What's new

"I am yet to be paid": Carlos Brathwaite reveals the dark side of franchise cricket

Ball Blazer

Local Club Star
Staff member
Joined
Apr 13, 2025
Runs
1,738
Brathwaite is among the first crop of players who had played T20 leagues around the world and have seen all the lifestyle had to offer.

However, he felt that the glitz and glamour of franchise cricket often masks the big financial struggles players in them face. In a blog LinkedIn profile, the 37-year-old revealed that three franchises he had played for previously had delayed paying him for months on end while one franchise is yet to pay him.

The post reads:

"In recent years, franchise cricket has exploded from the glitz of the IPL to start-ups in the smallest Associate nations. With the boom has come a growing crack in the system: late payments, or worse, no payments at all. It’s a pandemic. One that players especially local and up-and-coming talent feel most sharply.

In 2024, I personally had three franchise contracts where payments were delayed 6 to 8 months. As I write this in July 2025, I’m still owed money from one of them. And if this is happening to me, imagine what it's like for a young local player making his debut. The harsh reality? That young player might’ve taken leave from work, betting on an opportunity that should’ve been life-changing, but left him without income from either his job or the tournament. A vendor supplying meals, refreshments, or transport, waiting for a cheque that may never arrive. That vendor may never do business with cricket again. What kind of introduction is that to our sport?

Should we expect players to vet the tournament owners themselves? Or maybe agents to do the homework and only recommend secure gigs? Should the World Cricketers Association (WCA) ensure funds are liquid before a player signs? Or should the ICC, which already has sanctioning power, mandate that all player salaries (plus a buffer—say 10% for operational costs) be held in escrow before a ball is bowled?

There’s also the question of territorial boards. If a board signs off on a tournament in its country, should it share in the liability if players aren’t paid? Especially when their endorsement is what gives these events legitimacy in the first place?

After all, for a franchise tournament to be ICC-sanctioned, it already has to meet rigorous requirements: vetting the promoter, ensuring anti-corruption compliance, and securing NOCs for overseas players. So why not simply require that money to pay players and staff is actually available and protected?

We’re quick to showcase our growth as a sport through shiny new leagues, but late payments leave a stain, not just on tournaments but on cricket itself. The integrity of our game doesn’t stop at match-fixing; it extends to how we treat people behind the scenes.

At the end of the day, this isn't about millionaires chasing more millions. It's about protecting young dreams, community trust, and the basic principle of doing what we said we'd do; paying people for their work.

So again I ask: Who pays the players? And more importantly, who makes sure they get paid?"

Brathwaite has appeared for over two dozen franchises in his career, including Kolkata Knight Riders, Delhi Daredevils (now Delhi Capitals) and Sunrisers Hyderabad in the Indian Premier League.

In 2024, Brathwaite played for Gulf Giants in the International League T20 (ILT20) and for Lahore Qalandars in the Pakistan Super League (PSL) and in the Global Super League (GSL).
 
Last edited:
Brathwaite is among the first crop of players who had played T20 leagues around the world and have seen all the lifestyle had to offer.

However, he felt that the glitz and glamour of franchise cricket often masks the big financial struggles players in them face. In a blog LinkedIn profile, the 37-year-old revealed that three franchises he had played for previously had delayed paying him for months on end while one franchise is yet to pay him.

The post reads:

"In recent years, franchise cricket has exploded from the glitz of the IPL to start-ups in the smallest Associate nations. With the boom has come a growing crack in the system: late payments, or worse, no payments at all. It’s a pandemic. One that players especially local and up-and-coming talent feel most sharply.

In 2024, I personally had three franchise contracts where payments were delayed 6 to 8 months. As I write this in July 2025, I’m still owed money from one of them. And if this is happening to me, imagine what it's like for a young local player making his debut. The harsh reality? That young player might’ve taken leave from work, betting on an opportunity that should’ve been life-changing, but left him without income from either his job or the tournament. A vendor supplying meals, refreshments, or transport, waiting for a cheque that may never arrive. That vendor may never do business with cricket again. What kind of introduction is that to our sport?

Should we expect players to vet the tournament owners themselves? Or maybe agents to do the homework and only recommend secure gigs? Should the World Cricketers Association (WCA) ensure funds are liquid before a player signs? Or should the ICC, which already has sanctioning power, mandate that all player salaries (plus a buffer—say 10% for operational costs) be held in escrow before a ball is bowled?

There’s also the question of territorial boards. If a board signs off on a tournament in its country, should it share in the liability if players aren’t paid? Especially when their endorsement is what gives these events legitimacy in the first place?

After all, for a franchise tournament to be ICC-sanctioned, it already has to meet rigorous requirements: vetting the promoter, ensuring anti-corruption compliance, and securing NOCs for overseas players. So why not simply require that money to pay players and staff is actually available and protected?

