Australia (474 & 234) hands India (369 & 155) an 184-run defeat in the 4th Test to take a 2-1 lead in the 5-match series

22 overs is way way too many to survive. SCG miracle is not happening. That was a monumental achievement
 
Can Akash Deep bat?

He's been a flop as a night watchman.
 
What the hell umpire is thinking .if there no signs on ultra edge you can't give out.
 
Now tell me was I wrong in talking about umpire bias this whole series?

How can you go against the snicko when that is the entire purpose of 3rd umpire?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Aussies will have 10 overs of old ball, then 12 overs of second new ball - don’t see India saving this Test
 
Broad daylight robbery happened at MCG… what a shame, no deflection shown on the instrument, still third umpire shaifulla given Jaiswal out… IMO third umpire have impact of current situation in Bangladesh on him
 
Yashasvi Jaiswal is dismissed for 84(208) in India's second innings of the 4th Test against Australia. He could have led India to victory, but his dismissal came under controversial circumstances – there’s a visible deflection, but nothing on the snicko

euSUBai.jpg
 
Now tell me was I wrong in talking about umpire bias this whole series?

How can you go against the snicko when that is the entire purpose of 3rd umpire?

3rd class Bangladeshi umpire
You may have bcci power. We have CA Power
 
Massive issues with Snicko recently.

It's been making too many mistakes.
Then take it to the drawing board.

However the entire purpose of DRS is to depend on snicko and ball tracking. DRS is all about using technology

And as per technology it showed Jaiswal was not out.
 
So what kind of match has Jaiswal had? An 80 in the first dig followed by a runout that was partly his fault. Dropped a couple of catches, then another 80 in the second innings ending with a rash shot.
 
Yashasvi Jaiswal is dismissed for 84(208) in India's second innings of the 4th Test against Australia. He could have led India to victory, but his dismissal came under controversial circumstances – there’s a visible deflection, but nothing on the snicko

euSUBai.jpg

I don't think he could have let India to victory maybe a Draw :nehra
 
Yashasvi Jaiswal is dismissed for 84(208) in India's second innings of the 4th Test against Australia. He could have led India to victory, but his dismissal came under controversial circumstances – there’s a visible deflection, but nothing on the snicko

euSUBai.jpg

Ball must be swing lately, Jaiswal was not out
 
Then take it to the drawing board.

However the entire purpose of DRS is to depend on snicko and ball tracking. DRS is all about using technology

And as per technology it showed Jaiswal was not out.
I think the rule is the 3rd umpire needs to find conclusive proof before overruling the onfield umpire. So here, the 3rd umpire decided to rely on his eyes and rule out, based on the deflection that appeared to be there.
 
Australia have a better shot beating us in India with some no name Todd Murphy / Steven O Keefe type spinner than in Australia.
yeah the NZ series showed this to be honest, I wonder what warne could have done with this India although current players still play leg spin well. prime murali might have been too much for current India
 
Absolutely benign surface. India have done poorly. I stopped following after middle session
 
Then take it to the drawing board.

However the entire purpose of DRS is to depend on snicko and ball tracking. DRS is all about using technology

And as per technology it showed Jaiswal was not out.

Depends on what the rulebook says.

I think umpire's call is the first decider and then the technology because of problems like this.
 
This was an excellent decision from 3rd umpire imo. Takes guts to go against snicko but there have been instances when snicko has been clearly wrong.

This is one such incident. The ball hit both his bat and gloves. Jaiswal knew it the moment he played it.
 
Travis Head scored 1 run this test with Bumrah dismissing him twice...you pls dnt speak.

:ROFLMAO:
Yeah and he also butchered India into next week kn the 2nd and 3rd test. He ain't gonna perform every game.

It's 3-1 techincally. Rain saved you guys and India celebrated as if they won a world cup by drawing a 2.5 day test game which anyone can do 🤣🤣.

Even now India are trying for a draw. Will India take their shirts off like ganguly 🥰
 
Indian fans can make an issue out of it as is their right but there's no doubt in my mind this actually was out.
 
The pitch is still decent enough for these guys to survive. Just need Sundar to hog the strike.
 
I think the rule is the 3rd umpire needs to find conclusive proof before overruling the onfield umpire. So here, the 3rd umpire decided to rely on his eyes and rule out, based on the deflection that appeared to be there.
But the onfield umpire gave him not out.

Technology showed it not out.


Why?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Depends on what the rulebook says.

I think umpire's call is the first decider and then the technology because of problems like this.
You simply cant overrule onfield umpire decision plus technology and make your own assumption
 
Simon tauffel on 7 explained unless 3rd umpire got an additional footage which shows jaiswal is out conclusively , It's a howler
 
You can't give out based on images but trust on technology.
What is the purpose of snicko.after snicko test, what is purpose of image testing by the idiot unless he wants to screw up.has he done image processing to figure out snicko is wrong.seems umpire is also sub standard not only players from bng.
 
You lot are here in match thread also supporting Australia and your third umpire is also cheating on behalf of their white masters in MCG.

The same white masters who never invites your sorry team. Minnows
in what post have you seen i have supported Australia, get you country hating glasses off
 
Simon Taufel from Channel 7 if wanted: "In my view the decision was out. The third umpire did make the correct decision in the end. With the technology protocols, we do have a hierarchy of redundancy and when the umpire sees a clear deflection off the bat there is no need to go any further and use any other form of technology to prove the case. The clear deflection is conclusive evidence. In this particular case what we have seen from the third umpire, is they've used a secondary form of technology, which for whatever reason hasn't shown the same conclusive evidence of audio to back up the clear deflection. In the end the third umpire did the right thing and went back to the clear deflection and overturned the umpire field. So, in my view correct decision made."

Good umpiring :shakib
 
Are you serious? If you are You're only exposing yourself as a sore loser
No it's show you cant give out based on images . what's the use of technology .,

Bangladesh as whole nation is corrupt as here is not surprised at all.
 
For anyone saying that was out, here is what rule says.

3rd umpire has the privilege of using technology to rule out onfield decision if reviewed.

In this case, on field decision was not out and technology also showed there was no edge. On what basis the batsman was given out?

This win has massive asterisk.
 
More evidence we don't need Bangladeshis at any level in cricket - whether playing, commentating or officiating. They suck at everything and ruin it for the rest of the world who at least have some talent.
 
Back
Top