What's new

Haider Ali versus Yashasvi Jaiswal

Thunderbolt14

ODI Debutant
Joined
Jan 2, 2020
Runs
8,700
Post of the Week
2
In my opinion the only two standout bats from the ICC U19 World Cup 2020. Both have a lot of talent. No one else has really impressed except maybe Bangladesh’s Tanzid Tamim.

Jaiswal has unquestionably made more runs this tournament but I feel Haider to me personally is more pleasing to the eye. Haider also made his 50 against an Indian attack that was tougher than the Pakistani attack that Jaiswal made his 100 against (Tyagi and Bishnoi were unquestionably the better bowlers and asked all the right questions, whereas Pakistani bowlers were too defensive and unable to maintain the rights lines and lengths to really challenge these Indians).

Haider also troubled by the short ball and not as great with strike rotation. However, his back foot game is great and has some beautiful strokes including the Babar Azam-esque cover drive. Can he work on the weaknesses?

Jaiswal looks like he needs time to set in but once he does, he becomes a run machine. Not as beautiful though, more of a compact, practical batsman.

Who has a higher talent cap? Who will play for their country first? Who will come good?
 
Last edited:
Jaiswal, just no comparison. We should stop making such threads

Haider is too bad against short ball
 
Not as beautiful? lol He is one of the most attractive young batsman with pure technique. His high elbow shots are gorgeous to watch.
 
Problem with Haider is that he is not weak against short ball, rather has no game against it.
 
Haider Ali might play first, not because he is better. There is so much competition of the top 4 in India.


Jaiswal is miles better, he can open for Pakistan right now and do a better job than Fakhar Zaman. YJ is ready for international cricket
 
Don’t discount Haider yet. He’s got a long career ahead of him. Babar Azam and Unmukt Chand played in the same World Cup. He out scored Babar but look where he is and where Babar is. So only time will tell how things pan out for the two of them.
 
Jaiswal is probably ahead currently but Haider’s FC record is pretty good. He scored a 100 in the QeA Trophy Final
 
Last edited:
There is a long line past under-19 players waiting. Lucky players would get into the side at the right time like Virat Kohli did. To his credit he made the most of it.
 
Jaiswal is in a much better system so the chance of him getting better is much higher than Haider.
 
comparison are useless for u19 players, some guys look very average at 18yrs but turn out really good by 23 then there is guys who look like world beaters at 18 & 5 years later they’re gone..
 
He is already better than Imam, Fakhar and Abid.

I am in awe of his talent, technique, temperament and versatility at such a young age.

He has all the qualities to be India’s best left-handed top order batsman ahead of Dhawan/Ganguly.

You can’t help but feel jealous of India’s batting factory. They produce ATGs in every generation.

You can be very sure that at least two - if not all three - of Shaw, Gill and Jaiswal would end up as legends of the game.
 
He is already better than Imam, Fakhar and Abid.

I am in awe of his talent, technique, temperament and versatility at such a young age.

He has all the qualities to be India’s best left-handed top order batsman ahead of Dhawan/Ganguly.

You can’t help but feel jealous of India’s batting factory. They produce ATGs in every generation.

You can be very sure that at least two - if not all three - of Shaw, Gill and Jaiswal would end up as legends of the game.

Going a bit overboard.

Not all batsmen who are good initially become ATGs.

He’s had a good domestic season but needs to maintain it for recognition
 
Does not really matter who’s better of the two, there’s a much higher chance of Haider joining the national team before Jaiswal.

BCCI will like to blood Jaiswal in gruelling Ranji and IPL for a few years and if he still survives may get considered in 2023-24.

Haider Ali can be in the team by 2020-end.
 
For all the talent Jaiswal possesses, Haider will be the first to break into the Pakistan team. Jaiswal may be better at the moment but Haider is bound to be more successful as he will get more opportunities and exposure soon. I wish the best for Jaiswal but he won't be remembered after 1 year just like a plethora of Indian un19 players like Mavi, Nagarkoti, Unmukt Chand, etc whereas Haider is destined to become Babar Azam 2.0.
 
Problem with Haider is that he is not weak against short ball, rather has no game against it.

Good thing is he's just u19 and has a lifetime to correct his mistakes. He will have an amazing senior like Babar to work his issues out. Don't worry, he'll be fine and become an important cog in our batting line up.
 
