What's new

Homerun vs Six - The excitement factor

Colorblind Genius

First Class Captain
Joined
Dec 24, 2019
Runs
4,208
Post of the Week
3
I have been thinking about this lately.

In cricket, a six is considered a monster if measures 100 meters or more.

However, in baseball, a homerun distance averages at 400 feet, that is 123 meters.

Yes, the baseball ball is slightly less in weight but the shape of the bat makes it hard to hit. And in a sense, puts the comparison in balance.

So, two interesting things to note here.

A. The question.
Does hitting a homerun requires more power, muscle, technique, bravado and skill than hitting a six in cricket?

And I have been inclined to believe that it is perhaps true.

The very first reason is, there is absolutely NO WAY in baseball that a miss-hit or a top edge results in a homerun.

You need to absolutely nail it to send the ball over the fence. Even the absolute slightest of miss-timing or not finding the middle of the bat, spoils it.

Second, the boundary size.
It's a standard size boundary in almost all playfields, and that is 400 feet.
Sometimes homeruns, that fall in the crowd are measured up to 460 feet or more. That's a whopping 140 meters. But that happens often in baseball.

B. The point of the thread.
The excitement factor.

Where has that gone in cricket when a 6 is hit?


Here is an example of a homerun that was hit about an hour ago. And it's a very common occurrence in baseball.
The commentators do not need to pump any fake passion, just look at the excitement of fans, that tells it all.


And here is an example in the recent past.



The question is; why don't we have this much excitement left in the cricket fans when a six it hit? I think we used to have it, but not anymore.

We shortened the boundary lines in T20, to see more sixes which would result in more excitement, resulting in more popularity and eventually more money.

I guess the excitement part worked for a year or two but now, fans have gotten just immune to it.

Obviously, you can't scare the people with the same alligator everyday.

There is a six after six during the entire game and fans hardly seem to care anymore. Commentators try hard to put fake passion but fans hardly seems to move.

Even, we at homes when watching highlights or live games, we hardly move. There some rare occasions when the games are excited, like a lot of runs are required in the last over and the batsman scores it.

What's the solution for cricket so that fans can are gripped with tension during the course of the game and jump in joy and excitement when boundary is hit?

Theoretically, the solution should be something around the scenario where hitting a six should be made harder.

Should the boundary lines be increased to at least 100 meters (I know, hardly any cricket ground will be able to accommodate it)

Should the bat size be changed?
In other words, reduce the width by an inch; from 4.25 to 3.25 inches?

Should the timber/mass in the bat be reduced?
Maximum thirty inches edge width and 50 mm spine height?

Should the ball size be reduced where the circumference be around 7.5 inches?

And this actually my open question to all members where I wanted to provoke some thought.

How can we bring back this excitement factor in T20, just like we see in fans of baseball?
 
While I agree with you, I think there’s no solution that will be beneficial to all parties. It’s a paradox of some sort.

If you elongate the boundaries, you’ll have people stop watching cricket due to the lack of excitement ie: sixes and fours. If you do decide to elongate the boundaries, you’ll first need people to acclimatize to the longer boundaries, get used to fewer boundaries and then notice an increase in ‘excitement’ when boundaries are scored. And not a lot of people will want to stick on once there is a decrease in boundaries

A few of us might say they wouldn’t mind fewer boundaries but we have to acknowledge that we aren’t a true representative of people who watch cricket. A majority of viewers don’t care about the tactics, and subsequently don’t care for forums etc. we represent less than 10% of total cricket fans. They’re really just here for the big hitting and high scores
 
As a baseball fan, I completely agree that the joy of seeing a home run being hit (unless it's against your team) is on another level compared with the manufactured excitement of a six in white ball cricket.

Sixes have become too commonplace and ordinary to merit any special applause now, blame big bats and short boundaries. Cricket as a sport has tended to thrive when the ball is in the ascendancy.
 
A homerun is a lot more exciting, a lot more difficult, requires a lot more effort and not as common as hitting a six.

In cricket, a mishit can be a six. In baseball, a mishit can be out or foul.

The most important one is: in cricket you can hit a six anywhere in the ground - 360 degrees, but in baseball a homerun can be hit in just one quadrant - 90 degrees

And in cricket, there is no equivalent of a grandslam

For me, a homerun is more exciting :-)
 
Home runs are much harder to hit than sixes, rarer, and usually more decisive.
 
A home run is rarer than a six and the excitement factor will of course be a lot more when you compare one with the other.

In modern cricket an individual six is no longer exciting but the excitement comes from the quantity of sixes in a game. T20 isn't about making every six exciting but the hypothesis is that a greater number of sixes per match will make the overall game exciting.
 
As someone who plays both, a baseball is 1000% harder to hit. It's subjective for sure but home runs are way more exciting than a 6
 
baseball is a sport where the onus is on the pitcher to not concede a homerun, in cricket the onus is on the batter to not get out.

you can reframe the same argument as saying pitching is easier as batsmen have so many disadvantages in baseball, but its immaterial as being really good at either sport is about being better than hundreds of millions who have tried their hand at the sport.

from a scientific pov homers travel further because you can swing a baseball bat significantly faster than a cricket bat, its lighter, more aerodynamic and has its "sweet spot" pretty much at the fastest travelling part during a swing.

on a side note, nice to see pakistans baseball team winning some games.
 
Back
Top