jamie smith fan
First Class Captain
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2024
- Runs
- 4,664
I live in kashmir.I vacation in Kashmir regularly. Eat wazwan, ski. Hahahaha
I know what we have to go through.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I live in kashmir.I vacation in Kashmir regularly. Eat wazwan, ski. Hahahaha
Opinions of those sitting comfortably in Western nations without any inclination towards their country of origin are worthless, Rishwat. Don't let the door hit you on the way outRizwanT20champ has to be undercover army spokesman, there could be no other reason why all he can parrot is Dimmy Dimmy Dimmy in every thread. No solutions, only constant excuses about a previous administration.
Say it with me: Gandhi-Nehru virus: GNVIndia had the opportunity a few decades ago. But our impotent governments did not have the guts. They were happy to defend their existing lands. Gandhis philosophy has a strong choke hold on Indian psyche. Nehru was an A grade clown.
Opinions of those sitting comfortably in Western nations without any inclination towards their country of origin are worthless, Rishwat. Don't let the door hit you on the way out![]()
My sister in law is a Kashmiri Pandit. She can’t live in Kashmir and I know what her family went through too. However she didn’t whine or complaint: everyone in their family is super qualified and have very good careers.I live in kashmir.
I know what we have to go through.
Same old song and dance. These people aren't even bored repeating it.Pakistan pushes UNSC for ‘just and lasting’ settlement of Kashmir dispute
Pakistan has urged the UN Security Council (UNSC) to fulfil its responsibility by ensuring the implementation of its own resolutions on the Jammu and Kashmir dispute, according to a press release issued by the Permanent Mission of Pakistan to the United Nations on Tuesday.
In August 2019, Modi’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) had revoked occupied Kashmir’s special status by repealing Article 370 of the Indian constitution. The country’s Supreme Court had upheld that order in December 2023.
Soon after the elections in November last year, the legislative assembly of IoK had called for the restoration of the region’s special status but Modi rejected that demand.
The two countries saw a heated exchange in January this year as the military strongly reacted to the Indian army chief calling Pakistan the “epicentre of terrorism”.
“It is the responsibility of this Council to ensure the realisation of that right for the Kashmiri people and promote a just and lasting settlement of the Jammu and Kashmir dispute, by taking measures to implement its own resolutions,” Special Assistant to the Prime Minister and Minister of State for Foreign Affairs Tariq Fatemi was quoted by the Associated Press of Pakistan.
He made these remarks while speaking at the UNSC high-level open debate on the ‘Maintenance of International Peace and Security: Advancing Adaptability in UN Peace Operations — Responding to New Realities’.
Pakistan reminded that the Jammu and Kashmir dispute remains on the agenda of the UNSC and awaits a just and final settlement in accordance with the relevant resolutions of the Security Council that promised the Kashmiri people the right to self-determination through a UN-supervised plebiscite, the press release said.
It continued, “Pakistan emphasised that it was the responsibility of the Council to ensure the realisation of that right for the Kashmiri people and promote a just and lasting settlement of the dispute by taking measures to implement its own resolutions.
“Highlighting the importance of the UN peacekeeping operations as being cost-effective instruments to maintain international peace and security, he mentioned that the UN Military Observer Group in India and Pakistan, established in 1949, exemplified the observation and monitoring type of operations for inter-state conflicts.”
Fatemi was quoted as having said that originally conceived for inter-state conflicts, peacekeeping operations have since also been applied in intra-state conflicts and civil wars.
The special assistant to the prime minister mentioned Pakistan’s long association with UN peacekeeping operations in terms of being one of the longest-serving and leading troop contributors and a founding member of the Peacebuilding Commission.
He underscored that over the years, Pakistan has deployed 235,000 peacekeepers in 48 Missions across the globe.
The statement quoted him as saying: “[A total of] 181 Pakistani peacekeepers have paid the ultimate sacrifice in the service of international peace and security. More than 3,267 Pakistani men and women are proudly serving in blue helmets in 7 Missions today.”
Fatemi also highlighted the “new realities” and challenges facing peace operations today, which, he said, are being increasingly shaped by divergent objectives and priorities resulting from increased geo-political rivalries, lack of political will and insufficient allocation of resources.
He added that the proliferation of non-state actors, the changing nature of conflicts; and the weaponisation of new technologies and the information space were also challenges facing peace operations today.
