen such as Umer Amin and others could not stake a claim on the big stage as opposed to someone like an Azhar or Asad.
 
Technique, although extremely important, is sometimes massively over rated when it comes to practical on field results. In the current line up, Younis Khan and Azhar, having not the most celebrated batting technique have been somewhat our middle order batting pillars.

Grind work and attritional cricket are as important in test as knowing where your off stump is and this is the same reason aesthetic batsmen such as Umer Amin and others could not stake a claim on the big stage as opposed to someone like an Azhar or Asad.

Excellent article bro! Thoroughly put together and I look forward to many more from you as the series progresses.
 
[MENTION=136079]ahmedwaqas92[/MENTION] master piece bro, very well done.

Blazing stroke play and aesthetically pleasing cover drives can win you a bucket load of fans and other artificial incentives, but an overseas win in testing conditions can only be overhauled by the virtue of patience and the application of the tried and tested method of attritional Test match batting

Good point, i hope our management, players already aware of it.
 
[MENTION=136079]ahmedwaqas92[/MENTION] master piece bro, very well done.

Blazing stroke play and aesthetically pleasing cover drives can win you a bucket load of fans and other artificial incentives, but an overseas win in testing conditions can only be overhauled by the virtue of patience and the application of the tried and tested method of attritional Test match batting

Good point, i hope our management, players already aware of it.

Thanks Bro, hope you enjoyed it !!
 
Excellent article brother.

I looked into historical data and you are right. This approach can work.

But personally believe that the discipline needed to execute attritional batting in a place like England isn't present in modern day bats.

Pakistan batsmen are great at executing it in UAE but not sure whether this approach would yield efforts in England.

I feel batting needs to be somewhere between attritional and lively.

Can't drive on the up in England but can't get too bogged down too for 2 reasons:

1. Pacers will operate for most part
2. Collapses are common in England

Let's see how Pakistan batsmen approach this situation.
 
Great piece bro.
The only thing missing from here is that - and maybe I missed it- is that the actual key to us getting a 300 plus score is for the guy who gets through 30-40 balls to make sure he goes on and MAKES IT COUNT!!

It is very rare that you see the above scorecard- because you will always have a sub 10 score and a sub 20 score in the top 7 or 8.
 
Excellent article brother.

I looked into historical data and you are right. This approach can work.

But personally believe that the discipline needed to execute attritional batting in a place like England isn't present in modern day bats.

Pakistan batsmen are great at executing it in UAE but not sure whether this approach would yield efforts in England.

I feel batting needs to be somewhere between attritional and lively.

Can't drive on the up in England but can't get too bogged down too for 2 reasons:

1. Pacers will operate for most part
2. Collapses are common in England

Let's see how Pakistan batsmen approach this situation.

What I find encouraging about this particular Pakistani lineup is the fact that each and everyone of the bats knows their limitations and rather than confronting the matter head on, they try to play within them as best as possible - quite a clever approach if you ask me.

However, I wrote this piece with the intention of highlighting the simple fact that in order for us to make decent batting displays in English conditions; it would be wise to play to our strengths rather than trying to emulate a more dynamic approach which we are sadly, as a batting unit, quite alien towards.

Give yourselves small achievable targets so that completing them would be relatively easier rather than being wishful of scoring daddy hundreds and ATG level accomplishments. If this batting lineup can muster up 250-300ish scores each time they came out to bat then I believe that would be a job well done.
 
What I find encouraging about this particular Pakistani lineup is the fact that each and everyone of the bats knows their limitations and rather than confronting the matter head on, they try to play within them as best as possible - quite a clever approach if you ask me.

However, I wrote this piece with the intention of highlighting the simple fact that in order for us to make decent batting displays in English conditions; it would be wise to play to our strengths rather than trying to emulate a more dynamic approach which we are sadly, as a batting unit, quite alien towards.

Give yourselves small achievable targets so that completing them would be relatively easier rather than being wishful of scoring daddy hundreds and ATG level accomplishments. If this batting lineup can muster up 250-300ish scores each time they came out to bat then I believe that would be a job well done.

Yeah makes more sense to go for what has worked for you rather than try stuff which is alien to you.

I agree.

But they need to take control of the moments in the middle of the innings where run scoring can get important. I suppose Shafiq and Younis missed out such an opportunity in a test in SA and Pakistan paid the price. So those moments, Pak needs to be a bit more proactive.

This is going to be an interesting series and a wonderful case study.

