pillionrider
T20I Debutant
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2015
- Runs
- 6,328
Nothing like a needless Pakistan sledge in an India game. Now the Aussies are getting in on itWHy are they talking about Abdulla shafique here lol
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Nothing like a needless Pakistan sledge in an India game. Now the Aussies are getting in on itWHy are they talking about Abdulla shafique here lol
Rest three wickets can be out in just 2 overCan Akash Deep bat?
He's been a flop as a night watchman.
It's game over, Indian tail can't batYES! YES! YES!
Jaiswal is out.
That was out.Australia cheated.
What the hell umpire is thinking .if there no signs on ultra edge you can't give out.
No, clear deflection on the ball.Australia cheated.
You can't go just because there is deflectionThat was out.
Australia cheated.
YES! YES! YES!
Jaiswal is out.
It's game over, Indian tail can't bat
Also @KingLitonNo, clear deflection on the ball.
Indians must do something about itAustralia is desperately cheated to win the series .
Australia already did with third umpire to give him happy New year gift in advance on Christmas Day .Indians must do something about it
You may have bcci power. We have CA PowerNow tell me was I wrong in talking about umpire bias this whole series?
How can you go against the snicko when that is the entire purpose of 3rd umpire?
3rd class Bangladeshi umpire
Then take it to the drawing board.Massive issues with Snicko recently.
It's been making too many mistakes.
But that wasn't reviewed . This was.You can't go just because there is deflection
Bavuma was out yesterday and we all thought there was huge edge but there was no edged .
wow so many people don't understand cricket that was clearly out
Yashasvi Jaiswal is dismissed for 84(208) in India's second innings of the 4th Test against Australia. He could have led India to victory, but his dismissal came under controversial circumstances – there’s a visible deflection, but nothing on the snicko
Travis Head scored 1 run this test with Bumrah dismissing him twice...you pls dnt speak.You may have bcci power. We have CA Power
Yashasvi Jaiswal is dismissed for 84(208) in India's second innings of the 4th Test against Australia. He could have led India to victory, but his dismissal came under controversial circumstances – there’s a visible deflection, but nothing on the snicko
I think the rule is the 3rd umpire needs to find conclusive proof before overruling the onfield umpire. So here, the 3rd umpire decided to rely on his eyes and rule out, based on the deflection that appeared to be there.Then take it to the drawing board.
However the entire purpose of DRS is to depend on snicko and ball tracking. DRS is all about using technology
And as per technology it showed Jaiswal was not out.
yeah the NZ series showed this to be honest, I wonder what warne could have done with this India although current players still play leg spin well. prime murali might have been too much for current IndiaAustralia have a better shot beating us in India with some no name Todd Murphy / Steven O Keefe type spinner than in Australia.
Then take it to the drawing board.
However the entire purpose of DRS is to depend on snicko and ball tracking. DRS is all about using technology
And as per technology it showed Jaiswal was not out.
Yeah and he also butchered India into next week kn the 2nd and 3rd test. He ain't gonna perform every game.Travis Head scored 1 run this test with Bumrah dismissing him twice...you pls dnt speak.
Lol that was clear outCheating cheating cheating
Cheating cheating cheating
I agree. Blatant cheating; they had the broadcasters produce that massive deflection off his bat and created an illusion that Jaiswal absolutely smashed it. What technological manipulation!What the use of technology if you can't trust on it .
CHEATED
Unique perspective.This was an excellent decision from 3rd umpire imo. Takes guts to go against snicko but there have been instances when snicko has been clearly wrong.
But the onfield umpire gave him not out.I think the rule is the 3rd umpire needs to find conclusive proof before overruling the onfield umpire. So here, the 3rd umpire decided to rely on his eyes and rule out, based on the deflection that appeared to be there.
You simply cant overrule onfield umpire decision plus technology and make your own assumptionDepends on what the rulebook says.
I think umpire's call is the first decider and then the technology because of problems like this.
Absolutely benign surface. India have done poorly. I stopped following after middle session
What is the purpose of snicko.after snicko test, what is purpose of image testing by the idiot unless he wants to screw up.has he done image processing to figure out snicko is wrong.seems umpire is also sub standard not only players from bng.You can't give out based on images but trust on technology.
that umpire's not. Is there any rule you can't give that put if snicko doesn't show it. There was huge deflection not a little oneYou can't give out based on images but trust on technology.
Indian fans can make an issue out of it as is their right but there's no doubt in my mind this actually was out.
in what post have you seen i have supported Australia, get you country hating glasses offYou lot are here in match thread also supporting Australia and your third umpire is also cheating on behalf of their white masters in MCG.
The same white masters who never invites your sorry team. Minnows
No it's show you cant give out based on images . what's the use of technology .,Are you serious? If you are You're only exposing yourself as a sore loser
India is losing to Australia B because Hazelwood and Warner are not availableWhat the use of technology if you can't trust on it .
CHEATED