The SAPM also shared Pakistan’s suggestions to make UN peacekeeping more dynamic and capable of responding to contemporary challenges:
-Stronger political commitment from UN Member States, particularly the Security Council, to prevent negative actors from exploiting power vacuums. -Clear, realistic, and situation-specific mandates for peacekeeping missions.
Fatemi noted that the UN Security Council did not mandate any new peacekeeping operation in over a decade despite the apparent need, and urged the Council to not shy away from utilizing this significant tool for the maintenance of peace in conflict zones.
- Primacy of political solutions, ensuring peacekeeping operations support well-defined political objectives.
- Adequate financial resources to match growing operational demands.
- Modern training, equipment, and resources to counter emerging threats.
- Well-planned mission transitions and withdrawals, ensuring stability and civilian protection.
- Early peacebuilding initiatives within peacekeeping operations to foster long-term stability.
- Meaningful consultations with troop-contributing countries in shaping the future of UN peace operations.
He said that Pakistan is closely engaged at the policy and conceptual level in responding to the evolution of UN Peacekeeping, adding that it will be hosting the UN Peacekeeping Ministerial preparatory meeting in Islamabad next month, whose outcomes would feed into the ongoing deliberations on the future of UN Peace Operations.
Earlier in the month, the FO had also rejected recent remarks made by India’s foreign minister on Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) as “baseless claims” while asking his country to vacate occupied areas of the region.
Pakistan also denounced Indian authorities’ decision to declare two organisations of Indian-occupied Kashmir as “unlawful associations”, according to a Foreign Office statement issued earlier this month.
A day before the statement was issued in which the Indian Ministry of Home Affairs had declared the Jammu and Kashmir Awami Action Committee, headed by Kashmiri chief cleric and Hurriyat leader Mirwaiz Umar Farooq, and the Jammu and Kashmir Ittihadul Muslimeen, headed by Maulana Mohammad Abbas Ansari, as “unlawful association” for the next five years, The Hindu had reported.
Kashmir is not India’s ‘integral part’, Pakistan tells UN
Pakistan has also brushed aside India’s claim of Jammu and Kashmir being its “integral part”, saying the disputed status of the Himalayan state is acknowledged by the UN and the international community, APP reported.
“Every official UN map depicts Jammu and Kashmir as a disputed territory,” Pakistani delegate Gul Qaiser Sarvani told the UN Security Council as its high-level discussion on UN peacekeeping operations came to an end.
Sarwani, who is a counsellor at the Pakistan Mission to the UN, was reacting to Indian Ambassador Parvathaneni Harish’s claim that “ Kashmir has been, is, and will always be an integral and inalienable part of India.“
The Indian ambassador made that claim in response to Fatemi, who made an earnest call on the 15-member Council to implement its own resolutions promising the Kashmiri people the right to self-determination through a UN-supervised plebiscite.
Exercising his right of reply, the Pakistani delegate said, “No amount of obfuscation can change the legal, political and historical reality — Jammu and Kashmir is not, and has never been a so-called ‘integral’ part of India.
“It is a disputed territory, whose ‘final disposition’ is to be decided by the people of Jammu and Kashmir through a UN-supervised plebiscite, as demanded by numerous resolutions of the Security Council.”
Pointing out that India holds Kashmir by brute force with over 900,000 troops and paramilitary forces, he said that India has killed over 100,000 innocent Kashmiris since 1989.
“It (India) has imposed the densest occupation in history, with one Indian soldier for every eight Kashmiri men, women and children,” the Pakistani delegate said, adding that the UN has duly recorded India’s gross violations of human rights in occupied territory.
With regards to the Indian envoy’s allegation of cross-border terrorism, Sarwani said, “It is most ironic that India, which is committing the worst form of state terrorism in occupied Jammu and Kashmir, is portraying itself as the victim,” adding, that this was a familiar ploy of all occupiers and colonisers to paint legitimate struggles for freedom and liberation as terrorism.
Instead of maligning others for terrorism, he added, India should sincerely reflect on its own campaign of orchestrating targeted assassinations, subversion and terrorism in foreign countries, he added.
“It is India which supports and finances terrorism against Pakistan through [the banned] Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) and the Majeed Brigade.”
