What's new

Australia vs Pakistan | 3rd test | Hobart | Day 3- 16th Jan 2010

Status
Not open for further replies.
Shezada said:
guys how does a follow on work? do we have to erase there deficit all over again? or do we have to only erase the 300 remaining runs and add on more? how does it work? someone please explain :S



anyone????? :(
 
Shezada said:
guys how does a follow on work? do we have to erase there deficit all over again? or do we have to only erase the 300 remaining runs and add on more? how does it work? someone please explain :S

LEt's say we get bowled out 250 behind and they make us follow on.

We bat again immediately, if we get bowled for 200 then we lose by 50 runs.

If we get bowled out for 350 then Australia have to chase 101 to win
 
Eagle_Eye said:
The difference in score must be less than 200. For eaxmple Pakistan needs 320 to save follow on


yea but if we dont get to 320, what happens? how much do we have to trail by? or do we chase?
 
WithLoveFromCanada said:
We have a chance to repeat Kolkatta '01.

Australia should enforce the follow on and let the project kolkatta 01 begin - these are lines along which yousuf is thinking i bet :P

THIS.
 
now you'll see 20 threads shouting that our tail never wags because they couldn't score 200 runs :)))
 
Big Mac said:
LEt's say we get bowled out 250 behind and they make us follow on.

We bat again immediately, if we get bowled for 200 then we lose by 50 runs.

If we get bowled out for 350 then Australia have to chase 101 to win



aah ok thanks
 
Shezada said:
guys how does a follow on work? do we have to erase there deficit all over again? or do we have to only erase the 300 remaining runs and add on more? how does it work? someone please explain :S
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Follow-on

In short, you have to erase the deficit to <200 to avoid batting again straight away (follow on).
 
ahmed16 said:
Poor shot but at least he went trying to hit out with the tail. Something for which he has been heavily criticised, but is Amer the tail?
Judging from Manzoor's innings our tail starts at #3
 
Shezada said:
anyone????? :(

199 runs is the diffrent so thats mean

if a team hit 500 you have to get atleast 301 runs to avoid the follow on anything uder 300 is less
 
WithLoveFromCanada said:
typical Ijaz Ahmed innings, only difference is that Ijaz would have hit a hundred to make it completely sure.
Malik with 36 average gets into the team:) 58 is more than well done.
 
Eagle_Eye said:
i hope kaneria is watching aus spinners

The only way watching the Aussie spinners will help Kaneria is if the Aussies are watching our batsmen at the same time.
 
Every time I listen to the commentary, Tony Greig's talking about Cortisone.
 
i hope pak bat again. theyve gotten used to the pitch and i think we might kill it this time with all our batters to rely on now rather than just malik or butt as it was this time
 
93 runs needed what do you guys think about follow on?

can we still get these runs?
 
Katich the killer looking like Shane Warne's reflection.
 
Shezada said:
yea but if we dont get to 320, what happens? how much do we have to trail by? or do we chase?

Then its up to Ponting to decide whether Pakistan bast again or Aus. If Ponting makes us follow on then Pakistan has to surpass the remainder before Aus has to bat again. If our aggregrate score for both innings amounts to 500 and all out in 2nd inns as well then we lose by an innings and 19 runs
 
Let them block it out and frustrate them like the Aussie tailenders do for once.
 
abdulqadir786 said:
why the heck are they still blocking they need to play their shots.
Yousuf has said he's playing for the draw only. :moyo
 
Big Mac said:
The only way watching the Aussie spinners will help Kaneria is if the Aussies are watching our batsmen at the same time.

The Aus spinners have been watching them get out, does that count!
 
germanboy said:
i dont think ponting will take the follow on either way.. he will play for sure

Punter said he was looking for the follow on, Wether that was mind games i cant say!
 
Shezada said:
is it fair to say butt is responsible for the collapse we just had?
Maybe but Malik's shot wasn't too clever and Sarfraz thought it was a sloggathon.
 
great judgement by aamir, great tactical leave and at the same time, ensured that a review was wasted. make him captain
 
Poor call for review. Good for us though. Ah doesn't matter anyways now.
 
saadjhussain said:
great judgement by aamir, great tactical leave and at the same time, ensured that a review was wasted. make him captain
Allah ke marzee hogi, to ban jaaye gaa kuptaan:)
 
insaaniyat said:
Salam Tauseef Bhai. Bhale changey to ho naa?:)
Wasalam, main bhala changa hn ap sunao? whats happening? Enjoying our great great bating lineup's flawless bating display?
 
slix10 said:
I think he might this time

depends if we can mange to get another 50 runs then he will not even think about it but here we go another one gone
 
Simon katich 3fer....................... 2 more to go..........AAmer goes
 
adarsh_bang said:
why couldn't they play kamran akmal instead of manzoor... as a speacialist batsman???????

bahi jaan apko sirf india ki khabrein hai.. he didnt wanted to play as a batsman
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top