Usman Chadda
Senior T20I Player
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2005
- Runs
- 18,896
Should finish games against the likes of Zimbabwe. Extremely disappointing innings to be fair.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nowhere near kohli in any format.
Kohli would have won this match for his team with two three overs to spare.
At 26 age kohli was already the best chaser in the world.
As for the other members of fab 4, i think williamson could have won this game for nz not sure about smith and root.
These would have means nothing. With would haves we can change everything. You can say Kohli would have chased any target because he is indeed a brilliant batsman and a brilliant chaser. But where was he in 2019 wc semi final, champions trophy final, wc 2015 semi final, wc 2011 final, wc 2011 quarter final.
That's just the big matches.
I can say Babar Azam would have chased those scores down basing myself on his world cup chase vs NZ.
But these would have means nothing.
Babar Azam is a champion batsman.
When was the last time babar chased a good total,i dont know if you watch odis or not but kohli chased scores like these n no. of times .Every one knows that he hasnt performed in 50 OVER world cup knockouts but he has chased totals above three hundred a lot of times.
Babar hasnt even done that once,so please dont be hurt.Babar simply doesnt have the second gear which premier batsman like kohli,rohit and warner have and no one will rate him anywhere near these greats in lois.
Babar chased 235 against nz,235 is a below average total and it suggests nothing other than the fact that babar can play in tough conditions and we already know that,the question is does he have it in him to chase down good totals.
When was the last time babar chased a good total,i dont know if you watch odis or not but kohli chased scores like these n no. of times .Every one knows that he hasnt performed in 50 OVER world cup knockouts but he has chased totals above three hundred a lot of times.
Babar hasnt even done that once,so please dont be hurt.Babar simply doesnt have the second gear which premier batsman like kohli,rohit and warner have and no one will rate him anywhere near these greats in lois.
Babar chased 235 against nz,235 is a below average total and it suggests nothing other than the fact that babar can play in tough conditions and we already know that,the question is does he have it in him to chase down good totals.
For once we agree on every single word written.It is very rare for a batsman to take teams home on their own. You always need support from the other end even if you are the greatest chaser ever like Kohli.
Babar played a great innings but he had too much to do on his own, and the slight miscalculation in the end cost him. If he had taken Pakistan home it would have been a brilliant innings, but now it still deserves to be categorized as a great one.
Many all-time great ODI knocks have been played in the second innings in a losing cause. This was one of the best second innings efforts I have seen over the years in spite of the quality of the opposition.
Babar is getting closer and closer to Kohli but i always feel he is 2 sixes short in most of innings to go from Very Good to great.
For once we agree on every single word written.
Little bit of subject, what is your favorite innings in a loosing chase?
For me it's Afridi's 109 vs Sri Lanka. Tendulkar's 175 vs Australia was also special. There many others but these two are my favorite.
Recently Brathwaite effort vs NZ was astonishing as was Stoinis VS NZ.
Kohli has 20k plus runs with avg of 50 plus in all formats. How many runs does Babar have?
It is very rare for a batsman to take teams home on their own. You always need support from the other end even if you are the greatest chaser ever like Kohli.
Babar played a great innings but he had too much to do on his own, and the slight miscalculation in the end cost him. If he had taken Pakistan home it would have been a brilliant innings, but now it still deserves to be categorized as a great one.
Many all-time great ODI knocks have been played in the second innings in a losing cause. This was one of the best second innings efforts I have seen over the years in spite of the quality of the opposition.
Babar can't hit when required. It was clear he was relying on Wahab to up the scoring rate while he was supporting from the other end. Shows he is one dimensional.
It is very rare for a batsman to take teams home on their own. You always need support from the other end even if you are the greatest chaser ever like Kohli.
Babar played a great innings but he had too much to do on his own, and the slight miscalculation in the end cost him. If he had taken Pakistan home it would have been a brilliant innings, but now it still deserves to be categorized as a great one.
Many all-time great ODI knocks have been played in the second innings in a losing cause. This was one of the best second innings efforts I have seen over the years in spite of the quality of the opposition.
