Holding and Robert’s and garner all had under 60. Bumrah will be top 5 with ease.
-
Contact the PP Team
How does the present-day Jasprit Bumrah compare with the likes of Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis?
- Thread starter MenInG
- Start date
Ab Fan
Senior Test Player
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2015
- Runs
- 28,229
They are not top 10 let alone top 5. Also, they suffered a bit due to competition from Colin Croft and lost 8-10 games to WSC.
Ab Fan
Senior Test Player
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2015
- Runs
- 28,229
lol.. First learn to post sensibly before self promotion your so called potw.
mominsaigol
T20I Star
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2021
- Runs
- 31,244
- Post of the Week
- 2
Honestly match count and wicket count as parameters for greatness are only for statisticians to obsess over.
Once a bowler develops a body of work with success and skill showcasing across wide variety of surfaces and situations then they are fit to be in conversation of game's best. Usually with modern schedules around 30-35 tests is enough for tours across countries.
At this point in his career Bumrah is already an all time great bowler. He has shown consistency and performance as a difference making bowler in all of Ind/Aus/SA/Eng.
I am not a fan of comparing players across eras but anyone who watches Bumrah knows they are seeing a special talent. Probably the first proper three format #1 bowler.
Once a bowler develops a body of work with success and skill showcasing across wide variety of surfaces and situations then they are fit to be in conversation of game's best. Usually with modern schedules around 30-35 tests is enough for tours across countries.
At this point in his career Bumrah is already an all time great bowler. He has shown consistency and performance as a difference making bowler in all of Ind/Aus/SA/Eng.
I am not a fan of comparing players across eras but anyone who watches Bumrah knows they are seeing a special talent. Probably the first proper three format #1 bowler.
They are all top 10 and they are better than any Asian bowler barring bumrah imran and wasim
Ab Fan
Senior Test Player
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2015
- Runs
- 28,229
Not for me. My top 10 in no particular order - Marshall, McGrath, Hadlee, Ambrose, Imran, Steyn, Wasim, Donald, Lillee, Cummins/ Rabada/ Bumrah. That’s 12.
What is your top 10?
Marshall
Mcgrath
Hadlee
Steyn
Ambrose
Bumrah
Rabada
Garner
Imran
Wasim
Cummins
Holding
In order for me if you say 12
Lillee is far too overrated
Donald choked too much vs Aus.
Ab Fan
Senior Test Player
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2015
- Runs
- 28,229
So, Roberts and Holding aren’t in your top 10 either so I don’t know why you said they are top 10?
I was going to say above Donald and Lillee sorry
I was going through the list and then I was like yea Nha I can’t put him above Rabada or garner or even Cummins.
Actually thinking of it, arguably a case can easily be made for holding over Wasim. Wasim average vs top 4 teams of his era was only 28.25
Ab Fan
Senior Test Player
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2015
- Runs
- 28,229
Lille’s WPM is simply phenomenal. 5 WPM tells us about his ability to run through sides.
Donald worst avg is vs Aus which is 31. Not too bad.
Garner is too high in your list. Just 7 5-fers and avg is freakish probably due to playing in strong team with all superstar bowlers. ATG bowler but just misses out from a top10 for me.
I will take Donald over Garner by just.
Wasim should be lower actually
Imran can stay where he is
Would still say garner is better though than all including Donald.
Ab Fan
Senior Test Player
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2015
- Runs
- 28,229
Garner is behind them all.
Wasim has 400 wickets at 23, IK 350 at 22 and Donald 330 at 22.
Buffet
Post of the Week winner
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2011
- Runs
- 27,426
- Post of the Week
- 3
Looking at only wickets tally without looking at opposition is not right way to judge any player. Garner had high quality wickets and majority of wickets were against the top 4 opposition.
Garner against top 4 oppositions - 252 wickets at avg of 20 - That's an elite category. He has 259 career wickets, so 97% of his career wickets came against top sides during his career. Even if you include 4 tests against India, he still has avg of 20.xx, that would be 100% of his career.
To put it in context,
Some one like Wasim has 244 wickets at avg of 26 against top 5 opposition home and away combined. Wasim does have 170 wickets against bottom 2 teams/minnows at avg of 20. Garners's output against top teams was equal to Wasim's output against bottom/minnows. Picking 400 or 600 wickets won't change that fact. Both played enough against top teams and outputs were vastly different.
