IndianWillow
T20I Debutant
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2010
- Runs
- 8,271
- Post of the Week
- 1
The issue this logic just refuses to address is the reality that neither 250 nor 210 was going to be anywhere near enough.
In the first place, everyone could have batted differently if Dhoni didn't eat up 70 balls. Secondly, he ate up easy deliveries, it's not like it was unplayable Mustafizur he was blocking. It was NASIR HOSSAIN for heaven's sake.
The difference you just don't get is if Dhoni and Raina threw it around and that came off, we would have 300+. That would be a match-winning score.
I don't care much about WIN-BIGGER and LOSE-SMALLER, the kind of effort that magnifies margins when you're winning and makes a loss respectable when you're losing. I'm interested in efforts that will take some games from the loss or neutral column and put them in the winning column.
You are forgetting that team India is struggling at the moment and 300 is a tall order for them!!
There was about 5% chance of getting to 300 once we went four down - due to the combined effect of the series momentum factor (heavy loss in the first game), the mystery factor of Mustafizur and so on. Even Rohit, Kohli and Dhawan did not appear comfortable while they were at the crease - this wasn't the typical pitch where you can get 300 with eyes closed.
260-270 was a realistic target, which India could have achieved if they did not collapse in a heap towards the end. With that target India had a 50-50 chance to win. If they had lost quick wickets after Rayudu and got bowled out for 150 odd they would lose 10/10.