Can't believe I agree with you. Do u rate this babar inning more than new Zealand world cup inning?
Would any other batsmen in our history have chased that yesterday? I dont think so. I feel babar was very close to pull it off.
Indians are laughing babar couldn't chase this against 14th ranked side. I feel its very harsh. Do j agree with them to a certain degree?
Miandad, Inzamam and Razzaq are the only three that I can think could have pulled it off singlehandedly.
I would say that the one vs New Zealand was better because it was a must-win World Cup match against a brilliant attack on a tough pitch, but this innings does not deserve to be devalued because it came in a losing cause against a weak team.
Without Babar, we would have lost by 100+ runs.
Yeh some special efforts in here.All of those were great innings but I will add a few more.
Inzamam vs India in 2004 in the first ODI where Pakistan scored 344 after India posted 349.
Dilshan and Sangakkara vs india in 2009. They were chasing 414 and fell just 3 runs short.
Stokes vs Australia last year in the World Cup group game was also special.
Bevan 185* vs Asia XI in 2000 was also an incredible innings. The second highest score was 25 or something.
I feel Joe Root is underrated in ODI's.
On courent form, overall I will have Smith as the undisputed number 1; Kohli/Babar on tie for 2nd position and Williamson at 4.
Williamson hasn't played since the world cup but had a brilliant world cup.
So this was the post that created so much debate a year ago.
We can safely say, that on current form, Babar is behind no one in the world in any format (behind Smith in Tests still). If you need a batsman to put your money on in any format, any situation he is the one.
What a batsman he is turning out to be. Unfortunately we don't play enough Test and ODI cricket so his records are not going to speak about what he was capable of doing.
Babar is just below kohli once he starts winning matches then he will become better or on par with kohli.but he is Pakistan greatest bateman
You can't base personnal greatness on wins.
Lara was better than Ponting overall when no-one will win as much as Ponting.
For the knowledgeable people, you can see Babar is batting as good as anyone or even better than anyone bar Smith in tests.
That may happen, but I really can't see Babar flopping in the test series against NZ like Kohli did.
You can't base personnal greatness on wins.
Lara was better than Ponting overall when no-one will win as much as Ponting.
For the knowledgeable people, you can see Babar is batting as good as anyone or even better than anyone bar Smith in tests.
That may happen, but I really can't see Babar flopping in the test series against NZ like Kohli did.
I don't know why but you have this strange obsession of comparing Babar Azam with Kohli.
You can't base personnal greatness on wins.
Lara was better than Ponting overall when no-one will win as much as Ponting.
For the knowledgeable people, you can see Babar is batting as good as anyone or even better than anyone bar Smith in tests.
That may happen, but I really can't see Babar flopping in the test series against NZ like Kohli did.
You could make an argument that Babar is better than Smith, Root, and Williamson in LOIs. But that's about it.
Kohli and Smith have lots of 200s, Babar hasn't scored above 150 yet. His average is much lower than them. He hasn't had a dominating series like those 2 and is ranked lower than them. Some of these points also apply when comparing Babar to Root and Williamson in test cricket. So people need to calm down a bit when comparing Babar with these guys in Test cricket.
For a guy who has a grand total of 2 test hundreds against the top 5 teams and just one away hundred, you are hyping him way too much....
Yes Kohli failed in NZ and Babar most likely won't. But Kohli also dominated SAF in SAF , England in England and scored 4 hundreds an a single Aussie tour.... Can you see Babar do that as of now?
No, he is not there yet. Had a decent series in Australia after having failed miserably on his first tour there.
Wasn't very impressive in South Africa to put him along with the big guys nor in England either. But had great outings against srilanka, Bangladesh at home recently.
He needs to prove himself in newzealand atleast especially after he had a poor outing there last time in ODIs where he scored like 30 runs in 5 innings combined.
Babar played as well as Kohli did in SA at least, but different match situation made it look better for Kohli.
