Donald Trump - Former President of the USA's legal troubles

Trump Organization's outside accountant testifies he 'would have had a heart attack' if he'd seen the 'secret' Christmas bonus lists

The first defense witness in the Trump Org. tax-fraud trial is outside accountant Donald Bender.
He testified Tuesday he "would have had a heart attack" if he'd seen how the company paid X-mas bonuses.
Executives got bonuses in piecemeal checks signed by Trump, in what the DA says was a tax-dodge.

A longtime outside accountant for the Trump Organization testified at its tax-fraud trial on Tuesday that he would have been more than shocked if he'd seen the company's annual "secret" lists of Christmas bonus payments.

"I probably would have had a heart attack," Donald Bender, who did the company taxes for 35 years, told a Manhattan jury on Tuesday.

For years, former President Donald Trump personally signed stacks of bonus checks that were then stuffed into the holiday cards of favored company executives, jurors have already heard in the trial.

But the yearly executive bonus handouts were part of a 15-year payroll tax dodge scheme that reached right to the top of the company, prosecutors are trying to prove.

The bonuses should have been reported in their entirety on company W-2s each year, as taxable income. But they were not, prosecutors have charged.

Instead, prosecutors alleged executives received the bulk of their annual bonuses in separate checks from a variety of Trump Organization subsidiaries, as if they had worked the previous year as freelancers or contractors for Wollman Rink, Mar-a-Lago, the Trump International Golf Club in Palm Beach, Florida, and even Trump Productions, which produced "The Apprentice."

That way, prosecutors alleged, the company saved on withholding and got to write off the checks as subsidiary expenses. Meanwhile, the executives were able to claim the checks as freelance income, which allowed them to stash some of that money in tax-free savings accounts available only to the self-employed.

For example, in 2015, the Trump Organization paid out $1.1 million in executive bonuses and paid Allen Weisselberg, its chief financial officer, a $300,000 bonus, according to documents.

Of that, $100,000 was paid properly, as compensation claimed on Weisselberg's W-2 wage statement for that year.

But $75,000 of the bonus was paid to him in a check from Wollman Rink, as if the now-75-year-old CFO had moonlighted that year at the famed Central Park skating rink.

The remainder of his bonus was paid in $50,000 checks with three different payors, as if Weisselberg had done work the previous year for the Palm Beach golf club, Mar-a-Lago, and "The Apprentice."

On the stand last week, Weisselberg testified that these payments violated tax reporting requirements.

Careful records were kept internally of how company bonuses were paid, some titled "The Trump Organization Christmas Bonuses."

Trump's initials are on some of these records. He personally approved the total bonus amounts to be received each year by such executives as Weisselberg, company general counsel Jason Greenblatt, controller Jeffrey McConney, and COO Matthew Calamari, according to documents.

But Trump's initials are not on spreadsheets detailing what prosecutors say was the illegal part of the scheme — charts detailing which subsidiaries were paying the bonus checks.

Bender, who works for the Mazars accounting firm, testified Tuesday that he never saw these purported heart-attacks-on-a-chart, not until Manhattan prosecutors showed them to him in 2021.

If he had seen these charts and realized the extent of the scheme, he would have sounded an alarm, he told jurors, under cross-examination by Susan Hoffinger, one of the lead prosecutors.

"I probably would have had a heart attack," he said, before apologizing for the hyperbole and explaining he meant he would have been "very concerned," and likely would have alerted his firm, Mazars.

The accounting firm severed ties with Trump and the Trump Organization earlier this year, citing a history of financial "discrepancies" at the company.

A defense witness, Bender's testimony could help the defense argue that Trump, too, was kept in the dark about the subsidiaries paying executive bonuses as if it was outside compensation.

The trial is off for the rest of the week. Bender's testimony, and the defense case, could be completed Monday, with closing arguments possible as early as Tuesday.

Trump is not personally named as a defendant in the five-week-old criminal trial, but his company could face up to $1.6 million in penalties if convicted of conspiracy, scheme to defraud, and lying on official records.

MSN
 
Trump loses bid to avoid handing over tax returns

The US Supreme Court has paved the way for the handover of former president Donald Trump's tax returns to Congress after a three-year legal battle.

The court rejected Mr Trump's emergency application for an order that would have prevented the Treasury department from giving six years of tax returns for him and some of his businesses to the House Ways and Means Committee.

Mr Trump was the first president in four decades not to release his tax returns.

The Democratic-controlled committee had first requested Mr Trump's tax returns in 2019 as part of an investigation into the Internal Revenue Service's audit programme and tax law compliance by the former president.

The Treasury department had refused to provide the records during Mr Trump's presidency, but President Joe Biden's administration said federal law is clear that the committee has the right to examine any taxpayer's return, including the president's.

Lower courts agreed and rejected Mr Trump's claims it was overstepping and that the committee only wanted the documents to make them public.

Chief Justice John Roberts imposed a temporary freeze on 1 November to allow the court to weigh in on the legal issues raised by Mr Trump's lawyer and the counterarguments of the administration and House of Representatives.

But just over three weeks later, the justices denied Mr Trump's emergency application, with no justice publicly dissenting.

If Mr Trump had persuaded the Supreme Court to intervene, he could have run out the clock on the committee until the Republicans take control of the House in January, when they almost certainly would have dropped the records request had it not been resolved by then.

Third loss this year

It is the third time Mr Trump has lost at the Supreme Court this year.

In October, it refused to step into the legal fight surrounding the FBI search of his Florida estate, where classified documents were discovered. In January, it refused to stop the National Archives from turning over documents to the House committee investigating the 6 January insurrection at the US Capitol.

Last week, Mr Trump officially launched a third bid for the US presidency, saying: "America's comeback starts right now."

Making the announcement from his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, he said "everybody was doing great" after his four years in office, "the world was at peace" and he "kept his promises".

"Two years ago we were a great nation. And soon we will be a great nation again," the former US president added.

MSN
 
Writer E Jean Carroll has sued Donald Trump in the US state of New York for allegedly raping her in the 1990s.

Ms Carroll is among the first to sue under the Adult Survivors Act, which came into effect on Thursday.

The state law allows a one-year period for victims to file sexual assault lawsuits in New York over claims that would have otherwise exceeded statute limitations.

The former president has denied the allegations against him.

Ms Carroll alleges the attack took place in a New York luxury department store dressing room 27 years ago.

The Adult Survivors Act allows victims to come forward if the sexual assault occurred when they were over the age of 18 and took place on a date that exceeds time limits that exists on most felonies.

It is modelled after the state's recent Child Abuse Act, which applied to victims who were abused as minors.

The Child Abuse Act, which came into effect in 2019, allowed a two-year period for victims to come forward. Around 11,000 lawsuits were filed in New York against churches, hospitals, schools, camps and other institutions under that law.

Ms Carroll has also sued former President Trump for defamation after he accused her of lying when she first made her allegations public in 2019. Mr Trump has called Ms Carroll's claims "fiction". A civil trial for that case is scheduled for 6 February.

In a statement, Ms Carroll's attorney, Roberta Kaplan, said the new lawsuit filed on Thursday is intended to hold Mr Trump accountable for the alleged assault.

Alina Habba, a lawyer for Mr Trump, told US media that, while she respects and admires individuals that come forward "this case is unfortunately an abuse of the purpose of this Act" and "runs the risk of delegitimising the credibility of actual victims".

Others are also planning to file lawsuits under the new law.

This includes a planned class action lawsuit against Robert Hadden, a former gynaecologist at hospitals tied to New York-Presbyterian and Columbia University, who has been accused by dozens of patients of sexual abuse.

Mr Hadden was convicted in 2016 on sex-related charges in state court, but has pleaded not guilty to federal charges of abusing female patients over two decades.

Advocates for survivors of sex abuse believe the legislation provides an opportunity for people to come forward who may not have done so previously due to trauma or fear of retaliation.

Several other states have also extended or temporarily eliminated their statues of limitation on sex crimes in the wake of the #MeToo in 2018, including New Jersey, California, Arizona and Montana.

BBC
 
Appeals court halts special master review of documents seized at Mar-a-Lago in major defeat for Trump

In a major defeat for former President Donald Trump, a federal appeals court on Thursday halted a third-party review of documents seized from his Mar-a-Lago estate.

The ruling removes a major obstacle to the Justice Department’s investigation into the mishandling of government records from Trump’s time in the White House.

The three-judge panel of the 11th US Circuit Court of Appeals reversed US District Judge Aileen Cannon’s order appointing a so-called special master to sort through thousands of documents found at Trump’s home to determine what should be off limits to investigators. The court said the judge should not have intervened in the first place.

“The law is clear,” the appeals court wrote. “We cannot write a rule that allows any subject of a search warrant to block government investigations after the execution of the warrant. Nor can we write a rule that allows only former presidents to do so.”

The 11th Circuit said that either approach would be a “radical reordering of our caselaw limiting the federal courts’ involvement in criminal investigations” and that “both would violate bedrock separation-of-powers limitations.”

The Justice Department is investigating obstruction of justice, criminal mishandling of government records and violations of the Espionage Act, according to court filings. The probe exploded into public view with the August search, which came after investigators obtained evidence they said led them to believe that Trump had not complied with a subpoena for all documents marked as classified being stored at his Florida home.

The opinion – which was issued jointly by the three-judge panel made up of all GOP appointees – dismantled Trump’s arguments for why a special master was necessary. The court said that only in extraordinary circumstances should courts intervene in Justice Department investigations that are still in their early stages, and that standard had not been met here.

“This restraint guards against needless judicial intrusion into the course of criminal investigations—a sphere of power committed to the executive branch,” the court wrote.

A sketch of Dearie from a court case in 2013.
What to know about Raymond Dearie, the judge who will serve as Mar-a-Lago search special master
The appeals court said that its new ruling will go into effect in seven days, unless a party in the case successfully seeks an order – known as a stay – pausing the ruling from going into effect while it is appealed.

