AZulfi
First Class Star
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2011
- Runs
- 3,295
- Post of the Week
- 1
England need to get Carey out ASAP
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

AgreedAustralia playing at a faster run rate in test cricket than we often have in our T20s.
Australia will come out to chase 20 runs tomorrow evening.Innings defeat loading...

They can, if they could bowl well. They have the potential but are unable to execute their plans well@The Bald Eagle can England tullebaaz win a test in australia this time or as Usual 5-0 to Australia![]()
![]()
Congratulations Root on matching Yasir shah.So root nearing a 100.... Indians???? Where are you?
Congratulations Root on matching Yasir shah.
Konstas looked pretty good in his first 2 tests as well. He isn't a known commodity yet and more time on camera will bring out more weaknesses. still think Renshaw is the better option.Jake Weatherald played an eye-catching knock. It's rare to see someone playing their second test exude this kind of confidence. Looks like a good find for Australia. Very good player square of the wicket, and very good at playing those cut shots too. Reminds me a bit of Chris Rogers, though Weatherald looks like a more aggressive batsman.
Even two out of his three dismissals so far have been near unplayable deliveries that knocked him off his feet. I think any batsman in the world would have struggled to play those balls.
Him and Travis Head can form a dangerous opening combination for Australia at the top.
You think? I thought he got exposed after his first few knocks, with had a high element of risk and luck involved in them. Having seen him bat in West Indies, on much tougher pitches, he just doesn't look like someone ready for test cricket.Konstas looked pretty good in his first 2 tests as well. He isn't a known commodity yet and more time on camera will bring out more weaknesses. still think Renshaw is the better option.
I am just saying Konstas looked a million in his first 2 tests as well when he had the novelty factor. Weatherald too is only in his 2nd test. I saw him bat 4-5 years ago and he has visibly improved since then.You think? I thought he got exposed after his first few knocks, with had a high element of risk and luck involved in them. Having seen him bat in West Indies, on much tougher pitches, he just doesn't look like someone ready for test cricket.
Renshaw hopefully has improved because he failed to make a mark the last time he played for Australia. He is probably next in line, but for me, Weatherald is more deserving of the opportunity based on his domestic cricket output. He has been a consistent performer in Shield cricket.
And I'm saying that Konstas in his first few innings played knocks that were not exactly reflective of good batsmanship, and had a high level of risk and luck involved. They were not the type of innings he was going to replicate consistently. Weatherald's innings on the other hand was filled with proper cricketing shots. You can't arbitrarily compare Weatherald and Konstas like that without talking about the way in which they batted in their first few innings.I am just saying Konstas looked a million in his first 2 tests as well when he had the novelty factor. Weatherald too is only in his 2nd test. I saw him bat 4-5 years ago and he has visibly improved since then.
But Renshaw I think is the most deserving since he's virtually batted everywhere from 1-7 in domestics and has added a few more dimensions to his game and has been in good form in Shield. Aus have been guilty of being too harsh on Renshaw ever since his debut.
I am just saying Konstas looked a million in his first 2 tests as well when he had the novelty factor. Weatherald too is only in his 2nd test. I saw him bat 4-5 years ago and he has visibly improved since then.
But Renshaw I think is the most deserving since he's virtually batted everywhere from 1-7 in domestics and has added a few more dimensions to his game and has been in good form in Shield. Aus have been guilty of being too harsh on Renshaw ever since his debut.
Konstas was just 18 while Weatherald is 31. Plenty of time to mature for Konstas.And I'm saying that Konstas in his first few innings played knocks that were not exactly reflective of good batsmanship, and had a high level of risk and luck involved. They were not the type of innings he was going to replicate consistently. Weatherald's innings on the other hand was filled with proper cricketing shots. You can't arbitrarily compare Weatherald and Konstas like that without talking about the way in which they batted in their first few innings.

When i first saw Renshaw in 2016 and also in India in 2017 i felt here was a pure test batsman, someone i hoped would be untouched by the hype and hooplah of t20 but would become a real good test player. He had the technique, both front and back foot, possibly the only weakness was facing quality spin -(but that is the bane of even most indian players nowadaysKonstas was just 18 while Weatherald is 31. Plenty of time to mature for Konstas.
What I am saying is when I previously saw Weatherald bat a few years ago, he had a lot of deficiencies in his game but he's very much improved now but I fear he may have already reached his ceiling while Renshaw has a higher ceiling than Weatherald and has fixed a lot of chinks in his batting as well. With Jake being in his just second test, teams are yet to analyze his batting and may likely find his weaknesses they would be able to target. Renshaw has already gone through that cycle and is a much better batter now.
Am guessing today will be the best day to bat and pile on the runs, at least in the first half of the day and unless eng get aus out for a cheap lead, its going to be a long day....and test..and series...I'm glad there is something in the pitch for the batsmen because the pink-ball under lights is a big enough differential as it is
He may mature into a test batter. He's still 19. Australia's system is very good with developing players.Konstas is a hack. He should only stick to T20 perhaps.
Apart from that one Test, he has been a complete flop.
Weatherald is much better.
Was unfairly dropped for Bancroft back then.When i first saw Renshaw in 2016 and also in India in 2017 i felt here was a pure test batsman, someone i hoped would be untouched by the hype and hooplah of t20 but would become a real good test player. He had the technique, both front and back foot, possibly the only weakness was facing quality spin -(but that is the bane of even most indian players nowadays)....or even running between the wickets and i felt with time he would improve.
don'tn know why he has not played more matches, maybe guys like warner or khwaja stood in his way or maybe he didnt grab his chances, maximize his potential. Am sure somewhere down the line he will surely be considered for opening intests for aus.
Gonna take something special from England to get ahead in this match. Their fielding has really let them downAm guessing today will be the best day to bat and pile on the runs, at least in the first half of the day and unless eng get aus out for a cheap lead, its going to be a long day....and test..and series...
I do not think Poms have enough gas to get ahead.Gonna take something special from England to get ahead in this match. Their fielding has really let them down
Lead is 65 , Essentially, England need to score more than 300 runs to win.50+ is, traditionally, a very good lead at the Gabba where you have pretty much eliminated the loss