HA has lots of talent and with hard work and the right attitude, he will be able to work on the travails with the short ball. Only time will tell if he becomes a Babar or a Malik because Malik had similiar problems with pace and never sorted it and cant play anything resembling quick. Jaiswal will replace Pujara as the Ind 3 in 2 or 3 years time if things are linear but as we know from other players experiences, they arent. But he looks the complete package.
 
Hadier Ali scored hundred against Pakistani domestic bowling while Jaiswal scored double century against Indian domestic bowling - Massive difference.

Exactly! Massive difference.

If Jaiswal got to face Pakistani domestic bowling, he would have scored a List A triple century.

All the more reason to rate Jaiswal.
 
Hadier Ali scored hundred against Pakistani domestic bowling while Jaiswal scored double century against Indian domestic bowling - Massive difference.

Kindly post the names of those Indian domestic bowlers for us to understand the difference and how much quality was there in the attack he played against.
 
Last edited:
For our standard Haider is good but when we compare to World class batsman he is nothing special. Hope Haider work hard on his weakness and hopefully after Misbah tenure he will get selected.
 
Kindly post the names of those Indian domestic bowlers for us to understand the difference and how much quality was there in the attack he played against.

Does it really matter? You can see he was undefeated against our 5 premium bowlers and scored a hundred. If he plays test against our U19 he will probably score same or more.
 
Last edited:
Hadier Ali scored hundred against Pakistani domestic bowling while Jaiswal scored double century against Indian domestic bowling - Massive difference.

Exactly! Massive difference.

If Jaiswal got to face Pakistani domestic bowling, he would have scored a List A triple century.

All the more reason to rate Jaiswal.

I was intrigued so looked at the bowling attack Jaiswal scored 200 against.

Damn this bowling attack will give WI’s of 80s nightmare:

R Shukla
V Tiwari
Utkarsh Singh
V Aaron
As Roy
S Nadeem
 
Does it really matter? You can see he was undefeated against our 5 premium bowlers and scored a hundred. If he plays test against our U19 he will probably score same or more.

That is U19 level. The posters were talking about how he played in Indian domestic tournument and how will score 300 in List A against Pak FC attack so I have just asked the names of the bowlers which I have now posted myself. Never said he doesnt have potential.
 
If only one innings and one match decided things, Fakhar is 100 times better than Virat Kohli (2017 CT - need I say more). If only one series mattered, Saeed Ajmal and Mohd Amir are also better than Virat Kohli (they scored more runs than Kohli in England, 2014). Haider is a beast and world will see it once he makes his debut. Yes Jaiswal is good but he won't get a chance.
 
It is hard to predict the future of Indian young talent these days. They could be waiting eternally. If Sachin were around this era he would have never made debut at the age of 16.
 
some of the posters here are right. Pakistani Under-19 talent will get drafted into international cricket much earlier and be made to run before they can walk. In the process some weak ones get filtered out buf the tough ones like Bobby and Shaheen improve exponentially.

Zol, Unmukt, Mavi, Gill, Nagarkoti all were stars at Under-19) but then got lost in oblivion due to too much competition for seniors cricket while Babar , Shaheen, Naseem are already international cricket stars now.

We shouldn't be arrogant in celebrating too early.

At this level it's all about how much better can you get ryathwr than how good you are.

Some of these players will remain stagnant and never make it while some average players of now will become 10 times the player in coming years
 
I was intrigued so looked at the bowling attack Jaiswal scored 200 against.

Damn this bowling attack will give WI’s of 80s nightmare:

R Shukla
V Tiwari
Utkarsh Singh
V Aaron
As Roy
S Nadeem

Lol exactly. And compare this to Pakistani domestic bowling attack consisting of the likes of express young bowlers like naseem, shaheen, musa and former number 1 odi bowler Hasin Ali! Now you see the difference in quality of hundred facing such attack and double hundred facing the likes of bowlers who probably idolise ashok dinda or praveen kumar
 
Lol exactly. And compare this to Pakistani domestic bowling attack consisting of the likes of express young bowlers like naseem, shaheen, musa and former number 1 odi bowler Hasin Ali! Now you see the difference in quality of hundred facing such attack and double hundred facing the likes of bowlers who probably idolise ashok dinda or praveen kumar

Kindly tell us the skills and traits of Shukla, Tiwari, Roy and Utkarsh Singh as you seem to know a lot about domestic lineups and how to measure their quality.
 