Trump’s legal team has not decided whether to appeal the ruling to the Supreme Court but is weighing the option, a source familiar with the discussions told CNN.

Rebuke of Judge Cannon’s deference to Trump
The ruling is a stinging rebuke of how Cannon inserted herself into the dispute. In addition to reversing the order, the appeals court is instructing her to dismiss the entire case.

The appeals court took aim at the idea, hinted at in her order appointing the special master, that Trump deserves special treatment because he is a former president.

“It is indeed extraordinary for a warrant to be executed at the home of a former president – but not in a way that affects our legal analysis or otherwise gives the judiciary license to interfere in an ongoing investigation,” the court said.

To create that “special exception,” the 11th Circuit wrote “would defy our Nation’s foundational principle that our law applies ‘to all, without regard to numbers, wealth, or rank.’”

The three-judge panel that issued the ruling is comprised of appointees of Republican presidents, including two who were put on the bench by Trump: Britt Grant and Andrew Basher. Both jurists had previously hinted in a ruling related to the case that they believed Cannon had overreached.

The third, Judge William Pryor, the chief judge of the appellate court, is an appointee of George W. Bush who has long demonstrated his conservative bona fides on a host of controversial issues.

Trump had sought the special master in the weeks after the August search, securing the court order from Cannon. Judge Raymond Dearie, a senior judge who sits in Brooklyn, had been tasked by Cannon with leading the review of the thousands of documents that remained.

During oral arguments in the 11th Circuit case, Trump’s attorney James Trusty said that only about 900 of those documents were in dispute. Trump’s legal team contends the documents are his personal records or privileged and should be kept outside the scope of the investigation.

Lawyers for the Justice Department argued that the special master process stood to drag out for several weeks, if not months, impeding the probe into the documents. Prosecutors said that without access to the other documents, they could not question witnesses about the materials that had been found intermixed with classified records at Mar-a-Lago.

The Justice Department effort is now being led by special counsel Jack Smith, who was appointed last week to helm that probe and another investigation into efforts to reverse Trump’s 2020 election loss that could implicate the former president and current 2024 White House candidate.

Smith took over the investigation shortly before the 11th Circuit heard oral arguments in the case and said in court filings that he approved the stance federal prosecutors had taken. He has promised to not let his appointment slow the pace of the investigations he’s taking over.

CNN
 
The White House has condemned former President Donald Trump after he called for the "termination" of the US constitution.

Mr Trump made the comments in a post to his Truth social network on Saturday while repeating his false claim that he won the 2020 presidential election.

He also accused "Big Tech Companies" of colluding against him with Democrats.

White House spokesman Andrew Bates said Mr Trump's comments were "anathema to the soul of our nation".

"You cannot only love America when you win," Mr Bates said in a statement.

He added that Mr Trump's comments should be "universally condemned" - seemingly a pointed jab at senior Republicans who have so far avoided criticising the former president's outburst.

Other senior Democrats also challenged Republicans - including Rep Eric Swalwell who questioned how the party's members could continue to refer to themselves as "Constitutional conservatives" if they didn't condemn the comments.

In the post, Mr Trump referred to vague allegations of "massive & widespread fraud and deception" and asked whether he should be immediately returned to power.

"A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution. Our great 'Founders' did not want, and would not condone, False & Fraudulent Elections!" he said.

The post came just hours after Twitter's internal deliberations around limiting a 2020 story about Hunter Biden were revealed.

The story, which came weeks ahead of the 2020 presidential election, was published by the New York Post and revealed the chaotic personal life and business dealings of President Joe Biden's youngest son.

Twitter initially blocked the story because of a company policy on hacked and stolen materials, and the leaked emails showed confusion and disagreements among staff as they scrambled to respond.

The files - which the BBC cannot verify - were published on Twitter by Substack writer Matt Taibbi on Friday night.

But last week, Twitter owner Elon Musk hinted that he would release the information, writing on the platform: "This is necessary to restore public trust."

The billionaire defended the move in a Twitter spaces live stream on Saturday, but he accepted there may be a "legal risk" to his decision.

"We're just going to put all the information out there try to get a clean slate," Mr Musk said. He added that legal risks were "less of a concern than just clearing the air and making sure that people know what really happened".

Mr Trump announced his third presidential bid last month and remains the favourite to seal the Republican nomination in 2024.

But he has come under fire this week after dining with a known white nationalist and Holocaust denier at his Florida home.

Mr Trump said he was not aware that the man would be present and said he had accompanied the rapper Kanye West - who earlier this week expressed admiration for Adolf Hitler and has been accused of a host of anti-semitic comments.
 
The White House has condemned former President Donald Trump after he called for the "termination" of the US constitution.

Mr Trump made the comments in a post to his Truth social network on Saturday while repeating his false claim that he won the 2020 presidential election.

He also accused "Big Tech Companies" of colluding against him with Democrats.

White House spokesman Andrew Bates said Mr Trump's comments were "anathema to the soul of our nation".

"You cannot only love America when you win," Mr Bates said in a statement.

He added that Mr Trump's comments should be "universally condemned" - seemingly a pointed jab at senior Republicans who have so far avoided criticising the former president's outburst.

Other senior Democrats also challenged Republicans - including Rep Eric Swalwell who questioned how the party's members could continue to refer to themselves as "Constitutional conservatives" if they didn't condemn the comments.

In the post, Mr Trump referred to vague allegations of "massive & widespread fraud and deception" and asked whether he should be immediately returned to power.

"A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution. Our great 'Founders' did not want, and would not condone, False & Fraudulent Elections!" he said.

The post came just hours after Twitter's internal deliberations around limiting a 2020 story about Hunter Biden were revealed.

The story, which came weeks ahead of the 2020 presidential election, was published by the New York Post and revealed the chaotic personal life and business dealings of President Joe Biden's youngest son.

Twitter initially blocked the story because of a company policy on hacked and stolen materials, and the leaked emails showed confusion and disagreements among staff as they scrambled to respond.

The files - which the BBC cannot verify - were published on Twitter by Substack writer Matt Taibbi on Friday night.

But last week, Twitter owner Elon Musk hinted that he would release the information, writing on the platform: "This is necessary to restore public trust."

The billionaire defended the move in a Twitter spaces live stream on Saturday, but he accepted there may be a "legal risk" to his decision.

"We're just going to put all the information out there try to get a clean slate," Mr Musk said. He added that legal risks were "less of a concern than just clearing the air and making sure that people know what really happened".

Mr Trump announced his third presidential bid last month and remains the favourite to seal the Republican nomination in 2024.

But he has come under fire this week after dining with a known white nationalist and Holocaust denier at his Florida home.

Mr Trump said he was not aware that the man would be present and said he had accompanied the rapper Kanye West - who earlier this week expressed admiration for Adolf Hitler and has been accused of a host of anti-semitic comments.

Not sure about termination but US constitution can be reviewed.

For example, 2nd amendment. There is no need for it anymore.
 
Trump did not disclose $19.8m loan while president, documents show
The loan from Daewoo, a company with ties to North Korea, should have been reported in public financial disclosures

Donald Trump failed to disclose a $19.8m loan from a company with historical ties to North Korea, while he was the US president, according to a new report.

Documents obtained by the New York attorney general, and reported by Forbes, on Sunday indicate a previously unreported loan owed by Trump to Daewoo, the South Korean conglomerate.

Daewoo was the only South Korean company allowed to operate a business in North Korea during the mid-1990s.

Forbes revealed that Trump’s relationship with Daewoo is at least 25 years old. At one point, Daewoo partnered with Trump on a development project near the United Nations headquarters in New York City, Trump World Tower.

Trump and Daewoo continued to do business together, including using Trump’s name on six South Korea-based properties from 1999 to 2007, according to the magazine.

The outlet reports that the debt in question “stems from an agreement Trump struck to share some of his licensing fees with Daewoo”.

According to documents reviewed by Forbes, the $19.8m balance remained the same from 2011 to 2016. Five months into Trump’s presidency, the balance dropped to $4.3m, according to paperwork that showcased Trump’s finances as of 30 June 2017.

Soon after, “Daewoo was bought out of its position on July 5, 2017,” the documents said, without disclosing who satisfied the debt.

Forbes reports that even though the loan was reported on the Trump Organization’s internal documents, it was not disclosed on the former president’s public financial disclosure reports. Under disclosure laws, Trump was required to submit the documents to federal officials during his presidential campaign and after he became president.

In 2016, Trump’s chief financial officer, Allen Weisselberg, said that Trump had disclosed all debts related to companies that Trump had a 100% stake in.

Despite the apparent gap in disclosures, Trump may not have violated any laws, though the existence of the debt still could have posed a conflict of interest.

While president, Trump bragged about his relationship with North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un, saying in 2018: “He likes me, I like him. We get along” and that “we fell in love”.

The two leaders met in person, but the relationship came to nought.

Meanwhile, on Monday, jurors began deliberating in the Trump Organization tax fraud trial in New York, in which the company is accused of operating a criminal scheme that allegedly involved fraud and tax evasion.

The Guardian
 
Donald Trump firm guilty of defrauding tax authorities for more than 15 years

Donald Trump's real estate company has been found guilty of running a criminal scheme to defraud tax authorities for 15 years.

The scheme operated by The Trump Organization included avoiding paying personal income taxes on perks such as rent-free apartments and luxury cars.

"The smorgasbord of benefits is designed to keep its top executives happy and loyal," prosecutor Joshua Steinglass told
jurors during his closing argument on Friday.

The firm, which operates hotels, golf courses and other real estate around the world had pleaded not guilty.

The former US president was not personally charged in the case.

The Trump Organization had argued that chief financial officer Allen Weisselberg, 75, ran the scheme to benefit himself.

He is on paid leave and testified that he received more than $1m in salary and bonus payments this year.

The firm will be sentenced on 13 January. Trump Organization lawyer Alan Futerfas told reporters the company would appeal.

