Sherlock
Test Debutant
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2010
- Runs
- 14,293
Not surprised Lehman got away with it...Absolute joke.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not surprised Lehman got away with it...Absolute joke.
Wasn't it obvious - sponsors have pressed button, so Sutherland is behaving appropriately, but at the same time he can't make people upset, who has few aces under their sleeve as well.
This is what I posted few hours back - before this PC
Lehman has an advantage - Smith can call his name, but he also should have someone's name above sitting at CA - I don't think, he'll be squeezed enough so that he starts calling names above .......
I might be proven wrong, but let's wait and see - my hunch is Lehman won't be sacked, rather he would step down; things will be defused in a year or two and he'll be back at CA in some Capacity .... add to that PLs & SLs contract.
There is no question that this was not the "first time".
There is a reason Darren Lehmann is not fired already. They want him to stay quiet, which he wouldn't have if they fired him - that would have ended his career in cricket forever, with humiliation. Leaving him well motivated to go public. Right now, CA will take the bad publicity for not firing him - that's a better option than having him 'go rogue'.
There is no way that this was the "first time". And there is absolutely no way, that the bowlers in the team were unaware. That's simply not possible.
Sly dig at Pakistan for no reason
What's the worst case scenario if Lehmann was fired? Elaborate?
If Lehmann is fired, he would be humiliated and have no incentive to stay quiet. He could well go public with further information on how Aus team has cheated before. And more players were involved. Do you believe the fiction that none of the bowlers knew that the ball was being messed with to help them?
CA would be forced to act against guys like Starc, Hazelwood. Maybe even more. Potentially, Aus team would be exposed for systematically cheating over a longer period of time. It would absolutely devastate Cricket Australia's brand value in its home market. They simply cannot take that kind of risk.
Its much preferable for them to parrot a story that only 3 players were involved, and this was the only time it happened. Be seen as acting tough on the players. And then move on.
Imagine a fired off Lehmann going on a news TV show with a tell-all interview. CA can't afford that. That's why they are going through the trouble of supporting his 'innocence'. Even though they are taking a lot of short-term PR hits for not sacking him.
Sly dig at Pakistan for no reason
Club Statement: Cameron Bancroft
Somerset Director of Cricket Andy Hurry has offered the following statement regarding Cameron Bancroft:
“Over the last few days, cricket has been over shadowed by a very dark cloud. There has been an understandable amount of emotion, deliberation, varying degrees of language and opinions across the game, the public and the various media platforms all associated with the alteration to the condition of the ball by Cameron Bancroft during the Third Test in Cape Town.
Cricket Australia, following their investigations, have offered sanctions to those involved.
We as a Club have been monitoring this process closely, alongside gathering as much additional information as we can. I have spoken numerous times to Cameron since last Saturday, he has spoken very maturely, he shared his deep regret and apologised to everyone associated to the Club.
It’s important we remember there is a young man at the centre of all this, he made a poor choice, as I and I’m sure many of us have done during our lives. What’s important now, is Cameron is given the appropriate support. There is no doubt in my mind, he will learn from this and he will return stronger.
I have met this morning with the CEO, Club Captain and Head Coach and with the Club’s best interests at the centre of our decision can confirm Cameron Bancroft will not be our overseas player for the 2018 season.
We are currently undertaking the process to recruit a replacement overseas player that best fits our needs and will share an update in due course.”
It's always the AWAY team that gets caught ball tampering. Any ball tampering done by home team is swept under the carpet by broadcasters...lol
The said thing is the Australian media is as much to blame for all this mess. They started it
For years opposition would go to Australia and be humiliated and intimidated by the Australian public and media. After SA bullied Australia in Australia the Australian media went out of their limbs to publicly humiliate Faf. They don't like SA winning there, never have, anything to try and discredit us was high on their agenda. Faf of course got the support that he rightly deserved. It was totally humiliating for the Australian media when a David Warner footage surfaced applying lip gloss to a cricket ball which they buried. Of course they didn't run with that. It didn't suit their narrative.
I remember a show by Mbangwa on Supersport prior to the Aussies coming here, it was along the lines of how farely the Australian's are treated here by the media and public at large. Whereas in Australia the media are the first instigators and lay the platform for the Australian team to intimidate the opposition, with their fans later joining in.
In hindsight that show rallied the nation, it set the agenda. The Australian's were under so much scrutiny, our fans made life difficult for them. Absolutely humiliated Warner. They mentally disintegrated after. Going forward they'll know South Africa is an away tour, it's not their home country. Any dirty tricks down under will be returned in kind.
The sad part in all of this of course is that cricket is the ultimate loser. Our very own Tristan Holme wrote a great article about the culture of shaming. Give it a read.
‘I think it is such a sensitive issue,’ the former England bowler, who took over 450 international wickets, wrote in a column for the Yorkshire Post.
‘I do think there has been an overreaction regarding the bans, but once they got the 12-month bans from Cricket Australia, I would be hugely disappointed if one of the counties employed one of those three this season.
‘Next season, I would have no issue with it. They will have then served their ban. But not this season.’
‘Somerset led the way for me by getting rid of Bancroft,’ Gough added.
‘What disappointed me most about what [Surrey head coach] Michael Di Venuto said was that he actually stated that bringing in one of those three would benefit Australian cricket.
‘I am not bothered about benefitting Australian cricket. Why would one of our coaches in this country want to benefit their cricket with the Ashes coming up here next year?
‘This year, with everything that has gone on, I think it would be a bad move for a county to take them.’