Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Rob H said:)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
zulfiqar said:wow... what the hell happened?? How did the English get out so quickly!!
kablooee87 said:I have to say. After all this time I am rarely surprised at how far Australia can come and win a test match, but I'm surprised at this.
It's funny how it's always the teams facing Australia that tend to fold up.asifp said:Aussies do what they do best , play positive Cricket , this was more of a case of England folding up and playing negative cricket.
kablooee87 said:It's funny how it's always the teams facing Australia that tend to fold up.
kablooee87 said:I have to say. After all this time I am rarely surprised at how far Australia can come and win a test match, but I'm surprised at this.
Uzzy said:TBH i feel bad for Flintoff. He gave it his all and is a great cricketer. Shame he had to end up on the losing side.
![]()
shan said:was he crying?![]()
the Great Khan said:tdamn the aussies should thank us subcontinentals..every series where we have played them before the ashes we've brought them down a notch or two only to watch the aussies pound em!!...loll..lol..
The fear. The Australians have seen it before in the eyes of England's batsmen. And they weren't even playing them at the time.
It was June 2001 and Australia had recently arrived in the country when England reached tea on the last day of the second Test against Pakistan at Old Trafford two wickets down and odds on to achieve the draw that would give them their fifth successive series win and a handy pre-Ashes pep-up. They duly lost eight wickets in a session and with it the game. Steve Waugh chuckled knowingly. A couple of months later Australia handed out another Ashes thrashing.
England's mistake in Manchester was to play for a draw before they needed to. Pakistan had begun the day worrying about defeat, but instead sensed the hesitation and went in for the kill, unburdened by any thought of defeat. It was a lesson learned the harsh way.
Or so we thought. Then, this morning, Andrew Strauss and Ian Bell poked and prodded their way to 10 runs off the first 10 overs. Unlike Old Trafford, England had next to no chance of winning this game at the start of the day. But they could not have chosen a clearer way of signalling their worries to Australia than this. Back then, Pakistan attacked with Waqar Younis and Saqlain Mushtaq; now, Australia moved in with Brett Lee and Shane Warne. Then, as now, England propped forward and kept an anxious eye on the clock. Grim stuff and utterly self-defeating.
http://sport.guardian.co.uk/ashes2006-07/story/0,,1964279,00.html
Not the fact it was Harmison as we were losing then but the way he was giving out. The rule shouldnt be lbw as it isn't but "left the ball". I think that hawkeye needs to be brought it for these decisions. As soon as the batsman leaves it and it's hits the pad the finger is raised regardless of where it has hit him and the height. Shocking umpiring.Easa said:I agree those were two wrong decisions, but do you think the game would have changed that much? One of them was Harmison, and I doubt he was going to last for too long. You could argue about Strauss, though.
In the end, Australia were the better side and deserved to win. England played some atrocious shots, especially Pietersen! Why the hell would you want to play a lap sweep against somebody you can dominate? Ridiculous stuff.
Rob H said:Not the fact it was Harmison as we were losing then but the way he was giving out. The rule shouldnt be lbw as it isn't but "left the ball". I think that hawkeye needs to be brought it for these decisions. As soon as the batsman leaves it and it's hits the pad the finger is raised regardless of where it has hit him and the height. Shocking umpiring.
Easa said:Good point, I agree with you. Who was the umpire, anyways? At least you lot know that it was a human mistake.. not a fat umpire who wants to demoralize the **** out of you.
Rob H said:Not the fact it was Harmison as we were losing then but the way he was giving out. The rule shouldnt be lbw as it isn't but "left the ball". I think that hawkeye needs to be brought it for these decisions. As soon as the batsman leaves it and it's hits the pad the finger is raised regardless of where it has hit him and the height. Shocking umpiring.