DAWN NEWS
Pak should offer a referendum in Balochistan first and offer that as a role model followed by a referendum in POK and that will show their sincere intent . Why is the referendum in Balochistan not happening? Pak is pretty confident I am assuming, so why the delay?Pakistan pushes UNSC for ‘just and lasting’ settlement of Kashmir dispute
Pakistan has urged the UN Security Council (UNSC) to fulfil its responsibility by ensuring the implementation of its own resolutions on the Jammu and Kashmir dispute, according to a press release issued by the Permanent Mission of Pakistan to the United Nations on Tuesday.
In August 2019, Modi’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) had revoked occupied Kashmir’s special status by repealing Article 370 of the Indian constitution. The country’s Supreme Court had upheld that order in December 2023.
Soon after the elections in November last year, the legislative assembly of IoK had called for the restoration of the region’s special status but Modi rejected that demand.
The two countries saw a heated exchange in January this year as the military strongly reacted to the Indian army chief calling Pakistan the “epicentre of terrorism”.
“It is the responsibility of this Council to ensure the realisation of that right for the Kashmiri people and promote a just and lasting settlement of the Jammu and Kashmir dispute, by taking measures to implement its own resolutions,” Special Assistant to the Prime Minister and Minister of State for Foreign Affairs Tariq Fatemi was quoted by the Associated Press of Pakistan.
He made these remarks while speaking at the UNSC high-level open debate on the ‘Maintenance of International Peace and Security: Advancing Adaptability in UN Peace Operations — Responding to New Realities’.
Pakistan reminded that the Jammu and Kashmir dispute remains on the agenda of the UNSC and awaits a just and final settlement in accordance with the relevant resolutions of the Security Council that promised the Kashmiri people the right to self-determination through a UN-supervised plebiscite, the press release said.
It continued, “Pakistan emphasised that it was the responsibility of the Council to ensure the realisation of that right for the Kashmiri people and promote a just and lasting settlement of the dispute by taking measures to implement its own resolutions.
“Highlighting the importance of the UN peacekeeping operations as being cost-effective instruments to maintain international peace and security, he mentioned that the UN Military Observer Group in India and Pakistan, established in 1949, exemplified the observation and monitoring type of operations for inter-state conflicts.”
Fatemi was quoted as having said that originally conceived for inter-state conflicts, peacekeeping operations have since also been applied in intra-state conflicts and civil wars.
The special assistant to the prime minister mentioned Pakistan’s long association with UN peacekeeping operations in terms of being one of the longest-serving and leading troop contributors and a founding member of the Peacebuilding Commission.
He underscored that over the years, Pakistan has deployed 235,000 peacekeepers in 48 Missions across the globe.
The statement quoted him as saying: “[A total of] 181 Pakistani peacekeepers have paid the ultimate sacrifice in the service of international peace and security. More than 3,267 Pakistani men and women are proudly serving in blue helmets in 7 Missions today.”
Fatemi also highlighted the “new realities” and challenges facing peace operations today, which, he said, are being increasingly shaped by divergent objectives and priorities resulting from increased geo-political rivalries, lack of political will and insufficient allocation of resources.
He added that the proliferation of non-state actors, the changing nature of conflicts; and the weaponisation of new technologies and the information space were also challenges facing peace operations today.
The SAPM also shared Pakistan’s suggestions to make UN peacekeeping more dynamic and capable of responding to contemporary challenges:
-Stronger political commitment from UN Member States, particularly the Security Council, to prevent negative actors from exploiting power vacuums. -Clear, realistic, and situation-specific mandates for peacekeeping missions.
Fatemi noted that the UN Security Council did not mandate any new peacekeeping operation in over a decade despite the apparent need, and urged the Council to not shy away from utilizing this significant tool for the maintenance of peace in conflict zones.
- Primacy of political solutions, ensuring peacekeeping operations support well-defined political objectives.
- Adequate financial resources to match growing operational demands.
- Modern training, equipment, and resources to counter emerging threats.
- Well-planned mission transitions and withdrawals, ensuring stability and civilian protection.
- Early peacebuilding initiatives within peacekeeping operations to foster long-term stability.
- Meaningful consultations with troop-contributing countries in shaping the future of UN peace operations.
