BDfanforever
First Class Star
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2008
- Runs
- 3,543
I mean they did beat your Jaiswal, Tilak, Jurel, Vishnoi at u19 level.When you have garbage players all around so no option left but to play anyone who is available.![]()

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I mean they did beat your Jaiswal, Tilak, Jurel, Vishnoi at u19 level.When you have garbage players all around so no option left but to play anyone who is available.![]()
Disappointing performance.
I mean they did beat your Jaiswal, Tilak, Jurel, Vishnoi at u19 level.![]()
Lifetime achievement. Beating us at the U-19 level.
I mean they did beat your Jaiswal, Tilak, Jurel, Vishnoi at u19 level.![]()
Oh be quietYou should be happy. After all you wanted Rizwan out. Ab saza bhukto
India have never lost to BD in Mirpur in this format.Congratulations to Bangladesh they played well and dominated in their conditions. Now we know why India refused to tour them.
It is funny they troll when they along with Bangladesh and Windies are the worst touring side in this formIndia have never lost to BD in Mirpur in this format.
I blame this guyPK will probably win
Sorry bro, the sweep shot curse has been transferred to me lol.I blame this guy
The batting failed today but has shown a bit of life. The real issue is the awful bowling- if Hasan ali is your main man, and Faheem Ashraf is even a 4th bowler, you aint winning many games unless the opposition dies from boredom. The fact that SSA and Naseem are even worse should be ringing loud alarm bells in Naqvis office. We are in new a transition phase with guys in their mid 30s.![]()
Those we will see in Asia Cup (If that happens) and WT20 2026Anyway, I am not a fan of these pitches. I prefer a bit more sporting pitches (not flat but sporting).
140 definitely would've brought this game to the last over.I think batting was the culprit today. 110 was under-par.
Needed 140 minimum.
Bowlers did okay. There were 3 dropped catches.
140 definitely would've brought this game to the last over.
You are right and that will happen with guys in new roles and the nature of the team picked. As a team we aint going anywhere with a bowling lineup that I can only describe as awfulI think batting was the culprit today. 110 was under-par.
Needed 140 minimum.
Bowlers did okay. There were 3 dropped catches.
Pakistan have not seen the worst of this Mirpur pitch yet:
They are making stadium in Rajshai. It is a significantly higher scoring ground than Dhaka. Akbar Ali who is a way more powerful batter than Litton smashed 131 off 110 against RSA emerging.LOL. Yup.
Mirpur pitch actually got better. 140-150 is now par here. It was far worse a few years ago.
Anyway, I want to see better pitches suitable for T20. These pitches should used for Test and ODI only.
They are making stadium in Rajshai. It is a significantly higher scoring ground than Dhaka. Akbar Ali who is a way more powerful batter than Litton smashed 131 off 110 against RSA emerging.
Even in t20is, India is scoring 280 every where against all the big teams with their a sides.bang lost by 135 runs in a t20 game. Ipl is a just lab.Against eng with wood, archer, rashid etc India scored 250.One thing to remember is that 160 is/was a par score up until recently in T20. It started just recently when IPL started with all the impact player shenanigans where we have seen scores of 300 in T20. So slowly in the last 2 years or so, scores are starting to surpass 200.
Is Chittagong stadium where ishan scored 200 is not a batting pitch? Bang can play majority of matches there atleast it they want to improve.They are making stadium in Rajshai. It is a significantly higher scoring ground than Dhaka. Akbar Ali who is a way more powerful batter than Litton smashed 131 off 110 against RSA emerging.
Bangladesh pitches are always like this. I don't think they have any funding either to improve their pitches. Also their team will lose more at home with true wickets.
SSA and Naseem look bad when faced with top quality batting line-ups, not against Bangladesh.The batting failed today but has shown a bit of life. The real issue is the awful bowling- if Hasan ali is your main man, and Faheem Ashraf is even a 4th bowler, you aint winning many games unless the opposition dies from boredom. The fact that SSA and Naseem are even worse should be ringing loud alarm bells in Naqvis office. We are in new a transition phase with guys in their mid 30s.![]()
Is Chittagong stadium where ishan scored 200 is not a batting pitch? Bang can play majority of matches there atleast it they want to improve.
Either way, we are in a bad way. On any flat wicket, we are like Domestic cows on the African savannaSSA and Naseem look bad when faced with top quality batting line-ups, not against Bangladesh.
These new boys don’t have the pace to trouble international level batters.
100%Whether he's right or wrong, it's never a good look for the coach to criticize the pitch when his team got bowled out for 110 and the other side chased it down in 16 overs.
Yeah true.Its appalling how Pakistan keep benching Farhan their most in form player. Also if you plan to consistently bowl Saim then why not play a specialist bat instead of Khushdil or Nawaz.
It cannot be ignored as a one off considering he has bowled at least 2 overs in the last three games against Bang - so it appears to be a definite tactic. So if you know that Saim will open the bowling and Salman is there as backup why play both Nawaz and Khushdil? Why not replace one of them with Farhan.Yeah true.
I actually forgot saim bowled when looking at the he squad yesterday but we technically played four spin all rounders saim, agha, Khush and Nawaz
Who cares about W/L in T20I? Apart from T20 WC last year, India has ZERO to show since 2007 LOL!It is funny they troll when they along with Bangladesh and Windies are the worst touring side in this form
Last 3 years teams away from home (including neutrali venues) against regular test playing nations
![]()
Apparently you care lol That is why you are whining about Riz, babar coming back into the side.Who cares about W/L in T20I? Apart from T20 WC last year, India has ZERO to show since 2007 LOL!
Yeah it does seem like overkill. However Mike Hesson said on the PCB Podcast from 9:45 onwards that he believes the idea of specialist batters is outdated and wants players who are multiskilled. And by having more allrounders giving more batting depth, they can go harder with the bat.Its appalling how Pakistan keep benching Farhan their most in form player. Also if you plan to consistently bowl Saim then why not play a specialist bat instead of Khushdil or Nawaz.
Riz-Bar are legends of the game and I have been screaming my lungs out about how Pak will perform without them. Proof is for everyone to see that we are getting smashed by a pathetic T20 side like BD. Likes of Wasim, Waqar could probably turn up even now and beat BD. It is shameful. That has nothing to do with India being a failure in T20 since 2007 apart from one T20 WC win in 2024.Apparently you care lol That is why you are whining about Riz, babar coming back into the side.
well why do you care about bilaterals?Riz-Bar are legends of the game and I have been screaming my lungs out about how Pak will perform without them. Proof is for everyone to see that we are getting smashed by a pathetic T20 side like BD. Likes of Wasim, Waqar could probably turn up even now and beat BD. It is shameful. That has nothing to do with India being a failure in T20 since 2007 apart from one T20 WC win in 2024.
That philosophy was again exposed yesterday when a specialist batter at the top might have come in handy. I am all for depth but not at the cost of the main role.Yeah it does seem like overkill. However Mike Hesson said on the PCB Podcast from 9:45 onwards that he believes the idea of specialist batters is outdated and wants players who are multiskilled. And by having more allrounders giving more batting depth, they can go harder with the bat.
He also said he wants 6-8 bowling options for the captain to cover all matchups, i.e. a left-arm spinner if there's two RHBs at the crease.
Mickey Arthur had a similar philosophy. I'm not personally a big fan of some of our allrounders who contribute little with either bat and ball.