While the firm now faces paying a fine, it is considered unlikely that it would cause serious damage to a company of its size. The group comprises about 500 business entities.

However, the conviction could make lenders and partners think twice.

The Trump Organization also faces a fraud lawsuit brought by New York state Attorney General Letitia James.

And Donald Trump himself is being investigated by the US Department of Justice over his handling of sensitive government documents after he left office in January 2021 - and attempts to overturn the November 2020 election, which he lost to Joe Biden.

https://news.sky.com/story/donald-t...x-authorities-for-more-than-15-years-12763070
 
US Capitol riot: Lawmakers recommend filing charges against Trump
Congressional panel urges Justice Department to indict former president on four charges, including inciting insurrection.

US lawmakers investigating the riot at the United States Capitol last year have recommended filing criminal charges against Donald Trump, accusing the former president of “inciting” insurrection.

During a public meeting on Monday, the congressional panel voted unanimously to refer four criminal charges against Trump to the Department of Justice, which has the final say on whether to indict the ex-president.

The recommended charges are inciting, assisting or aiding insurrection; disrupting an official proceeding; conspiracy to defraud the US; and conspiracy to make a false statement to the federal government.

“The committee believes that more than sufficient evidence exists for a criminal referral of former President Trump for assisting, or aiding and comforting, those at the Capitol who engaged in a violent attack on the United States,” Congressman Jamie Raskin said as he outlined the panel’s findings.

“The committee has developed significant evidence that President Trump intended to disrupt the peaceful transition of power under our Constitution,” he said.

Over the past year, the Democratic-led committee has argued that Trump’s false voter fraud claims led to the riot on January 6, 2021, which saw a mob of his supporters storm the US Capitol building as Congress was meeting to certify Joe Biden’s 2020 presidential election victory.

Congresswoman Liz Cheney, the panel’s vice chair, said during its final session on Monday that Trump’s failure to call on his supporters to end the attack was not only “unlawful” but also an “utter moral failure and a clear dereliction of duty”.

“No man who would behave that way at that moment in time can ever serve in any position of authority in our nation again,” Cheney said of her fellow Republican. “He is unfit for any office.”

The panel is expected to release a final report on its findings this week as well as make public all “non-sensitive records” before the end of the year.

“These transcripts and documents will allow the American people to see for themselves the amount of evidence we’ve gathered and continue to explore,” Congressman Bennie Thompson, the committee chair, said on Monday.

Trump and his supporters have rejected the panel’s efforts as a partisan witch hunt.

The former president rebuked the committee ahead of Monday’s session, comparing its investigation to the years-long inquiry into possible collusion between his campaign and Russia, which he described as a “hoax”.

In posts on his Truth Social platform, Trump, who is running for president again in 2024, also reiterated unfounded accusations that Democrats “cheated” in the 2020 election.

“The real criminals are the people who are destroying our once great Country!” he wrote.

After the meeting, Trump hit out at Cheney, one of his most vocal Republican critics who lost her primary to a challenger backed by the former president earlier this year. But he did not comment on the criminal referrals against him.

“But Liz Chaney [sic] lost by a record 40 points!” he wrote on Truth Social.

Other observers welcomed the panel’s push for US prosecutors to file criminal charges against Trump, however, saying the move is necessary to hold those responsible for the violence on January 6 last year accountable.

“Today marks an essential step toward transparency and accountability,” said the Southern Poverty Law Center, which tracks hate groups in the US. “Our leaders and the courts must hold accountable all the planners, perpetrators, funders and those who incited the insurrection.”

The committee’s work is one of several investigations into last year’s riot.

Criminal charges have been filed against a number of participants in the attack on the Capitol, including the leader of the far-right Oath Keepers group, Stewart Rhodes, who was found guilty of seditious conspiracy last month for his role in what happened.

Reporting from Capitol Hill, Al Jazeera’s Mike Hanna noted that one of the charges recommended by the panel against Trump on Monday – obstruction of official proceedings – has been used to prosecute hundreds of accused January 6 rioters.

“That is a charge that the Justice Department is really familiar with,” Hanna said.

“The Justice Department has brought over 900 prosecutions in relation to the events on that day, and [is] likely to bring many more. Now it’s up to the Justice Department to decide whether or not Donald Trump is going to become one of those who will face charges related to January 6.”

Al-Jazeera
 
US House committee votes to make Trump tax returns public
The Democrat-led panel voted in a closed session to release six years of records pertaining to the former president.

A committee in the United States House of Representatives has voted to publicly release years of tax returns obtained from former President Donald Trump, capping a years-long legal and political battle that started when he was in the White House.

The Ways and Means Committee, a body responsible for overseeing tax-related issues, voted 24-16 in a closed-door session on Tuesday, in what was seen as the last opportunity for the Democrat-led panel to broach the issue.

A summary of Trump’s tax returns between 2015 and 2021 – when he was running for president and serving in the White House – will be partially redacted and released within days, said the committee’s chairman Richard Neal, a Democrat from Massachusetts.

The House of Representatives is set to shift to Republican control in January, following November’s midterm elections. Republicans have denounced Tuesday’s vote as partisan.

“We worry this will unleash a cycle of political retribution in Congress,” said Texas’s Kevin Brady, the leading Republican on the committee, in the lead-up to the vote.

It will also lead to further scrutiny of Trump, who recently announced his intentions to run for another term as president in 2024.

At stake were six years of tax returns for the former president and some of his business, part of a three-year-long political fight over the documents.

The committee had initially requested the tax returns in 2019, as part of an investigation into then-President Trump’s tax compliance and the audit programme run by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).

Title 26 of the US Code decrees that the US Treasury Department “shall furnish” the committee with “any return or return information” it requests.

But the Treasury Department at the time refused to release Trump’s tax records. And Trump had previously claimed he could not disclose the documents, as he was under an IRS audit.

However, the committee found that the IRS did not follow its own rules when it failed to audit Trump’s tax returns during three of his four years in office.

While its report indicated that the Trump administration may have disregarded an IRS requirement dating back to 1977 that mandates audits of a president’s tax filings, the IRS only began to audit Trump’s 2016 tax filings on April 3, 2019, more than two years into his presidency and just months after Democrats took control of the House.

There was no suggestion that Trump sought to directly influence the IRS or discourage the agency from reviewing his tax information. But the report found that the audit process was “dormant, at best”.

Trump’s decision not to release his tax records marked a significant break in bipartisan tradition, dating back to the 1970s, when major presidential candidates like Jimmy Carter started to publish their tax returns.

In 2020, Trump lost his bid for a second consecutive term as president, and the incoming administration of Democrat Joe Biden signalled its support for the Ways and Means Committee’s ability to review any taxpayer’s returns, including the president’s.

To stop that from happening, Trump took his fight to the courts, arguing he was the subject of a politically motivated attack. But lower courts sided with the committee, asserting that it had broad authority to obtain tax documents.

The Trump legal team responded with an emergency motion to stop the release. On November 1, Chief Justice John Roberts announced that the US Supreme Court would temporarily pause the documents’ handover, as the court considered the arguments surrounding the case.

On November 22, the Supreme Court lifted the freeze without noting any dissent, allowing the committee to access the tax records.

Neal, the committee chairman, applauded the decision, calling it a victory for government oversight.

“We knew the strength of our case, we stayed the course, followed the advice of counsel, and finally, our case has been affirmed by the highest court in the land,” Neal said in a statement. “This rises above politics, and the Committee will now conduct the oversight that we’ve sought for the last three and a half years.”

The committee’s investigation is one of several involving Trump’s business dealings. New York Attorney General Letitia James filed a lawsuit in September 2022 against Trump and the Trump Organization, alleging financial fraud.

In 2021, Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance obtained eight years of Trump’s tax filings as part of a criminal investigation into the former president and his namesake organisation.

Vance’s team had issued a subpoena for the records 18 months prior, but Trump’s legal team sought to use presidential immunity to block the investigation, which looked into alleged falsification of business records and tax fraud, among other purported crimes.

On December 6 of this year, Vance’s successor, Alvin Bragg, secured a guilty verdict against the Trump Organization for conducting a 15-year-long criminal scheme to defraud tax authorities. Trump himself was not charged in the case.

Neither that case, nor Vance’s investigation, resulted in the publication of Trump’s tax records. But the New York Times newspaper did obtain decades of personal and corporate tax records for the former president.

It published its findings in a Pulitzer Prize-winning report in 2018, followed by a second report in 2020. The paper did not publish the documents themselves in order to protect its anonymous sources, “who have taken enormous personal risks to help inform the public”.

The 2020 reporting revealed that Trump paid only $750 in federal income tax in both 2016 and 2017, and no income taxes in 10 of the last 15 years, after claiming millions of dollars in losses.

Trump denied the Times’ findings, saying, “It’s fake news, it’s totally fake news. Made up. Fake.”

Neal described the Times’ reporting as a reflection of the inequality in US society and called for his committee to continue its pursuit of Trump’s tax records.

“This reporting shines a stark light on the vastly different experience people with power and influence have when interacting with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) than the average American taxpayer does,” Neal said in a statement at the time.

“It appears that the President has gamed the tax code to his advantage and used legal fights to delay or avoid paying what he owes.”

Trump continues to be the subject of a separate Justice Department probe into his handling of classified documents.

The House committee investigating the attack on the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, also recommended criminal charges on Monday against the former president, though its recommendations are not legally binding.

Al-Jazeera
 
Former President Donald Trump's tax returns have been released, ending a bitter six-year long battle to gain greater insights into his finances.

The returns stretch from 2015 through 2020, covering Mr Trump's candidacy and time in the White House.

They give details of various entities through which he would have paid tax, including holdings companies and personal income.

The BBC is reviewing the documents.

Responding to Friday's release of hundreds of pages of tax returns, Mr Trump's camp warned that the disclosure will lead to the US political divide becoming "far worse".

"The Democrats should have never done it, the Supreme Court should have never approved it, and it's going to lead to horrible things for so many people," his statement said.

