EXPOSING depth of Pakistan's bowling woes in Australia and a blueprint to avoid another humiliation

Markhor

T20I Captain
Joined
Aug 18, 2010
Runs
41,368
Post of the Week
13
It’s my belief Pakistan’s bowlers have lived off past glories for a long time. Pundits often wax lyrical about Pakistan’s “world class bowling talent” but in reality, Pakistan’s bowlers have underachieved for years particularly in the so-called SENA countries.

Let’s take this series vs Australia. Pakistan’s bowlers collectively averaged 89.92 – the worst bowling performance in a Test series in Pakistan’s history. The second worst display was on the 1962 tour of England where the bowlers averaged 65.63.

The reasons are simple. Pakistan always fail to bowl the right length in Australia which is just a fraction fuller than a good length. Pakistan’s pacers historically tend to be skiddy and reliant on swing rather than continually hitting a hard length. That’s why Pakistan enjoy English conditions where the Dukes ball with its more pronounced seam always keeps a seamer interested, but struggle in Australia with the Kookaburra that stops swinging after 15 overs. Reverse swing also tends to be less of a factor in Australia (unless one has access to sandpaper).

Putting some numbers to the argument, this is how Pakistan’s bowlers fare historically in the SENA countries.

1.jpg

Already you see there’s a gulf between how we perform in “SEN” compared to Australia, even with the presence of the greats such as Imran Khan, Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis factored in. What about our last three tours in the SENA countries ?

2.jpg

Despite small improvements in the other countries, our performances have now fallen off a cliff in Australia as Pakistan’s pace bowling resources have dried up. Not only are we failing to take wickets, but we are going at nearly 4 RPO. The decline in Australia is particularly damning when you look series by series:

3.jpg

There’s an argument that Australian wickets provide great value for strokeplay, and actually one should ask more from the batsmen. Whilst partially true, to that I reply let’s compare our bowlers in Australia to other teams in the last 20 years (since November 1999). You may want to put the kids to bed. From worst to best:

4.jpg

That’s right, only Bangladesh and Zimbabwe bowlers have fared worse in Australia. So much for the Pakistani bowling mythology. However this is not a thread for crying and whining. Let’s focus on solutions.

1) Prioritise fitness. On those hard, unforgiving Australian grounds and in the heat, you need fit fast bowlers who can bowl long spells and sustain their speeds. That means not picking Sohail “huff and puff” Khan or unproven kids who haven’t fully grown into their bodies.

2) Identifying the right seamers for the conditions. Short skiddy bowlers like Musa Khan who can’t land six balls in the same place won’t cut it. Possessing pace but consistently failing to hit the right lengths always costs us. Accuracy plus height (ideally as close to 6ft and above as possible) and a bit of pace (don’t have to be express) must be the criteria. I’d look at guys like Sameen Gul and Ehsan Adil.

3) A five man attack. I know Australia and India have succeeded with four bowlers, but without the quality of their seamers, and a holding spinner, it’s difficult to justify. What’s happened in 2016/17 and now is that Yasir Shah has been brutally targeted, forcing us to overbowl our seamers without rest.

4) Pick the right spinner. Yasir Shah should never tour the Southern Hemisphere again. Unless you’re Shane Warne, leggies can be expensive. I’d look at a left-arm spinner like Zafar Gohar who can give the ball a rip but most importantly, is more likely to just hold up an end and allowing the captain to rotate his seamers.

If PCB are serious about learning the lessons, then the first thing is to accept our shortcomings and ensure our preparations are far more thorough next time. After England were humiliated in the 2006/07 Ashes, Andrew Strauss in 2010/11 put his team through a military boot camp, played a month of warm-ups against the state sides before the First Test, but most importantly picked the right profile of bowlers for the conditions and they won 3-1. We need a captain and coach with the same vision and determination to avoid another whitewash.
 
one flaw in your argument. the worst track for Pakistani bowlers has been Australia. look at the numbers, remove australia and keep in NZ, ENG and SA and the bowling average improves dramatically. the issue is Pakistani bowlers apart from Wasim, Waqar and IK have never bowled well in Australia. I can bet if we were playing against England, the bowling would have fared better, even in SA, we would have fared better
 
Last edited:
It’s my belief Pakistan’s bowlers have lived off past glories for a long time. Pundits often wax lyrical about Pakistan’s “world class bowling talent” but in reality, Pakistan’s bowlers have underachieved for years particularly in the so-called SENA countries.