He said that Pakistan is closely engaged at the policy and conceptual level in responding to the evolution of UN Peacekeeping, adding that it will be hosting the UN Peacekeeping Ministerial preparatory meeting in Islamabad next month, whose outcomes would feed into the ongoing deliberations on the future of UN Peace Operations.
Earlier in the month, the FO had also rejected recent remarks made by India’s foreign minister on Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) as “baseless claims” while asking his country to vacate occupied areas of the region.
Pakistan also denounced Indian authorities’ decision to declare two organisations of Indian-occupied Kashmir as “unlawful associations”, according to a Foreign Office statement issued earlier this month.
A day before the statement was issued in which the Indian Ministry of Home Affairs had declared the Jammu and Kashmir Awami Action Committee, headed by Kashmiri chief cleric and Hurriyat leader Mirwaiz Umar Farooq, and the Jammu and Kashmir Ittihadul Muslimeen, headed by Maulana Mohammad Abbas Ansari, as “unlawful association” for the next five years, The Hindu had reported.
Kashmir is not India’s ‘integral part’, Pakistan tells UN
Pakistan has also brushed aside India’s claim of Jammu and Kashmir being its “integral part”, saying the disputed status of the Himalayan state is acknowledged by the UN and the international community, APP reported.
“Every official UN map depicts Jammu and Kashmir as a disputed territory,” Pakistani delegate Gul Qaiser Sarvani told the UN Security Council as its high-level discussion on UN peacekeeping operations came to an end.
Sarwani, who is a counsellor at the Pakistan Mission to the UN, was reacting to Indian Ambassador Parvathaneni Harish’s claim that “ Kashmir has been, is, and will always be an integral and inalienable part of India.“
The Indian ambassador made that claim in response to Fatemi, who made an earnest call on the 15-member Council to implement its own resolutions promising the Kashmiri people the right to self-determination through a UN-supervised plebiscite.
Exercising his right of reply, the Pakistani delegate said, “No amount of obfuscation can change the legal, political and historical reality — Jammu and Kashmir is not, and has never been a so-called ‘integral’ part of India.
“It is a disputed territory, whose ‘final disposition’ is to be decided by the people of Jammu and Kashmir through a UN-supervised plebiscite, as demanded by numerous resolutions of the Security Council.”
Pointing out that India holds Kashmir by brute force with over 900,000 troops and paramilitary forces, he said that India has killed over 100,000 innocent Kashmiris since 1989.
“It (India) has imposed the densest occupation in history, with one Indian soldier for every eight Kashmiri men, women and children,” the Pakistani delegate said, adding that the UN has duly recorded India’s gross violations of human rights in occupied territory.
With regards to the Indian envoy’s allegation of cross-border terrorism, Sarwani said, “It is most ironic that India, which is committing the worst form of state terrorism in occupied Jammu and Kashmir, is portraying itself as the victim,” adding, that this was a familiar ploy of all occupiers and colonisers to paint legitimate struggles for freedom and liberation as terrorism.
Instead of maligning others for terrorism, he added, India should sincerely reflect on its own campaign of orchestrating targeted assassinations, subversion and terrorism in foreign countries, he added.
“It is India which supports and finances terrorism against Pakistan through [the banned] Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) and the Majeed Brigade.”
DAWN NEWS
Pakistan wasting everyone's time during its 2 year tenure at UNSC. 1 more year left and then quiet will return.Same old song and dance. These people aren't even bored repeating it.
This was because of the Cong gov and the nehru Indira dynasty. Nehru had the chance in 1948 to go all the way but he chickened out and like a kitten went running to the UN. And then Indira had a golden chance to settle the issue when Ind won the Ind Pak war( at a huge human cost) and it could have been done and seal it. But no, she signed some agreement for bilateral "negotiations " and led to prolonged issue for Ind until the Mod gov abrogated article 370.Pakistan has no right to Kashyapamar given its ancient Hindu ties. Muslim majority in Kashyapamar is a relatively recent demographic shift following conversions (mostly forced) from the 14th century under rulers like Shah Mir
Bharat today is simply paying the price for its historical softness wrt combating Islamist terrorism. The terror insurgencies in 1990s displaced a million Kashmiri Pandits from the valley further skewing the already tampered demographics of the valley in the favour of Muslims. We are talking about 500-600 years of forced Islamizationof the valley compared to its 5000 years Hindu history. Kashyapamar is not Muslim and they can fool someone else.
