What's new

Dean Jones bats for extra umpire to call no-balls instantaneously in T20s

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
217,901
As good as a cricket player Australia‘s Dean Jones was in the 1980s, he is equally good when it comes to innovations and cricketing tactics, and the former cricketer-turned coach and commentator believes that adding an extra umpire on the field to call no-balls, instantaneously, could be one of the methods to reduce umpires missing out on calling no-balls.

In an interview to the official website of Global T20 Canada, Jones flouted the idea of having an extra umpire right behind the non-striker to call no-balls by the bowlers immediately rather that relying in technology, which according to Jones will cost money and leads to delay in play.

“We need another umpire on the ground. Now why? Because there are too many no-balls that are being missed in every game.

“Now, the technology you need for a no-ball – the infra-red and all that they do for tennis – costs money,” Jones said adding, “And it’s not instantaneous. Let me tell you why that matters. If I’m the coach of Islamabad United and I have one of my batsman, say Andre Russell, on strike. If he takes a single, goes to the other end, and then the technology comes back and says ‘that was a no-ball’ – I don’t want Andre Russell taking that single. He is the biggest hitter in the game. He needs to be on strike. So we need instantaneous calls.”

The 58-year-old went to explain the best position for such umpire will be behind the non-striker to get an unobstructed view of the bowlers front and back foot. Jones also added that more often than not the umpire view, standing behind the wicket at the non-striker’s end, is obstructed due the incoming bowler’s movement, mostly hip movement, while delivering the ball.

“My first logical thought is that he stands behind the non-striker. He can see straight away if it’s a no-ball. The main umpire can’t see a no-ball most of the time because the bowler’s right hip covers their front foot. So the umpires are guessing sometimes. But if an umpire stands behind the non-striker, he’ll see everything. Back foot, front foot, everything. And you know what? What’s the cost of an extra umpire compared to the technology? So I want to have another umpire down there,” he added.

https://www.cricketcountry.com/news...-call-no-balls-instantaneously-in-t20s-878370
 
This is what good, insightful and productive management is all about. Use the available resource for maximal result and productivity. What's the use of a 4th Umpire anyway?
He has a brain. We should hire him as Head Coach for Pakistan team. We need a Manager of Men as Head Coach, who can plan, motivate, discipline and most importantly innovate when needed.
 
No. That would be too weird. One umpire in his normal position and another one right next to him. No thanks.
 
What? One more umpire on the field....doesnt make sense to me. All for just slight advantage of instantaneous call, is batsmen going to even watch the signal from this 3rd umpire or focus on ball. Even if this umpire calls it will the batsman hear it in time to actually change his shot or plan the runs around strike etc.

Better idea would be to have 3rd umpire watch for it specifically and just ensure there are no missed no ball calls like we sometimes see during games on balls that dont get wickets. They do double check wicket balls but often umpires miss non wicket balls no balls.
 
I think a loud beeping noise when a no ball is bowled triggered by some sensor could do the job
 
Back
Top