Indian batsmen are groomed under proper coaches from young age, hence most (all actually) looks good in eye - correct, composed, compact, well balanced, high elbow, steady head ... no wonder this Yas kid looks so good. But, Haider also has potential - his off side drives are great to watch. What I didn’t like of him is his foot work & his over use of bottom hand - and these are two main reason he looks vulnerable against short bowling.

Probably his baptism of batsmanship started in Tape-tennis cricket and that is evident in his game - poor footwork against spin, over use of bottom hand & weakness against short ball. But, his reflex & hand-eye is very good from that cricket, hence anything in his range, he can smash that beautifully. What he needs couple of years dedicated time under a proper batting coach - AND stay away from the royal thing - PSL.
 
Jaiswal is better.

Will be fun if Haider Ali and Jaiswal play for their senior national teams in a few years and this thread turns out just like the Babar v KL Rahul thread.
 
Indian batsmen are groomed under proper coaches from young age, hence most (all actually) looks good in eye - correct, composed, compact, well balanced, high elbow, steady head ... no wonder this Yas kid looks so good. But, Haider also has potential - his off side drives are great to watch. What I didn’t like of him is his foot work & his over use of bottom hand - and these are two main reason he looks vulnerable against short bowling.

Probably his baptism of batsmanship started in Tape-tennis cricket and that is evident in his game - poor footwork against spin, over use of bottom hand & weakness against short ball. But, his reflex & hand-eye is very good from that cricket, hence anything in his range, he can smash that beautifully. What he needs couple of years dedicated time under a proper batting coach - AND stay away from the royal thing - PSL.

Yes Haider has played a lot of Tape ball cricket and i saw he bat 3-4 years ago and he looked as dreadful as they come and never would have thought that he would even play for the u19s let alone domestic. He has improved massively since then so he definitely has put in a lot of hard work which shows his commitment.

Coming to his weakness against the short ball is similar to Haris Sohail. He can duck under them and can defend but doesn't pull or hook much he's been working on that. While his bottom hand he uses it but not as much and he's been trying to be more top hand.

Well he's been selected in PSL. I believe Mohammed Wasim didn't play him for a game throughout the National t20. Overall he has the potential to be a good player for us and he needs to work on his weaknesses and work hard which i am sure he will as he's very dedicated.
 
Good chance that both might not get to play in senior team. Yet people are trolling and hyping like anything.
 
Reminder : Title : Haider Ali vs Yashasvi Jaiswal

This is not a general discussion on India and Pakistan
 
Last edited:
I was intrigued so looked at the bowling attack Jaiswal scored 200 against.

Damn this bowling attack will give WI’s of 80s nightmare:

R Shukla
V Tiwari
Utkarsh Singh
V Aaron
As Roy
S Nadeem

Just two out of those 6 bowlers have over 600 FC wickets.

Anukul Roy, who is also one of the bowlers you have named is an U-19 WC winner from 2018 who already has 40 wickets in 13 FC games.

So let me ask you this - what exactly is your point, boy?
 
Just two out of those 6 bowlers have over 600 FC wickets.

Anukul Roy, who is also one of the bowlers you have named is an U-19 WC winner from 2018 who already has 40 wickets in 13 FC games.

So let me ask you this - what exactly is your point, boy?

I think he’s being sarcastic
 
why is every indian u19 batsman in the past 2 years prophesied to be better than tendulkar, dravid, and kohli combined?

the indian top 5 will stay for at least another 4 years in tests. iyer has also cemented his place in odis.

jaiswal will not be playing for india anytime soon.


in contrast, pak batting is in dire need for a complete revamp of their batting order. that is why haider ali will be debuting pretty soon and will play more years of international cricket than jaiswal
 
Can't believe people actually opened up a thread to compare between these two, anyone with a sane mind would agree that Jaiswal is light years ahead. Haider may get a chance sooner due to Pak's mediocre batting standard but that wouldn't prove jack.
 
Yes Haider has played a lot of Tape ball cricket and i saw he bat 3-4 years ago and he looked as dreadful as they come and never would have thought that he would even play for the u19s let alone domestic. He has improved massively since then so he definitely has put in a lot of hard work which shows his commitment.

Coming to his weakness against the short ball is similar to Haris Sohail. He can duck under them and can defend but doesn't pull or hook much he's been working on that. While his bottom hand he uses it but not as much and he's been trying to be more top hand.