Babar played as well as Kohli did in SA at least, but different match situation made it look better for Kohli.
Babar has done better than Kohli in England. He just bats better in England.
How are 2 scores of 104 and 97 in 4 innings just decent? One test was a pink ball game too!
All that talk about 5th gears!
Can someone explain again, because I failed to understand at that time, I may understand it now.
A 150 chase was right in his alley let's be honest. Nobody actually doubted that he could not chase 150ish scores. You would have had an argument if India's total had been 180 or above.
Just that I wasn't only talking about Babar but more about the man that has all the gears!
Kohli or Rahul?
Rahul received an absolute peach, not many are surviving that. You could probably blame Rohit for being lazy in his foot movement, but the Rahul delivery pitched around off stump and seamed in at 145 clicks. Should just take his cap for that delivery, it's not something you face every match even if you play Pakistan again.
Kohli's close to getting retired, he seems a shadow of himself right now. Yesterday was actually the first time he played some sort of a decent innings in a very long time.
Why talk about Rahul in this thread at all?
Kohli played well yesterday but he saw what's the difference between playing in India and in UAE.
He helped India get to a competitive total but wan't threatening at all with no acceleration ability whatsoever yesterday.
India did loose early wickets so you can still justify his approach in the powerplay but then India was very fine wickets in hand wise but still failed to aceelerate.
The current version of Kohli is a shadow of himself. Kohli has played very good innings even on difficult wickets in the past - Eg. His knock vs Pakistan on a slow turner at Kolkata in 2016. Even his knock at Mohali vs Aus was on a slow wicket.
The knock vs Australia in Mohali? I can't remember witch one you are talking about...
The one in witch he took apart Cummins, Hazlewood and Starc?
You fool yourself thinking Kohli ever had different gears than Babar.
His overall SR being better is only due to him playing home matches in India and Babar playing them in UAE.
I am sure there isn't much difference in SR in SA, Australia, England and NZ.
You're living in a different planet.
I'll start considering your argument when Babar chases 320 odd under 38 overs against a bowler similar to the calibre of peak Malinga even on the flattest wicket in the world.
Yes best way to avoid facts is to run away.
Go and bring boths T20 SR in Australia, England, SA and NZ. Kohli might be in front but I am quite sure it's tight.
The facts will tell us lot more than your "next year in australia that will happen"...
No I'm just amused at your persistence to argue Babar is equivalent or even better than what Kohli was at his peak. Even the most delusional of Pakistani fans won't argue that, the fact that you do so, not sure what to make of it.
I'm not running away. I'm simply asking you to name one iconic T20 or ODI innings that Babar has played, that made you sit up and think wow that was special. Like Kohli chasing 320 under 37 overs against peak Malinga or scoring 183 against a Saeed Ajmal led attack, or his quarter final heroics against Australia at Mohali in the T20 WC. The first two knocks didn't even happen in India, so not sure you can use the Indian wickets excuse. Babar is a player who has played a lot of good and some very good innings too, but he's not someone like Kohli or AB who are regarded as ATGs in ODI cricket. He is more similar to Kane Williamson in batting style than Kohli.
Let's forget all that. Since we're talking about T20Is, why don't we compare their records in World T20s. Kohli is playing his 4th WT20 and is averaging 83 @130 till now. He has won two player of the tournament awards in WT20s and has by far the best record in T20 world cups. Babar has just started to play his first ever WT20 but let's see if Babar can replicate the same record after one WT20 let alone 3. This is all the more amusing to me given you were the staunchest critic of Tendulkar's playing style.
You are going everywhere. ODI's, style of play, T20's, T20 world cups, Babat better than Kohli at his peak, ABdV, Tendulkar... It's too much for me.
So, I will say again what I have said, hopefully you will understand it. If you agree it's fine and if you disagree it's also fine.
My claim in our discussion was that Kohli doesn't bat at a better SR than Babar in T20I's. They are more or so same kind of batsmen in the format strike rate wise.
And I say this well knowing that Kohli's overall T20I SR is 138,52 and Babar's is 130.64.
