BD started playing ODI's in 1979, ICC trophy, here in the UK and became eligible to play ODI's in 1999 and got test playing status in 2000
AFG on the other hand played club cricket in the 90's, after which the game got banned for different reasons and was revived in 2000. AFG only got test status in June 2017 and first qualified for ODI's in 2009.
The point is that BD has been playing against quality opponents for much longer than Afg but the game maturity progression lags the time invested by BD compared to AFG.
Absolutely rubbish bro - what you have written here. I understand that the AFG show (on & off the field) was two days old so the memory has already faded away and Afghans have become PP darling once again for their talunt ... until next time; but what you have written is complete hog wash.
No, AFGs haven’t done anything, absolutely nothing and they are now playing for quite sometimes. Nothing against Afghans but the maturity they have shown here after 7-8 years is just nothing special- I can go back to 2007 when BD beat India & SAF in active WC games or beat WIN in an active T20 WC game. Or beating that Australia in 2006 in an ODI in UK, or making them run for life in that Fatullah Test in 2005. These are individual incidents - depending on whom you want to hype, you can make your story. In fact, AFGs haven’t done anything close to what Ireland or Kenya have done without remotely close support that Afghans are getting now.
What AFGs have got in their favour is that at very early stage of their journey, they got benefited from Indian system and because of ICCs globalisation efforts, they are playing lots of competitive games from lower tier - these have helped them to close the gap between associates & Test level. I can recall BD cricket of 1990s when our exposure of international cricket was ICC associates cup (WC qualifier) in every four years and may be a tour by MCC or Hyderabad Blues or Lahore Gymkhana in every two years.
What Afghans have done is the easiest part - before Afghans, Kenya were in far far better situation in that scale by even early 1990s. In fact where Afghans are today, Kenya was much better than that level in 1996. It’s nothing - you pick Nepal, Scotland or PNG, give them similar exposure & support, with in few years time they’ll prove that Afghans haven’t done anything special.
What is the toughest part is next step - getting into the mix of top tier, to a state that you can compete bite by bite with top dogs. This will take lot, lot more skills, maturity & overall development of the game than what AFGs are now. Kenya faded away, not because they were less ********, rather they couldn’t cope up with the demand of next step. This can be said for few countries as well - Ireland, Scotland, Holland, ZIM, Denmark. AFGs next 3-4 years will be the defining moment - now they won’t be judged with 80-90% games against associates.
In fact, I see the opposite- you can bookmark this post to bump in three years time. Afghans are a team with several aged players and these players learned their game trough hard ball cricket in Pakistan. The quality & skill set that I see among Afghan youngsters- I am afraid once their 30+ players like Nabi, Shinwari, Asghar, Shahzad, Zadran, Hamid Hasan, Naib ... retires, they’ll face a severe decline and I don’t see them overcoming it in current state.