ShehryarK
ODI Debutant
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2009
- Runs
- 11,129
- Post of the Week
- 1
Excellent points.Momo said:Aamer Sohail (on spinners in Tests and Hauritz): Warne McGraw loss is huge for Australia. Warne never gave runs freely even if he didn't get wickets. In his bad sessions he gave 30 runs in 12-14 overs.
Hauritz is not like that. When things don't go his way, he gets slaughtered. He overtires but his ability is lacking. So the great spinners are those who strangle the opposition even if they don't get wickets at times.
Shane Warne then had a lot of runs to defend usually (strong batting line). So he had licence to experiment. Now that room is not always there. Although Australia are still scoring most of the times. But for last two years the batting is getting tested for the first time. And that is showing on bowlers as well.
They still have fast bowlers. They missed Hilfenhaus. Clark is out. Brett Lee will avoid Test cricket for a while. But their spin scene is barren. Kretza not good enough. Smith is being worked on by Warne. Let's see. Finger spinners are not working for Australia. Maybe it's time for another wrist spinner.
In my view, on most non-South Asian surfaces, Australia's best attack is Bollinger + MJ + Hilfy + Siddle/. With Watson providing the back-up seam, and Katich, North and Michael Clarke providing three decent and very varied slow bowling and spin options. In reserve, they have Stuart Clark to play instead of Bollinger or Siddle if there's seam movement or cloud cover. That's an attack for most surfaces and most teams. Without Hilfy, they lack a genuine swing bowler.