Bhaijaan
Hall of Famer
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2011
- Runs
- 67,352
- Post of the Week
- 1
29 off Bravo’s over
Special hitter!!!!
Special hitter!!!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
29 off Bravo’s over
Special hitter!!!!
He has developed into one of the most devastating big hitters at the death.
Lol. Who the hell are these lallus.He's rubbish. Couldn't hit Rashid at death. Amir Yamin is way better even Anwar Ali
He is just a utility cricketer who is a master of none. He is actually cant better Stokes in any of the 3 disciplines who for me is the worlds best allrounder at the moment.
He does have a space in LOIs side thought as he is one of the best bits and pieces cricketer around.
Pandya is not a bits and pieces player. Bits and pieces is Faheem Ashraf.
Pandya is a monster with the bat, a terrific fielder (probably the best in the world) and a decent 5th bowler. The issue is that Pandya does not get enough opportunities with the bat. He mostly comes at the death and is expected to smash right from ball 1.
To me, Pandya is the best all rounder that India has ever produced in terms of impact. Only Kapil in his early days was better than Pandya.
Your last statement about Kapil and Pandya shows there is no need to argue with you. Kapil was atleast twice the player Pandya is in every format.
Faheem Ashraf is not bit and pieces cricketer actually he is just a bowler. Pakistan tried to make him a bits and pieces cricketer. Pandya is always the weakest bowler and almost always go for over 5 an over. Even hafeez bowled more effectively for Pakistan and was a better batsman.
To me Jadeja is better allrounder than Pandya - definitely better bowler by miles and can bat almost as much. Pandya is definitely bit and pieces! if you dont understand ask yourself this would he get into the team just for his bowling? would he get into the team just for his batting? answer is big fat no!
Genuine all-rounders are better than him in every discipline. Likes of stokes , Holder etc.
Kapil was great with the ball in the first couple of years. Then he became a trundler. His batting was hit or miss and Kapil is no where near the fielder as Pandya is.
Shame, we heard similar excuses for KL Rahul before he got pounded back to reality.Pandya is not a bits and pieces player. Bits and pieces is Faheem Ashraf.
Pandya is a monster with the bat, a terrific fielder (probably the best in the world) and a decent 5th bowler. The issue is that Pandya does not get enough opportunities with the bat. He mostly comes at the death and is expected to smash right from ball 1.
To me, Pandya is the best all rounder that India has ever produced in terms of impact. Only Kapil in his early days was better than Pandya.
Shame, we heard similar excuses for KL Rahul before he got pounded back to reality.
Pandya is a lame duck, and is not good enough for international cricket. He is actually MUCH inferior to Jadeja, as the poster above rightly pointed out.
Also, please stop demeaning your legends by making ridiculous comparisons. A year back people were comparing Pandya with Stokes, what happened there?![]()
Shame, we heard similar excuses for KL Rahul before he got pounded back to reality.
Pandya is a lame duck, and is not good enough for international cricket. He is actually MUCH inferior to Jadeja, as the poster above rightly pointed out.
Also, please stop demeaning your legends by making ridiculous comparisons. A year back people were comparing Pandya with Stokes, what happened there?![]()
He is a good fielder and a very inconsistent player. All of us saw his big hitting in the semi final of WC2019. It was so good that his fans had to brought Dhoni to justify his big hitting in the semi final and they were blaming Dhoni for forcing him to play like that.![]()
dhoni was trash in the semis. pandya was worse. pant was the worst.
it's like dumb; dumber and dumbest which suits pant perfectly.
if Mayank was actually picked a long with rayudu, India would have been champions.
dhoni was trash in the semis. pandya was worse. pant was the worst.
it's like dumb; dumber and dumbest which suits pant perfectly.
if Mayank was actually picked a long with rayudu, India would have been champions.
Pant came in when the team was 5/3 and Pandya at 24/4. After them, there was only Dhoni and Jadeja left. They had no other option but to bat the way they did. Yes, they could have scored more than 30, but it surely wasnt the worst innings from India. That award goes to Karthik.
Oh yes. political selection. god I can't stand karthik. All these frauds get in due to favouritism.
should have picked Mayank over karthik and rayudu should have been selected as well.
Add in perhaps someone like iyer then it would have been perfect
dhawan injury also cost india the wc.
He is just hype. Neither good with bat nor with ball. Classic bits and pieces guy. Just lucky with some innings and wickets.
Shardul Thakur is giving him tough competition.![]()
His 90+ in SA was one of the best knocks for India ever. Had it not been for that it would have been one of the lowest scores (and shameful at that) for India overseas. Hope he focuses on his batting which is hot and cold than his bowling which is ok now.
yea thanks to kohli's idiotic selections otherwise india could have won that game. drops rahane and pujara randomly.
Won’t be a big miss
Bowling is not upto the mark and batting is tullay baazi. He can have big games but he is too flaky the for a team wanting to become the best of the era
He can be better than Stokes if he works on his batting, bowling and fielding.after stokes it's pandya. best all rounder of Asia.
I don't rate him but he adds balance just like CDG who has more experience. Pandya can be as good as CDG in tests if he works on his bowling. Just needs to know how to contain and put pressure. Batting wise he has shown some glimpses of talent.
Pandya is a brilliant player. Certainly the most talented all-rounder since the emergence of Stokes.
Pandya can match Stokes statistically, but the latter’s ability to achieve superhuman feats under pressure has made him an all-time great.
Nevertheless, I can only laugh at people who were arguing that Faheem is better than Pandya.
Pandya is a brilliant player. Certainly the most talented all-rounder since the emergence of Stokes.
Pandya can match Stokes statistically, but the latter’s ability to achieve superhuman feats under pressure has made him an all-time great.
Nevertheless, I can only laugh at people who were arguing that Faheem is better than Pandya.
not at all jason holder chris woakes and cdg are better than pandya
They all have more experience. In terms of raw ability, Pandya is far ahead.
announced his comeback with brutal Century ON 37 balls in a domestic game with 10 SIXES![]()
jason holder in wc 2015 was easily better than pandya in wc 2019
not at all jason holder chris woakes and cdg are better than pandya
Holder was smashed to all corners by a certain batsmen twice in two months in 2015, one of them in the World Cup match in Sydney,a fairly big ground.
announced his comeback with brutal Century ON 37 balls in a domestic game with 10 SIXES![]()
So what pandya also got smashed many times
Good but bowling attack of the opposition team was worse than some of the club attacks in the world.
Another carnage in a domestic match 158* on 55 balls with 20 SIXES & 6 FOURS![]()
stokes on another level man. Dude is a phenom. Pandya has a long way to go to emulate stokes. He may never and it's ok. As long as he reaches CDG level I will be happy.
He is faster than CDG and can swing the ball a bit. Batting can be worked on as he did perform reasonably well in s.africa where the conditions were quite difficult.
Like I said, I don't rate him personally but he brings balance and adds depth which is important to give our strike bowlers rest.
Pandya has a long way to go before he emulates Razzaq let alone Stokes lol
Another carnage in a domestic match 158* on 55 balls with 20 SIXES & 6 FOURS![]()