Let’s take this series vs Australia. Pakistan’s bowlers collectively averaged 89.92 – the worst bowling performance in a Test series in Pakistan’s history. The second worst display was on the 1962 tour of England where the bowlers averaged 65.63.

The reasons are simple. Pakistan always fail to bowl the right length in Australia which is just a fraction fuller than a good length. Pakistan’s pacers historically tend to be skiddy and reliant on swing rather than continually hitting a hard length. That’s why Pakistan enjoy English conditions where the Dukes ball with its more pronounced seam always keeps a seamer interested, but struggle in Australia with the Kookaburra that stops swinging after 15 overs. Reverse swing also tends to be less of a factor in Australia (unless one has access to sandpaper).

Putting some numbers to the argument, this is how Pakistan’s bowlers fare historically in the SENA countries.

View attachment 97494

Already you see there’s a gulf between how we perform in “SEN” compared to Australia, even with the presence of the greats such as Imran Khan, Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis factored in. What about our last three tours in the SENA countries ?

View attachment 97495

Despite small improvements in the other countries, our performances have now fallen off a cliff in Australia as Pakistan’s pace bowling resources have dried up. Not only are we failing to take wickets, but we are going at nearly 4 RPO. The decline in Australia is particularly damning when you look series by series:

View attachment 97496

There’s an argument that Australian wickets provide great value for strokeplay, and actually one should ask more from the batsmen. Whilst partially true, to that I reply let’s compare our bowlers in Australia to other teams in the last 20 years (since November 1999). You may want to put the kids to bed. From worst to best:

View attachment 97497

That’s right, only Bangladesh and Zimbabwe bowlers have fared worse in Australia. So much for the Pakistani bowling mythology. However this is not a thread for crying and whining. Let’s focus on solutions.

1) Prioritise fitness. On those hard, unforgiving Australian grounds and in the heat, you need fit fast bowlers who can bowl long spells and sustain their speeds. That means not picking Sohail “huff and puff” Khan or unproven kids who haven’t fully grown into their bodies.

2) Identifying the right seamers for the conditions. Short skiddy bowlers like Musa Khan who can’t land six balls in the same place won’t cut it. Possessing pace but consistently failing to hit the right lengths always costs us. Accuracy plus height (ideally as close to 6ft and above as possible) and a bit of pace (don’t have to be express) must be the criteria. I’d look at guys like Sameen Gul and Ehsan Adil.

3) A five man attack. I know Australia and India have succeeded with four bowlers, but without the quality of their seamers, and a holding spinner, it’s difficult to justify. What’s happened in 2016/17 and now is that Yasir Shah has been brutally targeted, forcing us to overbowl our seamers without rest.

4) Pick the right spinner. Yasir Shah should never tour the Southern Hemisphere again. Unless you’re Shane Warne, leggies can be expensive. I’d look at a left-arm spinner like Zafar Gohar who can give the ball a rip but most importantly, is more likely to just hold up an end and allowing the captain to rotate his seamers.

If PCB are serious about learning the lessons, then the first thing is to accept our shortcomings and ensure our preparations are far more thorough next time. After England were humiliated in the 2006/07 Ashes, Andrew Strauss in 2010/11 put his team through a military boot camp, played a month of warm-ups against the state sides before the First Test, but most importantly picked the right profile of bowlers for the conditions and they won 3-1. We need a captain and coach with the same vision and determination to avoid another whitewash.

