What's new

Glenn Maxwell 'can be Virat Kohli': Justin Langer

Abdullah719

T20I Captain
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Runs
44,825
Justin Langer has challenged Glenn Maxwell to be Australia's answer to Virat Kohli, insisting he could not only become a world-beating 50-over batsman, but also a bona fide Test player.

The once-mercurial allrounder has steadily assumed a more consistent role in Australia's middle-order during their ascendant pre-World Cup run, posting scores of 71 (off 55 balls) and 98 (off 82) to lift Australia to their sixth- and seventh-consecutive ODI wins.

It comes after a blazing 50-ball ton against India to see Maxwell become the first Australian to score three international T20 centuries.

Langer has seen Kohli, the man some already regard as the best 50-over player of all time, first-hand in all formats across the course of his first summer as Australian coach and believes Maxwell has the pure skill to match him.

"The challenge for him is, and I've said this to him, we've just seen Virat Kohli, who is an extraordinarily talented player – he averages 60 in ODI cricket. He is a great player," Langer said ahead of Australia's fifth and final one-dayer against Pakistan.

"At the moment, in 99 games, Maxi averages 32 or 33.

"He can be Virat Kohli. He has got the talent to do that.

"The way he played that T20 hundred in India, the way he played both T20s - we know he's a great T20 player.

"His next challenge is to become a great ODI player and then potentially a Test player.

"So there's huge upside for him and while he keeps practicing with the purpose he's got and winning games of cricket like he is, it's great to have him."

The bold declaration comes ahead of the looming World Cup, where Maxwell looks set to play a key role in Australia’s title defence, though likely not in the same No.3 spot Kohli has come to dominate in ODIs.

But Langer’s assertion was delivered with both a recognition that Kohli has achieved more individually than Maxwell in one-day cricket and a concession Kohli has played more than double the games.

Sunday's series finale in Dubai will mark Maxwell’s 100th ODI – his first 99 games have delivered just one century.

By contrast, Kohli, born just 22 days after Maxwell, already had 13 hundreds and an ODI average nearing 50 at the same stage of his career.

Langer, having acknowledged how Maxwell has evolved as a cricketer, may take heart in the fact that the man he's compared him to has gotten significantly better in the second half of his career.

Since playing his 100th ODI, Kohli has averaged a staggering 68.73 and taken his century tally to 41 from 227 games.

"It's obviously a massive challenge isn't it?" Langer continued. "He (Maxwell) is now 30 years old and he's played 99 games, but we all see it - and everyone talks about it.

"He's got a huge amount of talent and now his challenge has always been to deliver on that talent. And he's done it in patches.

"He's such a valuable player for us because of everything he brings. It's not just his batting, it's his fielding, his bowling is really important. He's getting better with his bowling all the time.

"I think he bowled seven overs in the last World Cup final, so he keeps delivering on that. His fielding is world class.

"He's a good package isn't he?"

One of the major public criticisms Maxwell has had address in the past was that his training ethic lacked professionalism, with former skipper Steve Smith suggesting it was a factor in his exclusion from the one-day side during the 2017-18 summer.

Maxwell conceded he had "faked his way" through training during earlier stages of his career, but stressed he'd made vast improvements in how he fine-tunes his skills in recent years.

While Langer has previously demanded more hundreds from Maxwell, he has consistently voiced his approval of his training ethic and intensity and on Saturday suggested that his recent success has hinged on it.

"I think he's put a lot of emphasis into his practice as well. He's practicing with real purpose and he's getting the rewards for that. It's great to see,” said Langer.

"He's such an important part of our team. he brings energy to everything that he does - whether it's fielding, running between wickets, his strike rate.

"We saw it last night, he can come in when we were 4 down (for 140, before hitting 98) and under the pump. He can come in at the end - because his strike rate is 120 in ODIs, that's the highest by anyone in the world.

"If he can play those more responsible innings and do what he does, it's very important for us."

https://www.cricket.com.au/news/gle...ia-odi-tour-pakistan-uae-world-cup/2019-03-31
 
Lol people think players like Kohli come around everyday. I respect Maxwell as a player but he can never come close to Kohli.

But he can still be a good player for Australia.
 
What a nonsense comparison. Maxwell would have been a flop this series had we taken his catches.
 
Wrong comparison. Maxwell isn't a no.3 or 4 batsman. He can't score hundreds.
 
What a nonsense comparison. Maxwell would have been a flop this series had we taken his catches.

Regardless of that, they are two completely different players with different roles. Comparing apples with oranges
 
I think Maxwell is an inferior version of Buttler. Both play outrageous shots and at great strike rates.
 
Must be a satire comment. It's a joke ppl. Like hadi123 said, comparing apple with oranges.
 
Maxwell is very talented. But comparable to Buttler. Buttler in my view is the best explosive batsman in the world. Maxwell should strive to level
Up with Buttler.
 
The guy gives as many chances as Umar Akmal in every innings. Not every country is going to be so generous as Pakistan
 
Everybody wants to be Kohli based on one "match winning" innings, but nobody wants to show the consistency he has.
 
Rofl you can't compare every tom dick harry to virat.he is 2nd best batsman of all time after viv richards.glenn averages 32 and he is being compared with virat
 
Everyone can be Kohli just keep saying and in the next decades we might see a player like him. :uakmal
 
Maxwell is a wonderful modern cricketer, and if Australia trust his game, he will fly in all formats. He is almost as good as Buttler who is almost as good as de Villiers.

