JaDed
T20I Captain
- Joined
- May 5, 2014
- Runs
- 43,009
I'm from Gujarat. I never really liked Rohit but he's turned out to be a brilliant LOI batsman.
Fair enough bro ,i guess i have a bias against him and its pretty visible when i post as well
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm from Gujarat. I never really liked Rohit but he's turned out to be a brilliant LOI batsman.
Finally our players are having the guts to give out Pakistaniesque interviews
This is almost an Indian version of ghar ka kohli interview
#ghar ka amir

Already 3 pages for this thread, I wonder how many will this reach before 19th march and who will get to bump it on that day![]()
![]()
Wasim and Waqar did it. Imran did it.
Steyn does it from time to time.
The West Indian quartet could do it too.

Rohit will smash Amir this time. He's the ultimate FTB playing in his favourite ground. Amir is mediocre on flat tracks.
Sharjeel needs to fire or we're going to lose yet again.
No chance man. Bumrah will dismiss him easily. He's just a legside hack.
Lol Pakistan aren't coming in the first place.
Don't think they could on flat pattas like the one in Australia recently, without reverse swing. We all know how that's only possible in Tests now. In LOIs with the 2 new ball rule, it's practically out of the game. Add to that all the support batsmen get these days like their bats and shorter boundaries, and you'd be hard pressed to make an equal comparison. Even steyn and starc got smashed in the IPL.
No chance man. Bumrah will dismiss him easily. He's just a legside hack.
Bumrah is the perfect bowler to get sharjeel out as he always angles it away from the lefty. Sharjeel must hate such kind of bowlers.
If he fires a 50, our chances of winning increase tenfold.
I know but i feel getting sharjeel out is child's play for any thinking bowler like ashwin.
When did LOIs come into the picture?
We were just comparing the two tasks. While I agree that batsmen should be able to adapt to green seaming wickets however malicious they may be, a lot of bowlers get away easily on flat tracks doing nothing. It's true that you can't be as dangerous, however a tall bowler or a capable bowler can well extract whatever out of an unresponsive track for pace bowlers. Morne did it with a spectacular spell against India. Steyn did it in Galle. Australian bowlers regularly do it on their pattas. A lot of bowlers did it in the past. Yes, Imran, 2 Ws did it on wickets which were considered the graveyard for pace bowling.
It's true that a batsman always gets ridiculed when he isn't able to adapt to green tracks (where literally every ball will have your name on the delivery), whereas pace bowlers are completely ignored and given leeway on unresponsive tracks. We all saw how innocuous and "soft" the kiwi attack was when the ball stopped doing something. Our bowlers can't do jack on flat tracks, whereas perform well on helpful wickets. So why the special privilege for bowlers only?
I know but i feel getting sharjeel out is child's play for any thinking bowler like ashwin.
Sharjeel's problem is shot selection and trying to fire too early. He needs to give himself just a little bit of time to get a feel for the pitch and his opposition.
Because as you mentioned yourself how few bowlers of the past could extract some venom out of a lifeless pitch. However, on the other hand, there have been countless other batsmen who have been able to play on green tracks as well as flat.
And we are talking LOIs because that's what Rohit and the people here are judging Amir on.
So no, in LOIs it's even a bigger advantage for batsmen these days due to the pattas and lack of reverse swing.
I was actually talking generally and not specifically about the LOIs. I know that the rules are in favour of the batsmen on flat tracks. And even if Amir isn't as venomous at the Eden Gardens, I won't rate him any lower. Anyway I wasn't talking about Amir specifically here, but all bowlers in general.
I know that it is very hard for bowlers to run through sides on a flat pitch. However quality bowlers will always find a way to stem the flow of runs and build pressure and thereby get a few wickets even on unresponsive wickets.
No doubt, and that's what's the difference between guys like Bumrah (from what we've seen thus far), Amir, Steyn etc (not that they're each comparable) and guys like Ishant, Umar Gul (nowadays) and any other trundler you can think of. These guys leak far more runs than the aforementioned even on flat tracks.
Comparatively it's a lot easier for batsmen to score on a green wicket because a) after a period of time (heck a few overs in the indo-pak game), the ball stops misbehaving and b) if your technique is good, you can score even when the ball still is doing something unlike the case with bowling on flat tracks where the most you can do is contain. So that's why there's a 'double standard'.
Like who?
adding oil to it 
Rohit Sharma has spiced up the next encounter for the fans.adding oil to it
![]()