Ever since his entry into politics, critics have been keen to get Mr Trump - whose foundational pitch to voters had been that his business success made him the best choice to run the country - to show what his wealth actually looked like.

He had steadfastly refused.

Democrats who control the House of Representatives and oversaw the release argued that it was a necessary act of oversight.

Representative Don Beyer, a member of the House Ways and Means Committee which released the documents, said on Friday that Mr Trump "abused the power of his office to block basic transparency on his finances and conflicts of interest which no president since Nixon has foregone."

The committee also found that the Internal Revenue Service - the US federal entity charged with tax collection - failed to audit Mr Trump during his first two years in office, and only began doing so after congressional oversight proceedings were started in 2019.

Here's what it took to get to the disclosures made public.

BBC
 
Newly released tax returns for former President Donald Trump have shed light on his business losses, complicated tax set-ups and tax payments during his White House years.

However, they are unlikely to have a major political impact as he eyes another presidential run, experts say.

The documents confirmed that Mr Trump paid no federal taxes in 2020 and only $750 (£622) in 2016 and 2017.

He paid close to $1m in 2018, however.

A long legal battle led to the release of the records, and Mr Trump criticised the disclosure, warning that it will deepen the US political divide.

He added that the returns "show how proudly successful I have been and how I have been able to use depreciation and various other tax deductions as an incentive for creating thousands of jobs and magnificent structures and enterprises."

Although there's no law requiring it, it is tradition for presidents to publish their tax returns.

US presidents are paid a salary like any worker, but many also earn income from their personal businesses and investments.

The newly released documents include tax returns and related documents for Donald Trump, the Donald J Trump Revocable Trust and seven corporate entities.

They represent only a fraction of the former president's over 400 separate business interests.

BBC
 
<b>In response to the release of thousands of pages of his tax returns, former US president Donald Trump warned "horrible things" were to come, taking aim at "radical left Democrats".</b>

The former US president was unable to stop Democrats in Congress divulging the information, covering 2015 to 2020.

In a statement responding to the release, Mr Trump said: "The Democrats should have never done it, the Supreme Court should have never approved it, and it's going to lead to horrible things for so many people.

"The great USA divide will now grow far worse. The radical left Democrats have weaponised everything, but remember, that is a dangerous two-way street!

"The 'Trump' tax returns once again show how proudly successful I have been and how I have been able to use depreciation and various other tax deductions as an incentive for creating thousands of jobs and magnificent structures and enterprises."

The documents span more than 2,700 pages of individual returns from Mr Trump and his wife Melania, and more than 3,000 pages covering returns for his business entities.

There are some redactions in the release - chiefly bank account and social security numbers.

The documents span more than 2,700 pages of individual returns from Mr Trump and his wife Melania, and more than 3,000 pages covering returns for his business entities.

There are some redactions in the release - chiefly bank account and social security numbers.

The data release follows a party-line vote on the House of Representatives' ways and means committee last week to make the returns public after the Supreme Court ruled he must hand the documents over.

His finances have been largely shrouded in mystery since he refused to release them ahead of, and during, his term of office.

Mr Trump, known for building skyscrapers and hosting reality TV show The Apprentice before winning the White House, only provided limited details about his holdings and income on mandatory disclosure forms.

It has not prevented his critics from trying to shed more light on his wealth and tax details since.

In 2020, the New York Times published stories that he paid $750 (£622) in federal income taxes in 2017 and 2018, as well as no income taxes at all in 10 of the past 15 years because he generally lost more money than he made.

Mr Trump plans to run for office again in 2024.

The Trump Organisation was convicted earlier this month on tax fraud charges for helping some executives dodge taxes on company-paid perks such as apartments and luxury cars.

Mr Trump's accountant, Donald Bender, testified at the trial that he reported losses on his tax returns every year for a decade from 2009.

https://news.sky.com/story/donald-t...e-after-his-tax-returns-are-released-12776948
 
Donald Trump proposed using a nuclear weapon against North Korea and blaming it on another country, book claims

Donald Trump proposed attacking North Korea with a nuclear weapon in meetings with aides and said that the US could blame the attack on another country, according to a book about his presidency.

Mr Trump is said to have made the remarks in 2017, his first year in office, when he was especially belligerent in his public comments about North Korea, warning Mr Kim in August of that year not to make any threats to the US as they would be "met with fire and fury like the world has never seen".

The following month, during his first address to the United Nations, Trump doubled down by telling the North Korean dictator that he would "totally destroy" his country and mockingly referring to him as "little rocket man".

White House officials, led by Mr Trump's recently appointed chief of staff John Kelly, were said to have been far more concerned that the president's discussions in private were similarly threatening.

In an afterword due to be added to his 2020 book Donald Trump V. the United States, Michael Schmidt writes that Mr Trump had been threatening North Korea on social media in the days after Kelly took up the position.

In the new section of the book, due to be published next week, The New York Times' Washington correspondent adds: "What scared Kelly even more than the tweets was the fact that behind closed doors in the Oval Office, Trump continued to talk as if he wanted to go to war. He cavalierly discussed the idea of using a nuclear weapon against North Korea, saying that if he took such an action, the administration could blame someone else for it to absolve itself of responsibility."

Mr Schmidt also told Sky News' US partner NBC News that "behind closed doors in front of his aides, Trump would talk cavalierly about using force against North Korea, and there were deep concerns about this because Trump was saying things publicly that were signalling the potential of military conflict".

Read more: https://news.sky.com/story/donald-t...ng-it-on-another-country-book-claims-12785223
 
Trump and lawyer ordered to pay $1m for bringing ‘frivolous’ lawsuit against Hillary Clinton
In scathing ruling, US district court judge writes, ‘misuse of the courts by Mr Trump and his lawyers undermines the rule of law’

A federal judge has ordered Donald Trump and one of his attorneys to jointly pay nearly $1m in penalties for pursuing a frivolous lawsuit that accused Hillary Clinton, the Democratic National Committee and other perceived enemies of the former president of engaging in racketeering and concocting a vast conspiracy against him.

The suit was dismissed in September and Trump was ordered to pay tens of thousands in November after one defendant sought sanctions. The latest order came after a group of the remaining defendants, including Clinton, filed a separate request for sanctions.

The end of the lawsuit marks the latest legal setback for Trump as he grapples with an array of civil and criminal investigations, including the probe into his retention of sensitive documents, while some of his lawyers are under scrutiny themselves for conduct in those cases.

...
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...ing-frivolous-lawsuit-against-hillary-clinton
 
Donald Trump will be allowed back on to Facebook and Instagram, after Meta announced it would be ending its two-year suspension of his accounts.

The suspension will end "in the coming weeks", the social media giant said.

In a statement, Nick Clegg, Meta's president of global affairs, said the public "should be able to hear what their politicians are saying".

The then-US president was indefinitely suspended from Facebook and Instagram after the Capitol riot in 2021.

The firm had taken action following Mr Trump's "praise for people engaged in violence at the Capitol", Mr Clegg said.

"The suspension was an extraordinary decision taken in extraordinary circumstances," he added.

He said a review found that Mr Trump's accounts no longer represented a serious risk to public safety.

But because of Mr Trump's past "violations" he would now face heightened penalties for repeat offences.

Republicans have been pressing for Mr Trump to be allowed back on Facebook as he prepares to run for the presidency again next year.

Mr Trump posted on his own social media company, Truth Social, in response on Wednesday, saying that Facebook had "lost Billions" after banning "your favorite President, me".

"Such a thing should never again happen to a sitting President, or anybody else who is not deserving of retribution!" he wrote.
 
Donald Trump will be allowed back on to Facebook and Instagram, after Meta announced it would be ending its two-year suspension of his accounts.

The suspension will end "in the coming weeks", the social media giant said.

In a statement, Nick Clegg, Meta's president of global affairs, said the public "should be able to hear what their politicians are saying".

The then-US president was indefinitely suspended from Facebook and Instagram after the Capitol riot in 2021.

The firm had taken action following Mr Trump's "praise for people engaged in violence at the Capitol", Mr Clegg said.

"The suspension was an extraordinary decision taken in extraordinary circumstances," he added.

He said a review found that Mr Trump's accounts no longer represented a serious risk to public safety.

But because of Mr Trump's past "violations" he would now face heightened penalties for repeat offences.

Republicans have been pressing for Mr Trump to be allowed back on Facebook as he prepares to run for the presidency again next year.

Mr Trump posted on his own social media company, Truth Social, in response on Wednesday, saying that Facebook had "lost Billions" after banning "your favorite President, me".

"Such a thing should never again happen to a sitting President, or anybody else who is not deserving of retribution!" he wrote.

Common sense has prevailed!
 
Donald Trump will be allowed back on to Facebook and Instagram, after Meta announced it would be ending its two-year suspension of his accounts.

The suspension will end "in the coming weeks", the social media giant said.

In a statement, Nick Clegg, Meta's president of global affairs, said the public "should be able to hear what their politicians are saying".

The then-US president was indefinitely suspended from Facebook and Instagram after the Capitol riot in 2021.

The firm had taken action following Mr Trump's "praise for people engaged in violence at the Capitol", Mr Clegg said.

"The suspension was an extraordinary decision taken in extraordinary circumstances," he added.

Oh Cleggy, how far you have sold out to $$$$$$$$$.
 
Nick Clegg has done what he does best, U-Turns.

Never, EVER, trust a Liberal Politician - they are poisonous snakes in the glades of society.
 
Donald Trump sues Bob Woodward over The Trump Tapes for $50m
Former president claims Washington Post reporter ‘never got his permission to release these tapes’

Donald Trump has sued Bob Woodward for a fraction less than $50m, claiming he did not agree to the veteran Washington Post reporter publishing tapes of their conversations as an audio book.

The Trump Tapes: Bob Woodward’s chilling warning for US democracy
Read more
Woodward’s publisher, Simon & Schuster, and its parent company, Paramount Global, were also named as defendants.