As far as this comparison is concerned, Langer has played and seen enough cricket to understand that it is futile to compare him to someone like Kohli who is one of the top 5 greatest batsmen of all time. However, nothing would boost the confidence of a batsman more than to have his coach compare him to Kohli.
 
Maxwell is criminally underrated.

Comparing him to Umar Akmal is good, but I think Akmal just shades it.
 
Every batsman when in form or any up and coming batsman will be compared to the best of the era. It's only natural. It's used by coaches, pundits and senior players to boost morale.

Comments by Langer were compliments to Maxwell for the recent good performances he has put in. Comparing to Kohli is the highest compliment any player can get right now.

Don't read too much into it.
 
Atleast in this 5-0 whitewash Maxwell played a Kohli type of role for sure in 3 out of 5 games. In all 3 games his innings was the difference. In other two games it was Finch
 
Maxwell is too much of a luxury player, if that makes sense. He can be that perfect explosive batsmen down the order in the last 10 which everyone dreams of having in the modern game, however in reality, most of the time, what you need most is reliable batsmen who can play at a SR of 90-110. Maxi coming in at 7 was actually somewhat sad in a weird way, it shows his decline in-terms of being a trustable batsmen.
 
Kohli plays proper cricket shots. Maxwell is just a big hitter and is very one-dimensional.
 
Maxwell is just 40 centuries away from Kohli and 27 runs in avg. No biggy. :smith
 
Maxwell is a wonderful modern cricketer, and if Australia trust his game, he will fly in all formats. He is almost as good as Buttler who is almost as good as de Villiers.

As far as this comparison is concerned, Langer has played and seen enough cricket to understand that it is futile to compare him to someone like Kohli who is one of the top 5 greatest batsmen of all time. However, nothing would boost the confidence of a batsman more than to have his coach compare him to Kohli.

Maxwell is rubbish in every shape and form.

No consistency or cricketing brain whatsoever - a poor mans Afridi at best.
 
I thought he was ok and was being treated unfairly by ACB but I have come to the conclusion he is like Afridi (at least he held a record for a long time). Seems he never delivers when needed he cannot step up!
 
Maxwell is a wonderful modern cricketer, and if Australia trust his game, he will fly in all formats. He is almost as good as Buttler who is almost as good as de Villiers.

As far as this comparison is concerned, Langer has played and seen enough cricket to understand that it is futile to compare him to someone like Kohli who is one of the top 5 greatest batsmen of all time. However, nothing would boost the confidence of a batsman more than to have his coach compare him to Kohli.

He is a flop cricketer in ODIs, there is nothing good about him.
 
Last edited:
He had a stinker but players like him, Buttler etc. are prone to such patches every now and then, and it is a consequence of the brand of cricket that they play.

Dropping him would be a mistake because they will eventually go back to him anyway, because they don’t have many players for the role that they want him to play.

They need to keep faith with him and replace Stoinis with Turner, the former has done nothing apart from a fluke innings vs New Zealand.
 
Lol at the Aussies thinktank for rating him anyway near any proper batsman, Kohli is even a far cry .
Comparing him to Butler is also wrong. Butler can play 360 ,has a strong offside game as well and he is one of the most destructive batsman is current cricket.
 
He had a stinker but players like him, Buttler etc. are prone to such patches every now and then, and it is a consequence of the brand of cricket that they play.

Dropping him would be a mistake because they will eventually go back to him anyway, because they don’t have many players for the role that they want him to play.

They need to keep faith with him and replace Stoinis with Turner, the former has done nothing apart from a fluke innings vs New Zealand.

Why are you comparing him with Buttler?

It is like comparing Virat Kohli with Amla :moyo2
 
Why are you comparing him with Buttler?

It is like comparing Virat Kohli with Amla :moyo2

Buttler is definitely better but Maxwell is not far behind. He was a very talented batsman with a similar style.
 
Buttler is definitely better but Maxwell is not far behind. He was a very talented batsman with a similar style.

Maxwell averages 32.23
Buttler averages 40.68


"Maxwell is not far behind" Just because their styles are similar, doesn't mean they can be compared.
 
Maxwell averages 32.23
Buttler averages 40.68

"Maxwell is not far behind" Just because their styles are similar, doesn't mean they can be compared.

32 [MENTION=9367]123[/MENTION] is not far behind compared to 40 @120. We are not comparing a 40 averaging batsman with a 20 averaging one.

A couple of good series for Maxwell and a couple of bad series for Buttler and their stats will look closer than they are now. However, I totally agree that Buttler is superior, but my point is that Maxwell is a better player than what he has shown in this World Cup. How many players do Australia have who can play the Maxwell role? I doubt if there are many, but someone like Stoinis is a bigger red flag at this point.

Langer rates Maxwell so I don't think he is going anywhere, and in my opinion, it will be a mistake to drop him. He is 30 and he is entering his peak years now. Australia should utilise him instead of dropping him for inferior players and going back to him eventually. That is what they have always done since his emerged onto the scene. He has been dropped before they have inevitably gone back to him because his replacements were out of their depth.
 
Back
Top