Garner can make a strong claim among the top 10 pacers. He may miss for some posters, but just looking at wickets tally will be way off the mark when rating Garner. Garner's 250 wickets were golden at avg of 20 because it was mostly against top sides. You can stil rate Wasim due to various intangibles.
Legacy is made with performance against good teams and during tough tours. Garner passes that filter with a flying colors just like Marshall, McGrath, Bumrah, IK etc.
Ab Fan
Senior Test Player
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2015
- Runs
- 28,229
I am not looking at only wickets tally here for Garner. Let’s talk a bit about how his career spanned.
Garner was seen as the support act in that four man pace attack, which initially was led by Andy Roberts and Michael Holding. Colin Croft also emerged during the same time and his fearsome pace took the spotlight straightaway. Then a year later, Marshall debuted and soon he started leading the attack with Holding. Garner was always seen as support act till 1984 when he finally got the new ball.
Now, he has great record and astonishing numbers but a lot of those who have seen them play would consider him at about similar level as Roberts and Holding. I can probably dig deep on these three w.r.t test matches they played( durability, too much competition, WSC matches etc) but this is not the thread about them.
Now, back to Bumrah, my point is that assuming he plays 60 tests and the quality he has brought, it will probably put him in the league of top 10 fast bowlers of all time( tests) but to be a top 5, I don’t really think it is enough. You have Marshall, McGrath, Hadlee, Ambrose with same quality and longer careers. Top 5 will require Bumrah to maintain that quality over longer period.
Don’t care
Garner was a better bowler than both tbh
Bumrah has already done more than Wasim and Imran away from home. He is already 6th right now.
But yea for longevity 60 is plenty. Some greats have played 60 to 70.
sweep_shot
Test Captain
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2016
- Runs
- 48,725
Bumrah is 2 levels below Waqar and 4-5 levels below Wasim. No comparison whatsoever.
Wasim and Waqar were not chuckers. Bumrah is potentially a chucker (we can't tell until he gets tested).
Wasim and Waqar were not chuckers. Bumrah is potentially a chucker (we can't tell until he gets tested).
Ab Fan
Senior Test Player
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2015
- Runs
- 28,229
Not yet for me. Lack of durability in case of Bumrah puts him at 12-13 spot for me.
AZulfi
First Class Player
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2011
- Runs
- 2,767
- Post of the Week
- 1
Andy Roberts (known for his raw pace and ability to generate unpredictable, unplayable bounce) is a notable omission in your list. Many incl. Botham rate him the best and the most dangerous among the original fearsome Windies Quartet of Holding, Clarke, Roberts and Garner. Malcolm Marshall was not very threatening in the initial part of his career. He became a better and more complete bowler after 1983.
Pak fans can’t rate him fully until he performs in Tests against them.
AZulfi
First Class Player
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2011
- Runs
- 2,767
- Post of the Week
- 1
Andy Roberts dismissing both Chappell brothers
AZulfi
First Class Player
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2011
- Runs
- 2,767
- Post of the Week
- 1
meant Croft. Clarke was a decent bowler too
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2023
- Runs
- 35,818
atm, Bumrah's only issue is longevity.. If he conquers it, he is my top 3 for sure.
Ab Fan
Senior Test Player
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2015
- Runs
- 28,229
Lillee is better than Roberts and best bowler of his generation (70s).
AZulfi
First Class Player
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2011
- Runs
- 2,767
- Post of the Week
- 1
Lillee was average on sub-continental pitches
AZulfi
First Class Player
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2011
- Runs
- 2,767
- Post of the Week
- 1
Although Lillee played only 4 tests in Asia, 3 vs Pak and 1 vs SLA, his record was poor.
Only 6 wickets in 4 tests at 68.33
Sachin fan
Tape Ball Star
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2025
- Runs
- 994
Yes because we always judge players by one series and wasim and waqar never had any average or bad series.Ben Stokes Out bowled Bumrah at Lords in second Innings.. Bumrah was taken out of attack when Joe Root came to bat. The best opposition batter comes to crease anf your Generational opts to finish spell due to work load
The points being used are ridiculous
Ab Fan
Senior Test Player
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2015
- Runs
- 28,229
That’s a very low sample honestly. Also, Subcontinent didn’t hold much relevance back in 70s. Lillee is widely regarded as one of the greatest bowlers of all time and his duels vs Viv is well remembered. Actually these two can also be considered best cricketers of 1970s.
