Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
WNC said:Yeah, I'm sure Yousuf's the reason Akmal got bowled, or Afridi top-edged yet another delivery when there were loads of overs left, or that Younis Khan couldn't get off the mark, right?
Yes he's made mistakes, big blunders but in this match, it's the batting that has screwed us up yet again.
no,more than that..four ODI SIXES =PMIG said:twice actually.
Another Tendu in the making in that respectadiabbasi said:when ever yousuf plays a big inning pakistan loses that match why?
abdul2009 said:personally wouldnt be upset for losing to aussies....
Sometimes you go to give it up to the superior team, there is no shame in it
bala977 said:I am perfectly happy to crawl back wherever I came from ... some fans are beyond any reasoning & it is evident that you are one of those ... I would advise you to spend your energy supporting a U-19 player than someone from this useless bunch (U Akmal inclusive)
Let me break down the math for you assuming Afridi played sensibly..
1) Overs 21-40 ... knock it around. 5 runs an over ... get pakistan to 170-180.
2) Powerplay 41-45 ... hit around 40-50 runs .. get pak close to 220
3) Last 5 years ... go hell for leather .. try to chase down the remaining runs ... the target would be 7-8 an over ... possible & probable
There ... thank me
Indiafan said:but the manner of defeat should worry. Pak are way beter than this
Again even if Yk becomes captain he would be light years ahead of mr No Brain.insaaniyat said:No make MR iZero aka iQuit the captain again![]()
Raz said:It's got nothing to do with reasoning, it's about knowing what the situation is, knowing something about the players, who are batting and then opening your mouth. I know that's too difficult for you to grasp.
How about I break up the Math for you
Afridi got out when the score was 58 at 21.4 overs
5 runs an over for 18 overs = 90
That would mean at the 40 overs mark is 148.
So that would mean going at 12 runs an over for 10 overs to win the game. And that's with no recognised batsmen left in the shed and being able to do this for 28 overs. Yeah great idea Einstein!!!
The match was pretty much gone by the time Afridi came. As the last recognised batsman in the side, it was always going take a Herculean effort to snatch the victory. Today Afridi decided it wasn't going to be a day for something spectacular, although he still treated the world to a monstrous six.
Don't worry though, you will be informed when Afridi decided it's time for your team to be butchered to smithereens.
MIG said:I think we misunderstand Bala - its point of view is that Shilpa and Friends really rejected Pakistani players based upon the fact that they are pretty bad. The security of players and oter considerations such as the Prime Ministers phone call had nothing to do with it.
Afridi_Fan said:I say Banand then we will start winning.
Raz said:It's got nothing to do with reasoning, it's about knowing what the situation is, knowing something about the players, who are batting and then opening your mouth. I know that's too difficult for you to grasp.
How about I break up the Math for you
Afridi got out when the score was 58 at 21.4 overs
5 runs an over for 18 overs = 90
That would mean at the 40 overs mark is 148.
So that would mean going at 12 runs an over for 10 overs to win the game. And that's with no recognised batsmen left in the shed and being able to do this for 28 overs. Yeah great idea Einstein!!!
The match was pretty much gone by the time Afridi came. As the last recognised batsman in the side, it was always going take a Herculean effort to snatch the victory. Today Afridi decided it wasn't going to be a day for something spectacular, although he still treated the world to a monstrous six.
Don't worry though, you will be informed when Afridi decided it's time for your team to be butchered to smithereens.
yea another meaningful inning with the thrilling striking rate of 61.70Afridi_Fan said:Well Played Skipper
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
MIG said:I think we misunderstand Bala - its point of view is that Shilpa and Friends really rejected Pakistani players based upon the fact that they are pretty bad. The security of players and oter considerations such as the Prime Ministers phone call had nothing to do with it.