I have no idea what's going to happen so it would be interesting to see.
 
Great piece bro.
The only thing missing from here is that - and maybe I missed it- is that the actual key to us getting a 300 plus score is for the guy who gets through 30-40 balls to make sure he goes on and MAKES IT COUNT!!

It is very rare that you see the above scorecard- because you will always have a sub 10 score and a sub 20 score in the top 7 or 8.

You are correct in identifying the missing link in the article but I knowingly did not cover the latter since it would open up many other statistical possibilities of conversion rates, and percentage runs <50 and from 50<x<100.


This would've made the initial synopsis of the article quite clustered with arbitrary numerical and following the piece's logic from a non mathematical point of view would've been extremely confusing. We can however claim that if in the above scorecard any one of the blokes goes on and makes it count then as a counter balance that innings would effectively negate the couple of failures or as you sub par 10 or 20 scores.
 
Last edited:
This is a good piece bro.

The only thing I will say is we can't be defensive against Moen Ali. We should look to rotate the strike of him and hit boundaries if possible. Against broad and Anderson we need to be careful but not miss out on loose balls.
 
I suppose Shafiq and Younis missed out such an opportunity in a test in SA and Pakistan paid the price. So those moments, Pak needs to be a bit more proactive.

You talking about the 1st Innings of the 2nd Test between Pakistan and South Africa in Feb 2013. This is when Asad and Younis both scored 111 each but the problem is the game wasn't lost because of these two innings, in fact Younis and Asad set up the match perfectly for Pakistan to win. There were two defining factors in that loss.

(1) Support Batting around and Asad and Younis was practically non-existent + horrible second innings
(2) We lost the game because mighty Robin Peterson :facepalm: along with Steyn, Philander and Morkel added more than 100+ runs for the last three batting positions.

In the first Innings barring YK and Asad these were the scores of the top 7:

Hafeez 17 (35)
Nasir Jamshed 3 (23)
Azhar 4 (21)
Misbah 0 (4)
Sarfraz 13 (17)

Even after such a horrid show YK and Asad managed to keep the run rate around 3.1ish the entire time and this was the reason why we ended up with 338 in 116 overs. The second innings was just :facepalm: worthy as we got bundled out for 169 :69: :69:

My analysis earlier also indicated that a run rate of 3.xx in 600 odd deliveries would escalate us to 300+ scores while the only difference was that instead of going for blazing daddy hundreds we go for smaller achievable goals that are in line with the Pakistani batsmen's playing strengths. Just imagine if one of the blokes ends up with a ton while others score their bare minimum - we'd probably be looking at something around 400 I guess, but essentially it all depends on how much application our batsmen are willing to put in whenever they go out to bat.
 
Last edited:
This is a good piece bro.

The only thing I will say is we can't be defensive against Moen Ali. We should look to rotate the strike of him and hit boundaries if possible. Against broad and Anderson we need to be careful but not miss out on loose balls.

The English, knowing our strengths against the spinning ball would hardly dish out Moeen Ali for even 15% of the match. Whether we like it or not, they would rather bowl with a part time seamer than give us 20 odd overs of spin.

Also it's not about being defensive, its the mere fact that we should stick to something that has worked for us in the past. I know these are alien conditions to begin with but to magically expect our batters, who have played for the most part in sub continent, gun down daddy hundreds is absolute wishful thinking.

I would rather get the blokes to grind out a decent 40-45ish score on a consistent basis than to play 'modern cricket' and end up getting bundled out for 150 odd runs. The smart thing would be to play to our strengths rather than to try something that we haven't even remotely considered in the last five years.

What do you think ??
 
Last edited:
You talking about the 1st Innings of the 2nd Test between Pakistan and South Africa in Feb 2013. This is when Asad and Younis both scored 111 each but the problem is the game wasn't lost because of these two innings, in fact Younis and Asad set up the match perfectly for Pakistan to win. There were two defining factors in that loss.

(1) Support Batting around and Asad and Younis was practically non-existent + horrible second innings
(2) We lost the game because mighty Robin Peterson :facepalm: along with Steyn, Philander and Morkel added more than 100+ runs for the last three batting positions.

