The PCB has. You need to read peter Obournes book wounded tiger to understand that. We helped found the ACC and helped countries like bangladesh, and sri lanka. We also went up against the old colonial power England and the aussies on issues like neutral umpires (which we were instrumental in initiating). there are other issues around tours and unfairness that the PCB has championed for decades.
The BCCI is now a tool to be used by Right wing fascist extremists just like other Indian institutions. The Indian govt has a stated policy to isolate Pakistan culturally and diplomatically. Isolating Pakistan by preventing cricket in teh country through the sponsoring of the TTP and then making sure the cricket boycott against the country is maintained is part of the project. other ways in which the BCCI has been used is around actions e.g. hafeez and ajmal where the law was changed knowing it would impact Pakistan the most. granted the law wasnt Pakistan specific but teh fact that Pakistan would be most affected ensured it passed quicker without many obstacles.
Another way in which the BCCI has proven a detrement to the game is its successful lobbying and pursuit of rule changes that ultimatley benefit the batsman. England and the aussies have gone along with it because of the monetary awards but the BCCI has ensured that ODI playing conditions have simply become similar to their own home country. Thus allowing their team the ability to remain relevant for far longer than one could have envisioned. Ultimatley the cricket market in england and australia is dominated by a certain clique that can pay for the game behind a pay wall. They have thus outsourced the sustenance of the game to India.
Good for PCB if it did something good.So how does that prove BCCI is bad for the game.
Indian govt does not want to play Pakistan in bilateral series.There is no right wing conspiracy there, I being Indian fan agree with that , I don't want any bilateral series against Pakistan until political issues are sorted out.
Hafeez and Ajmal were chucking and were kicked out rightfully so, chuckers don't deserve to be in the game .Nobody stopped them from bowling with right actions.How is BCCI responsbile for Hafeez or Ajmal not able to chuck their way to glory.
PCB influence was never bigger than BCCI's at any point in their existence.1987 world cup was grand success but it did not fetch any money to eith PCB or BCCI.It was Dalmia who brought the money for Asian block and ICC.Once Dalmia stepped in BCCI went so far ahead that it is not even close now.
What rule changes have BCCI lobbied show me the proof , stop with your convulted theories.What I observed is PCB still likes to be subserviant to colonial powers and their thinking has permeated to its fans.
PCB feels it is still equal to BCCI, I have news flash for you, it is not equal to BCCI.BCCI wanted big three that is the only time they flexed their muscle to get larger share of the pie.Why should other countries get equal share when revenue is being generated mainly due to India.
PCB or Pakistan does not have any right to tell where and with whom India should play its cricket.India and Indian public have moved on about bilateral series issue, it is high time PCB and its fans do the same.
.