We’re quick to showcase our growth as a sport through shiny new leagues, but late payments leave a stain, not just on tournaments but on cricket itself. The integrity of our game doesn’t stop at match-fixing; it extends to how we treat people behind the scenes.

At the end of the day, this isn't about millionaires chasing more millions. It's about protecting young dreams, community trust, and the basic principle of doing what we said we'd do; paying people for their work.

So again I ask: Who pays the players? And more importantly, who makes sure they get paid?"

Brathwaite has appeared for over two dozen franchises in his career, including Kolkata Knight Riders, Delhi Daredevils (now Delhi Capitals) and Sunrisers Hyderabad in the Indian Premier League.

In 2024, Brathwaite played for Gulf Giants in the International League T20 (ILT20) and for Lahore Qalandars in the Pakistan Super League (PSL) and in the Global Super League (GSL).
In 2024, Brathwaite played for Gulf Giants in the International League T20 (ILT20) and for Lahore Qalandars in the Pakistan Super League (PSL) and in the Global Super League (GSL).

SO these are three franchises and from These mentioned teams no suprise which franchise haven't paid to him :kp
 
Went through his Linkedin profile. He is an educated guy and has started his own company in the UK. Good for him.

When it comes to franchise cricket, ICC messed up big time. In international cricket, ICC has a very good hold, if you compare it to field hockey, but in franchise cricket they have given it as a free for all.

Franchise cricket needs to have regulated calenders with proper players market. Give two windows in an year for 3 months each to franchise cricket leagues and have a proper trade and regularize market so players are paid and funds are there when leagues are being started.

The league cricket is more like the real estate industry of Pakistan. Start a project without funds, invite stakefolders and give them just a form, collect capital over the time and than pay out.
 
There are too many leagues coming up these days that are basically just money-laundering operations. Others like BPL don't do proper due-diligence while selling franchises to shady individuals. Players and their agents should demonstrate better judgment while signing up for these leagues because there is no oversight body that can hold these leagues accountable.

One dead give-away is that a number of them operate in the UAE or Carribean nations. The former because of its proximity to betting markets and the latter because of the loose regulartory overisght in those countries
 
There are too many leagues coming up these days that are basically just money-laundering operations. Others like BPL don't do proper due-diligence while selling franchises to shady individuals. Players and their agents should demonstrate better judgment while signing up for these leagues because there is no oversight body that can hold these leagues accountable.

One dead give-away is that a number of them operate in the UAE or Carribean nations. The former because of its proximity to betting markets and the latter because of the loose regulartory overisght in those countries
Not to mention, UAE and Caribbean nations are off-shore friendly economies
 
In 2024, Brathwaite played for Gulf Giants in the International League T20 (ILT20) and for Lahore Qalandars in the Pakistan Super League (PSL) and in the Global Super League (GSL).

SO these are three franchises and from These mentioned teams no suprise which franchise haven't paid to him :kp
No wonder he was being called a joke of a cricketer early in this thread :srt
 
There are too many leagues coming up these days that are basically just money-laundering operations. Others like BPL don't do proper due-diligence while selling franchises to shady individuals. Players and their agents should demonstrate better judgment while signing up for these leagues because there is no oversight body that can hold these leagues accountable.

One dead give-away is that a number of them operate in the UAE or Carribean nations. The former because of its proximity to betting markets and the latter because of the loose regulartory overisght in those countries
What I don't understand and maybe someone more informed than me can explain - I keep hearing how lucrative these T20 leagues are, how international cricket doesn't pay the players bills and how they represent the real future of cricket.

However outside the major leagues like IPL, Big Bash etc - there's reports of some franchises struggling to break even, delaying payment of wages or failing to pay wages whatsoever. Infact FICA's report in 2024 stated 1 in 4 players in sanctioned leagues have experienced payment issues.

This (T10) league in the Cayman Islands has literally been cancelled as the players haven't been paid and went on strike.

We keep hearing about how economically "unsustainable" international cricket is, which certainly has issues, but shouldn't we start talking about economically unsustainable T20 cricket too ? @Nikhil_cric
 
What I don't understand and maybe someone more informed than me can explain - I keep hearing how lucrative these T20 leagues are, how international cricket doesn't pay the players bills and how they represent the real future of cricket.

However outside the major leagues like IPL, Big Bash etc - there's reports of some franchises struggling to break even, delaying payment of wages or failing to pay wages whatsoever. Infact FICA's report in 2024 stated 1 in 4 players in sanctioned leagues have experienced payment issues.

This (T10) league in the Cayman Islands has literally been cancelled as the players haven't been paid and went on strike.

