What's new

Bharat Arun - Indian bowling coach

Bharat Arun explains how India caught Australian batsmen off guard

The Indian team management had started preparing for the Australia tour from July last year. As the country was slowly returning to normalcy after the lockdown, India’s coaching staff - under the leadership of head coach Ravi Shastri - had come up with a plan to tackle Tim Paine’s men during the long series.

The idea was to bowl in the straight line and make the Australian batsmen struggle on the leg side. And months later, as India yet again defeated Australia 2-1 in the Border-Gavaskar Trophy, India’s bowling coach Bharat Arun was happy that their planning and hard work paid off.

“Ravi Shastri called me sometime in July and said we need to take the offside out of the Australians. We had our own analysis and we felt that most of the runs that Steve Smith and Marnus Labuschagne scored were because of cut, pull and on the offside. We took cue from the New Zealand attack. When they bowled to Smith, they just attacked his body and he felt very uncomfortable,” Arun said during a media interaction on Friday.

“Ravi called and said ‘I want you to make a plan where we can eliminate their offside’. We thought about it and decided that we will attack more on the straighter lines and have an on side field. It becomes very difficult for the batsman to consistently clear the on side field. That worked for us. The thought process started sometime in July and then when we discussed it with Virat, he bought the theory. We used the same thing in Adelaide and then Ajinkya was magnificent from Melbourne. The bowlers adjusted to that beautifully,” Arun said.

Arun has been with the Indian team since 2014 - he was out of the side for a while and was brought back again in 2017 - and his partnership with head coach Shastri has helped the team.

“As a head coach, Ravi has been outstanding. He gives you the freedom to work and anyone in the support staff would tell you that he gives you a lot of freedom and you can express yourself. You have common goals for the team, but it is about how can I contribute to this goal. We have our arguments, showdowns. We totally disagree on things but at the end of the day, when we decide on something, we stick to it. We consult the captain and everyone and then come up with the strategy,” Arun said.

“It helps when you know someone for that long. It gets a lot easier to agree and also to disagree, which is important in any relation," the bowling coach said.

The India team faced many injury challenges during the Test series and Arun lauded Shastri for having the foresight to retain a few of the limited-overs specialists for the Test series.

“The Australian tour itself is a big challenge. Any past cricketer who has toured Australia would know that. It's probably one of the most challenging tours. I think in the COVID times, it was a good move by Ravi Shastri to hold back all the net bowlers as well. After the ODI series, most of them were supposed to go back, but somehow, we thought that in case anything happens to a player, it will be impossible for anyone to come because of restrictions. We said we will manage with everyone and since they were with us for long, it was possible for them to understand what was demanded of them to be successful in Australia.”

https://sportstar.thehindu.com/cric...kohli-bcci-indian-cricket/article33635823.ece


That leg side trap was a genius move. Look at the seriousness of the planning 5 months out. Kudos to Shastri, Arun and the analyst. Stellar job.
I wonder what that Pakistani analyst in cohesion with Waqar does all day because all the bowlers ever seem to do is bowl random deliveries.
 
BA is not a big name. He isnt a successful international star. So he has to do all this planning plotting to justify his salary.
 
The long break due to the virus arguably also enabled the coaching staff to make detailed plans for each Australian batsman.

Under usual circumstances, the scheduling doesn't allow you to think too far ahead. I'd wager, for example, that they won't have had sufficient time to strategize and plan in detail for each England batsman touring India next month.
 
BA is not a big name. He isnt a successful international star. So he has to do all this planning plotting to justify his salary.

Hopefully thats just sarcasm & you are not actually implying that if you are a superstar coach, you dont need to plan ahead for your opposition. I would rather think thats the basic job description for a bowling coach, isn’t it?
 
Hopefully thats just sarcasm & you are not actually implying that if you are a superstar coach, you dont need to plan ahead for your opposition. I would rather think thats the basic job description for a bowling coach, isn’t it?
At international level you don't need coaching as we know. We need better tactical planning. This guy is really shrewd in terms of planning and really he has made very raw type of 2nd rate attack punch way above their weights. I don't think if it wasnt him, siraj etc would do better than musa and other Pak bowlers.
Where waqar and Misbah failed, shastri and arun thrived ( that's the summary).
 
That leg side trap was a genius move. Look at the seriousness of the planning 5 months out. Kudos to Shastri, Arun and the analyst. Stellar job.
I wonder what that Pakistani analyst in cohesion with Waqar does all day because all the bowlers ever seem to do is bowl random deliveries.

Nothing, the Pakistani coaching staff and the analysts are incompetent.
 
I don't see even a single iota of tactical planning in them. The simple school level coaching ecen coaching isn't top class.
Having seen the videos Waqar should'nt be with under 19 camps even.
 
Why don't they plan like this for NZ,SA as well

Seems like we are extra motivated vs Aussies only

Bowlers did not let India down in South Africa.