I’m curious, where did you see him bat? Also, how do you know he’s been training to use the top hand more as well as on pull and hook shots?

That would be excellent news and I’m glad he’s constantly improving himself. Another good reason to compare him to Babar.
 
I’m curious, where did you see him bat? Also, how do you know he’s been training to use the top hand more as well as on pull and hook shots?

That would be excellent news and I’m glad he’s constantly improving himself. Another good reason to compare him to Babar.

I visit Pakistan regularly and try my best to visit the stadiums or their net sessions. I saw him bat few years ago in rawalpindi where my relative use to train and play and he looked terrible where he would swing everything to leg and pretty much all in the air. Since then he's improved a lot. The rest information is given to me by my relative that he works hard etc.
 
Can't believe people actually opened up a thread to compare between these two, anyone with a sane mind would agree that Jaiswal is light years ahead. Haider may get a chance sooner due to Pak's mediocre batting standard but that wouldn't prove jack.
Never know. Unmukt Chand seemed a better player than Babar Azam at one point of time and he's nowhere in the picture for senior team contention now.
 
Never know. Unmukt Chand seemed a better player than Babar Azam at one point of time and he's nowhere in the picture for senior team contention now.

This.

Can't predict future of unfinished cricketers. Even one technical flaw or temperamental deficiency can derail careers.
 
If you had watched the 2006 U19 WC, you would have thought Anwar Ali was Wasim Akram 2.0 (albeit right handed).
He looked even better than Jaiswal is looking here.

He absolutely destroyed whatever team came in front of him not just India.

Where is he now?

Likewise, we don't know where Jaiswal will be in 5-10 years
 
If you had watched the 2006 U19 WC, you would have thought Anwar Ali was Wasim Akram 2.0 (albeit right handed).
He looked even better than Jaiswal is looking here.

He absolutely destroyed whatever team came in front of him not just India.

Where is he now?

Likewise, we don't know where Jaiswal will be in 5-10 years

Jaiswal will do good.. he has good domestic record.. a list a double hundred.. nd we all has witnessed his exploits in this world cup.. now in a span of few month.. he will be finding himself among best players in the world.. in the best league.. there he will be provided with best of the learning curve

...but surely he will be needed to perform in Atleast 2 domestic season.. that's how it goes in india.. domestic performance is must.. not like parchi system.. performance is acknowledged.. like for shaw nd gill who hv now found a place in the team after their exploits in u19 level, domestics, A tours & IPL.. with dhawan not getting any younger.. jaiswal will provide a perfect option at top of the order.. he is that good..

Not only he plays spinners good.. he can also smack pacers if required.. He has very good short ball play.. Those two back to back sixes against pak fastest bowler that day (abbas) was just senior level stuff.. nd of all he carries a very sane head above his shoulder.. all the hardships he has faced since his early years had made him mentally tough..
 
Never know. Unmukt Chand seemed a better player than Babar Azam at one point of time and he's nowhere in the picture for senior team contention now.

Because Chand never got a chance. Reason very poor domestic record. Australia backed someone liek Labuschagne despite very pathetic in domestic. In India you cannot get into the side without numbers in domestic. Even Tendulkar had to score a couple of debut centuries before being given a go. If he had failed in those 2 matches Tendulkar would not have made debut at 16.
 
Because Chand never got a chance. Reason very poor domestic record. Australia backed someone liek Labuschagne despite very pathetic in domestic. In India you cannot get into the side without numbers in domestic. Even Tendulkar had to score a couple of debut centuries before being given a go. If he had failed in those 2 matches Tendulkar would not have made debut at 16.

There is a difference. Aus doesnt have many 40+ FC averaging batsmen in their domestic circuit so even when Labu was averaging mid 30s he was being looked at while in Indian domestic circuit there are countless batsmen averaging 50+.
 
There is a difference. Aus doesnt have many 40+ FC averaging batsmen in their domestic circuit so even when Labu was averaging mid 30s he was being looked at while in Indian domestic circuit there are countless batsmen averaging 50+.

Even by Australian standard he was very poor. Credit to him he turned it around. He was like 24 for the season when he got picked against India.
 
Do you guys remember Attapatu from SL? He probably had the worse start to international career, but his batting was very classical. He ended up with a decent record.
If someone is mentally tough and knows how to grind it, they will make it even with technical flaws.
 