This was because of the Cong gov and the nehru Indira dynasty. Nehru had the chance in 1948 to go all the way but he chickened out and like a kitten went running to the UN. And then Indira had a golden chance to settle the issue when Ind won the Ind Pak war( at a huge human cost) and it could have done and seal it. But no, she signed some agreement for bilateral "negotiations " and led to prolonged issue for Ind until the Modingov abrogated article 370.
It is not like we kashmiris are living in palestine like situation,we are living rather peacefully.
What exactly has PAK done for us apart from using our people for its benefits
Why would a Kashmiri want to live in pak when he gets much better facilities in India???
Its not like pak has some sympathy for us or loves us,pak only wants our resoures(same with india also)
Its too simplistic a narrative with regards to 1971 war.This was because of the Cong gov and the nehru Indira dynasty. Nehru had the chance in 1948 to go all the way but he chickened out and like a kitten went running to the UN. And then Indira had a golden chance to settle the issue when Ind won the Ind Pak war( at a huge human cost) and it could have been done and seal it. But no, she signed some agreement for bilateral "negotiations " and led to prolonged issue for Ind until the Mod gov abrogated article 370.
@jamie smith I really appreciate your honesty regarding Pakistan and India...and you are right here too to some extent. But let us all know who was Burhan Wani: A terrorist or freedom fighter..It is not like we kashmiris are living in palestine like situation,we are living rather peacefully.
What exactly has PAK done for us apart from using our people for its benefits
Why would a Kashmiri want to live in pak when he gets much better facilities in India???
Its not like pak has some sympathy for us or loves us,pak only wants our resoures(same with india also)
@jamie smith I really appreciate your honesty regarding Pakistan and India...and you are right here too to some extent. But let us all know who was Burhan Wani: A terrorist or freedom fighter..
The brute fact the hate Indian army more than anything else...can live in fantasies thoughBurhan Wani was alive until 2016 much before article 370 was revoked. At that time, the autonomy of Kashmir led to Pak sponsored terrorism. People like Burhan Wani were directly funded by ISI to keep the protest on. Basically the state of Pakistan have done nothing for Kashmiris, brainwashed and pushed its youth to pick up guns and kept them poor.
Now since 2019, Indian govt have removed autonomy of the state and invested lots of money for development and progress. Jammu and Kashmir is flourishing and so is its people. Pakistanis like yourself still want to remain in past and poke your nose in matters that doesn't concern you at all. Give it couple of more decades, more and more voices against Pakistan will come from Kashmir. By 2045, I strongly believe Kashmiris will hate Pakistanis same way that Afghans do. Lets be honest, at the end of the day everyone loves a good life, food, education over terrorism, guns and anarchy.
It is high time that the country of Pakistan with whatever shame left must forget about Kashmiris and focus on the development of its own country. The aim should be no longer a shinning light for the world to look at Pakistan in disgust.
The brute fact the hate Indian army more than anything else...can live in fantasies though
With Arab MONARCHs not peopleEven if they do, that is a problem for Indians (army and Kashmiris) to resolve na? The problem with Pakistanis is they think they are thekedaar of Islam and hence poke their nose in affairs of Kashmir, Palestine, Indian muslims etc etc. This is after they have been categorically asked to shut up by same people numerous times. This thekedaari is conditional though and never you will see they talking about Uyghur muslims. India under Modi has better relation with wider muslim/arab world than Pakistan. It is a fact
IMF ke paise ki thekdaari brother, no party even takes it seriously, including Kashmiris.Even if they do, that is a problem for Indians (army and Kashmiris) to resolve na? The problem with Pakistanis is they think they are thekedaar of Islam and hence poke their nose in affairs of Kashmir, Palestine, Indian muslims etc etc. This is after they have been categorically asked to shut up by same people numerous times. This thekedaari is conditional though and never you will see they talking about Uyghur muslims. India under Modi has better relation with wider muslim/arab world than Pakistan. It is a fact
I can't comment on that keeping in view the freedom of speech in India.@jamie smith I really appreciate your honesty regarding Pakistan and India...and you are right here too to some extent. But let us all know who was Burhan Wani: A terrorist or freedom fighter..
Thanks a lot brother...You are a straight forward man. Appreciate thatI can't comment on that keeping in view the freedom of speech in India.