We keep hearing about how economically "unsustainable" international cricket is, which certainly has issues, but shouldn't we start talking about economically unsustainable T20 cricket too ? @Nikhil_cric

I think people already are talking about them . Outside of IPL, BBL, Hundred , SA20, PSL and CPL, I'm not sure many leagues have been particularly successful or are meaningful in anyway.
 
What I don't understand and maybe someone more informed than me can explain - I keep hearing how lucrative these T20 leagues are, how international cricket doesn't pay the players bills and how they represent the real future of cricket.

However outside the major leagues like IPL, Big Bash etc - there's reports of some franchises struggling to break even, delaying payment of wages or failing to pay wages whatsoever. Infact FICA's report in 2024 stated 1 in 4 players in sanctioned leagues have experienced payment issues.

This (T10) league in the Cayman Islands has literally been cancelled as the players haven't been paid and went on strike.

We keep hearing about how economically "unsustainable" international cricket is, which certainly has issues, but shouldn't we start talking about economically unsustainable T20 cricket too ? @Nikhil_cric
You make a great point. And personally, I think this term is a misnomer. I think outside of IPL; SA20, PSL, BBL, Hundred and CPL are the only legit leagues. ILT20 and MLC can be considered legit with some asterisks.

The rest either don’t generate real revenue or are propped up by private money with zero return. They inflate player salaries to attract names, but there’s no ecosystem underneath. No gate revenue, no meaningful TV deals, no local engagement. It’s all surface-level.
 
You make a great point. And personally, I think this term is a misnomer. I think outside of IPL; SA20, ILT20, PSL, BBL, Hundred, CPL and MLC are the only legit leagues. LPL and BPL might be legit but they have historically had a number of different financial issues as well.

The rest either don’t generate real revenue or are propped up by private money with zero return. They inflate player salaries to attract names, but there’s no ecosystem underneath. No gate revenue, no meaningful TV deals, no local engagement. It’s all surface-level.
I'm actually surprised if even ILT20 and MLC are profitable . Like who do they even market it to?

Are locals really interested in these leagues?
 
I'm actually surprised if even ILT20 and MLC are profitable . Like who do they even market it to?

Are locals really interested in these leagues?
ILT20 is basically a sponsor-driven corporate showcase that happens to be a cricket league. Franchises have low operational costs, salaries are tax-free, and most of the revenue comes from broadcast rights (Zee), sponsorships and franchise fees, rather than ticket sales. The local interest is limited, but the Emirates board doesn’t need crowds when they’ve got cash-rich owners and guaranteed media deals.

MLC has a smaller scale but more focused model. They had investments from IPL franchises, but also locked down $100M+ funding round via investors like Satya Nadella, Adobe CEO etc. and signed a multi-year broadcast deal with Willow. With MLC, it feels like a long-term thing. They are betting big on the South Asian/Indian diaspora to get interested in the sport over time.

That said, both leagues are built on an artificial eco-system that is propped up by capital and corporates, rather than fan interest or organic demand.
 
MLC is just in its initial stages, US has many sports , another one wouldn’t hurt due to good cricket loving expats.

Problem is desis usually run bad businesses but having Corporations run them probably helps.
 
In any franchise sport, the money is there for the taking, but franchise teams must win for sponsors to pay out. Simple as that. If a team is losing on the field its losing in the bank too.

In the West, additional laws come into play, for example, player salaries are ring fenced in Football, Cricket, Tennis etc.

Plus with more and more T20 pyjama leagues, the money is even further dispersed.

There is more money in International Cricket than pyjama leagues for these reasons.

Anyway, why are mercenaries complaining about not getting paid on time? They know the rules. No win. No pay.
 
MLC is just in its initial stages, US has many sports , another one wouldn’t hurt due to good cricket loving expats.

Problem is desis usually run bad businesses but having Corporations run them probably helps.
They've done the smart thing of attracting the right people. Sundar Pichai, the CEO of Google co-founded the league. A number of the Indian CEOs of big corporations have major stakes in the league. While in other cases, they own entire teams. I believe Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella partly owns Seattle Orcas aswell, while San Francisco Unicorns is completely owned by a couple of Indian venture capitalists. On top of that, San Francisco Unicorns and Washington Freedom have formed partnerships with Cricket Victoria and Cricket NSW, which will give them access to a pipeline of Australian talent, and likely be beneficial for them in the long-run if they want access to coaching, high-performance expertise etc.
 
It can't be a PSL Franchise, the PCB pays the players in advance from their end and then claims the amount as a reimbursement from the franchises afterwards
 
It can't be a PSL Franchise, the PCB pays the players in advance from their end and then claims the amount as a reimbursement from the franchises afterwards

Brathwaite plays in many unknown leagues. He was probably referring to those leagues.

I remember one African league once failed to pay players and players declined to play.
 
Back
Top