The Trump Tapes was released in October 2022, under the subtitle Bob Woodward’s Twenty Interviews With President Donald Trump.

Amid generally positive reviews, the Guardian called the audiobook “a passport to the heart of darkness” of Trump’s presidency.

Woodward also wrote three print bestsellers about Trump and his administration: Fear, Rage and Peril – the last cowritten with Robert Costa. The interviews which formed The Trump Tapes were mostly carried out from December 2019 to August 2020, when Woodward was writing Rage.

In the suit filed in the northern district of Florida on Monday, lawyers for Trump said their case “centers on Mr Woodward’s systematic usurpation, manipulation and exploitation of audio of President Trump”.

They also alleged that one conversation was deceptively edited, citing a comparison with a recording made by Hogan Gidley, a Trump aide, at Mar-a-Lago in Florida on 30 December 2019.

That recording, the suit says, contains an exchange in which Woodward tells Trump: “This again is for the book to come out before the election.”

Rage was published in the US on 15 September 2020, a little less than two months before election day.

...
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2...ues-bob-woodward-over-the-trump-tapes-for-50m
 
Trump pleaded the fifth more than 400 times in fraud deposition, video shows
Former president repeatedly invoked constitutional right against self-incrimination in New York footage from late last summer

Video released on Tuesday showed Donald Trump answering questions from the New York state attorney general, Letitia James, in a deposition in a civil fraud case late last summer.

Questioned about his financial affairs, the former president repeatedly invoked his fifth-amendment right against self-incrimination – part of a refusal to answer he repeated more than 400 times.

“Anyone in my position not taking the fifth amendment would be a fool, an absolute fool,” Trump said.

On the advice of counsel, Trump said, he “respectfully decline[d] to answer the questions under the rights and privileges afforded to every citizen under the United States constitution”.

The footage was obtained and reported by CBS News.

Three of Trump’s children – Donald Trump Jr, Ivanka Trump and Eric Trump – were also deposed by James during an investigation which lasted for three years.

In his deposition, Trump repeatedly claimed to have been treated unfairly.

James told him: “Anything you say in this examination may be used in a civil proceeding, and that can include a civil enforcement proceeding or a criminal action. Do you understand that?”

Trump replied: “I think.”

James asked: “Is that yes?”

Trump said: “I don’t know what I did wrong, but the answer is yes, I do understand.”

Trump was also warned about the risk of perjury.
...
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...-pleads-fifth-video-new-york-fraud-deposition
 
Former US president Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner and daughter Ivanka Trump have been subpoenaed by the special counsel Jack Smith to testify before a federal grand jury regarding the January 6 attack on the Capitol, the New York Times reported on Wednesday, citing sources.

Merrick Garland, the attorney general, appointed Smith in November last year to take over two investigations involving Trump, who is running for president in 2024.

The first investigation involves Trump’s handling of highly sensitive classified documents he retained at his Florida resort after leaving the White House in January 2021.

The second investigation is looking at efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election’s results, including a plot to submit phony slates of electors to block Congress from certifying Democrat Joe Biden’s victory.

Guardian
 
Ex-US President Donald Trump expects to be arrested on Tuesday

Donald Trump says he expects to be arrested on Tuesday and has urged his supporters to launch mass protests.

However his lawyer said there had been no communication from law enforcement and the former president's post was based on media reports.

Prosecutors have been looking at a possible indictment of Mr Trump. Reports say it could come next week.

If he is indicted, it would be the first criminal case ever brought against a former US president.

This case focuses on alleged hush money paid on Mr Trump's behalf by his lawyer to former porn star Stormy Daniels prior to the 2016 presidential election.

It is one of several cases in which the 76-year-old is currently being investigated, although he has not yet been charged in any and denies wrongdoing in each.

Mr Trump has pledged to continue his campaign to become the Republican nominee in the 2024 presidential election, even if he is indicted.

...
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-65000325
 
US and Pak both trying to take out leaders who think differently to the woke world.

Both nations could up in some sort of civil conflict.
 
US and Pak both trying to take out leaders who think differently to the woke world.

Both nations could up in some sort of civil conflict.


Now I have seen everything: trump and IK being compared by an actual IK supporter! Haha!

Terrible
 
Now I have seen everything: trump and IK being compared by an actual IK supporter! Haha!

Terrible

Its not a comparison, its an observation.

No matter what Trump he is , he isnt brain dead like Biden. Trump will likely end the war in Ukraine. Yanks are laughing stock around the world atm.
 
Its not a comparison, its an observation.

No matter what Trump he is , he isnt brain dead like Biden. Trump will likely end the war in Ukraine. Yanks are laughing stock around the world atm.

Both Trump and IK are a threat to their respective establishments.
 
Trump is the establishment of the GOP, and the worst part is he used to be pretty “woke”
Himself till he found a voter base within right wing white supremacists calling themselves alt right now. He and Imran have absolutely nothing in common. One is a sincere honest successful man and the other is a fraud whose business ventures failed one after another. One has a non profit cancer hospital, the other will probably turn that into a hotel if he could.
 
Both Trump and IK are a threat to their respective establishments.

Two men willing to speak the truth as they see it.

Trumps speach against the deep state recently was not to dissimilar to Kennedys, which imo got him killed in the end.

Now they want to arrest Trump but Sleepy Joe and his son are no trouble even though more evidence of them being corrupt?

A lot of Americans and Pakistanis are behind Trump and IK , yet it shows how deeply embedded the establishments and deep states are in these nations, they control all the power. US is not much more of a democracy than Pakistan, both are controlled by regimes.
 
Two men willing to speak the truth as they see it.

Trumps speach against the deep state recently was not to dissimilar to Kennedys, which imo got him killed in the end.

Now they want to arrest Trump but Sleepy Joe and his son are no trouble even though more evidence of them being corrupt?

A lot of Americans and Pakistanis are behind Trump and IK , yet it shows how deeply embedded the establishments and deep states are in these nations, they control all the power. US is not much more of a democracy than Pakistan, both are controlled by regimes.

Haha, the hits just keep on coming. A lot of Pakistanis are behind Trump? Where do they live? Kharian, Kotli, Birmingham, and mirpur?
 
Haha, the hits just keep on coming. A lot of Pakistanis are behind Trump? Where do they live? Kharian, Kotli, Birmingham, and mirpur?

Are you related to Joe Biden? Slow down and read properly.

"A lot of Americans and Pakistanis are behind Trump and IK "

You support an old man who wets himself but millions, many more Americans support Trump.
 
Are you related to Joe Biden? Slow down and read properly.

"A lot of Americans and Pakistanis are behind Trump and IK "

You support an old man who wets himself but millions, many more Americans support Trump.

Personal attacks, but I won’t stoop to your level.

Proper English demands you add the word “respectively” at the end.
 
Trump warns of 'death and destruction' if he is indicted on Stormy Daniels charges

Donald Trump has warned of possible "death and destruction" if he is indicted for making alleged hush payments to adult film star Stormy Daniels.

In a post on the Truth Social network, the social media platform he founded, the former US president intensified his rhetoric even beyond its usual level of bombast and threat.

"What kind of person can charge another person, in this case a former President of the United States, who got more votes than any sitting President in history, and leading candidate (by far!) for the Republican Party nomination, with a Crime, when it is known by all that NO Crime has been committed, & also known that potential death & destruction in such a false charge could be catastrophic for our Country?" Mr Trump wrote on Friday.

"Why & who would do such a thing? Only a degenerate psychopath that truely [sic] hates the USA!"

The attack appears to be against Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg who is leading the criminal investigation into whether Mr Trump paid $130,000 to Ms Daniels so that she wouldn't reveal to the press an alleged sexual affair between them.

A grand jury had invited Mr Trump to testify in the case this week - often a sign that an indictment is close.

Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/worl...p&cvid=57c37cafd6e244929489d0c3a4546d5d&ei=44
 
Donald Trump indicted by grand jury over hush money payment to Stormy Daniels
Ex-president is expected to appear for his arraignment on Tuesday where he will be fingerprinted, photographed and processed for arrest

A grand jury has voted to indict Donald Trump in New York over a hush money payment made to the adult film star Stormy Daniels during the 2016 election.

No former US president has ever been criminally indicted. The news is set to shake the race for the Republican presidential nomination in 2024, in which Trump leads most polls.

“This evening we contacted Mr Trump’s attorney to coordinate his surrender to the Manhattan DA’s Office for arraignment on a supreme court indictment, which remains under seal,” said a statement from Manhattan district attorney Alvin Bragg’s spokesperson. “Guidance will be provided when the arraignment date is selected.”

Trump was expected to appear in court for his arraignment on Tuesday, Trump’s lawyer Susan Necheles said. At that point he would enter a plea on the charges. New York’s police have been told to all report for duty on Friday and be prepared to deal with “unusual disorder”, according to a memo seen by NBC.

It is unclear whether Trump will be handcuffed at his appearance but he will be fingerprinted, photographed and processed for a felony arrest. His legal team is expected to vigorously fight the charges, and a timeline for a potential trial remains unclear.

...
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/mar/30/donald-trump-indicted-stormy-daniels-hush-money
 
Who is Stormy Daniels? The ex-adult film star in Trump spotlight
Stephanie Clifford – Stormy Daniels’s real name – first met Trump in 2006 and claims they had a sexual relationship.

Stormy Daniels is a one-time adult film actress whose relationship with former US President Donald Trump has introduced her to the wider public in the United States and around the world.

Daniels says she first crossed paths with the real-estate-mogul-turned-politician in the summer of 2006 during a charity golf tournament in Lake Tahoe, on the border between California and Nevada. The actress had just made a brief appearance in the Judd Apatow film, “The 40-year-old Virgin”.

Daniels was 27 at the time and Trump was 60.

According to Daniels’s account, he invited her to dinner in his suite where he welcomed her dressed in his pyjamas.