5 man attack? Our batting can barely score under 250 pressure, how are 5 batsmen going to cope? We don't have an all rounder that can bat at 6 against decent bowling sides. I am not sold on Zafar Gohar, Nauman Ali looked a better bowler from the little I have seen of him and at 33, he is at a good age for a spinner.
 
one flaw in your argument. the worst track for Pakistani bowlers has been Australia. look at the numbers, remove australia and keep in NZ, ENG and SA and the bowling average improves dramatically. the issue is Pakistani bowlers apart from Wasim, Waqar and IK have never bowled well in Australia. I can bet if we were playing against England, the bowling would have fared better, even in SA, we would have fared better

Not sure if you read my argument because that's exactly what I'm saying. We have a specific problem bowling in Australia where there's a massive gulf between our performances there, and our performances in South Africa, England and New Zealand.

Also Waqar averaged 40 in Australia. Yet he was given task of preparing our bowlers to perform in Australia.
 
Brilliant thread. Am busy right now but will contribute and add my thoughts later
 
5 man attack? Our batting can barely score under 250 pressure, how are 5 batsmen going to cope? We don't have an all rounder that can bat at 6 against decent bowling sides. I am not sold on Zafar Gohar, Nauman Ali looked a better bowler from the little I have seen of him and at 33, he is at a good age for a spinner.

If we're conceding 500 and 600 every Test in Australia, then no amount of batting depth will suffice. Let's at least give ourselves the best shot of 20 wickets and reduce them to totals our batsmen can at least compete with.

Nauman Ali "official age" is 33 but on our next tour of Australia, which may not be for another 4-5 years, he'll be well past his prime. Best to groom someone for the future.
 
5 man attack? Our batting can barely score under 250 pressure, how are 5 batsmen going to cope? We don't have an all rounder that can bat at 6 against decent bowling sides. I am not sold on Zafar Gohar, Nauman Ali looked a better bowler from the little I have seen of him and at 33, he is at a good age for a spinner.
Five man attack is the easy part.

In 4 of his 5 Tests Shadab Khan has outscored at least 3 of the specialist batsmen in the team.

So I think it’s a No Brainer Outside Asia to bat Rizwan at 6, Shadab at 7 and then four quicks, two of whom need to be good batsmen.

I don’t really understand why a country with Pakistan’s population and physical attributes can’t groom a guy who is 6’6 tall, can bat competently and average 30 with the bat and bowl accurately at 135K and average 35 with the ball. A poor man’s Jason Holder!

That’s what you need at Number 8!
 
one flaw in your argument. the worst track for Pakistani bowlers has been Australia. look at the numbers, remove australia and keep in NZ, ENG and SA and the bowling average improves dramatically. the issue is Pakistani bowlers apart from Wasim, Waqar and IK have never bowled well in Australia. I can bet if we were playing against England, the bowling would have fared better, even in SA, we would have fared better

I think you are forgetting a Few others who performed in Austraila like Shoaib Akhtar, Mohd Asif, Mohd Sami, Sarfaraz Nawaz etc. In spinners Mushtaq Ahmed, Saqlain and Abdul Qadir (he gave a lot of runs but he got wickets).

The Current Lot is very inexperienced even Shaheen Afridi is very new. However your key bowlers can't bowl in Australia Like Yasir Shah, Even Abbas (I am not sure about his future). Mohd Amir could have at least helped leading this attack. going in with 3 teenagers was a gamble it failed because of Australians like Warner will not let you settle in a rhythm.
 
Last edited:
Brilliant post, posters like [MENTION=53290]Markhor[/MENTION] ji makes PP a great place to frequent. You sir analysed the pants off this topic.
 
Five man attack is the easy part.

In 4 of his 5 Tests Shadab Khan has outscored at least 3 of the specialist batsmen in the team.

So I think it’s a No Brainer Outside Asia to bat Rizwan at 6, Shadab at 7 and then four quicks, two of whom need to be good batsmen.

I don’t really understand why a country with Pakistan’s population and physical attributes can’t groom a guy who is 6’6 tall, can bat competently and average 30 with the bat and bowl accurately at 135K and average 35 with the ball. A poor man’s Jason Holder!

