What's new

Harbhajan Singh - Commentary Thread

topspin

Test Debutant
Joined
Jul 16, 2018
Runs
14,509
Post of the Week
1
Not been the most impressed by his appointment from Sky for his commentary/analyst/pundit (whatever you wanna call it) sting.

Seems short for words, lacks fluency and any energy to the Sky comm. box. Surely they could have found a better Indian to do the job.
 
1 billion people and they pick Harbhajan.

No sympathy.
 
Been very impressed with Swann and Sangakkara though - hope they can nudge the likes of Holding out of the commentary box.
 
Cringeworthy comment today to Guha asking her why she was not supporting India given that she was 'Indian'.
 
He's not a good commentator, can barely speak English.
 
I am better than him, I am damn sure about this thing

#Injustice #hireme
 
Its better for him to do hindi. Good chap. No need to embarrass himself like that
 
I wonder what the Sky guys do in respect of research to appoint these guys.

If they had done their homework they would have realised how poor Harbhajan Singh is as a commentator and how poor his command of the English language is.

Yesterday I was watching and Michael Holding made Singh look foolish a few times.
 
Last edited:
I wonder what the Sky guys do in respect of research to appoint these guys.

If they had done their homework they would have realised how poor Harbhajan Singh is as a commentator and how poor his command of the English language is.

Yesterday I was watching and Michael Holding made Singh look foolish a few times.

I wonder if they even interviewed Harbhajan for the job lol.
 
He is more like an Indian cheerleader in the commentary box. Can't they do basic interview, research before appointing him. His command over English is very poor. He can't understand others say , he can't provide any critical analysis, He just acts like a cheerleader in the commentary box.
 
His wife is British and he spends a lot of time in UK. Wonder if that made any difference (plus not too many better options).

Recent diktats by CoA mean anyone getting paid by BCCI / working with state associations cannot do commentary. Rules out Ganguly and Dravid.

Those not on BCCI payroll like Zaheer Khan, Agarkar are with cricket sites plus have good deals with TV channels. VVS works full time with Star Sports.

Kumble perhaps was not interested, though he is equally drab (but with good fluency).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Loving his commentary. Always great to have fresh personalities in the box than the same old crap. Michael Holding has been a boring wood in that box for ages now and i am sick and tired of his grim commentary. Too many negative people in this world complaining about everything, not willing to give chances to fresh faces and bragging about a foreign language. English is not the language of India, Pakistan we are not supposed to speak it like they do. Go mock Michael Schumachers or Cristiano Ronaldos of the world for their poor command over English. No you never would do that because its okay for a lot of the desi show offs if French, Italian nationals cant speak fluent English but a moment a desi has a slip of tongue these guys start laughing and abusing. Extreme display of insecurity and lack of pride in being desi.

Go Bhajji!

Bhaijaan is with you along with all large hearted men of desi land.

We are proud of you Jatta!
 
It was unwise to cast him. Unfair on him even- a producer or manager or director should have stepped in or ensured it was only on air for a few short guests stints. It is pretty clear that he is stifled by a lack of confidence or fluidity in his English.

I'm sure he has plenty to say in normal circumstances but he seems to be struggling with analysing the match, keeping up with his fellow commentators in another language, a director in the background/earpiece and freely expressing his own thoughts in English. It is a lot more to think about and a lot more pressure than simply having a conversation.
 
Worst commentator going around atm. Worse than some BBL commentators, and that's saying something!
 
You know things are bad when you are worse than Rameez Raja.
 
Bhajji's idea of commentary is not to say anything in comm box unless someone asks him any question. And when he opens his mouth...below happens :

Bhajji: "Whom you supporting Isa..you are also an Indian"

Isa: "I have Indian heritage yes..but I was born in England"

:)))

Bhajji should give a speech om brexit :uakmal
 
You know things are bad when you are worse than Rameez Raja.

I really enjoyed Rameez's commentary 'that is a magnificent blow'.. Rameez's english is very good but Harbhajan on the other hand...
 
Lol Ramiz has masters from Punjab University and studied at Aitchison college.

OTOH Harbhajan studied at government Punjabi medium school, Class 12 is his highest education qualification.

Whatever English Bhajji speaks he learned on his own, which is commendable.
 
Loving his commentary. Always great to have fresh personalities in the box than the same old crap. Michael Holding has been a boring wood in that box for ages now and i am sick and tired of his grim commentary. Too many negative people in this world complaining about everything, not willing to give chances to fresh faces and bragging about a foreign language. English is not the language of India, Pakistan we are not supposed to speak it like they do. Go mock Michael Schumachers or Cristiano Ronaldos of the world for their poor command over English. No you never would do that because its okay for a lot of the desi show offs if French, Italian nationals cant speak fluent English but a moment a desi has a slip of tongue these guys start laughing and abusing. Extreme display of insecurity and lack of pride in being desi.

Go Bhajji!

Bhaijaan is with you along with all large hearted men of desi land.

We are proud of you Jatta!

If you think this is just about fluency in English then you are very wrong. The guy can barely string 2 sentences together, appears very lethargic and doesn't give good insight into the game, for e.g. Bumble asked him what India were doing well when they were dismantling England's batting, he replied because they're bowling faster, so they're getting more swing. This actually makes no cricketing sense in respect of conventional swing and it had nothing to do with India's "extra pace" but more to do with the skills shown by the likes Pandya and etc.

How can you claim to love his commentary with this kind of showing?
 
I respect his ambition but i think hes over reaching here. Nothing wrong with hindi commentary for him ,millions of indians watch the hindi channel im sure.
 
Very dry. Don't think we'll see Bhaji in the Sky comm box again.
 
Maybe he will improve in future, but he's started on a high-profile channel where most of the other commentators are very very good, which makes him look even worse.
 
Agreed, on the other hand Sangakkara is actually pretty good, he is quite articulate.
 
Maybe he will improve in future, but he's started on a high-profile channel where most of the other commentators are very very good, which makes him look even worse.

Man don’t deserve a stint on a Punjabi radio station in Punjab in Punjabi we talking sky sports here . The individual who actually hired him needs sacking 😐
 
I want Gavaskar or heck, even the awful Ganguly. Where's Laxman??.

Sky also employing token woman. Guha is gushing over India btw
 
I want Gavaskar or heck, even the awful Ganguly. Where's Laxman??.

Sky also employing token woman. Guha is gushing over India btw

Why are you watching Sky when there is Sony?

You get Gavaskar, Swann and Bhogle.

Admittedly, there is also Manjrekar but the pros outweigh the cons.
 
Man don’t deserve a stint on a Punjabi radio station in Punjab in Punjabi we talking sky sports here . The individual who actually hired him needs sacking ��

There is no technical analysis from him at all which is surprising.

It's almost like they've thrown in a fan off the street with limited knowledge of cricket and asked him to commentate.
 
Chucking got out of hand in the late 90s and 2000s. Him, Saqlain and Murali were all chuckers.
Saqlain and chucking?

Saqlain Mushtaq probably had the most cleanest action for an off spinner. His arm was very fast and would twist his wrist for the doosra. His doosra didnt even spin that much, his off spin delivery was more lethal.

The guy had the most cleanest action.
 
Chucking got out of hand in the late 90s and 2000s. Him, Saqlain and Murali were all chuckers.
Yeah certainly Bhaji and Murali but not Saqlain.

He had the cleanest action as an off-spinner.

while bowling the doosra he might get closer to that but he wasn't a chucker for sure.
 
Sky Sports offered Commentary to Sehwag seriously?
 
Back
Top