I was intrigued so looked at the bowling attack Jaiswal scored 200 against.

Damn this bowling attack will give WI’s of 80s nightmare:

R Shukla
V Tiwari
Utkarsh Singh
V Aaron
As Roy
S Nadeem

For a random Ranji team, this is a very good attack.
 
For a random Ranji team, this is a very good attack.
This is Jharkhand (Dhoni's home state) bowling attack. This is quite a good bowling attack for a first class team. Shukla and Aaron are 140 plus kmph bowlers. Shahbaz Nadeem is one of the best spinners in India.
 
India badly needs some left handed batsmen! So hopefully he will serve as a left handed opener for all formats in future...
 
Because Chand never got a chance. Reason very poor domestic record.
Unmukt was already opening the batting for India 'A' on their tour to New Zealand less than one month after winning the U19 World Cup, so they did recognise his talent and try to fast-track him. He didn't progress the way everyone hoped he would.
 
Test cricket and senior ODI cricket >>>>>> U-19 cricket

It is only in poor cricketing setups that an U-19 batsman will directly break into the senior team on the basis of U-19 performances. It does not work that way in Indian cricket.
 
Success in U19 is not a guarantee of a success in international cricket.

Players are still developing physically and skill wise after that. Some kids develop a lot in their teens, but don't develop much later, whereas others could be late bloomers and develop in early 20s.

So, just because someone is good here, is no guarantee to long term success. However, some cricketers already develop significantly in their teens, that they are good enough to be really good in domestic cricket or even international cricket in their teens.

Tendulkar is one of the best examples. He was international class when he was 16, and was already one of the batsmen in the domestic circuit. In his first Ranji season, he ended up as the highest scorer for Mumbai, and top 10 scorers in Ranji that season. There was enough proof he was going to be an international cricket, so he was brought on. Within a series or 2 he picked it up and was averaging 40 within his first 10 tests.

Kohli, Shaw and Gill seems to be of a similar class, but not to the same extent as Tendulkar.
In bowling, Shaheen Afridi and Rabada are similar.

The question is whether Jaiswal fits that category. His List A results say so, but he will need to prove it in the domestic circuit.
 
One thing I have noticed in laat 10-15 years is that after Kohli all we have heard from the Indian side is hype and that's it. None of our hyped players even got into the national team.

Vijay Zol, Unmukt Chand, Gill, Kalra etc etc

None of them made it.

Frankly speaking I have reached a stage where I'm.sick and tired of the hype.and I don't blame the youngsters alone.

BCCI has clearly failed at introducing young cricketers in the team.
 
Our hopes are from Shaw, Gill and Yashashvi. Let's see if any of them can make it as big as a Sachin or Kohli. Only time will tell.
 
One thing I have noticed in laat 10-15 years is that after Kohli all we have heard from the Indian side is hype and that's it. None of our hyped players even got into the national team.

Vijay Zol, Unmukt Chand, Gill, Kalra etc etc

None of them made it.

Frankly speaking I have reached a stage where I'm.sick and tired of the hype.and I don't blame the youngsters alone.

BCCI has clearly failed at introducing young cricketers in the team.

It’s nice though. Must give Indians some mental solace about bench strength. Imagine if 3 Indians were suddenly caught in a spot fixing scandal, 2 were between drugs, 2 were found chucking, and one was Umar Akmal :afridi
 
Our hopes are from Shaw, Gill and Yashashvi. Let's see if any of them can make it as big as a Sachin or Kohli. Only time will tell.

Definitely all 3 will be mainstays in years to come. But can Haider accelerate his growth similar to Babar by taking advantage of the fact that he’s debuting earlier to his peers?

He has already displayed rapid, rapid growth in the last two years and I have a feeling more is yet to come. Seems Younis Khan is playing a good mentoring role to the young lad as well — don’t think he could ask for more.

One thing is for certain, between Shaw, Gill, Jaiswal, Haider, and Banton, there’s an exciting set of youngsters in the same age group who will be the prime players 5 years from now. Exciting times ahead!
 
Our hopes are from Shaw, Gill and Yashashvi. Let's see if any of them can make it as big as a Sachin or Kohli. Only time will tell.

Sachin Tendulkar and Virat Kohli have reached the pinnacle of the cricket, we can't expect every hyped/talented player to reach that level.
 
One thing is for certain, between Shaw, Gill, Jaiswal, Haider, and Banton, there’s an exciting set of youngsters in the same age group who will be the prime players 5 years from now. Exciting times ahead!