She claims they went on to have what “may have been the least impressive sex I’d ever had”. Trump has denied they ever had sexual relations, accusing Daniels of “extortion” and saying her claims are a “total con job”.

What is known for sure is that Daniels received $130,000 – a hush payment – just before the 2016 presidential election in which Trump ran as the Republican nominee

That payment is at the heart of the Manhattan district attorney’s indictment of Trump, reportedly on the possible violation of campaign finance laws.

Once the transaction was revealed in 2018, Daniels asked the courts to nullify her nondisclosure agreement with Trump and began making the rounds on television shows.

On CBS’s 60 Minutes, she said she wanted to set the record straight: “I’m not a victim,” she stated flatly. And even if she was not attracted to him that night in Lake Tahoe, she said their relationship was consensual.

...
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023...els-the-ex-adult-film-star-in-trump-spotlight
 
Looks like the excellent justice system and strong institutions of the USA will make sure this doofus doesnt get elected again.

Pakistan should take note from how nations avoid becoming a joke of the world. Looks like the writing is in the wall. GOP is going to disavow him soon hopefully.
 
Looks like the excellent justice system and strong institutions of the USA will make sure this doofus doesnt get elected again.

Pakistan should take note from how nations avoid becoming a joke of the world. Looks like the writing is in the wall. GOP is going to disavow him soon hopefully.

They are shameless. They won't.
 
Donald Trump has been indicted on criminal charges arising from an alleged hush money payment to an adult film actress.

A grand jury in New York voted to indict Trump over possible offences related to a $130,000 (£105,000) payment to Stormy Daniels during the 2016 presidential election campaign.

It was allegedly made in exchange for Daniels' silence about an alleged sexual encounter she said she had with Trump a decade earlier.

He is the first former US president to face criminal charges in court, even as he makes a bid to retake the White House in 2024.

Trump, a Republican, said he was "completely innocent" and called the indictment "political persecution", with his lawyers saying they will "vigorously fight" it.

The Manhattan district attorney's investigation centred on accusations of money paid to Daniels and former Playboy model Karen McDougal, whom Trump allegedly feared would go public with claims they had extramarital sexual encounters with him.

Trump, 76, has denied having affairs with either woman.

His former personal lawyer Michael Cohen said he co-ordinated with Trump on the payments to Daniels, real name Stephanie Clifford, and also to McDougal.

Cohen pleaded guilty to campaign finance violations in 2018 related to the payments and served more than a year in prison.

Federal prosecutors said Cohen acted at Trump's direction.

Trump said: "The Democrats have lied, cheated and stolen in their obsession with trying to 'Get Trump,' but now they've done the unthinkable - indicting a completely innocent person in an act of blatant election interference."

"Never before in our nation's history has this been done."

He added: "I believe this witch-hunt will backfire massively on Joe Biden."

Trump was expected to surrender to authorities next week.

He has denied any wrongdoing and has repeatedly attacked the investigation by district attorney Alvin Bragg.

His office has spent nearly five years investigating Trump and the grand jury has been hearing its evidence since January.

According to Mr Bragg's spokesperson prosecutors and Trump's legal team are now negotiating a surrender date, when the former leader would have to go to the district attorney's office in New York to be fingerprinted and photographed before an initial court appearance.

Trump son hits out at indictment

On Twitter, one of Trump's sons, Eric, wrote: "This is third world prosecutorial misconduct. It is the opportunistic targeting of a political opponent in a campaign year."

Amid speculation in recent weeks that the former American leader was due to be indicted, Trump urged his supporters to protest against the authorities if he was detained.

He published a long statement describing the investigation as a "political witch-hunt trying to take down the leading candidate, by far, in the Republican Party".

"I did absolutely nothing wrong," he said, before criticising a "corrupt, depraved and weaponised justice system".

Other ongoing cases Trump faces include a Georgia election interference probe and two federal investigations into his role in the 6 January 2021 insurrection at the US Capitol.

SKY
 
Looks like the excellent justice system and strong institutions of the USA will make sure this doofus doesnt get elected again.

Pakistan should take note from how nations avoid becoming a joke of the world. Looks like the writing is in the wall. GOP is going to disavow him soon hopefully.

Or it just means that this stuff was kept under wraps until it was decided Trump is more trouble than he is worth.
 
Or it just means that this stuff was kept under wraps until it was decided Trump is more trouble than he is worth.

Either way, the writing is on the wall.

I know for a fact you cannot charge a sitting president for any crime. I know, its a terrible law to have but thats how it is. There was talk of indicting him a number of times over different stuff while he was in office.

So in a way this does not surprise me too much. It takes time to build a case and it seems clear they were quietly working on it.
[MENTION=93712]MenInG[/MENTION], they dont have to be full of conscience to disavow trump. It can/will be a political move if they do because he is a sinking ship and with all thats going on with him, his supporters are going to ditch him. He will not be the GOP God he was a few years ago and when that happens, its easy for GOP to cut ties and run.

I think DeSantis' rise has much to do with it as well. He is not a loser (like Trump is), he is still in a position of power and the fickle trumpers value that. They will join Team DeSantis close to election time.
 
Either way, the writing is on the wall.

I know for a fact you cannot charge a sitting president for any crime. I know, its a terrible law to have but thats how it is. There was talk of indicting him a number of times over different stuff while he was in office.

So in a way this does not surprise me too much. It takes time to build a case and it seems clear they were quietly working on it.
[MENTION=93712]MenInG[/MENTION], they dont have to be full of conscience to disavow trump. It can/will be a political move if they do because he is a sinking ship and with all thats going on with him, his supporters are going to ditch him. He will not be the GOP God he was a few years ago and when that happens, its easy for GOP to cut ties and run.

I think DeSantis' rise has much to do with it as well. He is not a loser (like Trump is), he is still in a position of power and the fickle trumpers value that. They will join Team DeSantis close to election time.

Trump hates DeSantis, and without his endorsement the diehard Trumpers wont vote for him.
 
Trump will be more popular among the GOP now because of the indictment. He is almost certain to win the GOP nomination, however the Democrats and independents hate him so will lose the general election to Biden. Any other GOP candidate would have a good chance to beat Biden.
 
Trump hates DeSantis, and without his endorsement the diehard Trumpers wont vote for him.

DeSantis has a massive following now, he is actually looking to dethrone Trump who is already afraid of him. One huge sign of this is, whoever he believes is a legitimate threat to him, Trump starts targeting them on the social media, everywhere and he has started doing that with DeSantis.

I honestly believe that Trumpism is going to die by the time election rolls around. It will be DeSantism by then.
 
Trump court hearing confirmed for Tuesday afternoon

Donald Trump's court hearing has been set for 14:15 Eastern Time on Tuesday 4 April, according to a court spokesperson speaking to the BBC's US partner CBS.
 
Former Vice President Mike Pence calls Trump's indictment "an outrage" and suggests that the Manhattan district attorney who is leading the case, Alvin Bragg, is politically motivated.

"This will only further serve to divide our country," Pence says.

Pence also says the case would "offend" the notion of the overwhelming majority of the American people "who believe in fairness, who believe in equal treatment before the law".

Meanwhile, Florida's governor Ron DeSantis - widely seen as Trump's main potential opponent for the Republican presidential candidate nomination - criticised the indictment on Twitter, saying it was "un-American".

"The weaponization of the legal system to advance a political agenda turns the rule of law on its head," he said.

DeSantis also alleged that the Manhattan district attorney was "Soros-backed" - a reference to George Soros, the philanthropist that some on the right have falsely claimed is at the heart of a global conspiracy.
 
Russians happy

7Ik9C8F.png
 
Trump will not be handcuffed, says lawyer

Donald Trump will not be put in handcuffs when he attends court in New York next week, according to his lawyer.

Asked on ABC News how he expected the arraignment to unfold, Joe Tacopina said he was "sure [the prosecutors] will try and get every ounce of publicity they can from this thing", but added "the president will not be put in handcuffs".

He added: "I understand they’re going to be closing off blocks around the courthouse, shutting down the courthouse.

"We'll go in there… plead not guilty, start talking about filing motions, which we will do immediately and very aggressively, regarding the legal viability of this case."

==

Donald Trump's lawyer has said the ex-president's legal team has not seen the indictment against him and has only media reports to go on.

Joe Tacopina was speaking after a grand jury voted to indict Mr Trump in connection with a $130,000 pay-out to porn star Stormy Daniels.

Mr Trump's legal team did not know about the indictment until Thursday evening, Mr Tacopina told CBS.

He blamed "political persecution" for the grand jury's decision.

Mr Trump is expected to appear in court to face the charges and enter a plea in New York, reportedly next Tuesday.

He will not be put in handcuffs when he does, Mr Tacopina told ABC News.

He added: "I understand they're going to be closing off blocks around the courthouse, shutting down the courthouse."

On Friday morning, the streets around the courthouse were calm but the barricades were going up in anticipation of what may come next week.

The police were on patrol and security plans being put into place. Many expect the area to go into lockdown when the former president attends court.
 
Donald Trump's lawyer has said the former president's "knees don't buckle" and there is "zero" chance he will take a plea deal in the face of historic criminal charges.

In an interview with Sky News' US partner NBC News, Joe Tacopina said his client is "ready to fight" and was not going to "hole up" in his exclusive Mar-a-Lago golf resort in Florida.

SKY
 
DeSantis has a massive following now, he is actually looking to dethrone Trump who is already afraid of him. One huge sign of this is, whoever he believes is a legitimate threat to him, Trump starts targeting them on the social media, everywhere and he has started doing that with DeSantis.

I honestly believe that Trumpism is going to die by the time election rolls around. It will be DeSantism by then.

I think the opposite will happen and his popularity will go through the roof among GOP. DeSantis should not run in 2024 as he wont be able to beat Trump, and he will be front runner in 2028.
 
Donald Trump's lawyer has said the former president's "knees don't buckle" and there is "zero" chance he will take a plea deal in the face of historic criminal charges.