In the first Innings barring YK and Asad these were the scores of the top 7:

Hafeez 17 (35)
Nasir Jamshed 3 (23)
Azhar 4 (21)
Misbah 0 (4)
Sarfraz 13 (17)

Even after such a horrid show YK and Asad managed to keep the run rate around 3.1ish the entire time and this was the reason why we ended up with 338 in 116 overs. The second innings was just :facepalm: worthy as we got bundled out for 169 :69: :69:

My analysis earlier also indicated that a run rate of 3.xx in 600 odd deliveries would escalate us to 300+ scores while the only difference was that instead of going for blazing daddy hundreds we go for smaller achievable goals that are in line with the Pakistani batsmen's playing strengths. Just imagine if one of the blokes ends up with a ton while others score their bare minimum - we'd probably be looking at something around 400 I guess, but essentially it all depends on how much application our batsmen are willing to put in whenever they go out to bat.

That game, they defended against Peterson bit too much.

That innings run rate was 2.9 only.

That 338 could have been who knows...380 or 400 and you would have won the game.

SA won that game by 4 wickets only. That extra 50 runs would have been golden.

Of course, in any loss, there would be many reasons (or else a team wouldn't lose) but when Pak had a chance to really damage Saffers in the first innings, it didn't utilize it well.

The very reasons you mention in the above post is why you can't block too much.

In UAE, Pakistan had the skills to do it. Its very very impressive no doubt.

In England, it could very well go from 120/1 to 150/5 and 180 all out. Now scoring fast may not have mattered in an innings like here but it may matter in a crucial juncture.

Not asking batsmen to score really fast or play flashily but if you go into a shell....a Pujara situation can happen.

Long periods of spell but little impact cos he got out one ball.
 
The English, knowing our strengths against the spinning ball would hardly dish out Moeen Ali for even 15% of the match. Whether we like it or not, they would rather bowl with a part time seamer than give us 20 odd overs of spin.

Also it's not about being defensive, its the mere fact that we should stick to something that has worked for us in the past. I know these are alien conditions to begin with but to magically expect our batters, who have played for the most part in sub continent, gun down daddy hundreds is absolute wishful thinking.

I would rather get the blokes to grind out a decent 40-45ish score on a consistent basis than to play 'modern cricket' and end up getting bundled out for 150 odd runs. The smart thing would be to play to our strengths rather than to try something that we haven't even remotely considered in the last five years.

What do you think ??

They will have to bowl moen eventually. The seam bowlers can't bowl all day especially on hot days they wil need him eventually so we have to take advantage when he is bowling.

Yes I don't expect us to score at 4/5 an over but we can't be too defensive. We must respect Anderson and Broad but put away there bad balls. Also finn has struggled a bit so we can score of him.

The England batting line up will score at a faster rate than us so we can't be too defensive, strike rotation is a must if just to put England bowlers of there line and lengths. But for the most part we will be batting how we bat in the UAE
 
An "attritional" batting style is not as easy as it sounds. It requires a solid technique and knowing the off-stump. We're talking about England here, where even a proper horizontal bat shot could get you caught at the slip.
True lol. The whole plan hinges on the technique and temperament of our batting unit in England. If that wasn't an issue then there wouldn't be a debate even
 
A very enjoyable read.

Well done [MENTION=136079]ahmedwaqas92[/MENTION]
 
Interesting read. I am however trying to figure out, what runrate qualifies as 'attritional' as per OP.
If I look at Lord's test matches from 2010 till now a few things stand out from a batting point of view:
- in the 14 test matches played, England have won 7, drawn 3, and lost 4
- during this period pakistan has played once at lord's whereby england went at a little over 3 runs an over, Pakistan tried to go at 2.74 runs an over in its first innings
- there is no 'won' test match that has not been set up with one team going well over 3.5 runs an over
- for the most part team runrates go below 3 runs an over is when they are dismissed for a low score or defending on the last day (logical considering that you have to be conservative in both situations)

Compare that with Pakistan's last challenging tour abroad: against South Africa.
For much of the series Pakistan played at 2.8 - 3.2 run rates, whereas south africa went at 3.3 - 4.2: we know how that series ended.

Of course Pakistan lost that series since the quality of batting was not good enough to get them close. Its very difficult to judge how Pakistan will go this series, because they have a unique situation over the last 5 years of playing at home or close to home.
I feel ultimately, it will not be just about attritional cricket. It comes down to the quality of their batsmen. The assumption with attritional cricket is that an inferior cricketer can last out longer by eschewing risks. that does happen, but that requires enormous amount of mental fortitude. And I am not sure Pakistan's opening pair has that.
 
Pakistan's batting isn't lacking in application and temperament but apart from Asad and Azhar, they simply don't have the technique to cope with the conditions.
 