I don't want to get into trouble by commenting on that.Hope u understand what I think about him.
Always with the Good Muslim bad Muslim narrative.. dekha hai Good Taliban and Bad Taliban thing alsoWith Arab MONARCHs not people
I live in kashmir.
I know what we have to go through.
It will take a couple of decades and this insurgency will die out automatically. Kashmiris can see how bad siutation is in Pakistan and how Pakistani Punjabi army treats non-Punjabis in Pakistan. No rights are being denied and people are living, learning and growing gradually. The valley is gradually choosing the path of sanity.I feel PM Modi and his government is trying to really develop Kashmir, roads, Infrastructure, IT parks, tourism etc. Creating jobs and promoting tourism, will kill any narrative Pakistan resorts to, to cause violence in Kashmir using the muslim population there.
Once Indian Kashmir becomes a flourishing state it will natually make the ppl of POK want to revolt against Pakistan as their side of the land would be broke, dead going nowhere with the madarassa intellect.
Once the above is achieved Indian government can begin a seperatists movement which will ruin Pakistan for good, as handling the Balooch separatist on one side and a POK seperatists movement, will be too much for a country like Pakistan which pretty much has nothing going for it...
Making sane inferences was never a Kashmiri speciality, nor is it the reason for recent peace there.It will take a couple of decades and this insurgency will die out automatically. Kashmiris can see how bad siutation is in Pakistan and how Pakistani Punjabi army treats non-Punjabis in Pakistan. No rights are being denied and people are living, learning and growing gradually. The valley is gradually choosing the path of sanity.
I feel PM Modi and his government is trying to really develop Kashmir, roads, Infrastructure, IT parks, tourism etc. Creating jobs and promoting tourism, will kill any narrative Pakistan resorts to, to cause violence in Kashmir using the muslim population there.
Once Indian Kashmir becomes a flourishing state it will natually make the ppl of POK want to revolt against Pakistan as their side of the land would be broke, dead going nowhere with the madarassa intellect.
Once the above is achieved Indian government can begin a seperatists movement which will ruin Pakistan for good, as handling the Balooch separatist on one side and a POK seperatists movement, will be too much for a country like Pakistan which pretty much has nothing going for it...
I feel PM Modi and his government is trying to really develop Kashmir, roads, Infrastructure, IT parks, tourism etc. Creating jobs and promoting tourism, will kill any narrative Pakistan resorts to, to cause violence in Kashmir using the muslim population there.
Once Indian Kashmir becomes a flourishing state it will natually make the ppl of POK want to revolt against Pakistan as their side of the land would be broke, dead going nowhere with the madarassa intellect.
Once the above is achieved Indian government can begin a seperatists movement which will ruin Pakistan for good, as handling the Balooch separatist on one side and a POK seperatists movement, will be too much for a country like Pakistan which pretty much has nothing going for it...
Terrorism was allowed to flourish because of the corrupt state govts of Abdullah's and Muftis. 370 put a serious limitations on how Central govt could dictate the state govt. From my little experience, Kashmiri Muslims are less extremist compared to what we get in certain parts of UP.Making sane inferences was never a Kashmiri speciality, nor is it the reason for recent peace there.
Bharat should continue to punish Islamic extremism in Kashmir like they have done successfully under Modi Ji and Amit Shah's leadership. Thats the only way for a terror free state.
Studied in Chandigarh and Delhi, my experience was total opposite and that's with a sizeable Kashmiri population in our campus. Sample size was big enough to generalize, and I take no joy in saying that.Terrorism was allowed to flourish because of the corrupt state govts of Abdullah's and Muftis. 370 put a serious limitations on how Central govt could dictate the state govt. From my little experience, Kashmiri Muslims are less extremist compared to what we get in certain parts of UP.
I love how the Abdullah's and Muftis have toned down. Only a few noobs from Congress talk about reinstating 370. Almost everyone has accepted the reality and the inevitable future fully integrated with India and away from Pakistani interference.We are all Kashyapamaris. It belongs to the whole nation just like every other state of our country does. I am a Punjabi and i can proudly say that Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Assam are as much mine as is Kashyapamar. By revoking the special status PM Modi has opened and connected Kashyapamar to the rest of the country/
I love how the Abdullah's and Muftis have toned down. Only a few noobs from Congress talk about reinstating 370. Almost everyone has accepted the reality and the inevitable future fully integrated with India and away from Pakistani interference.