I say that the big difference of 8 points in SR is largely because of Kohli playing home games in easier conditions in India and Babar playing home games (most of them) in UAE where the SR can't be that high.
As you talked about Babar being a liability in Australia etc, I told you lets check theire SR in SENA in T20I's. I don't know if you checked them or not so I decided to do it myself and that are the results.
Virat Kohli's SR in SENA : 138.52
Babar Azam's SR in SENA : 142.14.
Hope that settle the discussion about being a liability in Australia.
Comparing across SENA is not the most accurate way because it depends on the attacks the respective batsmen faced. Kohli for example faced Rabada, Morkel, Morris and Ngidi in his last tour of SA in the ODI and T20 series while Babar faced the likes of Hendricks, Junior Dala, Sipamla and Magala in his last SA tour.
It's why I said if Babar is "more or less the same" player as Kohli, I'm sure he would win player of the series awards twice like Kohli did, on top of having the GOAT WT20 record (Kohli's WT20 record is basically like Sir Viv's ODI WC record). Forget about winning it twice like Kohli did, if Babar wins it at least once, I'll agree that Babar and Kohli are "more or less" the same players in T20Is.
Interesting post...
Our discussion being about T20's, I will stick to T20's. Surely we can talk about whatever you want but so far the discussion is about T20's.
Kohli has batted a total of 2 times in SA :
1st time : Was in 2011 against Parnell, 34-year old Ntini, Theron, Peterson and Botha.
2nd time: Darren Paterson, Dala, Moris, Phelukwayo, Shamsi, JJ Smuts
3rd Time : Darren Paterson, Dala, Moris, Phelukwayo, Shamsi, JJ Smuts
I know well the attacks both of them faced in Australia, but I don't even want to argue about it.
Guys like you just don't accept the truth.
I don't ignore anything.I may have got mixed up with the ODIs Kohli played because I distinctly remember Kohli playing Rabada, Ngidi and Morkel in LOIs in that series.
But interesting that you keep ignoring the WT20 bit.
I don't ignore anything.
The discussion so far is solely regarding T20 SR. Once it's finished we can me to another thing.
You can't mix many discussions, otherwise you will got mixed up just as you did for Kohli's performances.
All I'm saying is that I'll wait and see how Babar performs the WT20 and if he actually wins the player of the tournament, I'll be the first to eat humble pie and accept that Babar in T20s is at the same level as Kohli. World cups elevate players legacy and the ATGs get compared by their WC records. Kohli's poor ODI WC record is actually why I rate him below Tendulkar and Viv's ATG WC record is why I rate him the GOAT in ODI cricket. If Babar goes on to have a similar legacy like Virat has in WT20s, I'll readily accept your argument.
Ok, at least we agree that Kohli's bats at the same speed as Babar Azam in T20's.
Then if you think Kohli is ahead because he already has done well in 2 world cups, I think it's a fair point from you.
But Babar has started his world cup campaign strongly by playing a big innings in a big pressure match, chasing against a very good bowling line up.
I still think he is not. Root is in formidable form. Smith has so much lead in tests.There is no more Fab 4. They have all declined.
Babar Azam is the sole best batsman in the world, across formats.
I still think he is not. Root is in formidable form. Smith has so much lead in tests.
Babar is one of them. The rest of the world cup is going to tell us more.
No way Babar is ahead in Tests.In all formats Babar is ahead of root I think.
Maybe in test fab4 babar has still to prove but overall babar takes the cake.
The discussion is regarding fab 4/5 players across format. Butler and Bairstow do not qualifyRoot and Smith are far ahead in Tests, Babar in ODI's certainly but I wouldn't say any of them are outstanding in T20Is. The likes of Buttler and Bairstow rule that format imo.
No way Babar is ahead in Tests.
Root is such a special player in test cricket.
On courent form, overall I will have Smith as the undisputed number 1; Kohli/Babar on tie for 2nd position and Williamson at 4.
Williamson hasn't played since the world cup but had a brilliant world cup.