Anfield
T20I Debutant
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2010
- Runs
- 8,000
Need more away matches, especially away matches. So far IMO Mathews is a better bat but in longer run I think Kohli would triumph him.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
if virat can another big 100 and get india a draw atleast he will go above mathews
Based on 1 serieswhy don't you look at how both performed in England?
I'm going series by series before the england series mathews was leading but now after 2 100s virat is back on level terms
Why don't you look at how both performed in Australia and South Africa? Hell Mathews averages under 40 away much like Kohli and Kohli hasn't even faced Bangladesh.Based on 1 serieswhy don't you look at how both performed in England?
You can only use comparative results, Matthews >>>>>> Kohli in England. You can't put Kohli ahead until Matthews plays in Adelaide.
^^ It seems as there is a correlation between having Batman in your username and having a fondness for Kohli![]()
You can only use comparative results, Matthews >>>>>> Kohli in England. You can't put Kohli ahead until Matthews plays in Adelaide.
You can only use comparative results, Matthews >>>>>> Kohli in England. You can't put Kohli ahead until Matthews plays in Adelaide.
Avgs less than 30.I'm sure Mathews would've done equally well in Australia..
LOL, so after each good performance was one of them this thread is going to get bumped?
Matthews. Extra pressure as captain, series win in England and above all, an awesome series as a batsman in England which Virat can never boast of right now
Both are good.
Mathews will be more consistent on tougher surfaces.
Do tougher surfaces end in England?
You're getting insecure for no reason. Calm down.
Don't dig things from the past when he was new & struggling to find his feet. He transformed himself and is a completely different bat now.
What I said is true. Rahane may be able to challenge Mathews in tougher conditions.
Oh oh.More excuses.Keep them coming.
And BTW if you didnt know it was Kohli's first test tour of england.But then again you will probably find another new excuse about why Matthew's failures in SA/AUS etc and why he doesnt have any centuries outside UAE/SL except England and why Kohli's failures in England should be used to declare him a lesser batsman.
If Matthews played on these pitches he would have scored a couple double hundreds. Absolute pancakes when the likes of Hazlewood and Haris come close to quick centuries.
If Matthews played on these pitches he would have scored a couple double hundreds. Absolute pancakes when the likes of Hazlewood and Haris come close to quick centuries.
what else did you think?
You take it to another level![]()
If you are under the presumption that Australia can only produce fast and bouncy wickets you are ill informed. The real test of Australia was due to the bowling attack led by McGrath, and the fact that the pitches were actually spicy.
I take the word of a world-class international bowler like Haris who is playing on this wicket - who says these pitches are highways - than an armchair expert in India such as yourself. When a debutant like Hazlewood and the likes of Johnson, Harris and Starc are smashing big scores at ~100 SR then the pitch is flat, no question about that.
Again insecurity. You need to calm down. Kohli is good as I've already mentioned.
You don't have to force others to believe that he's the best young Test bat though. Most will disagree.
Can't really blame himMathews missed out on a great oppurtunity to show the world that he is a superior bat to virat in tests![]()
Mathews did well in ENG
Kohli did well in AUS
But overall so far Mathews test record > Kohli
I'm still not convinced about Kohli's credentials against swing. England's tour will remain a blemish on his career forever. That was beyond atrocious.
Being a rohit fanboy , this was expected from you
Even we Mumbaikars have lost hope on this noob, he's been an abject failure outside India in all formats.
lol. He has better test average in SA, NZ and Australia than Inzi.
View attachment 52571View attachment 52572
Kohli has big problems against pace bowling on green pitches and his game against the spinners isn't too special either. Matthews will atleast score runs against spinners.
How about you take into account the difference in quality between the teams that we have now and the ones during Inzi's time?
Kohli has big problems against pace bowling on green pitches and his game against the spinners isn't too special either. Matthews will atleast score runs against spinners.
Kohli has big problems against pace bowling on green pitches and his game against the spinners isn't too special either. Matthews will atleast score runs against spinners.
Kohli has big problems against pace bowling on green pitches and his game against the spinners isn't too special either. Matthews will atleast score runs against spinners.
Can't believe that people are using Kohli's performances on flat pitches to show that he has done great in South Africa and Australia. Matthews and any other good batsman would have scored runs on those pitches so its hardly a bid deal that Kohli plundered a lot of runs there.
I'd say that Matthews is better as of now.
How about you take into account the difference in quality between the teams that we have now and the ones during Inzi's time?
Mathews had the opportunity to play on those pitches and failed. One good knock in England is all he has outside Asia.
Please explain this bs you just posted.
But then again , you think MoYo was better than VVS , so i guess it is expected.
Every batsmen has big problems against great pace bowlers on green pitches .
Virat is one of the best players of the spin ,
you come across as really bitter and biased
Kohli is the best young batsman in the world today. Be it pace or spin, he is a beast.
Virat has played Anderson and Board in England in their prime (and failed), Steyn, Morkel and Philander in S Africa (succeed), Harris and Mitch in Australia (succeed), Boult and Southee in NZ (they make a decent pair).
He has played pretty good attacks by any standard. To be honest English bowling now is better than what it was during Inzi times. South African is almost equal ( Donald + Pollock vs Steyn + Philander + Morkel) Aussie is still pretty good though not good enough(Mcgrath + Gillespie + Warne vs Harris + Mitch) NZ is better I think at the moment (Bond played only handful of tests)
Anyway, I am not saying Virat is better than Inzi or anything, just saying that calling him FTB is stupid.
Wake me up when Matthews scores 5 test hundreds in Australia.