Studied in Chandigarh and Delhi, my experience was total opposite and that's with a sizeable Kashmiri population in our campus. Sample size was big enough to generalize, and I take no joy in saying that.
I know the college kids you are talking about and I agree. Talking to them was wildly different than meeting people actually in Kashmir. and I think things have changed in the last 4 years. No more weekly pocket money to throw stones at the army has changed the mindsets.Studied in Chandigarh and Delhi, my experience was total opposite and that's with a sizeable Kashmiri population in our campus. Sample size was big enough to generalize, and I take no joy in saying that.
It sure is. Assam belongs to every single Indian just as much as it belongs to us Assamese people.We are all Kashyapamaris. It belongs to the whole nation just like every other state of our country does. I am a Punjabi and i can proudly say that Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Assam are as much mine as is Kashyapamar. By revoking the special status PM Modi has opened and connected Kashyapamar to the rest of the country/
I see one good thing from saikia already.Bcci is hosting womens world cup,sa test match (first test match) in gauhathi .it generates normal sports traffic flow and kind of expectations with North east.it should be replicated in other states of ne .It sure is. Assam belongs to every single Indian just as much as it belongs to us Assamese people.
Having sports events in the north east is a good move.I see one good thing from saikia already.Bcci is hosting womens world cup,sa test match (first test match) in gauhathi .it generates normal sports traffic flow and kind of expectations with North east.it should be replicated in other states of ne .
My question is a bit off-topic bro.It sure is. Assam belongs to every single Indian just as much as it belongs to us Assamese people.
Under the Modi govt the spirit of unity rules J&K.
Another Hurriyat affiliate organization, Jammu and Kashmir Mass Movement, has rejected separatism, declaring complete commitment to the unity of Bharat. I sincerely welcome their move. Till now as many as 12 Hurriyat-linked organizations have broken off from secessionism, resting trust in the Constitution of India.
This is a victory of PM Shri @narendramodi Ji's vision for Ek Bharat Shreshtha Bharat.
Under the Modi govt the spirit of unity rules J&K.
Another Hurriyat affiliate organization, Jammu and Kashmir Mass Movement, has rejected separatism, declaring complete commitment to the unity of Bharat. I sincerely welcome their move. Till now as many as 12 Hurriyat-linked organizations have broken off from secessionism, resting trust in the Constitution of India.
This is a victory of PM Shri @narendramodi Ji's vision for Ek Bharat Shreshtha Bharat.
More to do with economy of both the countries, also removing the Adbullahs and Muftis always help.
“All it requires is for India's leadership to step down from the high horse that is galloping its republic towards the abyss.”
“Pursue peace with Pakistan. Sit with us. Talk to us. Let us resolve Kashmir [dispute] in accordance with the aspirations of its people.”
“Pakistan is prepared to forge a historic and phenomenal partnership with India to jointly fight terrorism.”
“Move beyond zero-sum paradigms and collaborate with Pakistan not as adversaries, but as neighbours bound by a moral and civilisational responsibility to safeguard over a billion lives in South Asia.”
Yup sit and talk about POK only .Bilawal Bhutto on Kashmir Issue & India-Pakistan Relations:
Addressing a seminar titled “Pakistan: A Bulwark Against Terrorism” in Islamabad, he said:
So nice of Pakistan not to do so. Instead, they'll go crying to the UN for the umpteenth time again in a few months.Pakistan could've annexed IOK during the recent conflict. India were on the back foot.
But, Pakistan didn't want to escalate I guess.
But who listens to them in UN..they are reprimanded for being a terrorist stateSo nice of Pakistan not to do so. Instead, they'll go crying to the UN for the umpteenth time again in a few months.
Our own Pakistani cricketers like Mohammed and hassan nawaz don’t realise the importance of this day while being paid to play in the national Mirpur stadium
The incompetence and mediocrity of our paid professionals magnifies our sheer neglect of our pride in our history
True..... Kashmiri Muslims are Indians and they are with Modiji for the development of kashmir
JUsf like how they Liberated BangladeshPakistan could've annexed IOK during the recent conflict. India were on the back foot.
But, Pakistan didn't want to escalate I guess.