Super Sixer said:how do u guys get those fours n sixes huge fonts? :S
Dr_Bassim said:Ok jee.. time for me to take leave
I would say Ajmal will win us the match... but my hallucinations and fanatsies for the night are over![]()
tauseefm said:yea another meaningful inning
excatly like his was in the previous ODIKhabri420 said:Bus karo yaar. The best batsmen in Aussie conditions scored a whopping duck and even if he was around, his innings would have made moyo's innings look like a T20 one!
what was YK SR?tauseefm said:yea another meaningful inning with the thrilling striking rate of 61.70
Because Gul doesnt know how to bowl with a brain.dirk diggler said:bollinger 17 off 8 overs, gul 70 off 10, why?
I am just answering u the way u were to me in the previous matchinsaaniyat said:what was YK SR?)
)
)
tauseefm said:excatly like his was in the previous ODI![]()
tauseefm said:I am just answering u the way u were to me in the previous match. u were keep shoving down yk's strike rate to people throat, kuch yaad aya?
PapaBear said:Ajmal keeping Gul off strike, knows how to play with tail enders.
Indiafan said:why do you have to keep on bringing India into things? If you havent noticed, our disease has been winning us matches after matches after matches but your approach is leading only to losses. Still you think its better? If it was an Indian player instead of Afridi, wouldnt u say he isnt great till he takes you over the winning line? What changed here or is it simply double standards?
And a RRR of 7 is nothing nowadays. Wasnt RRR over 7 when White started hitting last match?
In first ODI Yk's strike rate was 62.12Khabri420 said:and what is YK's strike rate for this match?![]()
tauseefm said:In first ODI Yk's strike rate was 62.12Boooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo now go to sleep mr No Brain fans
KA$H said:yea brilliant logic pal - basically you're saying he threw in the towel, cos the top order had collapsed
well wow-wie give this man the captaincy, cos he'll definately deliver another day
Idiotic
and he deliveredYaser said:its all down to Malik today
Raz said:You've obviously misunderstood what I said.
It wasn't just the top order, it was the top and middle order (barring Yousuf). What the hell did you want from him? 7.5 an over for 28 overs, either you wanted him to play that shot or not? Would you have complained if that had gone for 6?
In such a situation the order of the day, particularly if Afridi is out in the middle is to just go for it. You don't have much more to lose, and you've got everything to gain. If you fail to understand such a simple concept, then I suggest you seek psychological help immediately.
Savak said:That was a dissapointing shot from Afridi, He knows he is not strong on the pull shot, the Aussies were buzzing with energy and he should have atleast had some sort of partnership with Yousaf before he decided to go full monty.
Afridi is his own worst enemies. I dont know what it will take for him to learn to play safe ground strokes to keep the score board ticking over instead of playing cross bat risky shots so early in his innings.
Having said that, he isnt the main reason we lost. The entire top order is to blame as usual. The team seriously needs a batting coach on a full time basis.
One problem with your theory about the Indian Gods:Amir said:No matter what people say "oh its a good attack" , "They number 1".....are no excuses to get bowled out for 127 on any track! Its pathetic to lose without a fight. I saw the opening overs and saw how Butt started slow, I knew at that point we were going to lose.
They had gone back for their tuk tuk approach as opposed for going after the bowling like they did for the first ODI and this wicket was even more batsmen friendly. Yeah Siddle and Bollinger bowled well but they are not world beaters. Hit them, unsettle them....especially Siddle, he is a hot head and India just treated him like a kid and he kept feeding them the deliveries they wanted. If you do this tuk tuk, you are right away telling the opposition we fear you. I wonder how many more matches we have to lose until people realize this ODI team is a insult to our past ODI teams with this very ultra defensive approach. It will probably take another World Cup debacle to do so.
Easa said:One problem with your theory about the Indian Gods:
They 'unsettled' Siddle on pitches so devoid of life that the pitiable situation in Africa had begun to look like a big party in comparison. We were playing on a fast track, with bowlers bowling upwards of 150kph and moving it around under lights. No excuse to get bowled out for 127, but it was an excellent bowling performance.