AZulfi
First Class Player
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2011
- Runs
- 2,767
- Post of the Week
- 1
It will be between Andy Roberts and Dennis Lillee, according to Botham
AZulfi
First Class Player
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2011
- Runs
- 2,767
- Post of the Week
- 1
Lillee is indeed one of the greatest bowlers, but there were many other great bowlers in his era incl. the fearsome Windies quartet. I was just pointing out his record in Asia. During the three test series in Pakistan in 1980, Lillee only took 3 wickets at 101!
Sachin fan
Tape Ball Star
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2025
- Runs
- 994
I don't have any issues with people wanting longevity as a factor for greatness. But it's funny when the same guys hype Asif, Amir and Akhtar or don't consider longevity when comparing Smith vs Sachin.
At least be consistent in your logic and arguments. You cannot have it both ways.
At least be consistent in your logic and arguments. You cannot have it both ways.
Ab Fan
Senior Test Player
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2015
- Runs
- 28,229
Yeah, fair to say that Andy Roberts
is one of those bowlers whose peer reputation often exceeds his raw stats. Even Gavaskar rated him as the toughest he faced. But his overall record is not really a top level and inferior to about 6-7 names from 70s and 80s.
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2023
- Runs
- 35,818
STAY ON TOPIC
Impact fear factor
Match winning ability
All matters more
At his peak he is better than all of those guys I put below him. That’s all matters.
If he gets to 65 tests he is in top 3 provided he finishes with similar stats to say Steyn in terms of average.
Longevity matters only to an extent.
When you have played enough away matches then it’s a non issue. Like in bumrahs case.
He is already the best ever Asian bowler of all time.
If he was a Sena bowler and got to bowl entirely on Sena pitches and stat pad vs crap teams (which he does) then he would average like 17.
I am very impartial when it comes to discerning a player’s ability. I never rate someone high unless they prove themselves. I hate stat padders and that’s why I dislike kohli Rohit etc. but bumrah is truly something else.
It’s not even close.
Lollee is rubbish outside helpful pitches. So overrated.
He doesn’t play vs trash teams
Yea and then we all have to wake up one day to reality. Waqar is not better than shami. Shami is far better.Bumrah is 2 levels below Waqar and 4-5 levels below Wasim. No comparison whatsoever.
Wasim and Waqar were not chuckers. Bumrah is potentially a chucker (we can't tell until he gets tested).
Let alone bumrah. Siraj probably won more away matches in sea than useless Waqar.
RidiculousMan
T20I Debutant
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2023
- Runs
- 8,134
A bowler that cannot even remain fit cannot contest among goats. It's a disgrace to Cricketing Legends of the past
Sachin fan
Tape Ball Star
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2025
- Runs
- 994
Yet he has amongst the most overs bowled in test among fast bowlers in the last couple of years. And is nearing 250 wickets
And as I said, you guys hype Akhtar, asif, Amir who have way less matches and wickets, lol
mominsaigol
T20I Star
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2021
- Runs
- 31,244
- Post of the Week
- 2
Smith has played 120 tests and is about to retire. That is longevity. But I agree with the rest of your argument
Sachin fan
Tape Ball Star
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2025
- Runs
- 994
But still doesn't have the longevity Sachin had. Bumrah is nearing 250 tests wickets. Either longevity matters or it doesn't, you cannot selectively use it for comparing Wasim/Waqar vs Bumrah and then not consider it when comparing Sachin vs Smith.
And reminder, Sachin's average etc at this this stage is way closer to Smith than Wasim/Waqars is to Bumrah.
If Smith>Sachin based on slight increase in average than Bumrah>>>Wasim and waqar using the same logic
mominsaigol
T20I Star
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2021
- Runs
- 31,244
- Post of the Week
- 2
Longetivity should not be a metric in terms of match count.
It should be career vs Career. Smith throughout his career has achieved success same as Sachin.
The reason people talk about bumrah isnt due to match count, its cause he literally cannot play more then 2 tests in a row without huffing and puffing.
The reason he did so poorly in england is cause he had no stamina. His stamina was brutally exposed in this series.
The reason he doesnt have a 10 fer as well is cause he doesmt bowl that many overs for test standards.
No one sane or knowledgeable looks at his match count.
