Foreign player quality in PSL vs CPL?

Joined
Oct 26, 2016
Runs
0
So guys in my point of view CPL has better players this year with AB de villers dale steyn maetin guptill what u guys think?
 
CPL has better quality foreigners even though PSL offers more money. This might be because CPL is more established (running for a few years ). I think that this year, some foreign players stayed away from PSL due to the final in Lahore clause
 
CPL has more big name tickets

PSL has overall more complete pool
 
CPL is also more exciting, PSL was a spinners dream come true on sluggish pitches.
 
CPL is also more exciting, PSL was a spinners dream come true on sluggish pitches.

CPL time is terrible for asia though which means viewership is lower

also i think domestic pak players>domestic windies players

though what goes for cpl is that theres home and away matches whereas for psl the tournament is in just 2 stadia
 
CPL may have many foreign players, but it is boring, the matches in CPL were quite boring, the quality of cricket in PSL was top notch.
 
CPL time is terrible for asia though which means viewership is lower

also i think domestic pak players>domestic windies players

though what goes for cpl is that theres home and away matches whereas for psl the tournament is in just 2 stadia

Bro west indies domestic players are tailor made for T20s. Infact their domestic players are playing in PSL, BPL, some even in IPL.
 
I enjoyed the PSL but the crowds were not electric.

I think CPL had a good selection of foreign players but only a handful of them.
 
CPL is played in off season, while PSL or BPL is during busiest period of calendar. Only IPL has it's own window, otherwise more established players would have been in other leagues as well. Once ECB starts their PL, it'll be difficult for WICB to get any clutch name even from WI, if both tournaments are played in similar period.
 
I think despite some 'established' leagues, the PSL did great and is now probably the 2nd best league when it comes to franchise T20 cricket after the IPL.
 
I think despite some 'established' leagues, the PSL did great and is now probably the 2nd best league when it comes to franchise T20 cricket after the IPL.

Yes it's a 1 yr history vs 5:6 year history
 
Come on yaar I've seen CPL matches and they so boring. What is use of big ticket names if the matches are going to be boring.

The quality of cricket at the PSL was a whole lot better..
 
Psl has good overall pool just like BPL but CPL has bigger players, I am right???
 
Back
Top