That’s what you need at Number 8!

We are losing with 6 Batsman, the chances with the 5 are even lower. Shadab is not a Batsman and hence doesn't have the pressure of batting as a Batsman but if he bats in the top 7, easy on the eye 30s and 40s won't do. He would be expected to score and average in the 30s which ain't happening. Rizwan batting at 6 would most likely average in the late 20s and that means effectively are tail starts at 5.
 
If we're conceding 500 and 600 every Test in Australia, then no amount of batting depth will suffice. Let's at least give ourselves the best shot of 20 wickets and reduce them to totals our batsmen can at least compete with.

Nauman Ali "official age" is 33 but on our next tour of Australia, which may not be for another 4-5 years, he'll be well past his prime. Best to groom someone for the future.

We can play 11 bowlers and Aus will still score 550 because it's quality and not quantity that is the problem. Much better bowlers than these have been taken to the cleaners by the Aussies. In 99, the Aussies smashed perhaps our best ever attack and chased down 360+ at Bellrive and at the WACA Ponting and Langer took our greats to the cleaners.
The problem is that our bowlers lack the discipline to avoid the temptation to bowl short on wickets with bounce and don't have the seam to be able to get movement with the Kookaburra ball when they bowl full. Both lengths are fatal against good Aussie batsmen.
 
We can play 11 bowlers and Aus will still score 550 because it's quality and not quantity that is the problem. Much better bowlers than these have been taken to the cleaners by the Aussies. In 99, the Aussies smashed perhaps our best ever attack and chased down 360+ at Bellrive and at the WACA Ponting and Langer took our greats to the cleaners.
The problem is that our bowlers lack the discipline to avoid the temptation to bowl short on wickets with bounce and don't have the seam to be able to get movement with the Kookaburra ball when they bowl full. Both lengths are fatal against good Aussie batsmen.

I agree and I mention this in the OP about our issues finding the right length. A five man attack wasn't the only solution proposed - we also must identify the right profile of seamer who can succeed in Aussie conditions. That means guys who can consistently hit a hard length and who are fit enough to bowl long spells.

However we picked short and skiddy Musa Khan which was a disaster that could've been easily foreseen by anyone with cricketing sense.
 
I agree and I mention this in the OP about our issues finding the right length. A five man attack wasn't the only solution proposed - we also must identify the right profile of seamer who can succeed in Aussie conditions. That means guys who can consistently hit a hard length and who are fit enough to bowl long spells.

However we picked short and skiddy Musa Khan which was a disaster that could've been easily foreseen by anyone with cricketing sense.

I agree with you on the height of bowlers, I remember when Musa Khan 1st came on the scene in the psl and I pointed out that short bowlers very rarely succeed. We need taller bowlers who have good skills and bar Sameen and Ehsan, both of whom haven't really impressed me much in the past, we don't have anyone waiting.
 
I am not totally buying into this tall bowler theory. When you bowl with Kookaburra your seam position has to be absolutely spot on. That is how you extract bounce, That is how you take advantage of any indentation, any movement on the offer. You don't lose a lot of pace off the pitch when your seam position is good. Shami is not that exactly a tall bowler. But most of his wickets in this video are from short balls. He has one of the fantastic seam position like Sreesanth.

 
I think the new playing conditions in domestic cricket are going to pay off as far as fit tall bowlers are concerned. I feel Misbah should use his status with domestic coached to phase out Imran Khan/Sohail Khan type guys from the domestic scene.

As far as all rounder is concerned: In my view you should always have a five man bowling attack - where the fifth bowler should be a spinning all-rounder in home or home-like conditions and fast bowling allrounder in seam friendly conditions.

but to do this, Pakistan has to start now - you cannot be selecting players at home who cant win away. As happy as I am for Yasir Shah, what is the point of selecting him for five home tests, when the next tour is to England in summer where he averages 40 (barring the performance at Lord's)
 
Completely agree on all the 4 suggestions.