In an interview with Sky News' US partner NBC News, Joe Tacopina said his client is "ready to fight" and was not going to "hole up" in his exclusive Mar-a-Lago golf resort in Florida.

SKY

He wants the spectacle. If they take a mugshot or cuff him, he will use that in his campaign to appear as the victim.
 
well, i disagree, so we will find out in due time whose prediction ended up right.
 
I think the opposite will happen and his popularity will go through the roof among GOP. DeSantis should not run in 2024 as he wont be able to beat Trump, and he will be front runner in 2028.

DeSantis should be his running mate, VP.

Trump getting stronger and stronger by the day. They will probably rig the vote against him but he's too popular, they will bring up some sort of uprising as they did with BLM last time or even an attempt on his life is possible.

US, Pak and Ind all banana republics/states now.
 
DeSantis should be his running mate, VP.

Trump getting stronger and stronger by the day. They will probably rig the vote against him but he's too popular, they will bring up some sort of uprising as they did with BLM last time or even an attempt on his life is possible.

US, Pak and Ind all banana republics/states now.

oh yeah absolutely. I guess some people keep dreaming US and India are banana republics the likes of Pakistan.
I would actually say UK ranks higher than both US and India, with the whole brexit mess and the fact they country seems to be running on taxes paid out by all these bhagorey like Nawaz who have taken shelter there.

The US institutions are very very strong unlike Pakistan. there is independence of judiciary, executive and legislative branches unlike Pakistan.

The recent Trump indicment proves that. Maybe you should look into the dominion voting system lawsuits. they are taking allegations like yours to the cleaners.
 
oh yeah absolutely. I guess some people keep dreaming US and India are banana republics the likes of Pakistan.
I would actually say UK ranks higher than both US and India, with the whole brexit mess and the fact they country seems to be running on taxes paid out by all these bhagorey like Nawaz who have taken shelter there.

The US institutions are very very strong unlike Pakistan. there is independence of judiciary, executive and legislative branches unlike Pakistan.

The recent Trump indicment proves that. Maybe you should look into the dominion voting system lawsuits. they are taking allegations like yours to the cleaners.

There is no democracy in the west or in a lot of other nations.

It seems you are too emotionally attached as an immigrant. America let you in but it doesnt mean you have to hug the stars and stripes on a daily basis.

This is a politically motivated attack on Trump because he a gameshow host and a conman having a good time but not a 100% puppet like Biden who will even go to nuclear war if told to do so.

God bless you and God bless Amrkeea. :bush
 
DeSantis should be his running mate, VP.

Trump getting stronger and stronger by the day. They will probably rig the vote against him but he's too popular, they will bring up some sort of uprising as they did with BLM last time or even an attempt on his life is possible.

US, Pak and Ind all banana republics/states now.

that would be good for DeSantis, however he will have to do some major brown nosing to get he VP slot. VP for 2024 makes hims the likely GOP canididate regardless of what happens in 2024 election.

And while I think Biden beats Trump, I dont see anyone the Dems have that can win in 2028. If Kamala gets the nomination in 2028 she will lose as most people hate her. However if she does not get the nomination in 2028 a lot of the African American community will be angry and not support the nominee.
 
oh yeah absolutely. I guess some people keep dreaming US and India are banana republics the likes of Pakistan.
I would actually say UK ranks higher than both US and India, with the whole brexit mess and the fact they country seems to be running on taxes paid out by all these bhagorey like Nawaz who have taken shelter there.

The US institutions are very very strong unlike Pakistan. there is independence of judiciary, executive and legislative branches unlike Pakistan.

The recent Trump indicment proves that. Maybe you should look into the dominion voting system lawsuits. they are taking allegations like yours to the cleaners.

Compared to Pakistan sure, however the system is certainly not fair to the ordinary person. Both the executive and legislative branches get elected by receiving millions from donors. Once they are done from office they get money for speeches, and get jobs as lobbyist. That money and those jobs are not given for free or out of goodness of the donors hearts. They want things back in return.
 
This could backfire, he could fight this in court, get exonerated and be able to use the sympathy wave from his supporters to his advantage in a re-election campaign.
 
This could backfire, he could fight this in court, get exonerated and be able to use the sympathy wave from his supporters to his advantage in a re-election campaign.

Maybe that was the plan. The Dems intentionally did this so Trump would win the nomination, as he is the one candidate that Biden should be able to beat.
 
There is no democracy in the west or in a lot of other nations.

It seems you are too emotionally attached as an immigrant. America let you in but it doesnt mean you have to hug the stars and stripes on a daily basis.

This is a politically motivated attack on Trump because he a gameshow host and a conman having a good time but not a 100% puppet like Biden who will even go to nuclear war if told to do so.

God bless you and God bless Amrkeea. :bush

Actually I would agree with you in a way because US is not a true democracy. It’s a republic. Where representative votes and electoral college choose the president.

But with that being said it’s a system that works and it’s a system that works a helluva lot better than Pak, Ind, UK all combined. You can quip and jibe but what I stated were facts. America’s institutions are strong and so are its people and we are still the center and leaders of innovation. Not emotional banter, just stating facts. Complain and whine about Biden, Trump whosoever but just the fact you are a Pakistani living in the UK and seem to be so invested in discussions about US and Trump say everything that needs to be said.
Don’t be a hater, if UK or Pakistan had that power, they would abuse it much more and would be all over the world. America just uses subterfuge to have its say. Hahah! Let that sink in. Hope it doesn’t give you indigestion
 
Compared to Pakistan sure, however the system is certainly not fair to the ordinary person. Both the executive and legislative branches get elected by receiving millions from donors. Once they are done from office they get money for speeches, and get jobs as lobbyist. That money and those jobs are not given for free or out of goodness of the donors hearts. They want things back in return.

With all its flaws, still the top of the pile. If not every Tom, Dick, Patel, Chaudhri and Singh won’t be trying to come over here. Apple, Google, MS, FB, Netflix, etc all American companies and leaders in innovation who have changed the way we live our lives.

It’s a land of opportunity and it’s great for its people. Immigrants who come here reach for the stars if they are smart and work hard enough.
 
Maybe that was the plan. The Dems intentionally did this so Trump would win the nomination, as he is the one candidate that Biden should be able to beat.

The plan was to **** off closeted America hating trump supporters who only support trump because they want to see him destroy American and make mockery out of its country.

All the UK dwelling so called right wingers who blindly support trump are people who just want to see America crash and burn, hateful of its unseen establishment that seems to have bombed ME and Muslims and other countries. They conveniently forget how anti muslim trump is. But as long as he is “anti” so called “establishment” they will love him.

It’s the same concept with Indians hating IK.
They have absolutely no reason to or no dog in the fight but they love to hate IK. It’s the exact same thing with UK desis supporting Trump.
 
Actually I would agree with you in a way because US is not a true democracy. It’s a republic. Where representative votes and electoral college choose the president.

But with that being said it’s a system that works and it’s a system that works a helluva lot better than Pak, Ind, UK all combined. You can quip and jibe but what I stated were facts. America’s institutions are strong and so are its people and we are still the center and leaders of innovation. Not emotional banter, just stating facts. Complain and whine about Biden, Trump whosoever but just the fact you are a Pakistani living in the UK and seem to be so invested in discussions about US and Trump say everything that needs to be said.
Don’t be a hater, if UK or Pakistan had that power, they would abuse it much more and would be all over the world. America just uses subterfuge to have its say. Hahah! Let that sink in. Hope it doesn’t give you indigestion

You're funny, I dont get high off the nation I live in has power or not. Im confident in myself not to need such ecstasy. The most important thing is it speak the truth even if its against yourself. The US has many great people who are doing this , with white skin and their families being in the US for many more decades than you have been. We have the same in UK and there is the same in Pak. To blindly support the nation of your residence isnt doing yourself any favours.

The US IS NOT a democracy. You have donors funding politicians who then do their bidding and carry out their agendas once in office. Its as simple as this, its open corruption, worse than UK and even Pak.

Biden is an embarrassment to all Americans, how anyone can call him anything but an old man who is deranged and mentally challenged is beyond me.

Im not fan of Trump either but in current times having a leader who can speak properly and who is willing to stop any huge war is the most important.
 
You're funny, I dont get high off the nation I live in has power or not. Im confident in myself not to need such ecstasy. The most important thing is it speak the truth even if its against yourself. The US has many great people who are doing this , with white skin and their families being in the US for many more decades than you have been. We have the same in UK and there is the same in Pak. To blindly support the nation of your residence isnt doing yourself any favours.

The US IS NOT a democracy. You have donors funding politicians who then do their bidding and carry out their agendas once in office. Its as simple as this, its open corruption, worse than UK and even Pak.

Biden is an embarrassment to all Americans, how anyone can call him anything but an old man who is deranged and mentally challenged is beyond me.

Im not fan of Trump either but in current times having a leader who can speak properly and who is willing to stop any huge war is the most important.
Seriously?

Hahaha. HILARIOUS! Trump can speak properly! Maybe you two speak the same language!

SO let me ask you this, what makes you think Trump was not funded by lobbyists? Do you know what Trump and his Jew son in law Jared had in mind with Israel? Do you know he actually recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel?

Dont let your blind hate for America fool you, kid. Admit it you want Trump, purely out of scorn for AMERICA. Any idiot can see how divisive and destructive he has been for the country. But somehow you claim you know better.
 
Seriously?

Hahaha. HILARIOUS! Trump can speak properly! Maybe you two speak the same language!

SO let me ask you this, what makes you think Trump was not funded by lobbyists? Do you know what Trump and his Jew son in law Jared had in mind with Israel? Do you know he actually recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel?

Dont let your blind hate for America fool you, kid. Admit it you want Trump, purely out of scorn for AMERICA. Any idiot can see how divisive and destructive he has been for the country. But somehow you claim you know better.

Trump is Einstein compared to Biden. Even a 10 year old is more aware and not wetting himself.