Didn't we get RSA out in like all innings in RSA ?And that too cheaply mostly
 
Bharat Arun explains how India caught Australian batsmen off guard

The Indian team management had started preparing for the Australia tour from July last year. As the country was slowly returning to normalcy after the lockdown, India’s coaching staff - under the leadership of head coach Ravi Shastri - had come up with a plan to tackle Tim Paine’s men during the long series.

The idea was to bowl in the straight line and make the Australian batsmen struggle on the leg side. And months later, as India yet again defeated Australia 2-1 in the Border-Gavaskar Trophy, India’s bowling coach Bharat Arun was happy that their planning and hard work paid off.

“Ravi Shastri called me sometime in July and said we need to take the offside out of the Australians. We had our own analysis and we felt that most of the runs that Steve Smith and Marnus Labuschagne scored were because of cut, pull and on the offside. We took cue from the New Zealand attack. When they bowled to Smith, they just attacked his body and he felt very uncomfortable,” Arun said during a media interaction on Friday.

“Ravi called and said ‘I want you to make a plan where we can eliminate their offside’. We thought about it and decided that we will attack more on the straighter lines and have an on side field. It becomes very difficult for the batsman to consistently clear the on side field. That worked for us. The thought process started sometime in July and then when we discussed it with Virat, he bought the theory. We used the same thing in Adelaide and then Ajinkya was magnificent from Melbourne. The bowlers adjusted to that beautifully,” Arun said.

Arun has been with the Indian team since 2014 - he was out of the side for a while and was brought back again in 2017 - and his partnership with head coach Shastri has helped the team.

“As a head coach, Ravi has been outstanding. He gives you the freedom to work and anyone in the support staff would tell you that he gives you a lot of freedom and you can express yourself. You have common goals for the team, but it is about how can I contribute to this goal. We have our arguments, showdowns. We totally disagree on things but at the end of the day, when we decide on something, we stick to it. We consult the captain and everyone and then come up with the strategy,” Arun said.

“It helps when you know someone for that long. It gets a lot easier to agree and also to disagree, which is important in any relation," the bowling coach said.

The India team faced many injury challenges during the Test series and Arun lauded Shastri for having the foresight to retain a few of the limited-overs specialists for the Test series.

“The Australian tour itself is a big challenge. Any past cricketer who has toured Australia would know that. It's probably one of the most challenging tours. I think in the COVID times, it was a good move by Ravi Shastri to hold back all the net bowlers as well. After the ODI series, most of them were supposed to go back, but somehow, we thought that in case anything happens to a player, it will be impossible for anyone to come because of restrictions. We said we will manage with everyone and since they were with us for long, it was possible for them to understand what was demanded of them to be successful in Australia.”

https://sportstar.thehindu.com/cric...kohli-bcci-indian-cricket/article33635823.ece

This was a fascinating read.

Analysis and planning is cool but of course the hardest thing is to convince and train the bowlers to bowl as per the plan and stick to it amidst adversity.

For that the bowling coach must spend a lot of time with each bowler, earn their trust and motivate them.

Not every player is comfortable in playing as per plan or instructions.
 
Waqar should consider himself lucky not to play in these flat pitches. Players like Gayle, Kohli, Sharjeel, AB, Rohit, Root, Guptil, Roy, Bairstaw..... would have ended his career in 3-4 years.
 
Hopefully thats just sarcasm & you are not actually implying that if you are a superstar coach, you dont need to plan ahead for your opposition. I would rather think thats the basic job description for a bowling coach, isn’t it?

If you are a successful international star you get a much longer rope as a coach, because of your legacy. But when you are a unknown name, your margin is a lot less.

When BA was appointed as coach in 2014, and Indian bowling was performing poorly, it was widely said that BA simply doesn't have the knowledge to plan against international batsmen as he himself never did it.

It was Shastri who insisted on Arun again in 2017. Ofcourse Indian bowling has had more successes than failures as BA slowly grew into his role.

But if not for Shastri, BA would have been discarded long back because he wasn't a international star.
 
At international level you don't need coaching as we know. We need better tactical planning. This guy is really shrewd in terms of planning and really he has made very raw type of 2nd rate attack punch way above their weights. I don't think if it wasnt him, siraj etc would do better than musa and other Pak bowlers.
Where waqar and Misbah failed, shastri and arun thrived ( that's the summary).

BA has had the opportunity to work with this group for few years now. He probably knows them inside out, their strengths their weakness everything, so its easier for him to support and plan for them.
 
BA has had the opportunity to work with this group for few years now. He probably knows them inside out, their strengths their weakness everything, so its easier for him to support and plan for them.

It doesn't seem like you want him to be our coach(correct me), check out Siraj's video on Hyderabad IPL thing how he thanks Bharat Arun..
 
It doesn't seem like you want him to be our coach(correct me), check out Siraj's video on Hyderabad IPL thing how he thanks Bharat Arun..

There was a time when i didn't want him to be our coach. Ofcourse he has proved his doubters wrong.
 