Out of them Banton gives me the most excitement.
 
For all the talent Jaiswal possesses, Haider will be the first to break into the Pakistan team. Jaiswal may be better at the moment but Haider is bound to be more successful as he will get more opportunities and exposure soon. I wish the best for Jaiswal but he won't be remembered after 1 year just like a plethora of Indian un19 players like Mavi, Nagarkoti, Unmukt Chand, etc whereas Haider is destined to become Babar Azam 2.0.

Exactly going as predicted. Kohli and Rohit are not going anywhere for the next 7-8 years or so. Gills, Shaws, Jaiswals can only wait and unfortunately their skills may also take their hit in the meantime. The only hope is for the Indian u19 batch when the aforementioned two are retiring. If Pakistan can continue to unearth even 1/2 players per batch, we're set to build a very strong team in the next 3-4 years.
 
Never compare Indian and Pakistani batsmen. As talented as Haider looks, Jaiswal is something else. He will be better than Ganguly and Dhawan.
 
Never compare Indian and Pakistani batsmen. As talented as Haider looks, Jaiswal is something else. He will be better than Ganguly and Dhawan.

Doesn't matter as long as the Indian batsmen never get to play and Pakistani batsmen perform and help the team win.
 
Exactly going as predicted. Kohli and Rohit are not going anywhere for the next 7-8 years or so. Gills, Shaws, Jaiswals can only wait and unfortunately their skills may also take their hit in the meantime. The only hope is for the Indian u19 batch when the aforementioned two are retiring. If Pakistan can continue to unearth even 1/2 players per batch, we're set to build a very strong team in the next 3-4 years.

India isn’t Pakistan where you play till 40. 2023 World Cup will be Rohit’s farewell in ODI cricket at 36. Even if he doesn’t retire they will try to phase him out slowly like they are doing with Dhawan now.

India will need a new opener to compete alongside Rahul and Shaw in 2-3 years and they will obviously give chances to Jaiswal.
 
India isn’t Pakistan where you play till 40. 2023 World Cup will be Rohit’s farewell in ODI cricket at 36. Even if he doesn’t retire they will try to phase him out slowly like they are doing with Dhawan now.

India will need a new opener to compete alongside Rahul and Shaw in 2-3 years and they will obviously give chances to Jaiswal.

Rohit Sharma and Virat Kohli are bound to milk the brands they've created and play until 2025-26 for sure.
 
Jaiswal is upcoming superstar unfair on haider ali to be compare with him .
 
Jaiswal was better than Haidar Ali on the last U19 world cup just like Nagarkotti was better than Shaheen Shah Afridi in 2018 version. But its very tough to get into Indian national team considering the competition. Likes of Jaiswal are not even in pipeline for international debut.
 
This is one thing which I like the most about Pak cricket. Whatever the reasons maybe, giving int'l exposure to promising teen-agers is a laudable thing and can reap great results in the future.

Of course, you shouldn't overdo it by throwing them against Australia in Australia like the Pak think-tank did but playing them in inconsequential games against weak opponents should be encouraged more in Indian cricket. Their treatment of Gill has been pathetic so far. They could have easily given him some games last year against the likes of SL, Ban, WI etc but instead allowed Kohli and Rohit to statpad.

Anyways, Haider Ali will be a much improved cricketer by the time Jaiswal makes his int'l debut (likely after the '23 WC). After that, it's anyone's guess.
 
The thing they continuously associate with jaiswal is his work ethic. This thing about him makes me feel he is gonna score heavily in coming years.
Where as with haider, he is great at the moment but i fear he might be too content with these t20 performances in future.Just guessing and hopefully he proves me wrong by working herder.
 
Definitely all 3 will be mainstays in years to come. But can Haider accelerate his growth similar to Babar by taking advantage of the fact that he’s debuting earlier to his peers?

He has already displayed rapid, rapid growth in the last two years and I have a feeling more is yet to come. Seems Younis Khan is playing a good mentoring role to the young lad as well — don’t think he could ask for more.

One thing is for certain, between Shaw, Gill, Jaiswal, Haider, and Banton, there’s an exciting set of youngsters in the same age group who will be the prime players 5 years from now. Exciting times ahead!

I think haider can be a man winner but myt not score as many runs as babar and I would also include hurraira in the package
 
Back
Top