Key difference here is that if it were a statement made by some Pakistani cricketer ex or current flaming Kohli, and suggesting that he's a "normal batsman" then most of the pakistani fans would be against him; however, in this case, with the indian doing the trash talking you can see how their fans are split with half of them defending this stance. Which fanbase has the biggest chest-thumpers now?
I agree with you in LOIs.
However in tests, on green wickets, all it takes is one little error in judgment to get your wicket. Almost all of the deliveries in atleast the first two sessions will have your name on it, and one little shot offered to a slightly fuller ball, or a single error in judgement of the line of the ball, and you will be on your way to the pavilion. However bowlers, even if they go for a few runs in one spell, they can always come back again in a new spell or with the old ball, or even when the ball is changed, to get wickets in their new spell. Bowlers do get some leeway for errors in Tests, unlike batsmen.
So I think the difference is exaggerated in Tests.
The only difference is Kohli won his team many games just in the recent past and Amir hasn't won a single game on his own. TBH, his inability to clean up UAE batsmen on a helpful pitch took the sheen out of his performance against India. Hence the bravado from rivals.
The only difference is Kohli won his team many games just in the recent past and Amir hasn't won a single game on his own. TBH, his inability to clean up UAE batsmen on a helpful pitch took the sheen out of his performance against India. Hence the bravado from rivals.
Won't, until the Pakistani batsmen are shamed in to performing. It's safe to say that Aamirs inclusion has had no impact on Pakistan's fortunes so far.Did you watch that Pakistan vs UAE game? Amir was toying them and they were desperately trying to see him off. In a T20. He still picked up two wickets.
Amir, being a bowler, will have more match-winning performances than Kohli, who is also 4-5 years older than him.
Starc is the only one that is comparable.There is Michel Stark. There is another one too. Read my previous passage more carefully, you'll find the answer.![]()
(Point to note My favorite bowler is Amir too, but currently I believe there are few others who are ahead of him because they are proven whereas Amir just returned)
The only difference is Kohli won his team many games just in the recent past and Amir hasn't won a single game on his own. TBH, his inability to clean up UAE batsmen on a helpful pitch took the sheen out of his performance against India. Hence the bravado from rivals.
How does a bowler run through a team in a 20/20 ?? That too defending 80 runs, even if the track is helpful ??
If you haven't figured 20/20 is a game totally made for batsmen and sloggers because a bowler has only max 4 overs.
I keep saying if you want a proper contest then Tests are the real battle between a bowler and batsman. ODIs less so because a bowler is still restricted in his lines and how many overs he can bowl but still we can see at least a mini battle and the bowler at least can get in some rhythm.
Amir could have got 6 or 7 wickets but how on earth can he "win on his own" in such a format defending such a low total ??
We've already discussed that bowling in LOIs is at a distinct disadvantage than batting. Even on "green tracks". The ones here the ball stops swinging within a few overs.
And being able to run through attacks isn't a requirement to be a good bowler. He's far better than a "normal bowler" and if the great wasim akram thinks so then who or what is Rohit in comparison.
Did you watch that Pakistan vs UAE game? Amir was toying them and they were desperately trying to see him off. In a T20. He still picked up two wickets.
Amir, being a bowler, will have more match-winning performances than Kohli, who is also 4-5 years older than him.
Wasim hasn't faced Amir. Wasim hasn't scored double hundreds in ODIs. Wasim isn't just back from a block buster Australian tour. Rohit might be incorrect in calling Amir an ordinary bowler but don't question his credentials. FTB or not, he's done a few things that a lot of other batsmen could only dream of. Now imagine the ego on such a guy. Imagine his disgust when his own media talks about the same opponent. Now read what he said.
I'm well aware of the proceedings and how his ego brought about this statement. That still doesn't justify it. That's what we're arguing here, whether what he said has any credibility or not; we're not arguing why he said it.
Also, what does scoring double hundreds on flat pattas have to do with anything? What good is that experience if you can't survive two balls in slightly challenging conditions? Block buster australian tour? You mean on flat tracks? Again I ask, what exactly does that prove? We're discussing bowlers here, and Wasim has 10x better knowledge about bowling and bowlers who are worthy of being complimented like Amir. So yes, in that regard, again, who or what is Rohit? When he comes into the league of Tendulkar and Lara and such then sure I'll give his statements on bowling some credibility. Until then he's a nobody, at least in this context.
Rohit knows that the green pitch was an anomaly. Yes, Australian pitches are flat, Indian pitches are flat. In fact LOI cricket for the most part is played on flat pitches. You yourself called Rohit a bully or a master on those pitches when you casually called him a FTB. So yes, he thinks Amir just had a good day against India that too on a green pitch. He thinks he can dominate him. Why wouldn't he? Amir hasn't exactly set the world alight except for that one game. He was part of a game where NZ scored 170 without losing a wicket. He did OK in the ODIs but it didn't matter much as the team lost. Zero five wicket hauls so far. He struggled to pick wickets on flat wickets against mediocre batsmen ( compared to International batsmen) in PSL. He couldn't pluck out UAE batsmen, didn't make much of a difference against BD. All of these games are on flatter wickets and Rohit is one of the best batsmen on these wickets in LOIs now. So, that's the logic behind his rant.
Adding to my earlier post, we are all awed by Amir's performance against India. He made the ball talk and was unplayable. Dont forget that it was a green mamba though. When you can appreciate the prowess of a fast bowler on a green pitch, you should be able to appreciate the skill of an effortless batsman on flat tracks. The hundred against Starc and co. at Melbourne before the WC was a sight to watch. His innings against BD on a green pitch in the 1st game was fantastic. He is dominant on conditions that favor him and Amir's the same. I am strictly talking about LOIs here.
Perhaps you missed his stints in England as a 17-18 year old. He showed everyone his bowling potential then. All he needed to show now was that he still has some of that 'magic' left in his bowling, and he did.
Against NZ, 3 catches were dropped off of his bowling. It was also his first tour back and he performed pretty well all things considered. He struggled in the PSL? That's a surprise. Taking a hattrick doesn't sound like struggling to me. He took 2-6 against UAE in a T20-that's decent in my books. He brought us back into the game against BD with those two wickets before the Sami over.
And sure, Rohit is good on flat tracks, and may even dominate him. But we're discussing Amir's potential here. Not whether or not he'll do well on flat tracks. To call him a "normal" bowler then bring up Bumrah shows what he's really thinking. And it's certainly not that Rohit thinks "he can dominate him". It's just petulant behaviour on his part.
That performance against England was again on green tracks. Anyway, I personally feel that Rohit said what he said strictly considering the T20 WC. He said Amir's not going to run through line ups and that's accurate on flat wickets. As far as his behaviour goes, ID again point out to his ego. Him being a gun batsman and falling to Amir that way definitely hurt him and he just threw a salvo. Just harmless trash talk really and the fans should treat it as such.
Well..Kohli's been winning games for India for a few years now. Its not his first year. If you are happy with Amir taking 2 wickets against UAE, then fine. But, Isn't that what Rohit said? He said Amir won't run through batting lineups and I didn't see him do that yet. Maybe he does that in the future and then you won't hear such comments again.
Won't, until the Pakistani batsmen are shamed in to performing. It's safe to say that Aamirs inclusion has had no impact on Pakistan's fortunes so far.
Looks like Johnson not happy with Sharma ji statements. Here are johnson tweets
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Ball swinging back in..... Not the first time it's happened! <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/leftarmer?src=hash">#leftarmer</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/outplayed?src=hash">#outplayed</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/sameold?src=hash">#sameold</a></p>— Mitchell Johnson (@MitchJohnson398) <a href="https://twitter.com/MitchJohnson398/status/707438601169215490">March 9, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Rohit is ignorant and you seem to have a short memory. Amir has run through the batting lineups of Australia and England, in test matches. He ripped apart India's top four in a T20, did something similar against New Zealand, recently.
These sort of comments won't stop, no matter what trees Amir pulls out of the ground. There will always be lame excuses of him not doing it in 'x' country in a 'y' situation, sinply because some people cannot give credit where it is due.
I posted about this the day.. i realised something yestarday.. this whole gaga about Amir by Rohit could be early attempt at mind games trying to get into Amirs head before the game.. Mess with Amirs head so Amir bowls with Anger rather than with his brain as he usually does .. (just a thought)
Win or lose, I want Amir to embarrass Sharma again like he did in the Asia Cup.
Again. The discussion is about LOIs on flat wickets. Amir can rip through batting orders on green wickets in tests. I believe that even though it remains to be seen. Luckily, we don't have to wait for too long to find that out. AUS, NZ and English tours are not far away.

