What's new

England v Pakistan | Third Test | Day 1 : Session 1 | The Oval | 18/08/10

Status
Not open for further replies.
Pakistan have done well here as the wicket is pretty placid!
 
How come the umpires were checking if it was a no-ball if it wasn't called a no-ball to begin with and there was no referral?

From Cricinfo:

Now then - the batsmen confer and here's something interesting. Pietersen thinks it's a no-ball. The replays confirm KP at the non-striker's end was watching Riaz's front foot and it is very tight, though just a legal delivery. Trott decides not to ask for a review in any case.

Shameful but as they said when KP hit the "dead ball" in the last test , its KP and he is allowed to do these things.

Not in Aussieland you wont. Idiot.
 
Nice to see Wahab getting the wickets.

Well driven down the ground by Collingwood though
 
The replays have me laughing.
As soon as Hameed took the catch, he took off. The Umar Akmal was chasing him dragging him by his sweater. Definitely one for the captions this thread.

haha indeed, that was hilarious!
 
Why did Tony Hill heed what KP had to say about the legality of the ball?

Surely, a wrong precedent is being set.

I agree, totally foolish by Hill. If you can't spot a no ball then you don't call it and move on.
 
Lol.....clouds or no clouds....the wicket is a dry wicket and is a batting paradise until Pakistan bat - they will then make it look like a minefield. 2 or 2 wickets max today. 100 odd run opening partnership. Centuries for Strauss and Pieterson.

Legendary predictions! :))
 
They should change Wahabs designation to (lfs) - s for sifarishi :)
 
Why did Tony Hill heed what KP had to say about the legality of the ball?

Surely, a wrong precedent is being set.

There are no such things as precedents when it comes to Pakistan or India !
 
From Cricinfo:



Shameful but as they said when KP hit the "dead ball" in the last test , its KP and he is allowed to do these things.

Not in Aussieland you wont. Idiot.

And meanwhile Gower and Rameez were going on about how, yes, they think that was a good thing to do....without explaining the rationale behind the whole thing.

That was BS in my opinion.
 
if they're checking the no ball - thats a referral in my book

I don't understand what they were doing. If it was not a referral, I don't see why they were checking it on the replays when it wasn't called a no-ball to begin with and there was no referral.

And the commentators did not explain it either.
 
Morgan having troubles with the extra pace of wahab.
Aussies would do well to review these vids. I expect something is going to give soon with Morgan facing Wahab.
 
Super bowling by Pak bowlers. And for a change their fielders are supporting them.

Time for batsmen to get into act.
 
Lol.....clouds or no clouds....the wicket is a dry wicket and is a batting paradise until Pakistan bat - they will then make it look like a minefield. 2 or 2 wickets max today. 100 odd run opening partnership. Centuries for Strauss and Pieterson.

:))) :))) I think I shouldnt even laugh at you because i feel sorry for you because of your pessimism.How many times this summer you are going to be embarressed .
 
If Pakistan can have england 6 down by Lunch that would be great!

Pakistans session so far!
 
good take by akmal, way down the leg side from Aamir.
Maybe it is good to keep him on his toes with a replacement in the wings.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top