Depends what you look for imo.
If its image, some neat features and a good if not long lasting performance, sure (Apple phones notorious for slowdown and hell, wasnt it proven Apple intentionally do this to encourage new sales?)
If your interest is in functionality, reliability and value, absolutely not.
I got a brand new phone for 220 euro 15 months ago. Owned a second hand HTC for about three years prior to that. Have never had a single issue with either, aside from 1-2 minor issues which were easilt and cheaply fixed. My new one has a battery that easily lasts a day, decent storage, OK camera and is reliable and does everything I want. Has survived 1-2 drops no problem. Not even a single performance complaint from me.
Everyone I know with the Apple variant costing a minimum of three times as much either has
1) battery thats already worn and crap
2) replaced it as it shattered on a single drop
3) some performance problems.
I dont give a damn about online debates people are more than entitled to their choices, and my example is obviously a small sample, but imo if your interest lies beyone 1-2 cutting edge features you likely wont need and image, Apple products are borderline theft.
Got a Lenovo laptop for 400 a year ago too, brand new, works an absolute charm. Meanwhile people who use laptops less than I do fork out a grand plus on a Macbook with admittedly impressive specs but, I’ll never understand the appeal considering the price. But thats fine, I dont have to. Free market, free choice. Apple is most certainly not mine, and I doubt I ever will unless I win one free or something.