An 18 year old Amir already destroyed batting sides in test cricket. Please refresh your memory using YouTube.
How many 23 year old pacemen in the history of cricket have "ripped" through strong batting lineups on flat wickets, in T20 cricket?
This argument of yours makes zero sense. Rohit praised Bumrah after calling Amir a "regular, old bowler", please link me to the match where he ripped through a batting side on a flat pitch in LO cricket.
This is like me calling Kohli a regular batsman just because he has never scored a century against a top class bowling unit on a seaming pitch, which was also conducive to swing bowling.
I don't think he ever said Bumrah is better than Amir. Nobody in their right mind will say that. He asked the indian journos to forget about Amir and focus on Bumrah.
Starc regularly gets 5 wicket hauls in ODIs , so there is already a precedent of someone ripping through lineups in LOIs.
As far as Kohli goes, a lot of people already say that. Unless he scores against ENg in tests in Eng, those comments will not stop.
He called Amir a regular bowler and Bumrah a special talent. Doesn't take a genius to figure out that he is implying that Bumrah is the better bowler. Whether he actually believes it or not is not the issue here.
So now the criteria has been changed to five wickets hauls? Instead of the more ambiguous, "ripping" through batting sides on flat pitches, eh? Well, if you ever decide to go back, Amir has a four-fer against Sri Lanka in Colombo. He also has a few three-fers despite having only played 17 ODIs, thus far.
No one calls Kohli a regular batsman. He's obviously a world-class player, regardless of those flaws.
Today's match was in Mumbai not at Kolkata.Woah. Any link to the full program?
Amir will be smashed anyway, this pitch and atmosphere is graveyard for swing bowlers.




Also dhoni has been very lucky to have won toss most of the time.