I think problem never was lack of solutions but lack of vision and rigidness from team managements over the decades as well as top PCB management.

It was completely evident even couple of years ago that Yasir isnt good enough for overseas tests and doesnt add much however, he is still playing in Aus, SA, NZ etc which just shows rigidness of the management based upon stats in a particular condition.

Further 5 bowlers combination with 2 of them who can bat a bit clearly made Pakistan to look like a much stronger unit in England where they drew the test series 1-1 however, without any logic same team management tried to do things differently in SA.

Even Srl with their limited bowling resources tries to incorporate conditions while selecting pacers and overall team as we saw in SA as well.
 
I am not totally buying into this tall bowler theory. When you bowl with Kookaburra your seam position has to be absolutely spot on. That is how you extract bounce, That is how you take advantage of any indentation, any movement on the offer. You don't lose a lot of pace off the pitch when your seam position is good. Shami is not that exactly a tall bowler. But most of his wickets in this video are from short balls. He has one of the fantastic seam position like Sreesanth.


Ind Bowlers do have good seams but Ind would not have won in Australia if Warner and Smith were playing.
 
Completely agree on all the 4 suggestions.

I think problem never was lack of solutions but lack of vision and rigidness from team managements over the decades as well as top PCB management.

It was completely evident even couple of years ago that Yasir isnt good enough for overseas tests and doesnt add much however, he is still playing in Aus, SA, NZ etc which just shows rigidness of the management based upon stats in a particular condition.

Further 5 bowlers combination with 2 of them who can bat a bit clearly made Pakistan to look like a much stronger unit in England where they drew the test series 1-1 however, without any logic same team management tried to do things differently in SA.

Even Srl with their limited bowling resources tries to incorporate conditions while selecting pacers and overall team as we saw in SA as well.

Yasir isn't a good Bowler but he has amazing stats and just imagine if they went Aus and got smashed and he was sitting at home.
 
Ind Bowlers do have good seams but Ind would not have won in Australia if Warner and Smith were playing.

That is another debate. I am just saying fast bowlers don't have to be tall to do well in Australia. Yes you get natural bounce. Not all bowlers do well there. Not all short bowlers fail there. Medium height bowlers have done well as well.
 
Yasir isn't a good Bowler but he has amazing stats and just imagine if they went Aus and got smashed and he was sitting at home.

True. However, that is why mentally strong and visionary people should be part of PCB who are strong enough not to be influenced by the Yasir's overall stats and facing journalists if things dont go as planned. I dont remember many noticeable performances by leggies as a whole in tests in SENA countries in recent times and if we put Yasir's overseas stats on top of this there logically is no reason for him to be in the playing XI.

Team management should be strong enough to put forward the facts to the people to show them why this decision was made and none of them can defy the stats which are there for everybody to see. No journalist can say anything after you put Yasir's overseas stats and than leggies who played in SENA in recent times.
 
That is another debate. I am just saying fast bowlers don't have to be tall to do well in Australia. Yes you get natural bounce. Not all bowlers do well there. Not all short bowlers fail there. Medium height bowlers have done well as well.

Generally they do, unless they have amazing seams and those are very rare.
 
True. However, that is why mentally strong and visionary people should be part of PCB who are strong enough not to be influenced by the Yasir's overall stats and facing journalists if things dont go as planned. I dont remember many noticeable performances by leggies as a whole in tests in SENA countries in recent times and if we put Yasir's overseas stats on top of this there logically is no reason for him to be in the playing XI.

Team management should be strong enough to put forward the facts to the people to show them why this decision was made and none of them can defy the stats which are there for everybody to see. No journalist can say anything after you put Yasir's overseas stats and than leggies who played in SENA in recent times.

The media would eat them alive in PK, this media wants the likes of AA and AS in the odi team, not picking Yasir and losing would finish them.
 