I'm positive you said before that they would grind their way to a century and struggle otherwise.

Grind to a century with a couple of low scores(30-50s). I back Azhar to score more than Asad. With 6 batsmen like them we'd get to 330-370 consistently and that'd be enough to win/draw the series.
 
Attritional batting style for the world: batting carefully and thoughtfully, not taking undue risks.

Attritional batting style for Pakistan: chicken out of pace, don't look to score any runs of them and wait for the spinners to come.

The Pakistani way of attritional batting works beautifully in the UAE because the pitches there are the flattest in the world where even the best pacers in the world are neutralized.

Our batsmen can simply play them out without touching any delivery that pitches outside the three stumps and can then take on the spinners.

In places like England, sooner or later, one delivery will have your name on it. You cannot afford to go into the shell completely and will have to be a little more engaged against pace bowling, because the spinners will not bowl as many overs as they do in the UAE and scoring opportunities against them will be less.

However, there's a fine line between being reckless and being proactive. I am not sure if the Pakistani batsmen are capable of treading on this fine line.

The bottom line is that they will have to show more guts against pace bowling than they usually do.

People are quick to point out Lord's and Oval are flat pitches, but English flat pitches are not the same as UAE flat pitches, because there is still pace in the wicket and they are not dry and sluggish like UAE wickets.

It's easier to bat at a good tempo against pace bowling on flat English wickets, but you need to have the courage to play your shots.

Apart from Hafeez and Sarfraz, our players don't have the courage to play shots against pace.
 
I appreciate your effort, brother, but I don't buy this idea of attritional cricket in the modern fast times.

[MENTION=20160]Corridor of Uncertainty[/MENTION] analysed it really well in another thread, one of his points was;

3. Attritional cricket vs 10 good balls

None of Pakistani batsmen have proven themselves to defend for hours in English conditions. It is not easy and possibly outside our skill set. One good ball is enough to undo a batsman defending for hours with an SR of 20 and 30 runs against his name.

And same goes for the English side, none have proven themselves to defend for hours.
 
Attritional batting style for the world: batting carefully and thoughtfully, not taking undue risks.

Attritional batting style for Pakistan: chicken out of pace, don't look to score any runs of them and wait for the spinners to come.

The Pakistani way of attritional batting works beautifully in the UAE because the pitches there are the flattest in the world where even the best pacers in the world are neutralized.

Our batsmen can simply play them out without touching any delivery that pitches outside the three stumps and can then take on the spinners.

In places like England, sooner or later, one delivery will have your name on it. You cannot afford to go into the shell completely and will have to be a little more engaged against pace bowling, because the spinners will not bowl as many overs as they do in the UAE and scoring opportunities against them will be less.

However, there's a fine line between being reckless and being proactive. I am not sure if the Pakistani batsmen are capable of treading on this fine line.

The bottom line is that they will have to show more guts against pace bowling than they usually do.

People are quick to point out Lord's and Oval are flat pitches, but English flat pitches are not the same as UAE flat pitches, because there is still pace in the wicket and they are not dry and sluggish like UAE wickets.

It's easier to bat at a good tempo against pace bowling on flat English wickets, but you need to have the courage to play your shots.

Apart from Hafeez and Sarfraz, our players don't have the courage to play shots against pace.

POTW for me this!

100% agree pakistan are going to have to score a lot more runs and be proactive against england pacers in this series, by just playing out maidens and blocking pacers will just allow pressure to build and a good delivery will take a wicket and pakistans inns wont have advanced, pakistan need to keep the pace of the game ticking along as we wont see to many overs from englands spinners in this series.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Worked for Pakistan but England showing the other way of doing things!
 
Need to be a bit more positive in the next innings. At least rotate the strike more.
 
Looking at the current innings, it almost seems as though this plan is being utilised! Better strike rotation than previously, but also a lot of discipline, specially from Sami.
 
Looking at the current innings, it almost seems as though this plan is being utilised! Better strike rotation than previously, but also a lot of discipline, specially from Sami.

I was planning on bumping this thread :P

On topic - the thing about attritional cricket is that it enables the batting order to go big since you practically give yourself more of a chance to get used to the conditions and assess how to go about on the track.

In addition, with English being the whiners that they have been over the years, it brings out the best of them on field :P case in point - Jimmy Anderson !!! :D
 
This is what we miss now with Younis and Misbah not there.
 
Back
Top