I never suggested Trump isnt funded. I wrote "This is a politically motivated attack on Trump because he a gameshow host and a conman having a good time but not a 100% puppet like Biden who will even go to nuclear war if told to do so."

Trump is here for a good time, he wouldnt want a world war, Biden doesnt know what a world is let alone a war.

However you've missed my main point, US is not a democracy , it has open corruption where donors pour in millions , sometimes billions over years to bring their man, woman or they into power so they can do their bidding. Everyone knows this but you. lol

P.s They wont kick you out, its ok to speak the truth and put the flag down for a min or two.
 
Trump is Einstein compared to Biden. Even a 10 year old is more aware and not wetting himself.

I never suggested Trump isnt funded. I wrote "This is a politically motivated attack on Trump because he a gameshow host and a conman having a good time but not a 100% puppet like Biden who will even go to nuclear war if told to do so."

Trump is here for a good time, he wouldnt want a world war, Biden doesnt know what a world is let alone a war.

However you've missed my main point, US is not a democracy , it has open corruption where donors pour in millions , sometimes billions over years to bring their man, woman or they into power so they can do their bidding. Everyone knows this but you. lol

P.s They wont kick you out, its ok to speak the truth and put the flag down for a min or two.

Whatever kind of democracy it is, you guys over in the UK seem to be too hung up over it. Dont you have to go brush away the remnants of brexit or something?
Lol. If your " main point " is supposed to be a measure of your intelligence, I am pretty disappointed.
On one hand you claim US democracy is corrupt and donors win the white house and on the other you are ok with the most corrupt businessman this side of river sindh to win a presidency. Who do you think helped him into the office? The military industrial complex that funds the right and touts gun ownership thats who. The crazy war mongerers you hate. In the two years before IK, he didnt start a war but he sure quietly droned the heck out of pakistan.

But regardless of allllll of that, you keep saying i missed your point. I actually didnt. While you were probably busy googling dirt on the other idiot Biden or perhaps looking up Trump pictures for fan girls, you are the one who missed my comment on how US is not a true democracy. Now take it to the bank and cash it.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="zxx" dir="ltr"><a href="https://t.co/mxToRoHWNn">pic.twitter.com/mxToRoHWNn</a></p>— Tom Petty (@tompetty) <a href="https://twitter.com/tompetty/status/1274527971513004033?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 21, 2020</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Trump 'gearing up for battle' at New York court hearing, lawyer says

Former US president Donald Trump is "gearing up for a battle" ahead of his scheduled court hearing on Tuesday, his lawyer has said.

Mr Trump is expected to fly to New York City from his Mar-a-Lago home on Monday to face charges related to hush money payments made to a porn star.

He then plans to return to Florida following his court hearing, where he will address his supporters.

Mr Trump has continued to deny any wrongdoing.

His lawyer, Joe Tacopina, promised that any charges against the former president will be fought vigorously.

"He's someone who's going to be ready for this fight," Mr Tacopina told ABC's This Week programme on Sunday.

"We're ready for this fight. And I look forward to moving this thing along as quickly as possible to exonerate him."

Media reports have said that Mr Trump will be facing more than 30 charges related to business fraud over a $130,000 (£105,000) pay-out to Stormy Daniels in 2016 that was made in an attempt to buy her silence over an alleged affair.

...
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-65142623
 
Trump arrives in New York City ahead of Tuesday court appearance
Ex-president departed Florida around midday and is expected to appear at the Manhattan courthouse Tuesday afternoon

Donald Trump arrived in New York City on Monday, a day before he is due for a hotly anticipated court appearance where he’ll respond to the first ever criminal indictment filed against a former American president.

At about 2.15pm ET on Tuesday, he will appear at the courthouse where a grand jury convened by Manhattan district attorney Alvin Bragg handed down its indictment last week, to learn the exact details of which laws he is alleged to have broken. At his arraignment, he is expected to be photographed and fingerprinted, but will not be handcuffed per an agreement his legal team reached with Bragg, Trump’s attorney Joe Tacopina said last week.

Trump’s lawyers opposed videography, photography and radio coverage of the arraignment, saying it would “exacerbate an already almost circus-like atmosphere around this case”. Late on Monday, Judge Juan Merchan ruled that five photographers would be admitted for several minutes before the arraignment, with TV cameras allowed only in the hallways of the building.

...
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/apr/03/donald-trump-court-appearance-new-york-city
 
Stormy Daniels not unhappy, it seems, with recent events

Stormy Daniels' alleged encounter with Donald Trump in 2006 appears to have boosted her finances.

Following his indictment last week, the adult film star tweeted that "merch orders" were "pouring in" and she was trying not to spill her champagne.

Her hashtag is #Teamstormy and people have also been asking for autographs, too, she tweeted.

"Thank you to everyone for your support and love! I have so many messages coming in that I can't respond."

Customers were advised to allow a few extra days for shipment.

As an example of the "merch", she has some handmade candles for sale which "smell wonderful and cleanse the space of negative energy".

Daniels - real name Stephanie Clifford - is married to a fellow adult film star and has a young daughter and a horse farm, according to her social media profiles.

She grew up with a single mother in Louisiana, telling Vice News in 2021: "We were just trash, and my mom was a trainwreck, and my clothes didn't fit, and I was poor and I smelled."

But she said she did well at school, edited her high school newspaper and started stripping to support herself.

She then began a career in adult movies.
 
Trump will plead not guilty 'very loudly' to judge

A Donald Trump lawyer has given an insight into how the former president will conduct himself in the Manhattan court later today.

Joe Tacopina says Trump plans to plead "very loudly 'not guilty' before the judge".

And Trump's legal team is preparing to file "a host of motions", he said, including a motion to dismiss the case citing what Tacopina argued was selective prosecution and prosecutorial misconduct.

The judge in today's case could issue a gag order preventing Trump from speaking about his indictment on the campaign trail.

Mr Tacopina has warned that if Judge Juan Merchan were to issue a gag order it would "really set ablaze the passions and the tempers that already have been inflamed by this case".

Mr Tacopina is confident there won't be an order.

"Obviously, that's not going to happen," he told Fox News' Sean Hannity when he was asked about the possibility.

"There's no scenario where that's going to happen, I'm sure of that."
 
Trump is awake and is calling it "a tragic day for our Republic".

An email went out to his mailing list with the subject "My last email before my arrest" in which he asks people to "chip in to save America", and includes a fundraising link. He also expresses concern that the US is becoming a "Marxist Third World country".

Soon after the email went out, Trump posted an all-caps message on Truth Social, the social media platform he owns, criticising the New York location of his court appearance later as a "very unfair venue with some areas that voted 1% Republican".

Trump also calls the judge who will arraign him "highly partisan" and says his family are "well-known Trump haters".

Trump says that Justice Juan Merchan, who oversaw last year's criminal trial of the Trump Organization, was "impossible to deal with during the witch hunt trial."

"KANGAROO COURT!", Trump concludes.
 
Donald Trump now under arrest

Following his arrival at court, Donald Trump is now formally under arrest and in police custody ahead of his upcoming arraignment.

He's the first American president to face criminal charges.
 
Donald Trump has been formally arrested following his arrival at a New York courthouse where he will become the first former US president to face criminal charges.

The frontrunner to be the Republicans' choice for the White House in 2024 surrendered to authorities at the Manhattan district attorney's office in the same building.

Minutes earlier, he pumped his fist as he left his nearby home at Trump Tower before being escorted to Manhattan Criminal Courthouse in a motorcade by his Secret Service protection team.

Wearing a dark blue suit and red tie, he is due to be fingerprinted and processed but it is unclear whether a mugshot of him will also be taken.

Trump will then make his way to the courtroom for his arraignment where the formal charges will be disclosed and he is then expected to enter a plea. He is not expected to be in handcuffs during the proceedings.

On his social media platform, Truth Social, he wrote: "Heading to Lower Manhattan, the Courthouse. Seems so SURREAL - WOW, they are going to ARREST ME. Can't believe this is happening in America. MAGA!"

Television cameras will not be allowed inside the courtroom, after a ruling by Judge Juan Merchan, but five still photographers will have access before the hearing begins to take pictures of Trump and the scene.

However, TV cameras will be allowed in the hallways of the building so Trump may talk to reporters when he is there.

The indictment - a formal charge - contains multiple accusations of falsifying business records, including at least one felony offence, it has been reported.

SKY
 
His legal troubles are mounting by the day. From 1/6 insurrection attempt to hush payments through campaign funds, he is looking at a whole gamut of legal charges.


Better buckle up, boy! This will take a lot of time. haha
 
What are the charges facing Trump?

Donald Trump has become the first current or former president to be charged with a crime - marking a new chapter in American history.

He has pleaded not guilty to 34 felony counts of falsifying business records and conspiracy for his alleged role in hush money payments to two women toward the end of his 2016 presidential campaign.
 
His legal troubles are mounting by the day. From 1/6 insurrection attempt to hush payments through campaign funds, he is looking at a whole gamut of legal charges.


Better buckle up, boy! This will take a lot of time. haha

One of things we were all waiting for was the derail in the indictment but there is none. I'm no lawyer but even I know when something is fishy and this case against trump is fishy. There is nothing absolutely nothing to support the case and next hearing 8 months? That's a long time for such a bog standard case. If this was anyone but Donald trump the case would not have even made it to a court hearing.
 
What are the charges facing Trump?

Donald Trump has become the first current or former president to be charged with a crime - marking a new chapter in American history.

He has pleaded not guilty to 34 felony counts of falsifying business records and conspiracy for his alleged role in hush money payments to two women toward the end of his 2016 presidential campaign.

Felony charges for hush money after he eon the election? Seems very desperate.

I really want to see what evidence they have because I the face of it even the best lawyers in the world will struggle to prosecute.
 
The indictment is laughable. It's 34 paragraphs of the same statement over and over. Why is there no detail? Why is the meat of the stories missing?
 
Back
Top