Its a simple rule bowlers that bowl the channel at 135-140 kph with a high action with consistent accuracy will get rewarded in australia

This is why pakistan never has historically done well in aus because theyve always took shortish inaccurate slingy bowlers who lack consistentcy to bowl the good length to get the bounce

The general rule is what works in pakistan for the pakistani bowlers is the complete opposite to what is needed in australia

Youd have thought that waqar and misbah with a combined test and coaching career of 40 plus years wouldve figured this out by now
 
Yasir isn't a good Bowler but he has amazing stats and just imagine if they went Aus and got smashed and he was sitting at home.

India would still win regardless. kohli doesn't lose test matches if he wins the toss. Go check his record.
India would have at worst drawn the series. India also played 2 pain*u players in the opening 2 tests aka Rahul and vijay who literally played for Australia.

had Mayank and Shaw played it would have been different for the first 2 tests as well.

australia were never winning the 3rd and 4th tests though no matter whether smith or his baap played.
 
Its a simple rule bowlers that bowl the channel at 135-140 kph with a high action with consistent accuracy will get rewarded in australia

This is why pakistan never has historically done well in aus because theyve always took shortish inaccurate slingy bowlers who lack consistentcy to bowl the good length to get the bounce

The general rule is what works in pakistan for the pakistani bowlers is the complete opposite to what is needed in australia

Youd have thought that waqar and misbah with a combined test and coaching career of 40 plus years wouldve figured this out by now

Brilliant observation - that’s a exactly the reason. Even in past, most top PAK pacers used to play either in Counties or league cricket in UK, and their skill set was most effective in English condition.

You can’t learn a particular trait on job (means play lots of Test match in Australia and learn it), for that PCB has to come out with at least 2 venues for domestics with rock hard & bouncy tracks, so that players have an idea of what it’s like to play in Australia.
 
We need to have more players play in the big bash and adjust to Australian conditions properly
It was a big task for them to jump into test cricket after a whole year of World Cup warm up matches and then the tournament itself to then test themselves on Australian cricket grounds
An Australian coach would help as well, I don’t know if Pakistan have ever had an Australian coach but it would show them the Aussie rules and how to make the most out of each day
 
For the next tour, the PCB should recruit an Australian bowling consultant to help our pacers specifically for that tour. Will make a big difference
 
India would still win regardless. kohli doesn't lose test matches if he wins the toss. Go check his record.
India would have at worst drawn the series. India also played 2 pain*u players in the opening 2 tests aka Rahul and vijay who literally played for Australia.

had Mayank and Shaw played it would have been different for the first 2 tests as well.

australia were never winning the 3rd and 4th tests though no matter whether smith or his baap played.

I don't agree the Inds would have won. The more likely result would have been a 2-1 to the Aussies or a drawn series.
 
[MENTION=53290]Markhor[/MENTION] -
Just read OP and not rest of thread but immediate thought which came to mind was that from all the SENA countries Australia also has the flattest wickets and batsmen to punish you especially for past 3-4 years when our record there has really taken a beating.
 
India would still win regardless. kohli doesn't lose test matches if he wins the toss. Go check his record.
India would have at worst drawn the series. India also played 2 pain*u players in the opening 2 tests aka Rahul and vijay who literally played for Australia.

had Mayank and Shaw played it would have been different for the first 2 tests as well.

australia were never winning the 3rd and 4th tests though no matter whether smith or his baap played.

Rain saved aussies from phainta in the last test...3-1 is the accurate scoreline of the sheer dominance India displayed.
 
I don't agree the Inds would have won. The more likely result would have been a 2-1 to the Aussies or a drawn series.

draw is possible or india win because india won the toss. Had australia won't it, perhaps the result could go the other way round. Virat's record is insane when he wins the toss. India never lose when they win the toss.

I want to see if this indian team can win even after losing toss in australia. That's the question now.
 
Rain saved aussies from phainta in the last test...3-1 is the accurate scoreline of the sheer dominance India displayed.

absolutely. sheer domination.

remember Mayank and Shaw dint even play the first 2 tests. there goes the smith and warner excuse.

Also 3rd and 4th was not even close so australia was never going to win those tests.
 
Back
Top