Sachin fan
Tape Ball Star
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2025
- Runs
- 994
Yet Bumrah is the bowlers who bowled the most number of overs in tests since 2024.
He was coming back from an injury which is why management wanted him to play only 3 tests and he choose to do it, it was voluntary,.not forced.
Just a reminder, except couple of trundlers no bowler bowled in all 10 innings of the England series, not even stokes.
You cannot compare him with bowlers who have barely bowled since 2024 and hence are able to play more matches.
You guys just hold bumrah to different standards compared to any other bowlers. I will repeat, even now he is among the bowlers bowling most overs in tests.
I remember the same mental gymnastics with sachin
mominsaigol
T20I Star
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2021
- Runs
- 31,244
- Post of the Week
- 2
Don't say You guys with me. I am not aware of what other people are arguing and couldn't bother.
I acknowledge bumrah skills wise is the best bowler on the planet atm. However he won't make it to top 5 or top 10 bowlers of all time that people have portrayed him to be.
The truth is despite his skills he hasn't even had 10% the career of Starc despite india being the world's strongest odi and t20 team and the world's best away touring team in tests and best home team in test.
Starc was directly responsible for wc 2015 win, was crucial in 2023 wtc and wc win. Has the greatest pink ball test bowling figured of all time, fastest 5 wicket haul, has 10 fers and has 400 wickets with amazing bgt and ashes performance.
His only black mark is BGT away series and a horrible 2021 t20 cup despite Australia winning it. Starc was awful.
Bumrah in comparison has a laughable test career given his current team state. As a bowler he will be remembered for losing India's first home series in a long time which was a whitewash, as well as ending india's dominace vs Australia in aus den.
He will also be remembered for his cr 2017 and wc 2023 botch despite winning a 2024 wc cup for his team.
jeeteshssaxena
T20I Debutant
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2017
- Runs
- 6,519
Wasim is ahead for now cos he has 400+ wkts, so the difference in average can be countered with longevity.
As soon as Bumrah reaches 300 wkts he will only be judged on quality as 300 wkts is enough longevity.
The likes of Lillee, Khan have 350 odd wickets, Marshall is Goat contender and he has 380 wkts.
Bumrah is already ahead of Waqar because of his average performances against top team.
As soon as Bumrah reaches 300 wkts he will only be judged on quality as 300 wkts is enough longevity.
The likes of Lillee, Khan have 350 odd wickets, Marshall is Goat contender and he has 380 wkts.
Bumrah is already ahead of Waqar because of his average performances against top team.
jeeteshssaxena
T20I Debutant
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2017
- Runs
- 6,519
Bumrah will be remembered for doing what no other Asian bowler could do i.e win two back to back series in Aus and making the two best batsman of this generation his bunny.
On top of that he is already the GOAT t20i bowler.
On top of that he is already the GOAT t20i bowler.
Ab Fan
Senior Test Player
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2015
- Runs
- 28,229
Yes but why do you think the top 3 or top 5 fast bowlers of all time lacks these criteria - Marshall, McGrath, Hadlee, Ambrose, Steyn, Imran.
Ambrose and Hadlee have phenomenal record in Australia. Steyn has phenomenal record in era of flat tracks across all parts of the world. Imran has phenomenal series in Windies with bowl and freakish home dominance.Averages under 30 everywhere.
In addition to having impact, fear factor, match winning ability, they also had longevity and it is beyond 80 tests.
Reckon Bumrah with 60-65 tests will be at same level as Donald or Lillee or Wasim or Cummins / Rabada(they can get to 100) in Tests.
RyanRyan10
First Class Star
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2018
- Runs
- 3,847
India should aim to be an exceptional team rather than worrying about their best players being considered GOATs. Not many people will change their opinion of Bumrah when no matches are being played or after just a handful of games, whether the opinions are positive or negative. I know some individuals have revised their opinions but that has more to do with Bumrah's nationality and those opinions shouldn't be taken seriously.
You are also right about Pakistani fans overhyping Akhtar, Asif, and Amir. Bumrah has made Pakistan fans respect the two Ws more than they do. Not long ago, there was a thread discussing 90s players lacking a legacy, and some posters who are using the two Ws to belittle Bumrah here claimed they had no legacy. Waqar has been scrutinized many times on this forum by Pakistani fans and most sided with Amir when he retired blaming Waqar. Waqar's failure to win an ICC trophy is often brought up to make Amir look better.
Similar threads