Him and Ravi Shastri have pioneered something new. The South Africans are now copying the exact same tactic against Pakistan
 
Yes. This is the new in-vogue style in world cricket.
Logical as well on this pitch. Teams have no clue and we had Hasan ali bowling wide half volleys.
Joke.
 
Have a feeling the ICC might come up with a rule denying this field placing if teams adopt this tactic habitually because the batsman will have to try T20 strokes to counter it
 
Yes. This is the new in-vogue style in world cricket.
Logical as well on this pitch. Teams have no clue and we had Hasan ali bowling wide half volleys.
Joke.

Lol, can you blame Hasan Ali? Waqar definitely doesn't even have the brains to understand how to analyze the pitch, conditions, opposition and to correctly tell the bowlers what line length to bowl on this pitch and to advise the bowlers, captains on what field placements to go for.

Waqar even as a player operated purely on luck, he never really mastered the art of consistently setting up a batsman over a lengthy spell
 
If you are a successful international star you get a much longer rope as a coach, because of your legacy. But when you are a unknown name, your margin is a lot less.

When BA was appointed as coach in 2014, and Indian bowling was performing poorly, it was widely said that BA simply doesn't have the knowledge to plan against international batsmen as he himself never did it.

It was Shastri who insisted on Arun again in 2017. Ofcourse Indian bowling has had more successes than failures as BA slowly grew into his role.

But if not for Shastri, BA would have been discarded long back because he wasn't a international star.
I highly doubt that anyone who has undergone professional coaching would ever say that a coach is not capable of making plans just because he wasn’t a successful player. That would be a view from keyboard-warrior fans and journalists and would have no bearing on Bharat Arun’s position as that is decided by folks who have played cricket at least at first class level.
Many of the successful Indian coaches have never been great international players and vice versa. Subrato Bannerjee was an average medium fast bowler and probably would have never even bowled above 140 kph but is a renouned fast bowling coach in India with wards like Umesh Yadav who has touched 150’s. Parras Mambrey is another average player who has successfully coached the last two batches of our U-19 bowers who were some of the fastest in the tournament. The MRF coaches TA Sekhar and Senthilnathan are also examples of average players making great coaches.
Coaching needs different skills than what a successful player has. Parras Mambrey might not have had the physical attributes to bowl at a higher pace but has the knowledge and skill to teach young kids like Mavi, Nagarkotti, Kartik Tyagi etch how to do that and more.
 
I highly doubt that anyone who has undergone professional coaching would ever say that a coach is not capable of making plans just because he wasn’t a successful player. That would be a view from keyboard-warrior fans and journalists and would have no bearing on Bharat Arun’s position as that is decided by folks who have played cricket at least at first class level.
Many of the successful Indian coaches have never been great international players and vice versa. Subrato Bannerjee was an average medium fast bowler and probably would have never even bowled above 140 kph but is a renouned fast bowling coach in India with wards like Umesh Yadav who has touched 150’s. Parras Mambrey is another average player who has successfully coached the last two batches of our U-19 bowers who were some of the fastest in the tournament. The MRF coaches TA Sekhar and Senthilnathan are also examples of average players making great coaches.
Coaching needs different skills than what a successful player has. Parras Mambrey might not have had the physical attributes to bowl at a higher pace but has the knowledge and skill to teach young kids like Mavi, Nagarkotti, Kartik Tyagi etch how to do that and more.

What i said was said by an ex Indian captain, with more than 100 tests.

In 2014, while giving his post lunch comments he said that taking wickets is an art. Setting up batsmen is an art. The Australian bowling coach( it was McDermott then i guess) knows it and hence he can pass it own. Not so sure about the Indian coach.
Mhambrey is a domestic coach, not the international coach.
 
What i said was said by an ex Indian captain, with more than 100 tests.

In 2014, while giving his post lunch comments he said that taking wickets is an art. Setting up batsmen is an art. The Australian bowling coach( it was McDermott then i guess) knows it and hence he can pass it own. Not so sure about the Indian coach.
Mhambrey is a domestic coach, not the international coach.
So in domestics, you don’t think bowlers don’t setup the batsmen? How do you think Siraj setup Green in his first international match itself?
And I mentioned Mhambrey because he coached our U-19 fast bowlers who bowled at 140 KPH and higher which he couldn’t do it himself when he was a player.
 
What i said was said by an ex Indian captain, with more than 100 tests.

In 2014, while giving his post lunch comments he said that taking wickets is an art. Setting up batsmen is an art. The Australian bowling coach( it was McDermott then i guess) knows it and hence he can pass it own. Not so sure about the Indian coach.
Mhambrey is a domestic coach, not the international coach.
And knowing something well is never an indication that you would be able to teach it as well to others. Teaching is a different skill altogether and a coach needs to be a good teacher first.
 
He is best thing happen to indian cricket .Mighty impressive with his work with the indian bowlers
 
Back
Top